Automotive warning and recording system
First Claim
1. An automotive recorder for use with a motor vehicle comprising:
- one or more sensors adapted to transmit a signal indicative of a safety related vehicle operation variable, one of said one or more sensors being adapted to transmit a signal indicative of vehicle speed;
a processor having one or more inputs, a timer, an operator alerting output, and an information output, the one or more processor inputs being coupled responsively to said one or more sensors;
an indicator coupled responsively to the operator alerting output of said processor, said indicator being located for easy perception by an operator of the vehicle when the operator alerting output of said processor is energized; and
a storage unit coupled to the information output of said processor, said storage unit being substantially non volatile and adapted to receive and accumulate information transmitted from the information output of said processor for review by a monitoring authority after an operation episode;
said processor being adapted to energize the operator alerting output when the signal from one of said sensor exceeds a predetermined value corresponding to a predefined maximum safe vehicle operating condition, the timer being adapted to trigger said processor to automatically and beyond the control of the vehicle operator transmit information from the information output to said storage unit for review by the monitoring authority after the vehicle operation episode when a predetermined time elapses from the time of energization of the operator alerting output and the signal from said sensor has not receded below the predetermined value.
0 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
An automotive unsafe condition recorder is provided having one or more automotive condition sensors coupled to the input of a timer equipped processor. An indicator for alerting the operator is coupled to an output of the processor, which the processor energizes in response to a signal level from the sensor indicating the existence of a predetermined unsafe operating condition. If the unsafe operating condition is not corrected within a predetermined time, the processor transmits information pertaining to the unsafe condition to a storage unit, which accumulates the information for later review.
232 Citations
System and method for reconfiguring an electronic control unit of a motor vehicle to optimize fuel economy | ||
Patent #
US 7,899,610 B2
Filed 09/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for detecting use of a wireless device in a moving vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,876,205 B2
Filed 10/02/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Aircraft vehicular propulsion system monitoring device and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,925,392 B2
Filed 04/08/2008
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Apparatus for Tracking and Recording Vital Signs and Task-Related Information of a Vehicle to Identify Operating Patterns | ||
Patent #
US 20110153154A1
Filed 02/25/2011
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Apparatus for Tracking and Recording Vital Signs and Task-Related Information of a Vehicle to Identify Operating Patterns | ||
Patent #
US 20110153153A1
Filed 02/25/2011
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Speed limiting in electric vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 7,962,256 B2
Filed 08/13/2007
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
System and method for defining areas of interest and modifying asset monitoring in relation thereto | ||
Patent #
US 7,999,670 B2
Filed 07/02/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
ROW UNIT BOUNCE MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20110184551A1
Filed 01/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
CNH Industrial Canada Ltd
|
Original Assignee
CNH Canada Limited
|
Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task-related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns | ||
Patent #
US 8,014,917 B2
Filed 03/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Vehicle visual and non-visual data recording system | ||
Patent #
US 7,983,811 B2
Filed 11/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Appy Risk Technologies Limited
|
Original Assignee
Intelligent Mechatronic Systems Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for pitch state estimation for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,979,179 B2
Filed 08/13/2007
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Systems and methods for customizing insurance | ||
Patent #
US 8,046,244 B1
Filed 06/03/2010
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Automated consumer to business electronic marketplace system | ||
Patent #
US 8,044,809 B2
Filed 04/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Processing an application for insurance coverage | ||
Patent #
US 8,046,246 B1
Filed 10/13/2010
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Enhanced control of a transporter | ||
Patent #
US 7,857,088 B2
Filed 05/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Enhanced control of a transporter | ||
Patent #
US 7,740,099 B2
Filed 07/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
System and method for providing a user interface for vehicle mentoring system users and insurers | ||
Patent #
US 20100205012A1
Filed 02/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Vehicle device to activate a visual or audible alert and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 7,659,811 B2
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Speed exceeded notification device for vehicle having a data bus and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 7,659,810 B2
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Apparatus for Tracking and Recording Vital Signs and Task-Related Information of a Vehicle to Identify Operating Patterns | ||
Patent #
US 20100286865A1
Filed 03/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
AUTOMATED CONSUMER TO BUSINESS ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100268619A1
Filed 04/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Speed exceeded notification device for vehicle having a data bus and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 7,671,727 B2
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Enhanced Control of a Transporter | ||
Patent #
US 20100222994A1
Filed 05/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
System and method for taking risk out of driving | ||
Patent #
US 7,659,827 B2
Filed 05/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Systems and methods for customizing automobile insurance | ||
Patent #
US 7,774,217 B1
Filed 10/20/2006
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
System and method for viewing and correcting data in a street mapping database | ||
Patent #
US 20100207751A1
Filed 02/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for selective review of event data | ||
Patent #
US 7,804,426 B2
Filed 12/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and method for monitoring and updating speed-by-street data | ||
Patent #
US 7,859,392 B2
Filed 05/22/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
IWI Incorporated
|
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR FAULT DETECTION AT VEHICLE STARTUP | ||
Patent #
US 20090055033A1
Filed 08/23/2007
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
VEHICLE DEVICE TO ACTIVATE A VISUAL OR AUDIBLE ALERT AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20090051519A1
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
SPEED EXCEEDED NOTIFICATION DEVICE FOR VEHICLE HAVING A DATA BUS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20090051518A1
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Method and system for diagnosing, collecting information and servicing a remote system | ||
Patent #
US 7,516,193 B2
Filed 10/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
AUTOMATED CONSUMER TO BUSINESS ELECTRONIC MARKETPLACE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20090109037A1
Filed 03/03/2008
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
System and method for wireless delivery of event data | ||
Patent #
US 7,536,457 B2
Filed 12/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Accessory interface bus for telephone headset adapter | ||
Patent #
US 7,633,963 B1
Filed 09/22/1999
|
Current Assignee
Plantronics Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Plantronics Inc.
