FUTURE INSIGHT MAPS AND ASSOCIATED TOOLS

• US 20110126128A1
• Filed: 09/24/2010
• Published: 05/26/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 09/28/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Future Insight Maps, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Future Insight Maps, Inc.
• Inventors: MCKENZIE, BRUCE, HAMLIN, BRIAN, LORAND, JANE
• Application Number:
  US12/890,523
• Publication Number:
  US 20110126128A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 715/753
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/04 Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem" market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities G06Q30/0202
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling

Abstract

A diverse group of participants using on one or more client machines is enabled to generate on a user interface their solicited responses about any set of two or more independent variables that underlie a complex issue. The two or more independent variables are applied against each other. A likely outcome is predicted, wherein an application resident on a server is configured to integrate the solicited responses from the participants. The results are displayed on the display of the client machines to enable the participants to view. The participants are to develop insights related to the complex issue based on reviewing the results.

Claims

1. A computer-assisted method comprising:

enabling a diverse group of participants on one or more client machines to contribute on a user interface their thoughts based on applying two or more strategies against plausible future events, generated by the participants, to anticipate a diversity of future outcomes, wherein the thoughts contributed by the participants are stored in a database;

integrating the thoughts contributed by the participants using an application resident on one or more servers; and

displaying the integrated thoughts on displays of the participants'"'"' client machines, wherein the participants are to develop insights based on reviewing the displayed thoughts of all the participants.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the participants contribute information related to plausible future events, and wherein the insights are used to identify one or more of risks, opportunities, and innovations associated with an occurrence of one or more such plausible future events.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the participants is to rate a selected, diverse group of the plausible future events based on impacts that the plausible future events in the group are likely to have on a designated population and based on probability that each of the plausible future events in the group will occur within a given time frame, wherein the group of plausible future events including those that have high impact and high probability rating or a high standard deviation, and wherein strategies are used to test their performance against the selected plausible future events.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein each of the participants is to provide an observation and a rationale for the observation by considering how a given strategy will perform under a change condition of a plausible future event, and wherein the observation and the rationale information provided by each of the participants is stored in the one or more databases and becomes viewable to all other participants.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the observations and rationale provided by the participants are organized into groups based on each of the strategies, and wherein successive groups of observations are reviewed by all participants to identify one or more insights from emergent ideas, patterns, or themes associated with respective groups of observations.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the one or more insights from the emergent ideas, patterns, or themes associated with successive groups of observations is used to enable the designated population to work with a specific strategy to make the strategy more resilient to changed conditions caused by the plausible future events.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the observations provided by the participants are organized into groups based on each of the plausible future events, and wherein the successive groups of observations are reviewed by all participants to identify one or more insights from the emergent ideas, patterns, and themes associated with the respective group of observations.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the one or more insights from the emergent ideas, patterns, and themes associated with the respective groups of observations is used to enable the designated population to work with a specific plausible future event or an event like it, to enable the designated population to anticipate and plan for how it can optimize its position should that plausible future event, or the event like it, actually occur.

9. A computer-assisted method of enabling a diverse group of participants on one or more client machines to anonymously generate on a user interface their solicited responses about any sets of two or more independent variables that underlie a complex issue, where the sets are applied against each other, and then identify observations about the interaction coupled with their rationale, wherein an application resident on a server is configured to integrate the solicited responses from the participants forming response results and to display the response results to enable the participants to view all the response results on displays of their client machines, wherein the participants are the required to develop insights related to the complex issue based on reviewing the response results.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the two or more sets of independent variables include a strategy variable and a future event variable, and wherein the participants are to rate each of the future events based on its impact on a designated group and based on the probability that said future event will occur within a designated window of time.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein the two or more sets of independent variables are associated within a learning environment.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein the participants are to identify observations and insights about the relevant relationships of the independent variables, comparing and contrasting their observations and insights with all other participants, wherein the participants are to be prompted to provide, using their client computers, headlines that reflect their thoughts and comments that elaborate the headlines, both of which relate to the sets of independent variable, and wherein the participants are to rate an impact that an event associated with the headline will have on a designated population and a probability that the event associated with the headline will occur, with context of impact and timeframe of occurrence being set by an administrator.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein a set of events are set for consideration by all of the participants and presented to the participants on the displays of their client machines, wherein the participants are to provide their observations about how a set of strategies will perform under their imagined changed conditions of each of the events based on own experience and background, independent of other participants, wherein the observations are stored in one or more databases and viewable by all of the other participants, each of the observations showing one participant'"'"'s perspective of how the changed conditions will affect the strategy under review.

14. The method of claim 13, based on a review of all the observations of a given strategy, the participants are to generate insights to enhance the resilience of said strategy under diverse changed conditions, wherein the insights are stored into one or more databases and viewable by all of the participants.

15. The method of claim 14, based on a review of all of the observations of a given future event, the participants are to generate insights of steps to take to enhance viability of an organization should said event, or one like it, actually occur.

16. The method of claim 15, based on integrating the insights generated, administrators and the participants are to generate unique visual displays of subsets of insights relevant to specific needs of the organization.

17. An apparatus comprising:

means for enabling a group of participants to provide a first set of information to be considered;

means for enabling a group of participants to categorize the first set of information to be considered;

means for enabling the group of participants to rate impact of the first set of information on a designated population;

means for enabling the group of participants to rate probability that events associated with the first set of information will occur within a given time frame;

means for enabling the group of participants to view the first set of information and their associated ratings;

means for mapping the first set of information with a set of criteria; and

means for soliciting insights from the group of participants when applying one or more of the criteria against the first set of information.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the means for mapping the first set of information with the set of criteria comprises:

means for selecting a subset of information from the first set of information, including information related to high impact and high probability rating and high standard deviation; and

means for mapping the subset of information with the set of criteria.

19. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising means for identifying observations and insights to enhance the resilience of each of the criteria.

20. The apparatus of claim 19, further comprising means for identifying observations and insights to build the insurance against identified risks associated with an occurrence of events associated with the subset of information.