INTERFACE FOR RESOLVING SYNCHRONIZATION CONFLICTS OF APPLICATION STATES

• US 20140095929A1
• Filed: 09/30/2013
• Published: 04/03/2014
• Est. Priority Date: 10/02/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. (Razer Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Nextbit Systems, Inc. (Razer Incorporated)
• Inventors: Chan, Michael A., Tong, Linda
• Granted Patent: US 9,268,655 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 714/20
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1438 Restarting or rejuvenating
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1471 involving logging of persistent data for recovery
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1662 the resynchronized component or unit being a persistent storage device re-synchronization of failed mirror storage G06F11/2082; rebuild or reconstruction of parity RAID storage G06F11/1008
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/178 Techniques for file synchronisation in file systems

Abstract

Technology is disclosed herein for resolving synchronization conflicts when synchronizing application state data between computing devices. According to at least one embodiment, a server detects a first set of application state data at a first computing device conflicting with a second set of application state data at a second computing device. The first and second sets of application state data represent application states of the same computer application running at the first and second computing devices, respectively. Accordingly, the first computing device presents a user interface prompting a user to choose a preferred set of application state data between the first and second sets of application state data. If the user chooses the second set of application state data as the preferred set, the first computing device uses the second set of application state data to overwrite the first set of application state data at the device.

Claims

1. A method for resolving synchronization conflicts when synchronizing application state data between computing devices, comprising:

detecting, at a server, a first set of application state data at a first computing device conflicting with a second set of application state data at a second first computing device, wherein the first set of application state data represents an application state of a computer application running at the first computing device, and the second set of application state data represents another application state of the computer application running at the second computing device;

receiving, from the first computing device at the server, a signal indicating that a user has chosen the second set as a preferred set of application state data via an user interface generated by the first computing device; and

transferring, to the first computing device, the second set of application state data to overwrite the first set of application state data at the first computing device.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the receiving comprises:

receiving, from the first computing device at the server, a signal indicating that a user has chosen the second set as a preferred set of application state data, for the conflict and future conflicts for the computer application ,via an user interface generated by the first computing device; and

wherein the method further comprises;

maintaining a ranking list specifying priorities of the first and second computing devices for conflicts of application state data, based on the choice of the user.

3. A computer-implemented method comprising:

sending, from a first computing device to a server, a signal indicating that a first set of application state data has been generated, wherein the first set of application state data represents an application state of a computer application running at the first computing device;

receiving, at the first computing device from the server, a message indicating that a second set of application state data for the computer application has been generated at a second computing device, wherein the second set of application state data conflicts with the first set of application state data;

presenting, at the first computing device, a user interface prompting a user to choose a preferred set of application state data between the first and second sets of application state data; and

if the user chooses the second set of application state data as the preferred set, requesting from the server the second set of application state data to overwrite the first set of application state data at the first computing device.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising:

starting running the computer application at the first computing device, wherein the computer application has run at the second computing device.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising:

generating, at the first computing device, the first set of application state data for the computer application.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the first computing device synchronizes the preferred set of application state data for the computer application with the second computing device via the server based on what the user chooses between the first and second sets of application state data.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface presents metadata of the first and second sets of application state data.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein the metadata include identifications of the first and second computing devices, device types or models of the first and second computing devices, timestamps indicating when the first and second sets of application state data was generated, an identification of the computer application, or progress information indicative of application states represented by the first and second sets of application state data.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface further prompts the user to decide whether the choice of the preferred set of application state data applies to future conflicts for the computer application.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9, further comprising:

when there is a conflict between a set of application state data for the computer application at the first computing device and another set of application state data for the computer application at the second computing device, automatically choosing between the set and the other set, by the first computing device, based on the user'"'"'s choice of the preferred set of application state data without presenting a further user interface prompting the user to decide.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface is generated by an operating system of the computing device, instead of the computer application running at the computing device.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface further includes an option for the user to choose not to synchronize the application state data of the computer application between the first and second computing devices.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface further enables the user to specify a time period or recurring time periods for which the choice of the preferred set of application state data applies to future conflicts for the computer application.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the user interface further enables the user to specify one or more locations at which the choice of the preferred set of application state data applies to future conflicts for the computer application.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, further comprising”

If the user chooses the first set of application state data as the preferred set, transferring, from the first computing device to the server, the first set of application state data so that the server can relay the first set to the second computing device to overwrite the second set of application state data at the second computing device.

16. A computing device comprising:

a network interface configured to communicate with a server;

a storage component storing a first set of application state data representing an application state of a computer application running at the computing device;

an output component configured to present user interfaces;

a processor configured to run the computer application and an operating system of the computing device; and

a memory component storing instructions of the operating system which, when executed by the processor, cause the operating system to perform a process including;

receiving, from the server, a message indicating that a second set of application state data for the computer application has been generated at a second computing device, wherein the second set of application state data conflicts with the first set of application state data;

presenting, via the output component, a user interface prompting a user to choose a preferred set of application state data between the first and second sets of application state data; and

if the user chooses the second set of application state data, requesting, from the server, the second set of application state data to overwrite the first set of application state data stored in the storage component.

17. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the computing device synchronizes the application state data for the computer application with the second computing device via the server.

18. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the server is a cloud storage service.

19. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the user interface presents metadata of the first and second sets of application state data including identifications of the first and second computing devices, device types or models of the first and second computing devices, timestamps indicating when the first and second sets of application state data was generated, an identification of the computer application, or progress information indicative of application states represented by the first and second sets of application state data.

20. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the user interface further prompts the user to decide whether the choice of the preferred set of application state data applies to future conflicts for the computer application.

21. The computing device of claim 16, wherein the user interface further enables the user to specify a location of the computing device, a time period, or recurring time periods for which the choice of the preferred set of application state data applies to future conflicts for the computer application.