|
Data Transfer System and Method | ||
Patent #
US 20080043736A1
Filed 08/18/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
SPEED EXCEEDED NOTIFICATION DEVICE FOR VEHICLE HAVING A DATA BUS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20080030316A1
Filed 08/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Automated consumer to business electronic marketplace system | ||
Patent #
US 7,339,483 B1
Filed 04/16/2004
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 7,378,961 B1
Filed 12/23/2005
|
Current Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Aircraft vehicular propulsion system monitoring device and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,389,162 B2
Filed 09/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Apparatus and Method for Pitch State Estimation for a Vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20080161990A1
Filed 08/13/2007
|
Current Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Segway Incorporated
|
Control and/or monitoring apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,397,363 B2
Filed 09/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
|
Original Assignee
Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
|
System and method for monitoring driving behavior with feedback | ||
Patent #
US 20080243558A1
Filed 03/27/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ash Gupte
|
Original Assignee
Ash Gupte
|
Post collision restraints control module | ||
Patent #
US 7,158,870 B2
Filed 01/24/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Method and system for diagnosing, collecting information and servicing a remote system | ||
Patent #
US 20070033268A1
Filed 10/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Method of detecting vehicle speed sensor failure | ||
Patent #
US 7,286,917 B2
Filed 05/04/2005
|
Current Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Aircraft vehicular propulsion system monitoring device and method | ||
Patent #
US 20070233329A1
Filed 09/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Askari Badre-Alam, Russell Altieri, Mark Jolly, James Kuhn, Steve Southward, Leslie Fowler
|
Monitoring apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,277,010 B2
Filed 10/03/2002
|
Current Assignee
Joao Control and Monitoring Systems LLC
|
Original Assignee
Raymond Anthony Joao
|
System and Method for Wireless Delivery of Event Data | ||
Patent #
US 20070260363A1
Filed 12/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and Method for Selective Review of Event Data | ||
Patent #
US 20070260361A1
Filed 12/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and Method for Reducing Driving Risk With Foresight | ||
Patent #
US 20070257804A1
Filed 05/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TAKING RISK OUT OF DRIVING | ||
Patent #
US 20070257815A1
Filed 05/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and Method for Multi-Event Capture | ||
Patent #
US 20070257782A1
Filed 12/04/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and Method for Identifying Non-Event Profiles | ||
Patent #
US 20070257781A1
Filed 08/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Technique for effectively providing information responsive to a notable condition in a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 6,587,759 B2
Filed 07/30/2002
|
Current Assignee
American Calcar Inc.
|
Original Assignee
American Calcar Inc.
|
Digital memo recorder | ||
Patent #
US 6,694,126 B1
Filed 07/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Visteon Global Technologies Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Johnson Controls Interiors Technology Corporation
|
Monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 7,002,477 B1
Filed 03/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Method for operating a pre-crash sensing system in a vehicle having a countermeasure system using stereo cameras | ||
Patent #
US 7,009,500 B2
Filed 02/13/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Insurance coverage verification | ||
Patent #
US 20060095305A1
Filed 10/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
LexisNexis Risk Solutions Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Choicepoint Asset Company
|
Method of detecting vehicle speed sensor failure | ||
Patent #
US 20060253236A1
Filed 05/04/2005
|
Current Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
System and method for safety and financial monitoring of motor vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 20050033492A1
Filed 02/19/2004
|
Current Assignee
Alan Mendelson, Leon Pintsov
|
Original Assignee
Alan Mendelson, Leon Pintsov
|
Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance | ||
Patent #
US 6,868,386 B1
Filed 05/15/2000
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Automated consumer to business electronic marketplace system | ||
Patent #
US 20050091175A9
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Real time stamping synchronization system | ||
Patent #
US 6,882,912 B2
Filed 03/19/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Vehicle tracker with user notifications and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,888,495 B2
Filed 12/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Aircraft vehicular propulsion system monitoring device and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,954,685 B2
Filed 04/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Aircraft vehicular propulsion system monitoring device and method | ||
Patent #
US 20040024499A1
Filed 04/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Lord Corporation
|
Collision warning and safety countermeasure system | ||
Patent #
US 6,721,659 B2
Filed 02/01/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system | ||
Patent #
US 20040111200A1
Filed 11/29/2001
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Automated consumer to business electronic marketplace system | ||
Patent #
US 20040139034A1
Filed 10/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 6,762,684 B1
Filed 04/19/1999
|
Current Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
AccuTrak Systems Inc.
|
Remote sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system | ||
Patent #
US 6,775,605 B2
Filed 11/29/2001
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Vehicle tracker with user notifications and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 20040201520A1
Filed 12/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
Omega Patents L.L.C.
|
Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system | ||
Patent #
US 6,819,991 B2
Filed 11/29/2001
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Rear collision warning system | ||
Patent #
US 6,831,572 B2
Filed 01/29/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Autonomous emergency braking system | ||
Patent #
US 6,523,912 B1
Filed 11/08/2001
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Passive countermeasure methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,519,519 B1
Filed 02/01/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Motion detection and recording method and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,549,834 B2
Filed 07/24/2001
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Independent Witness Incorporated
|
Method for operating a pre-crash sensing system in a vehicle having a counter-measure system | ||
Patent #
US 20030076981A1
Filed 10/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Post collision restraints control module | ||
Patent #
US 20030139864A1
Filed 01/24/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Systems, methods, and computer program products for privacy protection | ||
Patent #
US 20030130893A1
Filed 11/08/2002
|
Current Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Telanon Inc.
