Adaptive link assignment for a dynamic communication network

• US 4,912,656 A
• Filed: 09/26/1988
• Issued: 03/27/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 09/26/1988
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Harris Corporation (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Harris Corporation (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.)
• Inventors: Nieto, John W., Cain, Joseph B., Adams, Stanley L., Noakes, Michael D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lall, Parshotam S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): MELNICK, STEVEN A
• Application Number:
  US07/249,180
• Time in Patent Office: 547 Days
• Field of Search: 364/514, 364/200 MS File, 364/900 MS File, 364/402, 364/407, 371/11.2, 371/11.1, 371/8.1, 371/68.2, 340/827, 340/826, 340/825.03, 455/8
• US Class Current: 709/242
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/18521 Systems of inter linked satellites, i.e. inter satellite service for optical links between satellites H04B10/118
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/02 Topology update or discovery
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 45/44 Distributed routing

Abstract

An adaptive link assignment scheme for dynamically changing communication node topologies such as satellite networks, fleets of ships or aircraft, etc. Periodically each node in the network transmits topology information to all the nodes in the network. Then each node determines the degree of connectivity of the network. It is preferred that the network be at least triconnected, and if the network is less than that each node determines what connections it can make to improve the network connectivity. If more than one alternative is available, a choice is made based on line of sight endurance and then on traffic delay. The identification of the selected connection is then broadcast to all the nodes in the network. Each node thus receives the proposed changes from all the network nodes, and each node then resolves conflicts between the broadcast selections and determines what change it should make. Finally, the changes are implemented. The scheme emphasizes network connectivity to bring the network to a triconnected state and then emphasizes line of sight endurance and reduction of traffic delay.

Claims

1. For use in a multinode communication graph including a plurality of communication nodes and having a known graph topology with each node a part of a component, each component made up of a number of nodes between one and the full number of nodes in the graph, each node having a plurality of communication ports, each port capable of establishing a communication link with a communication port of another node, a method of assigning ports to communication links to maintain the connectivity of the graph, said method comprising within any one node the steps of:

(a) analyzing the current graph topology to determine the current graph connectivity state;

(b) determining the available changes said one node is capable of making to improve the graph connectivity;

(c) broadcasting a description of the determined changes to other nodes in the graph;

(d) receiving from other nodes in the graph broadcasts of descriptions of changes determined by the other nodes to be available to such other n odes to improve the graph connectivity;

(e) resolving conflicts between link assignments in the determined changes of all nodes in the graph to determine a new link assignment for said one node; and

(f) initiating establishment of a new communication path with another node in accordance with the determined new link assignment.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of analyzing the current graph topology comprises the steps of:

(i) identifying components within the graph which are at least triconnected with other components of the graph;

(ii) identifying components within the graph which are less than triconnected with other components of the graph; and

(iii) identifying components within the graph which are less than biconnected with other components of the graph

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the step of analysing the current graph topology comprises the further step of:

(iv) identifying components within the graph which are in danger of splintering from the graph due to loss of an existing communication link.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of analysing the current graph topology comprises the step of identifying components within the graph which are in danger of splintering from the graph due to loss of an existing communication link.

5. A method as claimed in claim 3 or 4 wherein the step of determining the available changes comprises the step of identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with one of the components identified as in danger of splintering.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the step of identifying a port comprises the step of evaluating existing communication links from said one node to identify an existing communication link that can be broken to provide a port without creating a new biconnected or less component.

7. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the step of determining the available changes comprises the steP of identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with a node of another component with which the component of said one node is less than biconnected.

8. A method as claimed in claim 2 or 7 wherein the step of determining the available changes comprises the step of identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with a node of another component with which the component o said one node is less than triconnected.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the step of identifying a port includes the steps of determining the line of sight endurance of all port within said one node that are available to establish the new communication link;

and identifying the one of said all ports having the greatest line of sight endurance.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the step of identifying a port includes the further step of determining the effect on delay of all traffic transmitted by said one node that would result from establishing the new communication link with the identified port.

11. A method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the step of identifying a port includes the step of determining the effect on delay of all traffic transmitted by said one node that would result from establishing the new communication link with the identified port.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of resolving conflicts includes comparing the descriptions of available changes received from other nodes with the available changes of said one node;

identifying commonly available changes; and

determining the new link assignment from the commonly available changes.

13. In a multinode communication graph including a plurality of communication nodes and having a known graph topology with each node a part of a component, each component made up of a number of nodes between one and the full number of nodes in the graph, each node having a plurality of communication ports, each port capable of establishing a communication link with a communication port of another node, an arrangement for assigning ports to communication links to maintain the connectivity of the graph, said arrangement comprising within each node;

(a) means for analyzing the current graph topology to determine the current graph connectivity state;

(b) means for determining the available changes said one node is capable of making to improve the graph connectivity;

(c) means for broadcasting a description of the determined changes to other nodes in the graph;

(d) means for receiving from other nodes in the graph broadcasts of descriptions of changes determined by the other nodes to be available to such other nodes to improve the graph connectivity;

(e) means for resolving conflicts between link assignments in the determined changes of all nodes in the graph to determine a new link assignment for said one node; and

(f) means for initiating establishment of a new communication path with another node in accordance with the determined new link assignment.

14. An arrangement as claimed in claim 13 wherein said means for analyzing the current graph topology comprises:

(i) means for identifying components within the graph which are at least triconnected with other components of the graph;

(ii) means for identifying components within the graph which are less than triconnected with other components of the graph; and

(iii) means for identifying components within the graph which are less than biconnected with other components of the graph.

15. An arrangement as claimed in claim 14 wherein said means for analysing the current graph topology comprises:

(iv) means for identifying components within the graph which are in danger of splintering from the graph due to loss of an existing communication link.

16. An arrangement as claimed in claim 13 wherein said means for analysing the current graph topology comprises means for identifying components within the graph which are in danger of splintering from the graph due to loss of an existing communication link.

17. An arrangement as claimed in claim 15 or 16 wherein said means for determining the available changes comprises means for identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with one of the components identified as in danger of splintering.

18. An arrangement as claimed in claim 17 wherein said means for identifying a port comprises means for evaluating existing communication links from said one node to identify an existing communication link that can be broken to provide a port without creating a new biconnected or less component.

19. An arrangement as claimed in claim 14 wherein said means for determining the available changes comprises means for identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with a node of another component with which the component of said one node is less than biconnected.

20. An arrangement as claimed in claim 14 or 19 wherein said means for determining the available changes comprises means for identifying a port within said one node that can be utilized to establish a new communication link with a node of another component with which the component of said one node is less than triconnected.

21. An arrangement as claimed in claim 19 wherein said means for identifying a port includes means for determining the line of sight endurance of all ports within said one node that are available to establish the new communication link;

and means for identifying the one of said all ports having the greatest line of sight endurance.

22. An arrangement as claimed in claim 21 wherein said means for identifying a port further includes means for determining the effect on delay of all traffic transmitted by said one node that would result from establishing the new communication path with the identified port.

23. An arrangement as claimed in claim 19 wherein said means for identifying a port includes means for determining the effect on delay of all traffic transmitted by said one node that would result from establishing the new communication link with the identified port.

24. An arrangement as claimed in claim 13 wherein said means for resolving conflicts includes means for comparing the descriptions of available changes received from other nodes with the available changes of said one node;

means for identifying commonly available changes; and

means for determining the new link assignment from the commonly available changes.