INTELLIGENT CONNECTION MANAGEMENT FOR MULTIPLE INTERFACES

• US 20190132219A1
• Filed: 10/26/2017
• Published: 05/02/2019
• Est. Priority Date: 10/26/2017
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC (Microsoft Corporation)
• Inventors: Gandhi, Dhiraj Pramod
• Granted Patent: US 10,469,341 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/5692 Selection among different networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5003 Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0811 by checking connectivity
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0829 Packet loss
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/087 Jitter
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/55 Testing of service level quality, e.g. simulating service usage
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/22 Alternate routing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/535 Tracking the activity of the user network monitoring arrangements H04L43/00; recording of computer activity G06F11/34
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 88/06 adapted for operation in multiple networks or having at least two operational modes, e.g. multi-mode terminals
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 30/70 in wireless communication networks

Abstract

A computing device supports multiple different network interfaces providing respective connections to, for example WiFi, short-range and near field communication (NFC), and mobile data (e.g., cellular) networks, over which bandwidth-consuming applications may operate. An operating system (OS) instantiated on the computing device supports a connection manager configured to dynamically and concurrently optimize utilization of the available network connections across the executing applications to provide seamless user experiences on the device while meeting various user objectives. These objectives may include, for example, maximizing device battery life, minimizing costs associated with use of mobile data plans and other metered network connections, minimizing glitches, data buffering, and disruptions (e.g., when streaming multimedia, downloading files, and engaging in real-time communications like voice and video calls), and transparency of operation as the diverse network connections are utilized.

Claims

1. One or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices storing instructions which, when executed by one or more processors disposed in a computing device, cause the computing device to:

measure Quality of Service (QoS) of network bandwidth provided by a connection between the computing device and a current communication network;

monitor network bandwidth utilization by each of one or more applications executing on the computing device, the monitoring being performed per application feature;

compare the measured QoS of the current communication network with QoS requirements for the application feature; and

switch from the connection to the current communication network to a connection to an alternative communication network based on the comparison.

2. The one or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices of claim 1 in which the instructions further cause the computing device to determine QoS requirements of the application and application feature, the determining including one of enabling registration of QoS requirements through an application programming interface, or inferring QoS requirements by observation of application or application feature operations under different network conditions.

3. The one or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices of claim 1 in which the instructions further cause the computing device to:

monitor contextual data applicable to the computing device or applicable to a user of the computing device;

generate a history of user interactions with the computing device;

predict execution of an application or application feature using the monitored contextual data and user interaction history; and

switch network connections based on the predicted execution of the application or application feature.

4. The one or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices of claim 3, in which the instructions further cause the computing device to surface a notification to the user about the network connection switching and receive feedback from the user about the network connection switching.

5. The one or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices of claim 1, in which the instructions further cause the computing device to observe application behaviors as QoS of networks vary and in which QoS requirements are estimated using the observations.

6. The one or more hardware-based computer-readable memory devices of claim 1, in which the instructions further cause the computing device to categorize applications by type and switch among available network connections based on categorized types.

7. A method for optimizing utilization of a plurality of network connections available on a computing device having a user interface configured for interacting with a user, comprising:

determining a current state of each of the available network connections;

identifying Quality of Service (QoS) requirements for one or more bandwidth-consuming applications executing on the computing device;

mapping the identified QoS requirements for each application to the available network connections based on the current state;

observing that a bandwidth-consuming application is accessing network bandwidth; and

selecting a network connection to provide the network bandwidth using the mapped QoS requirements.

8. The method of claim 7 in which the QoS requirements are determined per application on a per-feature basis.

9. The method of claim 8 in which a different network connection is selected to support a different feature provided by a bandwidth-consuming application.

10. The method of claim 7 further including measuring instrumentation to determine the current state of the available network connections.

11. The method of claim 7 in which the executed instructions further cause the computing device to obtain user preferences for utilization of network connections and utilize the user preferences when performing the mapping.

12. The method of claim 7 in which the QoS requirements are determined by iteratively testing each of the available connections with a bandwidth-consuming application, and observing application behaviors during each test.

13. The method of claim 12 in which the observed application behaviors include one of disruption in rendered user experience, buffering of data over the tested network connection, or surfacing of a notification pertaining to network bandwidth.

14. The method of claim 7 in which the QoS requirements are determined through an application programming interface over which the bandwidth-consuming applications register their respective QoS requirements.

15. A computing device, comprising:

one or more processors;

a user interface configured to support interactions between the computing device and a user of the computing device;

one or more sensors configured for sensing an environment surrounding the computing device;

a plurality of network interfaces supporting respective network connections to different communication networks providing network bandwidth; and

one or more hardware-based memory devices storing executable code associated with one or more network bandwidth-consuming applications and further storing computer-readable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing device to

enable applications executing on the computing device to register Quality of Service (QoS) criteria for application features that use network bandwidth;

maintain context-awareness of contextual data through direct sensing by the one or more sensors, the contextual data describing interactions between the user, applications, and the surrounding environment;

measure performance of available network connections to identify network connections that meet QoS criteria of registered applications;

determine that a registered application is requesting network bandwidth, and

utilize the contextual data to select a network connection from among the identified network connections to satisfy the network bandwidth request.

16. The computing device of claim 15 in which the contextual data describes an operational state of the computing device or a user behavior when interacting with the computing device, and in which the contextual data comprises one or more of time/date, location of the user or computing device, language, schedule, applications installed on the device, user preferences, user activities, stored contacts, call history, messaging history, browsing history, traffic conditions, application usage history, computing device type, computing device capabilities, or communication network type.

17. The computing device of claim 15 in which the contextual data is obtained using the sensors on the computing device, the sensors including one or more of cameras, accelerometers, location-awareness components, thermometers, altimeters, heart rate sensors, human physiology sensors, barometers, microphones, or proximity sensors.

18. The computing device of claim 15 in which the contextual data includes information obtained from one or more applications executing on the computing device.

19. The computing device of claim 15 in which the measuring utilizes instrumentation adapted for determining one or more of bandwidth, packet loss, jitter, or latency.

20. The computing device of claim 15, in which the one or more processors further cause the computing device to

generate a history of user interactions with the computing device;

predict execution of an application or application feature using the monitored contextual data and user interaction history; and

switch network connections based on the predicted execution of the application or application feature.