|
Real time stamping synchronization system | ||
Patent #
US 20030182035A1
Filed 03/19/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Device for automatically cleaning windows | ||
Patent #
US 20030192566A1
Filed 12/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Personal mobility vehicles and methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,367,817 B1
Filed 08/10/2000
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Electronic thronttle control with accident recordal unit | ||
Patent #
US 6,397,132 B1
Filed 08/14/2000
|
Current Assignee
Continental Automotive GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Continental Automotive GmbH
|
Laser radar based collision avoidance system for stationary or moving vehicles, automobiles, boats and aircraft | ||
Patent #
US 20020117340A1
Filed 01/31/2002
|
Current Assignee
Roger Stettner
|
Original Assignee
Roger Stettner
|
Method for operating a pre-crash sensing system in a vehicle having a countermeasure system | ||
Patent #
US 6,498,972 B1
Filed 02/13/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Vehicle crash data recorder | ||
Patent #
US 6,185,490 B1
Filed 03/15/1999
|
Current Assignee
Medici Portfolio Acquisition LLC
|
Original Assignee
FERGUSON BOBBIE J.
|
Vehicle motion detection and recording method and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,266,588 B1
Filed 03/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Independent Witness Incorporated
|
Personal mobility vehicles and methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,302,230 B1
Filed 06/04/1999
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Method for engine control | ||
Patent #
US 6,330,873 B1
Filed 12/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Anti-lock braking system capable of recording the operating conditions of elements thereof and recording method therefor | ||
Patent #
US 5,775,783 A
Filed 07/24/1996
|
Current Assignee
Daewoo Electronics
|
Original Assignee
Daewoo Electronics
|
Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance | ||
Patent #
US 5,797,134 A
Filed 01/29/1996
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
System for the security and auditing of persons and property | ||
Patent #
US 5,825,283 A
Filed 07/03/1996
|
Current Assignee
Elie Camhi
|
Original Assignee
Elie Camhi
|
Method for engine control | ||
Patent #
US 5,847,644 A
Filed 06/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Detroit Diesel Corporation
|
Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance | ||
Patent #
US 8,090,598 B2
Filed 01/23/2004
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 8,140,358 B1
Filed 06/03/2008
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
System and method for alerting drivers to road conditions | ||
Patent #
US 8,188,887 B2
Filed 02/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Processing an application for insurance coverage | ||
Patent #
US 8,219,427 B1
Filed 05/24/2011
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Processing an application for insurance coverage | ||
Patent #
US 8,219,426 B1
Filed 12/02/2010
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 8,311,858 B2
Filed 02/17/2012
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
System and method for reducing driving risk with foresight | ||
Patent #
US 8,314,708 B2
Filed 05/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and method for identifying non-event profiles | ||
Patent #
US 8,373,567 B2
Filed 08/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Hybrid vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 20130096752A1
Filed 10/05/2012
|
Current Assignee
Paice LLC
|
Original Assignee
Paice LLC
|
Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task-related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns | ||
Patent #
US 8,442,715 B2
Filed 02/25/2011
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Row unit bounce monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 8,448,587 B2
Filed 01/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
CNH Industrial Canada Ltd
|
Original Assignee
CNH Canada Limited
|
Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task-related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns | ||
Patent #
US 8,457,833 B2
Filed 02/25/2011
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
System and method for estimating loss propensity of an insured vehicle and providing driving information | ||
Patent #
US 8,489,433 B2
Filed 07/29/2010
|
Current Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task-related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns | ||
Patent #
US 8,532,867 B1
Filed 04/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
System and method for categorizing driving behavior using driver mentoring and/or monitoring equipment to determine an underwriting risk | ||
Patent #
US 8,577,703 B2
Filed 07/17/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance | ||
Patent #
US 8,595,034 B2
Filed 12/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Hybrid vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 8,630,761 B2
Filed 10/05/2012
|
Current Assignee
Abell Foundation Incorporated, Paice LLC
|
Original Assignee
Abell Foundation Incorporated, Paice LLC
|
System and method for monitoring vehicle parameters and driver behavior | ||
Patent #
US 8,630,768 B2
Filed 05/22/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for naming, filtering, and recall of remotely monitored event data | ||
Patent #
US 8,666,590 B2
Filed 06/22/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for detecting use of a wireless device while driving | ||
Patent #
US 8,688,180 B2
Filed 08/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for providing a user interface for vehicle monitoring system users and insurers | ||
Patent #
US 8,818,618 B2
Filed 07/17/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for the collection, correlation and use of vehicle collision data | ||
Patent #
US 8,825,277 B2
Filed 06/05/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Vehicle exception event management systems | ||
Patent #
US 8,868,288 B2
Filed 11/09/2006
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Memory management in event recording systems | ||
Patent #
US 8,880,279 B2
Filed 01/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers | ||
Patent #
US 8,892,310 B1
Filed 02/21/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method for detecting use of a wireless device in a moving vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,890,673 B2
Filed 01/24/2011
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring and updating speed-by-street data | ||
Patent #
US 8,890,717 B2
Filed 12/22/2010
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Driver mentoring to improve vehicle operation | ||
Patent #
US 8,892,341 B2
Filed 02/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 8,892,451 B2
Filed 09/14/2012
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
System and method for viewing and correcting data in a street mapping database | ||
Patent #
US 8,963,702 B2
Filed 02/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems | ||
Patent #
US 8,989,959 B2
Filed 11/07/2006
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server | ||
Patent #
US 8,996,240 B2
Filed 03/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method for evaluating driver behavior | ||
Patent #
US 9,067,565 B2
Filed 05/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Vehicle operator and/or occupant information apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 9,075,136 B1
Filed 03/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
NavBlazer LLC
|
Original Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
System and method for providing a user interface for vehicle mentoring system users and insurers | ||
Patent #
US 9,117,246 B2
Filed 02/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
System and method for monitoring and improving driver behavior | ||
Patent #
US 9,129,460 B2
Filed 06/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
OBD based in-vehicle device providing content storage and access | ||
Patent #
US 9,142,065 B2
Filed 10/01/2013
|
Current Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
VEHICLE MONITORING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20150274062A1
Filed 03/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Jet Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Jet Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
|
Wireless device detection using multiple antennas separated by an RF shield | ||
Patent #
US 9,172,477 B2
Filed 02/14/2014
|
Current Assignee
inthinc Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Apparatus for tracking and recording vital signs and task-related information of a vehicle to identify operating patterns | ||
Patent #
US 9,177,426 B2
Filed 12/19/2014
|
Current Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Original Assignee
LeRoy G Hagenbuch
|
Distributed vehicle event recorder systems having a portable memory data transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 9,183,679 B2
Filed 09/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,188,984 B2
Filed 07/30/2014
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Tailgate position detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,199,576 B2
Filed 08/23/2013
|
Current Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Ford Global Technologies LLC
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,201,842 B2
Filed 03/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,208,129 B2
Filed 08/02/2013
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Time window authentication for vehicle telematics device | ||
Patent #
US 9,208,624 B2
Filed 12/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
Memory management in event recording systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,226,004 B1
Filed 11/03/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,400,502 B2
Filed 02/11/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server | ||
Patent #
US 9,402,060 B2
Filed 02/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,411,339 B2
Filed 02/10/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,411,336 B2
Filed 02/19/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,429,955 B2
Filed 02/13/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,442,492 B2
Filed 02/19/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,442,491 B2
Filed 02/12/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,442,486 B2
Filed 02/10/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Communication profile selection for vehicle telematics device | ||
Patent #
US 9,451,028 B2
Filed 08/08/2014
|
Current Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Zubie Inc.
