Methods for determining the proper coloring for a tooth replica

• US 4,654,794 A
• Filed: 02/18/1984
• Issued: 03/31/1987
• Est. Priority Date: 02/18/1984
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: X-Rite Incorporated (Danaher Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Colorgen, Inc. (Danaher Corporation)
• Inventors: O'Brien, John K.
• Primary Examiner(s): Harkcom, Gary V.
• Application Number:
  US06/580,864
• Time in Patent Office: 1,137 Days
• Field of Search: 364/400, 364/413, 364/415, 364/417, 364/148-150, 364/167-168, 433/25-27, 433/54-55, 433/171, 433/201-203, 433/213, 433/215, 433/229
• US Class Current: 433/215
• CPC Class Codes: A61C 19/10 Supports for artificial teeth for transport or for comparison of the colour
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 2003/467 Colour computing
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 2003/468 of objects containing fluorescent agent
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/0251 Colorimeters making use of an integrating sphere
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/10 Arrangements of light sources specially adapted for spectrometry or colorimetry
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/463 Colour matching
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/465 taking into account the colour perception of the eye; using tristimulus detection
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/50 using electric radiation detectors
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/508 measuring the colour of teeth
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 3/524 Calibration of colorimeters
• CPC Class Codes: G06T 11/001 Texturing; Colouring; Generation of texture or colour inpainting G06T5/77

Abstract

Polychromatic light is directed at the surface of a live tooth and color data of light reflected therefrom is recorded, multiplied by the stored power distribution of a first standard illuminant and converted to three tristimulus values. Such values are compared with color values of a first group of stored color dental shades, and if a match occurs within a given tolerance, an indication of the nature of the recipe is produced. A second level search may be carried out against a substantially larger group of stored dental shades in the event of a no-match condition resulting from the first search. Excellent lifelike reproduction of the patient'"'"'s tooth is enhanced by checking for least metamerism by operating upon the measured data with other illumination standards and selecting the best match under all lighting conditions. Additionally, a translucency factor is calculated, and employed to reduce the opacity of the inner opaque layer of the recipe which would otherwise be indicated should the patient'"'"'s tooth not have a high degree of translucency. The calculation of a fluorescence factor also enhances excellent reproduction of the live tooth, and is employed to indicate the addition of a fluorescent ingredient to the final recipe.

Claims

1. A method of determining shade values for a recipe used to fabricate a color matched replica of a live tooth being examined in the mouth of a patient, comprising the steps of:

(a) directing polychromatic light at the surface of said live tooth;

(b) recording dental color data of light reflected from said live tooth consisting of a plurality of values indicative of the power distribution of wavelengths of light reflected from said tooth within each of a plurality of frequency bands in response to the execution of step (a);

(c) operating upon the color data produced in accordance with step (b) with the power distribution values of a given standard illuminant to produce modified color data;

(d) converting the modified color data produced in accordance with Step (c) to three tristimulus values by multiplying said modified color data with three standard color data templates;

(e) comparing said three tristimulus values with color values of a group of stored main color dental shades in accordance with a first level search;

(f) establishing an acceptance color difference tolerance value; and

(g) identifying stored main color shades which are close enough to the shade represented by said three tristimulus values to satisfy said tolerance value.

2. The method of claim 1 further including repeating Step (e) to produce a second level search if no match is produced by executing Step (e), by comparing said three tristimulus values with a second, substantially larger group of stored dental color shades.

3. The method of claim 2 further including the step of increasing said tolerance value if a match is not produced by carrying out said second level search.

4. The method of claim 2 further including the step of modifying a stored color shade value to bring it within said tolerance value if no match is produced.

5. The method of claim 1 further including the step of modifying a stored color shade value to bring it within said tolerance value if no match is produced.

6. The method as set forth in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, further including the step of checking for least metamerism in the event that at least two color data matches are produced, by operating upon said three tristimulus values with additional illumination standards other than said given standard illuminant to produce modified tristimulus values;

matching said modified tristimulus values with reflectance color data of the previously matched shades determined under said additional illumintion standards; and

determining which matched shade produces the least color difference.

