DEVELOPING FAULT MODEL FROM SERVICE PROCEDURES

• US 20120232743A1
• Filed: 03/10/2011
• Published: 09/13/2012
• Est. Priority Date: 03/10/2011
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Original Assignee: GM Global Technology Operations LLC (General Motors Company)
• Inventors: Singh, Satnam
• Granted Patent: US 8,527,441 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 701/29.9
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/20 Administration of product repair or maintenance

Abstract

A method and system for developing fault models from structured text documents, such as service procedures. A service procedure or other structured text document is parsed using diagnostic rules to extract symptoms, failure modes, and correlations. Testing procedures and repair instructions are also parsed to create a fault tree and identify additional symptoms and failure modes. Reachability analysis is then used to find hidden dependencies in the fault tree, thus yielding additional correlations. The resultant symptoms, failure modes, and correlations are then assembled into a fault model, which can be used for real-time fault diagnosis onboard a vehicle, or for off-board diagnosis at service shops.

Claims

1. A method for creating a fault model for a hardware or software system, said method comprising:

providing a structured text document containing diagnostic information about the hardware or software system;

extracting fault model data from the structured text document;

parsing test procedures and repair instructions contained in the structured text document to produce a fault tree and to obtain additional fault model data;

performing reachability analysis on the fault tree to identify cross-functional dependencies; and

assembling the fault model from the fault model data and the cross-functional dependencies.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein extracting fault model data includes using diagnostic rules to extract the fault model data from diagnostic fault information and scan tool tables contained in the structured text document.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein parsing test procedures and repair instructions includes identifying a test for a first symptom, and identifying a failure mode and a second symptom which may be deduced from the test.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein performing reachability analysis on the fault tree includes determining where failure modes in the fault tree are cross-functionally dependent on more than one symptom.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the fault model data includes symptoms, failure modes, and correlation values.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the symptoms include Diagnostic Trouble Code (DTC) symptoms and non-DTC symptoms.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein assembling the fault model includes creating rows of the failure modes, creating columns of the symptoms, and placing the correlation values in intersections of the rows and the columns.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising using the cross-functional dependencies to define additional correlation values in the fault model.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the hardware or software system is a vehicle or a vehicle sub-system.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the structured text document is a service procedure document for the vehicle or the vehicle sub-system.

11. A method for creating a fault model for a vehicle or a vehicle sub-system, said method comprising:

providing a service procedure document containing diagnostic information about the vehicle or the vehicle sub-system;

using diagnostic rules to extract fault model data from diagnostic fault information and scan tool tables contained in the service procedure document;

parsing testing procedures and repair instructions contained in the service procedure document to produce a fault tree and to obtain additional fault model data;

performing reachability analysis on the fault tree to identify cross-functional dependencies, where the reachability analysis includes determining where failure modes in the fault tree are cross-functionally dependent on more than one symptom; and

assembling the fault model from the fault model data and the cross-functional dependencies.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the fault model data includes symptoms, failure modes, and correlation values.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein assembling the fault model includes creating rows of the failure modes, creating columns of the symptoms, and placing the correlation values in intersections of the rows and the columns.

14. The method of claim 11 further comprising using the fault model for fault diagnosis in connection with the vehicle or the vehicle sub-system.

15. A system for creating a fault model, said system comprising:

means for providing a structured text document containing diagnostic information about a hardware or software system;

means for extracting fault model data from the structured text document;

means for parsing test procedures and repair instructions contained in the structured text document to produce a fault tree and to obtain additional fault model data;

means for performing reachability analysis on the fault tree to identify cross-functional dependencies; and

means for assembling the fault model from the fault model data and the cross-functional dependencies.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein the means for extracting fault model data uses diagnostic rules to extract the fault model data from diagnostic fault information and scan tool tables contained in the structured text document.

17. The system of claim 15 wherein the means for parsing test procedures and repair instructions identifies a test for a first symptom, and identifies a failure mode and a second symptom which may be deduced from the test.

18. The system of claim 15 wherein the means for performing reachability analysis determines where failure modes in the fault tree are cross-functionally dependent on more than one symptom.

19. The system of claim 15 wherein the means for assembling the fault model creates rows of failure modes, creates columns of symptoms, and places a correlation values in intersections of the rows and the columns.

20. The system of claim 15 wherein the structured text document is a service procedure document, and the hardware or software system is a vehicle or a vehicle sub-system.