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,459,627 B2
Filed 02/13/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,472,029 B2
Filed 11/17/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods | ||
Patent #
US 9,501,878 B2
Filed 10/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Micro motion warning device with none false alarm systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,522,650 B1
Filed 07/10/2014
|
Current Assignee
Vasil W. Turjancik
|
Original Assignee
Vasil W. Turjancik
|
Control of a personal transporter based on user position | ||
Patent #
US 9,529,365 B2
Filed 02/11/2015
|
Current Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Original Assignee
Deka Products Limited Partnership
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,545,881 B2
Filed 07/13/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Power management systems for automotive video event recorders | ||
Patent #
US 9,554,080 B2
Filed 02/10/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,566,910 B2
Filed 10/30/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers | ||
Patent #
US 9,594,371 B1
Filed 09/15/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle fuel consumption monitor and feedback systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,610,955 B2
Filed 11/11/2013
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Method of analyzing driving behavior and warning the driver | ||
Patent #
US 9,619,203 B2
Filed 02/18/2014
|
Current Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Vehicle event recorder systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,633,318 B2
Filed 12/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 9,652,900 B2
Filed 03/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Jet Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Jet Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
|
Rail vehicle event detection and recording system | ||
Patent #
US 9,663,127 B2
Filed 10/28/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Distributed vehicle event recorder systems having a portable memory data transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 9,679,424 B2
Filed 11/06/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event recorder systems and networks having integrated cellular wireless communications systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,691,195 B2
Filed 10/17/2016
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods | ||
Patent #
US 9,728,228 B2
Filed 08/10/2012
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle exception event management systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,738,156 B2
Filed 10/17/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 9,754,424 B2
Filed 09/14/2012
|
Current Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
|
Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,761,067 B2
Filed 10/30/2014
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method for reducing driving risk with hindsight | ||
Patent #
US 9,836,716 B2
Filed 05/09/2006
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and method for monitoring and updating speed-by-street data | ||
Patent #
US 9,847,021 B2
Filed 10/17/2014
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
inthinc LLC
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 9,865,019 B2
Filed 09/23/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Systems and methods for customizing insurance | ||
Patent #
US 9,875,508 B1
Filed 10/22/2013
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Memory management in event recording systems | ||
Patent #
US 9,911,253 B2
Filed 12/28/2015
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 9,932,033 B2
Filed 06/08/2015
|
Current Assignee
Arity International Limited
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Insurance system for analysis of autonomous driving | ||
Patent #
US 9,940,676 B1
Filed 02/19/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server | ||
Patent #
US 9,942,526 B2
Filed 07/01/2016
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle visual and non-visual data recording system | ||
Patent #
US 9,947,152 B2
Filed 07/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Appy Risk Technologies Limited
|
Original Assignee
Intelligent Mechatronic Systems Inc.
|
System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers | ||
Patent #
US 9,953,470 B1
Filed 02/23/2017
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System for risk mitigation based on road geometry and weather factors | ||
Patent #
US 9,996,883 B2
Filed 03/30/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 10,011,247 B2
Filed 04/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Original Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods | ||
Patent #
US 10,019,858 B2
Filed 11/21/2016
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Electronics for remotely monitoring and controlling a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,023,114 B2
Filed 06/13/2016
|
Current Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,037,579 B2
Filed 04/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Arity International Limited
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,037,578 B2
Filed 04/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,037,580 B2
Filed 08/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Power management systems for automotive video event recorders | ||
Patent #
US 10,053,032 B2
Filed 12/06/2016
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,074,139 B2
Filed 04/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Reward system related to a vehicle-to-vehicle communication system | ||
Patent #
US 10,096,067 B1
Filed 01/24/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Road segment safety rating system | ||
Patent #
US 10,096,038 B2
Filed 02/04/2016
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
System and method for determining driver signatures | ||
Patent #
US 10,134,091 B2
Filed 12/31/2013
|
Current Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Control, monitoring, and/or security apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 10,152,876 B2
Filed 07/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Original Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Road segment safety rating | ||
Patent #
US 10,157,422 B2
Filed 01/28/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Traffic information system | ||
Patent #
US 10,210,772 B2
Filed 04/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Insurance Services Office Incorporated
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,229,462 B2
Filed 08/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
System and method for reducing driving risk with hindsight | ||
Patent #
US 10,235,655 B2
Filed 11/01/2017
|
Current Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lytx Inc.
