ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE RATING SYSTEM

• US 20120130515A1
• Filed: 05/03/2010
• Published: 05/24/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 05/01/2009
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Nike, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Nike, Inc.
• Inventors: Homsi, Kristopher L., Annis, David H.
• Application Number:
  US13/264,565
• Publication Number:
  US 20120130515A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 700/91
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2102/02 Tennis
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2102/18 Baseball, rounders or similar games
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2102/182 Softball
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2243/0037 Basketball
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2244/087 without take off run
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/0038 Sports
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 20/30 relating to physical therapies or activities, e.g. physiotherapy, acupressure or exercising

Abstract

In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to an athleticism rating method for normalizing and more accurately comparing overall athletic performance of at least two athletes. Each athlete completes at least two different athletic performance tests. Each test is designed to measure a different athletic skill that is needed to compete effectively in a defined sport. The results from each test for a given athlete are normalized by comparing the test results to a database providing the distribution of test results among a similar class of athletes and then assigning each test result a point number based on that test result'"'"'s percentile among the distribution of test results. Combining the point numbers derived from the at least two different athletic performance tests for an athlete produces an athleticism rating score representing the overall athleticism of each athlete.

Claims

1. One or more computer-storage media having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon for performing a method in a computing environment for evaluating the athleticism of an athlete in hockey, the method comprising:

receiving at least two results for the athlete'"'"'s performance in at least two different athletic performance tests related to the hockey;

comparing each of the at least two results to a corresponding distribution of test results of athletic data for athletes similar to the athlete and determining a percentile ranking for each of the at least two results;

transforming the percentile ranking for each of the at least two results to a fractional event point number for each result; and

combining the fractional event point numbers and using a scaling factor to produce an athleticism rating score for the athlete in hockey.

2. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 1, wherein the percentile rankings for each of the at least two results are progressive.

3. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 2, wherein transforming the percentile ranking for the at least two results to the fractional event point number comprises applying an inverse-Weibull transformation.

4. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 1, wherein the distribution of test results of athletic data for athletes similar to the athlete is determined using the empirical cumulative distribution function.

5. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 1, wherein the percentile ranking for each of the at least two results is capped at a ceiling value.

6. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 1, wherein the percentile ranking for each of at least two results is capped at a floor value.

7. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 1, wherein the at least two athletic performance tests include a two-hop jump test, a recovery test, a sprint time test, and an agility time test.

8. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 7, wherein the recovery test is a Yo Yo Intermittent Recovery Test.

9. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 8, wherein the sprint time test is a twenty meter sprint.

10. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 8, wherein the agility time test is cross pattern agility drill.

11. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 10, wherein the agility test comprises picking up a first bill in a first area and dropping off the first ball in a second area.

12. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 11, wherein the agility test further comprises picking up a second ball in a third area.

13. The one or more computer-storage media of claim 7, wherein the test results of athletic data for athletes similar to the athlete comprise data from athletes within a range of ages including the athlete'"'"'s age.

14. A method for evaluating the athleticism of an athlete in hockey, the method comprising:

measuring the athlete'"'"'s performance in at least two different athletic performance tests related to hockey to define a result for each performance test;

comparing the result for each performance test to a distribution of test results of athletic data for athletes similar to the athlete and determining a percentile ranking for each result for the performance test;

converting each percentile ranking to a fractional event point number for each result; and

combining the fraction event point numbers and using a scaling factor to produce an athleticism rating score the athlete in hockey.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the percentile rankings for each result for the performance test are progressive.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the percentile ranking for each result for the performance test is capped at a floor value and a ceiling value.

17. The method in of claim 14, wherein measuring the athlete'"'"'s performance comprises:

measuring a distance of two-hop jump;

measuring a time for a recovery test;

measuring a sprint time of said athlete over a predetermined distance; and

measuring a cycle time of said athlete around a predetermined course.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the measuring a cycle time of said athlete around a predetermined course is a cross pattern agility drill.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the cross pattern agility drill includes picking up a first bill in a first area, dropping off the first ball in a second area, and picking up a second ball in a third area before completing the drill.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the recovery test is a Yo Yo Intermittent Recovery Test.