A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING FOOD WASTE

• US 20170069222A1
• Filed: 04/21/2015
• Published: 03/09/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 04/21/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Winnow Solutions Limited
• Original Assignee: Winnow Solutions Limited
• Inventors: MEKHSIAN, Hrair, DUFFY, Kevin, ZORNES, Marc
• Granted Patent: US 10,290,226 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 17/04 for weighing fluids, e.g. gases, pastes
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/414 using electronic computing means only
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 19/00 Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying F41G3/26

Abstract

The present invention relates to a system for monitoring food waste. The system includes a weight mechanism configured for weighing a waste receptacle, wherein the waste receptacle is configured for receiving food waste from a plurality of consecutive disposal events before emptying, a processor configured for measuring the difference in weight of the waste receptacle between each disposal event and calculating the weight of a disposal event based upon the difference and a user interface configured to receive at least one indication categorising the food waste in a disposal event by a user. A method for monitoring food waste is also described.

Claims

1. A system for monitoring food waste, including:

A weight mechanism configured for weighing a waste receptacle, wherein the waste receptacle is configured for receiving food waste from a plurality of consecutive disposal events before emptying;

A processor configured for measuring the difference in weight of the waste receptacle between each disposal event and calculating the weight of a disposal event based upon the difference; and

A user interface configured to receive at least one indication categorising the food waste in a disposal event by a user.

2. A system as claimed in claim 1, further including a central server, and wherein weights and categorisations of disposal events are transmitted to the central server.

3. A system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the central server is configured for receiving weights and categorisations of disposal events from a plurality of locations.

4. A system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the weights and categorisations of disposal events are transmitted to the central server periodically.

5. A system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the central server is configured to analyse the weights and categorisation of disposal events to generate a report.

6. A system as claimed in claim 5, wherein the report includes suggestions for reducing waste based on the analysis.

7. A system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the report is delivered electronically to a user device.

8. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the weights and/or categorisations are processed to remove user error.

9. A system as claimed in claim 1, further including a central server, and wherein weights and categorisations of disposal events are transmitted to the central server and wherein the central server is configured to process the weights and/or categorisations to remove user error.

10. A system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the processor is configured to process the weights and/or categorisations to remove user error.

11. A system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the user error removal processing includes detecting erroneous weights and correcting the erroneous weights.

12. A system as claimed in claim 11, wherein erroneous weights are detected and corrected using deviations from previous and later disposal events.

13. A system as claimed in claim 11, wherein the processor detects erroneous weights for a disposal event caused by user presence by detecting a weight change and the absence of a user.

14. A system as claimed in claim 13, wherein the processor corrects erroneous weights for a disposal event caused by user presence by utilising a weight signal to calculate the weight for the disposal event once the user is absent.

15. A system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the user error removal processing includes detecting erroneous disposal events.

16. A system as claimed in claim 15, wherein pattern recognition is utilised to detect and correct erroneous disposal events.

17. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the user interface is configured to receive indications from a plurality of category types.

18. A system as claimed in claim 17, wherein the category types include a stage of waste occurrence, type of waste, specific waste, and/or reason for dumping out the waste.

19. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein the user interface is further configured to prompt the user for categorisation.

20. A system as claimed in claim 19, wherein the user interface prompts the user by providing options within a multi-stage menu.

21. A system as claimed in claim 20, wherein selection of at least one of the options by the user triggers display of further options, such that several indications in different category types are received from the user to categorise the food waste.

22. A system as claimed in claim 20, wherein selection of at least one of the options automatically categorises the food waste into a plurality of category types without further indications.

23. A system as claimed in claim 20, further including a central server, and wherein weights and categorisations of disposal events are transmitted to the central server and wherein the multi-stage menu is updated periodically from the central server.

24. A system as claimed in claim 1, further including a stability controller configured to receive weight signals from the weight mechanism, detecting weight changes at the weight mechanism and controlling transmission of weight signals to the processor based upon the stability of the weight signal.

25. A system as claimed in claim 24, wherein the stability controller is configured to determine when the weight signal is stable based on a period of time of stability where the period of time is generated based on the magnitude of change in the weight signal.

26. A system as claimed in claim 25, wherein the period of time is increased when the magnitude of change is less than a first threshold.

27. A system as claimed in claim 25, wherein the weight signal is updated and retransmitted to the processor after expiration of a period of time when the magnitude of change is greater than a second threshold.

28. A system as claimed in claim 26, wherein the first and/or second thresholds are defined periodically.

29. A system as claimed in claim 28, wherein the first and/or second thresholds are defined based upon historical data for the weight mechanism.

30. A system as claimed in claim 1, further including a user identity system.

31. A system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the user identity system is automatic.

32. A system as claimed in claim 31, wherein the user identity system includes a camera, and is configured to perform facial recognition to identify users.

33. A system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the user identity system is configured to regularly prompt initially unidentifiable users via the user interface to obtain identity information.

34. A system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the user identity system is configured to present a tutorial to newly identified users.

35. A system as claimed in claim 34, wherein the user identity system includes a camera, and is configured to perform facial recognition to identify users and wherein newly identified users are identified via facial recognition.

36. A system as claimed in claim 30, wherein at least some of the weights and/or categorisations of disposal events are assigned to a user identity.

37. A system as claimed in claim 36, wherein the system is further configured to analyse the weights and/or categorisations of disposal events for a user and to display results of the analysis to the user.

38. A method for monitoring food waste, including:

a. A processor receiving a first weight from a weight mechanism of a waste receptacle after a first disposal event;

b. The processor receiving a second weight from a weight mechanism of a waste receptacle after a second disposal event;

c. The processor determining the weight for the second disposal event based on the difference between the first and second weights; and

d. A user interface receiving an input from a user to categorise the food waste for the second disposal event.

39. (canceled)