|
System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers | ||
Patent #
US 10,249,105 B2
Filed 01/25/2018
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Subjective route risk mapping and mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,269,075 B2
Filed 02/02/2016
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Delivery of customized insurance products and services | ||
Patent #
US 10,282,785 B1
Filed 10/21/2011
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle operator performance history recording, scoring and reporting systems | ||
Patent #
US 10,339,732 B2
Filed 07/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle event recorders with integrated web server | ||
Patent #
US 10,404,951 B2
Filed 01/26/2018
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Providing rewards based on driving behaviors detected by a mobile computing device | ||
Patent #
US 10,445,758 B1
Filed 02/24/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle exception event management systems | ||
Patent #
US 10,471,828 B2
Filed 08/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
System and method to detect execution of driving maneuvers | ||
Patent #
US 10,497,187 B2
Filed 02/20/2019
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Vehicle monitoring devices and methods for managing man down signals | ||
Patent #
US 10,522,033 B2
Filed 11/13/2017
|
Current Assignee
Inthinc Technology Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
inthinc LLC
|
Control, monitoring, and/or security, apparatus and method for premises, vehicles, and/or articles | ||
Patent #
US 10,546,441 B2
Filed 05/20/2014
|
Current Assignee
Raymond Anthony Joao
|
Original Assignee
Raymond Anthony Joao
|
Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 10,562,492 B2
Filed 04/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Original Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Insurance system related to a vehicle-to-vehicle communication system | ||
Patent #
US 10,664,918 B1
Filed 07/11/2016
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Power management systems for automotive video event recorders | ||
Patent #
US 10,682,969 B2
Filed 07/12/2018
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Reward system related to a vehicle-to-vehicle communication system | ||
Patent #
US 10,733,673 B1
Filed 05/27/2016
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Reward system related to a vehicle-to-vehicle communication system | ||
Patent #
US 10,740,850 B1
Filed 08/13/2018
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Determining a driver score based on the driver's response to autonomous features of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,783,587 B1
Filed 08/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Determining a property of an insurance policy based on the density of vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 10,783,586 B1
Filed 08/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Electronics for remotely monitoring and controlling a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,787,122 B2
Filed 08/30/2019
|
Current Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Apparatus and method for providing shipment information | ||
Patent #
US 10,796,268 B2
Filed 01/05/2019
|
Current Assignee
Transcend Shipping Systems LLC
|
Original Assignee
GTJ Ventures LLC
|
Determining a property of an insurance policy based on the level of autonomy of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,796,369 B1
Filed 08/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
System and method for determining driver signatures | ||
Patent #
US 10,803,529 B2
Filed 11/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
|
Determining a property of an insurance policy based on the autonomous features of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,803,525 B1
Filed 08/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle event playback apparatus and methods | ||
Patent #
US 10,818,112 B2
Filed 05/02/2018
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Route risk mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,872,380 B2
Filed 11/30/2017
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle event recorder systems | ||
Patent #
US 10,878,646 B2
Filed 12/08/2005
|
Current Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SmartDrive Systems Inc.
|
Insurance product development and maintenance system and method | ||
Patent #
US 10,878,506 B1
Filed 09/30/2014
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Subjective route risk mapping and mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,885,592 B2
Filed 03/06/2019
|
Current Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Company
|
Vehicle data recording system | ||
Patent #
US 5,173,856 A
Filed 10/05/1990
|
Current Assignee
PI RESEARCH LIMITED OAKINGTON HOUSE COLES LANE OAKINGTON CAMBRIDGE CB4 5AF A BRITISH COMPANY
|
Original Assignee
PI RESEARCH LIMITED
|
Information display system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 5,006,829 A
Filed 03/31/1988
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Trip recorder | ||
Patent #
US 4,939,652 A
Filed 03/14/1988
|
Current Assignee
CENTRODYNE INC.
|
Original Assignee
CENTRODYNE INC.
|
Accident data recorder | ||
Patent #
US 4,638,289 A
Filed 10/23/1984
|
Current Assignee
Edmund Zottnik, Klaus F. Kolley
|
Original Assignee
Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbH
|
Device for indication of operational and computed values | ||
Patent #
US 4,344,136 A
Filed 06/20/1980
|
Current Assignee
Daimler-Benz AG
|
Original Assignee
Daimler-Benz AG
|
Excessive speed and theft deterrent system | ||
Patent #
US 4,236,142 A
Filed 01/26/1978
|
Current Assignee
Albert Lindsey
|
Original Assignee
Albert Lindsey
|
Method and device for teaching safe driving | ||
Patent #
US 3,885,324 A
Filed 01/02/1974
|
Current Assignee
Alvan F. Davenport, Jacob H. Wiens, Ralph F. Gerken
|
Original Assignee
Alvan F. Davenport, Jacob H. Wiens, Ralph F. Gerken
|
7 Claims
-
1. An automotive recorder for use with a motor vehicle comprising:
-
one or more sensors adapted to transmit a signal indicative of a safety related vehicle operation variable, one of said one or more sensors being adapted to transmit a signal indicative of vehicle speed; a processor having one or more inputs, a timer, an operator alerting output, and an information output, the one or more processor inputs being coupled responsively to said one or more sensors; an indicator coupled responsively to the operator alerting output of said processor, said indicator being located for easy perception by an operator of the vehicle when the operator alerting output of said processor is energized; and
a storage unit coupled to the information output of said processor, said storage unit being substantially non volatile and adapted to receive and accumulate information transmitted from the information output of said processor for review by a monitoring authority after an operation episode;said processor being adapted to energize the operator alerting output when the signal from one of said sensor exceeds a predetermined value corresponding to a predefined maximum safe vehicle operating condition, the timer being adapted to trigger said processor to automatically and beyond the control of the vehicle operator transmit information from the information output to said storage unit for review by the monitoring authority after the vehicle operation episode when a predetermined time elapses from the time of energization of the operator alerting output and the signal from said sensor has not receded below the predetermined value. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
-
-
7. A method for encouraging safe motor vehicle operation comprising the steps of:
-
equipping a motor vehicle with sensor means for detecting one or more unsafe operation conditions thereof, means responsive to the detection of an unsafe operation condition for indicating to a vehicle operator the existence of said unsafe operation condition, and time delay means for a substantially non volatile storing, beyond the control of the vehicle operator, of information pertaining to the unsafe operation condition if the unsafe operation condition remains uncorrected after indicating the existence thereof to the operator; monitoring the sensor means for the detection of said unsafe operation condition; energizing an indicating means to alert the operator upon detection of said unsafe operation condition; allowing a predetermined period of time for correction of the unsafe operation condition to elapse after energizing the indicating means; automatically storing for review by a monitoring authority after a vehicle operation episode, information pertaining to the unsafe vehicle operation condition, if the detected unsafe operation condition is not corrected during the allowed predetermined period of time after energizing the indicating means.