7. The method set forth in claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, further including the step of:

(h) illuminating said tooth with a dark background behind said tooth;

(i) recording the reflected dark background color data resulting from Step (h);

(j) subtracting said dark background color data from data recorded in accordance with step (b) to produce a translucency factor assignable to search; and

(k) employing said translucency factor to reduce the opacity factor data component of a matched recipe should said translucency factor exceed a predetermined value.

8. The method of claims 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, further including the steps of:

(h) illuminating said tooth with light having a substantial ultraviolet component;

(i) deriving a fluorescence factor by subtracting the color data produced in accordance with Step (h) from data produced by illuminating said tooth with light not including said substantial ultraviolet component; and

(j) producing data indicative of the amount of a given fluorescent ingredient to be added to the receipe proportional to said fluoresence factor.

9. A method of determining shade values for a recipe used to fabricate a color matched replica of a live tooth being examined in the mouth of a patient, comprising the steps of:

(a) applying polychromatic light to the surface of a color calibration chip;

(b) recording color signature data consisting of a plurality of values indicative of the power distribution of wavelengths of light reflected from said chip within each of a plurality of frequency bands in response to reflection of light from said calibration chip in accordance with executing step (a);

(c) enabling the normalization of subsequent dental color data measurements by applying a correction factor thereto produced by subtracting data recorded in accordance with step (b) from a stored set of data representing the calibration of the stored dental color data base;

(d) directing polychromatic light at the surface of said live tooth;

(e) recording dental color data of light reflected from said live tooth in response to the execution of Step (d);

(f) normalizing dental color data recorded in accordance with Step (e) by applying said correction factor thereto, said correction factor produced in accordance with Step (c);

(g) operating upon the color data produced in accordance with Step (f) with the power distribution values of a given standard illuminant to produce modified color data;

(h) converting the modified color data produced in accordance with Step (g) to three tristimulus values by multiplying said modified color data with three standard color data templates;

(i) comparing said three tristimulus values with color values of a group of stored main color dental shades in accordance with a first level search;

(j) establishing an acceptable color difference tolerance value; and

(k) identifying stored main color shades which are close enough to the shade represented by said three tristimulus values to satisfy said tolerance value.

10. The method of claim 9 further including repeating Step (i) to produce a second level search if no match is produced by executing Step (i), by comparing said three tristimulus values with a second, substantially larger group of stored dental color shades.

11. The method of claim 10 further including the step of increasing said tolerance value if a match is not produced by said second level search.

12. The method of claim 10, further including the step of modifying a stored color shade value to bring it within said tolerance value if no match is produced.

13. The method of claim 9, further including the step of modifying a stored color shade value to bring it within said tolerance value if no match is produced.

14. The method as set forth in claims 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, further including the step of checking for least metamerism in the event that at least two color data matches are produced, by operating upon said three tristimulus values with additional illumination standards other than the standard of Step (g) to produce modified tristimulus values;

matching said modified tristimulus values with reflectance color data of the previously matched shades determined under said additional illumination standards; and

determining which matched shade produces the least color difference.

15. The method set forth in claims 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, further including the step of illuminating said tooth with a dark background behind said tooth;

recording the reflected dark background color data resulting from the preceding step;

subtracting said dark background color data from data recorded in accordance with Step (e) to produce a translucency factor assignable to search; and

employing said translucency factor to reduce the opacity factor data component of a matched recipe should said translucency factor exceed a predetermined value.

16. The method of claims 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, further including the step of illuminating said tooth with light having a substantial ultraviolet component;

deriving a flourescence factor by comparing the color data produced in accordance with the preceding step with data produced by illuminating said tooth with light not including said substantial ultraviolet component; and

producing data indicative of the amount of a given fluorescent ingredient to be added to the recipe proportional to said fluorescence factor.

