SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING AND DETECTING SPEED

• US 20110184588A1
• Filed: 01/28/2010
• Published: 07/28/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 01/28/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GE Global Sourcing LLC (Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation)
• Original Assignee: General Electric Company
• Inventors: Nielsen, Ben, Peters, Douglas, Englund, Matthew John, Brusilovsky, Roman, Carbone, John William, Salvo, Joseph James, Messier, Daniel John
• Granted Patent: US 8,275,490 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/1
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3407 specially adapted for specific applications
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3697 Output of additional, non-guidance related information, e.g. low fuel level G01C21/3679 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/052 with provision for determining speed or overspeed speed measuring in general G01P
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096716 where the received information does not generate an automatic action on the vehicle control
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096741 where the source of the transmitted information selects which information to transmit to each vehicle
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/20 Monitoring the location of vehicles belonging to a group, e.g. fleet of vehicles, countable or determined number of vehicles

Abstract

A system for determining instances when a vehicle'"'"'s indicated speed exceeds a governing speed includes a receiver to receive information from which a vehicle'"'"'s location envelope, indicated direction of travel, and indicated speed can be derived, and a processor. The processer is configured to ascertain a location envelope in which the vehicle is located, an indicated speed of the vehicle, and a direction of travel of the vehicle at a sample time. It is also configured to select the governing speed for the vehicle at the sample time, which includes ascertaining possible road segments with at least a portion within the location envelope, eliminating road segments with a road segment direction of travel inconsistent with the indicated direction of travel, and selecting as the governing speed a speed associated with a remaining road segment. The processor will then determine if the indicated speed exceeds the governing speed.

Claims

1. A system for determining instances when a vehicle'"'"'s indicated speed exceeds a governing speed, comprising:

a receiver to receive information from which a vehicle'"'"'s location envelope, indicated direction of travel, and indicated speed can be derived;

a processor configured to;

ascertain a location envelope in which the vehicle is located, an indicated speed of the vehicle, and a direction of travel of the vehicle at a sample time;

select the governing speed for the vehicle at the sample time, comprising;

ascertain possible route segments comprising at least a portion within the location envelope,

eliminate route segments comprising a route segment direction of travel inconsistent with the indicated direction of travel,

select as the governing speed a speed associated with a remaining route segment; and

determine if the indicated speed exceeds the governing speed.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein select a governing speed comprises generate an inferred governing speed using suggestive information that suggests a speed for the remaining route segment, compare the inferred governing speed and the speed associated with the remaining route segment, and determine which value should be used, or if the determination should be abandoned for that sample time.

3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a transmitter to transmit the information from the vehicle to a remote processor.

4. The system of claim 1, comprising a notification transmitter to transmit speeding exception information to the vehicle, and a notification receiver in a vehicle to receive the speeding exception information, wherein upon determination of a speeding exception, a notification is sent to a driver that the speeding exception has been ascertained.

5. The system of claim 1, wherein the information from which a vehicle'"'"'s location envelope can be derived comprises latitude and longitude, and wherein the information from which a vehicle'"'"'s indicated speed can be derived comprises a value determined by the vehicle, or geodetic information from which the speed can be calculated.

6. The system of claim 1, wherein the speed associated with the remaining route segment is supplied by a third party or by an administrator.

7. The system of claim 1, wherein an altitude envelope of the vehicle can be derived from the information, and wherein the processor ascertains an indicated vehicle altitude envelope, and wherein select a governing speed further comprises eliminating route segments comprising elevations inconsistent with the altitude envelope of the vehicle.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein select a governing speed comprises eliminating route segments inconsistent with a pre-planned route.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein select a governing speed comprises generating a most-feasible route comprising at least two location envelopes utilizing route-optimization software, and eliminating route segments inconsistent with the most-feasible route.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the route-optimization software is based on at least one of a Djikstra optimization algorithm and a Belman-Ford optimization algorithm.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein select a governing speed comprises locating nearby points-of-interest of a type that impose a localized speed limit on the remaining route segment, and determining if the localized speed limit should be selected as the governing speed.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the localized speed limit is supplied by a third party or by an administrator.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to develop a statistical model to identify patterns associated with speeding exceptions.

14. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to locate points-of-interest nearby a location of speeding exceptions.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to develop a statistical model to identify patterns between speeding exceptions and the points-of-interest nearby the location of speeding exceptions.

16. The system of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to process the speeding exceptions and locations for speeding exceptions for a plurality of vehicles.

17. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is configured to supply pattern information regarding patterns associated with the speeding exceptions to a route optimization program database thereby enabling the route optimization program to consider the pattern information when optimizing a route.

