SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AGGREGATING DATA OF MULTIPLE LEAD PROVIDERS

• US 20110087504A1
• Filed: 10/12/2010
• Published: 04/14/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/13/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Quadrant Information Services LLC
• Original Assignee: Quadrant Information Services LLC
• Inventors: Koa, Lawrence
• Application Number:
  US12/903,175
• Publication Number:
  US 20110087504A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 705/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24556 Aggregation; Duplicate elimination
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance

Abstract

A competitive pricing analysis system and method has a central database with a first bridging application or interface that enables lead providers to provide lead data in a variety of formats. A second bridging application or interface enables clients to retrieve leads from the database and to provide a set of leads to a rating engine. The rating engine then generates premiums from the leads for a plurality of companies. Based on the generated premiums and a comparison thereof, a company is able to analyze their competitive position in the current marketplace.

Claims

1. A method for competitive pricing analysis comprising:

(A) receiving a plurality of leads into a database;

(B) retrieving a set of the plurality of leads from the database;

(C) providing the set of leads to at least one rating engine that uses each lead of the set of leads to generate a plurality of premiums for a plurality of companies;

(D) generating an output that provides a comparison of the premiums for the plurality of companies.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving a plurality of leads into the database comprises receiving a batch file of leads from a lead provider.

3. The method of claim 2 comprising providing a bridge interface to the database that enables a lead provider converts the batch file of leads into a format usable by the database.

4. The method of claim 1 comprising providing a bridge interface from the database that enables the set of leads to be retrieved in a third party format.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein comprising storing the plurality of premiums for the plurality of companies in a premiums database.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein generating the output comprises processing the data of the premiums database.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein generating the output comprises generating one or more reports that provides a comparison of premiums for the set of leads for a plurality of companies.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the one or more reports indicate a difference between the premiums for the set of leads for the plurality of companies.

9. A competitive pricing system comprising:

(A) a database configured to store a plurality of leads;

(B) at least one first bridge application configured to provide an interface for providing leads to the database; and

(C) at least one second bridge application configured to provide an interface for retrieving at least one set of leads from the database.

10. The competitive pricing system of claim 9 wherein the at least one bridge application is configured to receive a file comprising a plurality of leads in a first format and convert the leads into a format to be stored in the database.

11. The competitive pricing system of claim 9 wherein the at least one second bridge application is configured to convert a set of leads retrieved from the database into a third party format.

12. The competitive pricing system of claim 9 comprising at least one rating engine configured to receive a set of leads from the database and to generate a plurality of premiums for a plurality of companies from each lead of the set of leads.

13. The competitive pricing system of claim 12 comprising at least one second database for storing the generated premiums.

14. The competitive pricing system of claim 12 wherein the at least one rating engine comprises at least one rating algorithm or rating table and wherein the at least one rating engine is configured to apply data from at least one lead of the set of leads to the at least one rating algorithm or rating table to generate the premium.

15. The competitive pricing system of claim 9 comprising at least one report generator that is configured to generate one or more reports that provide a comparison of premiums generated for a plurality of companies from the set of leads.

16. A competitive pricing system comprising:

(A) database means for storing a plurality of leads;

(B) means for receiving a plurality of leads into the database means;

(C) means for retrieving a set of the plurality of leads from the database means;

(D) means for providing the set of leads to at least one rating engine means;

(E) rating engine means for generating a plurality of premiums for a plurality of companies from the set of leads; and

(F) means for generating an output that provides a comparison of the premiums for the plurality of companies.