17. A method of determining shade values for a recipe used to fabricate a color matched replica of a live tooth being examined in the mouth of a patient, comprising the steps of:

(a) directing polychromatic light to the surface of a color calibration chip;

(b) recording color signature data consisting of a plurality of values indicative of the power distribution of wavelengths of light reflected from said chip within each of a plurality of frequency bands in response to reflection of light from said calibration chip in accordance with Step (a);

(c) enabling the normalization of subsequent dental color data measurements by applying a correction factor thereto produced by subtracting data recorded in accordance with Step (b) from a stored set of data representing the calibration of the stored dental color data base;

(d) directing polychromatic light at the surface of said live tooth;

(e) recording dental color data of light reflected from said live tooth in response to the execution of step (d);

(f) normalizing dental color data recorded in accordance with step (e) by applying said correction factor thereto, said correction factor produced in accordance with step (c);

(g) operating upon the color data produced in accordance with Step (f) with the power distribution values of a given standard illuminant to produce modified color data;

(h) converting the modified color data produced in accordance with step (g) to three tristimulus values by multiplying said modified color data with three standard color data templates;

(i) comparing said three tristimulus values with color values of a group of stored main color dental shades;

(j) establishing an acceptable color difference tolerance value;

(k) identifying stored main color shades which are close enough to the shade represented by said three tristimulus values to satisfy said tolerance value;

(l) illuminating said tooth with a dark background behind said tooth;

(m) recording the reflected dark background color resulting from the preceding step;

(n) subtracting said dark backgound color data from data recorded in accordance with Step (e) to produce translucency factor assignable to search;

(o) employing said translucency factor to reduce the opacity factor data component of a matched recipe should said translucency factor exceed a predetermined value;

(p) illuminating said tooth with light having a substantial ultraviolet component;

(q) deriving a flourescence factor by comparing the color data produced in accordance with step (p) with data produced by illuminating said tooth with light not including said substantial ultraviolet component; and

(r) producing data indicative of the amount of a given fluorescent ingredient to be added to the recipe proportional to said fluorescence factor.

18. The method as set forth in claim 17, further including the step of checking for least metamerism in the event that at least two color data matches are produced, by operating upon said three tristimulus values with additional illumination standards other than the standard of Step (g) to produce modified tristimulus values;

matching said modified tristimulus values with reflectance color data of the previously matched shades determined under said additional illumination standards; and

determining which matched shade produces the least color difference.

19. The method of claim 17 or 18, further including the step of modifying a stored color shade value to bring it within said tolerance value if no match is produced.

20. A method of determining shade values for a recipe used to fabricate a color matched replica of a live tooth being examined in the mouth of a patient, comprising the steps of:

(a) directing light at the surface of said live tooth having a plurality of frequency bands;

(b) electronically producing analog signals consisting of a plurality of analog values indicative of the power distribution of wavelengths of light reflected from said live tooth within each of said plurality of frequency bands in response to the execution of step (a);

(c) electronically converting said analog signals to digital color data;

(d) providing sets of electronically stored digital shade value data;

(e) comparing said digital color data with each set of said stored digital shade value data;

(f) establishing an acceptacne color difference tolerance value for the difference between said digital color data and said stored digital shade value data;

(g) identifying those sets of stored digital shade value data which are close enough to the shade represented by said digital color data to satisfy said tolerance value;

21. (h) illuminating said tooth with a dark background behind said tooth;

(i) recording the reflected dark background color data resulting from step (h);

(j) substracting said dark background color data from data recorded in accordance with step (b) to produce a translucency factor assignable to search; and

(k) employing said translucency factor to reduce the opacity factor data component of a matched recipe should said translucency factor exceed a predetermined value.

22. A method of determining shade values for a recipe used to fabricate a color matched replica of a live tooth being examined in the mouth of a patient, comprising the steps of:

(a) directing light at the surface of said live tooth having a plurality of frequency bands;

(b) electronically producing analog signals consisting of a plurality of analog values indicative of the power distribution of wavelengths of light reflected from said live tooth within each of said plurality of frequency bands in response to the execution of step (a);

(c) electronically converting said analog signals to digital color data;

(d) providing sets of electronically stored digital shade value data;

(e) comparing said digital color data with each set of said stored digital shade value data;

(f) establishing an acceptance color difference tolerance value for the difference between said digital color data and said stored digital shade value data;

(g) identifying those sets of stored digital shade value data which are close enough to the shade represented by said digital color data to satisfy said tolerance value;

(h) illuminating said tooth with light having a substantial ultraviolet component;

(i) deriving a fluorescence factor by subtracting the color data produced in accordance with step (h) from data produced by illuminating said tooth with light not including said substantial ultraviolet component; and

(j) producing data indicative of the amount of a given fluorescent ingredient to be added to the receipe proportional to said flouresence factor.