Accelerometer system

• US 4,601,206 A
• Filed: 09/14/1984
• Issued: 07/22/1986
• Est. Priority Date: 09/16/1983
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ferranti International, PLC
• Original Assignee: Ferranti Limited
• Inventors: Watson, Norman F.
• Primary Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Application Number:
  US06/650,648
• Time in Patent Office: 676 Days
• Field of Search: 73/514, 73/517 A, 73/510, 73/505
• US Class Current: 73/510
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/188 for accumulated errors, e.g. by coupling inertial systems with absolute positioning systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 15/08 with conversion into electric or magnetic values
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 15/18 in two or more dimensions

Abstract

An inertial platform accelerometer cluster (FIG. 1) comprises a cluster of gyro and accelerometer system triads disposed in a cluster housing 10 to detect motion along and about orthogonal x, y and z axes. The orthogonal accelerometer systems each comprises a pair of codirectional accelerometers e.g. 15x, 15'"'"'x having an operating bandwidth from 0 to several KHz mounted on the housing walls equidistant from a point 14, which represents a common center of percussion to all pairs, at the center of gravity of the cluster. The analogue output signals of each accelerometer pair are scaled, summed and differenced to provide `sum` and `difference` signals which represent respectively acceleration in the sensitive direction and angular acceleration about an orthogonal axis. The sum and difference signals can be used in analogue correction generating circuitry to obtain correction signals for coning and sculling effects, for which responses at high-frequency are called for, while economizing on computer time and capacity. Furthermore the coincidence of the center of percussion for all accelerometer pairs eliminates size effect errors from the `sum` signal which is employed for the normal inertial platform computations. Separate high- and low-frequency responsive accelerometers may be used.

Claims

1. An inertial platform accelerometer cluster having three orthogonal axes, said accelerometer cluster comprising an accelerometer system associated with each of the three orthogonal axes, each accelerometer system including:

at least one means for sensing inertial accelerations, said means for sensing inertial accelerations being responsive to accelerations in a frequency range extending down to zero Hertz;

a pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations, each of said means for sensing vibrational accelerations being responsive to vibrational acceleration in a range of relatively higher frequencies causing coning and sculling effects in the inertial accelerometers of said cluster, said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations being disposed equidistantly about a centre of percussion common to the other orthogonal axes and the centre of gravity of the cluster; and

signal processing means operable to produce from the sum of the signals from said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations a sum signal representative of vibrational acceleration of the cluster along said axis and operable to produce from the difference between the signals from said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations a difference signal representative of the angular acceleration of the cluster about one of said orthogonal axes.

2. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 in which the signal processing means includes:

scaling means operable to control the absolute and relative amplitude of the signals produced by said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations;

a summing amplifier responsive to said scaled signals to produce a sum signal related to the algebraic average of the signals; and

a differential input amplifier responsive to difference in magnitude and polarity between said scaled signals to produce said difference signal.

3. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 in which the cluster includes a closed cubical housing structure, said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations associated with each of the three coordinate axes being carried on internal opposite faces of the housing structure.

4. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 including self-checking means operable to compare the signals produced by said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations in the frequency range of said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations integrated over a time period long in relation to that of rotational motion between said pair of means for sensing vibrational accelerations and to give an indication of any difference in their responses.

5. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 in which each accelerometer system comprises two accelerometers each responsive both to inertial accelerations in the frequency range extending down to zero Hertz and to vibrational accelerations in the range of frequencies causing coning and sculling effects in the accelerometers of the cluster.

6. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 in which each accelerometer system comprises separate inertial and vibrational accelerometers for respectively sensing inertial and vibrational accelerations.

7. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 6 in which the inertial accelerometer of one accelerometer system is located at the centre of gravity of the cluster.

8. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 6 including combining means responsive to the sum signals of the processing means and signals of the inertial accelerometer to produce a unified acceleration related signal extending over a bandwidth including the operating frequency ranges of the component inertial and vibrational accelerometers.

9. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 8 in which the combining means comprises a cross-over filter network including low-pass filter means connected to receive signals from the inertial accelerometer and pass signals at frequencies below a predetermined cross-over frequency and high-pass filter means connected to receive signals from the summing means of the processing means and pass signals above said cross-over frequency.

10. An accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 6 including further self-checking means comprising filter means operable to pass signals from the inertial accelerometer and signals from the vibrational accelerometers in a band common to both types of accelerometer, and comparison means operable to compare the signals received from each type of accelerometer and indicate any difference in their response.

11. An inertial platform including a cluster formed by orthogonal gyros, an accelerometer cluster as claimed in claim 1 and computing means responsive to signals received from the gyros and accelerometer systems to compute the motion of the platform in three dimensional space.

12. An inertial platform as claimed in claim 11 including analogue correction generating means responsive to said `sum` and `difference` signals from each accelerometer system to provide correction signals, in respect of coning and sculling motions by the cluster, for processing in connection with the accelerometer and gyro signals.

13. An inertial platform as claimed in claim 12 including cross-checking means responsive to signals from the gyros indicative of motion about said coordinate axes and to signals from the accelerometer cluster also indicative of motion about said coordinate axes to compare the responses of co-responding instruments.

14. An inertial platform as claimed in claim 11 including cross-checking means responsive to signals from the gyros indicative of motion about said coordinate axes and to signals from the accelerometer cluster also indicative of mmotion about said coordinate axes to compare the responses of corresponding instruments.