-
1 Specification
This application is a Continuation of applicant'"'"'s co pending application Ser. No. 07/992,246 filed Dec. 14, 1992, now abandoned.
The present invention relates to warning systems and mobile data recorders, and more particularly, an apparatus and method for the monitoring, indicating and selective recording of automotive data associated with unsafe automotive driving conditions.
Mobile data recorders, such as aviation type flight recorders, are well known. These devices are commonly used to make continuous recordings of the conditions which exist during and relating to aircraft operation. The devices are typically multiple input units wherein a plurality of input signals are recorded. The inputs are usually coupled to a plurality of input signal sending devices, such as sensors for airspeed, landing gear positions, control surface positions, attitude, altitude, engine operating parameters, as well as the positions of the controls for the aircraft such as throttle, brakes, and the like. These devices are typically housed in a crash resistant structure, and upon a crash, the recordings of parameters which existed immediately prior to the crash are preserved for later review and analysis.
This information can be used to virtually recreate situations which have occurred. The information can then be used by repair and maintenance personnel, airline officials for evaluation of the craft and crew, regulatory authorities for incident or crash analysis, and insurance companies for liability and premium determinations.
In an automotive context, devices which identify and alert drivers to the existence of specific conditions are also well known. These are often in the form of simple gauges or indicator lights, buzzers and the like which are used to inform the operator of excessive or insufficient operating parameters, or even potentially unsafe conditions. These include excessive vehicle speed, engine speed and temperature, insufficient coolant, oil and fuel levels, low oil pressure or electrical system voltage, unbuckled seat belts, and the like. More technically sophisticated devices, such as automotive computers, are able to monitor and record diagnostic information for future reference and repair of systems controlled by the computer, such as engines and anti lock brake systems.
While these systems have been designed to notify operators of specific conditions or to record conditions for future reference, it would be desirable to have a variation upon a combination of these systems. Such a device would not only inform operators of unsafe conditions, the recorded information would improve authorities'"'"' ability to perform accident reconstruction, and would enable vehicle owners and insurance companies to evaluate the driving habits of vehicle operators. In such an application, continuous recording of information would be unnecessary and wasteful of storage resources, particularly since it is the information pertaining to the prevalent conditions during unsafe operation of the vehicle which is of most interest.
Unfortunately, an automotive unsafe condition recorder would likely be found objectionable by vehicle owners and drivers, not only because of the increased cost of the vehicle for the additional equipment, but because of the "Big Brother" like nature of having an operator'"'"'s every momentary inattention or indiscretion preserved for insurance company scrutiny.
Many otherwise safe drivers will occasionally do something which could be considered unsafe, such as momentarily forgetting to latch their seat belt, or even exceed the speed limits for short periods of time, for example to complete a passing maneuver, or because they are inattentive to their speedometers while keeping pace with cars around them, or when the road gradually changes to a more downhill attitude. An automotive unsafe condition recorder would more likely be acceptable to the majority of vehicle drivers and owners if these momentary lapses in law obedience or safety could be screened from the recording process. The device would likely be even more acceptable if it would give warning to the operator of the existence of an unsafe condition, and a reasonable opportunity to correct the situation before beginning to record the occurrence.
The benefits of such a device would be multiple. Monitored drivers would be motivated to drive more safely by the reward of lower insurance premiums, which could be lowered further if they prove themselves responsible. Insurance companies could eliminate persistent speeders and unsafe drivers, or increase their premiums accordingly. Authorities could more accurately reconstruct accidents. Fleet owners of vehicles, such as busses, trucks and taxis could substantially reduce their major operating expense of insurance, and become more competitive in the marketplace by offering their services at lower rates. The public would ultimately benefit from lowered prices for taxi and bus services and truck shipped goods, as well as the reduced number of unsafe drivers on the road. People would be able to evaluate the safe driving habits of others using their vehicles, such as parents having young or new drivers in the family.
Accordingly, a need exists for a device which can monitor vehicle operating parameters and alert the operator to predetermined unsafe conditions, allow a short time for correction of those conditions, and if uncorrected in that time, record the incident for later review by the appropriate parties.
It is therefore an object of the instant invention to provide a device which alerts a vehicle operator to the existence of a predefined unsafe driving condition, if and when such a condition should occur.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a device to alert a driver upon the existence of an unsafe driving condition, and to make a recording of the event for future reference if the condition is not corrected within a reasonable time.
Still another object of the present invention to provide a device which will further record additional vehicle operating parameters when an unsafe operating condition has occurred and the operator has not corrected the situation within a reasonable time.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a device by which insurance companies may identify vehicles they insure which are operated under unsafe conditions or at excessive speed with unacceptable frequency.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a device which will motivate drivers to avoid unsafe operating conditions such as unsafe speed.
Yet another object of the present invention to provide a device which enables insurance companies to attract clients whose vehicles are operated in a safe and responsible manner.
A further object of the present invention to provide a device which improves the accuracy with which accidents can be analyzed.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a device which enables the storage and retrieval of information relating to the unsafe operation of a vehicle.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a device which enables vehicle fleet owners to reduce their insurance expenses.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon contemplation of the disclosure herein in conjunction with the drawings.
