Intervehicle distance control system for vehicles

• US 4,491,840 A
• Filed: 04/05/1982
• Issued: 01/01/1985
• Est. Priority Date: 04/07/1981
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Honda Motor Company)
• Inventors: Aoki, Takashi, Nishikawa, Masao
• Primary Examiner(s): Groody, James J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Heim, Michael F.
• Application Number:
  US06/365,159
• Time in Patent Office: 1,002 Days
• Field of Search: 91/6, 92/48, 180/167, 180/169, 180/176, 180/177, 340/31 R, 340/32, 340/33, 340/53, 340/62, 340/903, 340/933, 367/99, 367/909, 367/93, 367/94, 364/426
• US Class Current: 340/903
• CPC Class Codes: B60Q 9/008 for anti-collision purposes
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/34 using transmission of continuous, frequency-modulated waves while heterodyning the received signal, or a signal derived therefrom, with a locally-generated signal related to the contemporaneously transmitted signal
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/931 of land vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/93185 Controlling the brakes
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9319 Controlling the accelerator
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/932 using own vehicle data, e.g. ground speed, steering wheel direction
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9321 Velocity regulation, e.g. cruise control
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9323 Alternative operation using light waves
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9324 Alternative operation using ultrasonic waves
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 2013/9325 for inter-vehicle distance regulation, e.g. navigating in platoons
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 367/909 Collision avoidance

Abstract

An intervehicle distance control system for a vehicle which, when there exists a possibility of collision between the vehicle and an interfering object ahead thereof, generates a control signal and imparts to a vehicle accelerator member an operation reaction force corresponding to the control signal. The driver is thereby alerted as to a possibility of collision, while the selection of acceleration operation is substantially entrusted to the driver. In the absence of such control signal, the reaction force has a strength of substantially zero. Regardless of the vehicle speed, the driver will never suffer from a metal burden due to operation of the control system.

Claims

1. An intervehicle distance control system for a vehicle, comprising:

signal generating means for generating, when there exists a possibility of collision between said vehicle and an interfering object ahead thereof, a control signal corresponding to the degree of said possibility;

accelerator means having an accelerator member for increasing the vehicle speed according to the amount of displacement in a predetermined operating direction of said accelerator member from an original position thereof;

reaction force means for urging said accelerator member in the direction opposite to said operating direction with a reaction force of a strength corresponding to said control signal;

said reaction force having a strength of substantially zero when said control signal is absent;

said control signal comprising a number of alerting signals, said number corresponding to said degree of said possibility of collision;

said reaction force means comprising at least one solenoid valve adapted to be activated by said control signal and at least one throttle controller adapted to provide said reaction force when said solenoid valve is active;

said solenoid valve including a first connection port connected to a negative pressure source, a second connection port communicating with the atmosphere, a third connection port connected to said throttle controller and switching means for connecting said third connection port selectively to said first and second connection ports;

said throttle controller including a diaphragm member defining a pressure chamber communicating with said third connection port and a rod member interlocked with said diaphragm member; and

wherein;

the maximum number of said alerting signals is n and there are n said solenoid valves and n said throttle controllers as respectively ordered and with respect to an integer i ≦

n, said solenoid valves and said throttle controllers up to the i-th order become active when said number of said alerting signals is i.

2. A control system according to claim 1, wherein:

said accelerator member comprises a pivotable throttling pedal, and respective ones of said rod members of said n throttle controllers are retained at at least one predetermined position on said throttling pedal.

3. A control system according to claim 2, wherein:

there are n said retaining positions as ordered; and

with respect to any integer j≦

n, the rod member of the j-th throttle controller is retained to the j-th retaining position.

4. A control system according to claim 3, wherein:

the j+l-th retaining position is spaced further than said j-th retaining position from a pivot center of said throttling pedal.

5. A control system according to claim 2, wherein:

with respect to any integer k where n>

k>

l, there are k said retaining positions as ordered; and

the rod members of the throttle controllers up to the n - l-th order are retained to the retaining positions up to the k-l-th order and the rod member of said n-th throttle controller is retained to the k-th retaining position.

6. A control system according to claim 4 or 5, wherein:

n is equal to 3.

7. A control system according to claim 1, wherein:

said strength of said reaction force given by said n-th throttle controller is larger than that given by any of the throttle controllers up to the n-l-th order.

8. A control system according to claim 7, wherein:

the n-th alertng signal serves also as an operating signal for a braking system of said vehicle.