18. The system of claim 15, wherein the processor is configured to supply pattern information regarding patterns between the speeding exceptions and the points-of-interest nearby the location of speeding exceptions to a route optimization program database, thereby enabling the route optimization program to consider the pattern information when optimizing a route.

19. A computer readable medium comprising program instructions for execution on a computer system, which when executed by a computer, cause the computer system to determine when a vehicle'"'"'s indicated speed exceeds a governing speed, comprising:

ascertaining a location envelope, an indicated speed of the vehicle, and an indicated direction of travel of the vehicle at a sample time using geodetic data;

selecting a governing speed for vehicle at the sample time, comprising; and

ascertaining possible route segments comprising at least a portion within the location envelope,

eliminating route segments comprising a direction of travel

inconsistent with the indicated direction of travel,

selecting as the governing speed a speed associated with a remaining route segment;

determining if a value of the indicated speed is greater than the value of the governing speed.

20. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises generating an inferred governing speed using suggestive information that suggests a speed for the remaining route segment, comparing the inferred governing speed and the speed associated with the remaining route segment, and determining which value should be used, or if the determination should be abandoned for that sample time.

21. The computer readable medium of claim 19, comprising ascertaining an indicated elevation envelope of the vehicle, and selecting a governing speed comprises eliminating route segments comprising elevations inconsistent with the indicated elevation envelope of the vehicle.

22. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein select a governing speed comprises eliminating route segments inconsistent with a pre-planned route.

23. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises generating a most-feasible route comprising at least two location envelopes utilizing route-optimization software, and eliminating route segments inconsistent with the most-feasible route.

24. The computer readable medium of claim 19, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises locating nearby points-of-interest of a type that impose a localized speed limit on the remaining route segment using a geodetic database, and determining if the localized speed limit should be selected as the governing speed.

25. The computer readable medium of claim 19, comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns associated with speeding exceptions.

26. The computer readable medium of claim 19, comprising locate points-of-interest nearby a location of speeding exceptions.

27. The computer readable medium of claim 26, comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns between the speeding exceptions and the points-of-interest nearby the location of speeding exceptions.

28. The computer readable medium of claim 19, comprising processing speeding exceptions and locations for speeding exceptions for a plurality of vehicles.

29. The computer readable medium of claim 19, comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns related to instances of speeding and supplying pattern information to a route optimization program database, thereby enabling the route optimization program to consider the pattern information when optimizing a route.

30. A method for determining when a vehicle'"'"'s indicated speed exceeds a governing speed, the method comprising:

ascertaining a location envelope, an indicated speed of the vehicle, and an indicated direction of travel of the vehicle at a sample time using geodetic data;

selecting a governing speed for the vehicle at the sample time, comprising; and

ascertaining possible route segments comprising at least a portion within the location envelope,

eliminating route segments comprising a direction of travel

inconsistent with the indicated direction of travel,

selecting as the governing speed a speed associated with a remaining read route segment;

determining if a value of the indicated speed is greater than the value of the governing speed.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises generating an inferred governing speed using suggestive information that suggests a speed for the remaining route segment, comparing the inferred governing speed and the speed associated with the remaining route segment, and determining which value should be used, or if the determination should be abandoned for that sample time.

32. The method of claim 30, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises ascertaining an indicated elevation envelope of the vehicle, and selecting an accepted posted speed comprises eliminating route segments comprising elevations inconsistent with the indicated elevation envelope of the vehicle.

33. The method of claim 30, wherein select a governing speed comprises eliminating route segments inconsistent with a pre-planned route.

34. The method of claim 30, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises generating a most-feasible route comprising at least two location envelopes utilizing route-optimization software, and eliminating route segments inconsistent with the most-feasible route.

35. The method of claim 30, wherein selecting a governing speed comprises locating nearby points-of-interest of a type that impose a localized speed limit on the remaining route segment using a geodetic database, and determining if the localized speed limit should be selected as the governing speed.

36. The method of claim 30, the method comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns associated with speeding exceptions.

37. The method of claim 30, the method comprising locating points-of-interest nearby a location of speeding exceptions.

38. The method of claim 37, the method comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns between speeding exceptions and the points-of-interest nearby the location of speeding exceptions.

39. The method of claim 30, the method comprising processing speeding exceptions and locations for speeding exceptions for a plurality of vehicles.

40. The method of claim 30, the method comprising developing a statistical model to identify patterns related to speeding exceptions and supplying pattern information to a route optimization program database, thereby enabling the route optimization program to consider the pattern information when optimizing a route.