According to the instant invention, an unsafe driving condition recorder is provided, which comprises a timer equipped processor having one or more information inputs. The processor has an output coupled to an information storage unit, which depending upon its configuration, has means for retrieval of recorded information. The processor inputs are coupled to signal sources which provide signals indicative of monitored vehicle operation variables, at least one of such variables being vehicle speed. The signal input is routed through the processor which is adapted to selectively transmit the information to the storage unit. The processor further has an operator alerting output line coupled to an unsafe condition indicator which is within the easy perception of the vehicle operator. The processor energizes the operator alerting output when the input signal exceeds a predetermined safe value, and upon elapse of a predetermined time, if the input signal has not receded below the predetermined value, initiates accumulation by the storage unit of information pertaining to one or more of the monitored vehicle operating variables for later review and analysis.
In the drawings, wherein the same number indicates the same element throughout the several views:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a basic embodiment of the automotive unsafe condition recorder of the instant invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a basic embodiment of the instant invention.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an embodiment of the instant invention, as equipped with a microcontroller multiple input data acquisition and monitoring unit.
The block diagram of FIG. 1 illustrates a basic embodiment of the unsafe driving condition recorder 10 of the instant invention. The device is intended to be fitted to a vehicle such as an automobile, truck, bus, motorcycle or the like. Therein is at least one sensor or signal generator 12 which generates a signal indicative of vehicle speed. The output signal from speed signal generator 12 may indicate the actual speed of the vehicle, or in simpler configurations, may simply indicate whether the vehicle speed is above or below a predetermined or maximum safe value. A processor 14 is coupled responsively to speed signal generator 12 by means of a line to processor signal input 16. Processor 14 includes clock 18 which provides means for determining elapsed time. In addition, processor 14 has an operator alerting output 20 which is coupled to and adapted to energize indicator 22. Indicator 22 may be a light or a sound emitting device, located for easy perception by the operator of the vehicle when energized. Processor 14 is further provided with an information output 24, which is in turn coupled to a storage unit 26. The storage unit 26 is adapted to accumulate and store for later review and analysis, information pertaining to one or more predefined unsafe driving conditions, which processor 14 is adapted to transfer or transmit. At least one of such unsafe driving conditions is prolonged excessive speed.
It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the above elements may be implemented in a variety of forms, from simple to complex, with corresponding variations in fabrication expense and the amount and detail of information monitored and stored, without departing from the spirit and scope of the instant invention.
Turning now to FIG. 2, a schematic diagram is shown for a very simple and inexpensive embodiment of the instant invention. Speed signal generator 12 of FIG. 1 corresponds to contacts 12a of FIG. 2, which in their most simple form are contemplated as being adapted to be triggered by the position of the vehicle'"'"'s speedometer needle. This can be accomplished by a microswitch, or appropriate well known circuitry in conjunction with optical, magnetic or capacitive sensors. The contacts 12a provide a voltage level to the circuitry of recorder 10 whenever the needle passes a predetermined location. This location would correspond to a particular speed, for example, the most common speed limit, or the maximum national speed limit, that is, 55 M.P.H. or 65 M.P.H., respectively. To reduce the potential for defeating the function of the instant invention, components thereof not necessarily located elsewhere should be within an enclosure which is tamper resistant or tamper evident, or both. Power source 28 for operating the circuitry of the instant invention may be independent, or shared from the vehicle battery. In such an embodiment, processor 14 inexpensively takes the form of a time delay relay 14a, in turn coupled to selectively enable counting by elapsed timer 26a, which corresponds to storage unit 26 of FIG. 1. Depending upon the construction of time delay relay 14a chosen, the mechanism or circuitry providing for the delay in the relay corresponds to timer 18 of FIG. 1. The circuit of FIG. 2 employs a simple lamp 22a in view of the driver as indicator 22 of FIG. 1, such that processor input 16 is the same node as operator alerting output 20.
Thus in this simple embodiment, only prolonged excessive speed is contemplated as the unsafe driving condition to be monitored, and cumulative elapsed time above the predefined maximum safe speed is the operating parameter or variable to be stored. In operation, as the vehicle exceeds the predetermined speed, the speedometer needle position triggers closure of contacts 12a, simultaneously energizing the coil of relay 14a and operator alerting output 20a. Alerting output 20a causes indicator lamp 22a to light, warning of the unsafe driving condition and calling the operator'"'"'s attention to the impending memorialization of the event. If the operator corrects the unsafe driving condition before elapse of the delay time of relay 14a, in this case by slowing down, the operator'"'"'s momentary indiscretion or inattention will be, in effect, forgiven. Conversely, if the operator does not reduce the vehicle speed sufficiently before expiration of the delay time of relay 14a, the contacts of relay 14a will close, energizing output 24a, causing elapsed timer 26a to begin accumulating time until the vehicle speed is sufficiently reduced.
Relay 14a is selected according to the delay desired between the time the relay coil is energized and the time the contacts of relay 14a close, and is contemplated to give the operator a reasonable opportunity to correct the vehicle'"'"'s speed, or complete a passing maneuver. Relays having delay times between ten seconds and two minutes are at the time of this writing deemed to be most useful and appropriate, although these values may be further varied according to the application.
The delay between the time of onset of this predefined unsafe condition and initiation of information accumulation constitutes a "grace period" within which a vehicle operator can correct the condition. The consequences of this grace period is to give the vehicle operator control of accumulation of information, so as to minimize the "Big Brother" effect that many drivers would likely find objectionable. In fact, such a system may even be deemed desirable by many drivers, insofar as they will be alerted to circumstances which would subject them to traffic summonses if observed by police.
Additional contact sets 12a may be integrated in the device to be triggered at progressively higher speeds, which would in turn, trigger additional time delay relays having delay times of progressively shorter durations, thus giving lesser grace periods for increasingly unsafe conditions. Accordingly, additional operator alerting outputs and indicators may be used to indicate the varying seriousness of the unsafe condition.
Turning now to FIG. 3, a more complex embodiment of the instant invention is shown, which utilizes microprocessor 14b. While an equivalent device to that of FIG. 3 may also be fashioned from discrete circuit elements, the use of a microprocessor is deemed desirable at the time of this writing, because these microprocessors have recently become increasingly sophisticated and reliable, as well as inexpensive and plentiful. Not only do these processors comprise microprocessors, but within the same integrated circuit, they may also comprise analog to digital input converters, serial and parallel input and output channels, read only memory, and random access memory. Because of their greatly expanded abilities, these types of microprocessors are commonly referred to as microcontrollers, and this is the type of device which is contemplated by FIG. 3.
In the diagram of FIG. 3, the processor has an input and output signal interface, which is shown as sub block 30 of processor 14b. Input and output interface 30 provides for the input of information to processor 14b from input signal generators 12b, via input lines 16b. I/O interface 30 also provides for the output of information from processor 14b to output indicators 22b and storage unit 26b. Interface 30 should also provide for connection and communication with optional external terminal 36, whereby stored information may be retrieved from storage unit 26b, via terminal I/O line 38. In such a case, information line 24b would be bidirectional, although alternative provisions may be made for connection of terminal 36 directly to storage unit 26b.
Consequently, multiple input signal generators 12b of varying output signal type are shown coupled to processor 14b, via input lines 16b, so that multiple vehicle operating variables may be monitored. Thus, according to the programming stored in the ROM 32, a variety of unsafe vehicle operating conditions may be predefined and simultaneously monitored for their occurrence. As above, should a predefined unsafe condition occur, an appropriate output indicator 22b will then be energized via its corresponding output line 20b for a predetermined grace period. Again, if the unsafe condition is not corrected before elapse of the grace period, information pertaining to the occurrence will be transferred to storage unit 26b.
A variety of methods for determining vehicle speed may be chosen from. For example, a signal may be taken from a signal generator or source already existing in the vehicle, such as digital or electronic speedometers, or wheel speed sensor systems in anti lock brake equipped vehicles. Alternatively, vehicles may be retrofitted with components from such systems which generate such signals, or with other well known magnetic or optical sensors in conjunction with pulse generating rings installed on driveline or other components which rotate at a rate proportional to vehicle speed. Examples of such driveline components include the transmission tailshaft, driveshaft, axle, transaxle, road wheels, brake rotors or drums, or the like. In the case of retrofitted vehicle speed sensors, these can be easily calibrated by motoring the wheels at a known circumferential speed.
Ideally, using multiple speed sensors 12b1, the speed of each of the vehicle'"'"'s wheels would be monitored in the same manner as traction control systems and antilock brake systems, so that detection of gross speed variation between wheels is enabled, which in turn, would correspond to conditions of extreme braking or acceleration. These may constitute additional unsafe conditions to be monitored, and recorded if uncorrected after warning the operator of their existence.
As mentioned above, when the instant invention is equipped with microcontroller type processor 14b, monitoring of multiple channels of input information from multiple signal generators 12b is possible, and an increased number of unsafe driving conditions may be predefined and detected. In this example, input signal generators include G force transmitters 12b3, such as laterally or longitudinally oriented accelerometers, or both, so that the system can detect and alert the operator to conditions approaching those where the vehicle'"'"'s tires would be pushed beyond their limits of adhesion, and a vehicle slide, skid, or other loss of control would result. Again, varying degrees of unsafe driving conditions may be predefined in terms of acceleration forces, either alone or in conjunction with other operating parameters, and correspondingly varying grace periods and warning scenarios implemented before initiating storage of the monitored vehicle operation variables. Furthermore, since most vehicles cannot attain forces above 1 g under their own power, under normal driving conditions, a signal level above such a magnitude would indicate external origin of the forces, i.e. collision.
Also included in the embodiment shown in FIG. 3 are distance signal transmitters 12b2, which may take the form ultrasonic ranging and proximity detecting devices, directed outwardly and located around the vehicle to monitor the distance to surrounding objects or vehicles, and when monitored in conjunction with speed, to indicate tailgating. Again, according to the speeds or accelerations and distances sensed, varying degrees of tailgating or unsafe proximity may be established, and correspondingly varying grace periods implemented.
The embodiment of FIG. 3 also ideally includes input signal generator 12b4, which indicates active usage of one or more items of the vehicle'"'"'s equipment. Such monitored equipment may include seat belts, windshield wipers, headlights, steering wheel position, throttle position, directional indicators, and the like. Information thereby provided may be merely be used for storage upon the uncorrected occurrence of an unsafe condition, or these variables may be used in conjunction with additional programming in ROM 32 and input signal generators 12b such as ambient light and or moisture detectors to define additional unsafe conditions, such as operation in darkness without headlights, operation in precipitation without wipers, and the like. The input sensors used to detect such conditions would include photocells for ambient light detection, moisture sensors such as those from automatic sprinkler systems to detect precipitation, feedback potentiometers for vehicle component positions, or mere connection to existing vehicular circuitry to indicate use status of items such as headlights, wipers, seat belts, and the like.
Since the embodiment of FIG. 3 is able to monitor a variety of operating parameters for detection of more than one predefined unsafe driving conditions, it is equipped with multiple indicators 22b, coupled to alerting outputs 20b, each indicating a different unsafe driving condition or necessary corrective action, so that the vehicle operator is alerted to both the existence of an unsafe driving condition, and the nature of the unsafe condition so that it may be identified and corrected more quickly by the vehicle operator. Legends may be placed over indicators 22b to better implement this where they take the form of indicator lamps. Where the implementation of the instant invention provides for varying grace periods, the period may also be communicated to the driver by pulsing of indicators 22b, varying the frequency of the pulsing, for example, increasingly faster pulsing indicating increasingly less grace period remaining.
It should be noted that recorder 10 of FIG. 3 may employ more or less than four input signal generators and indicators, and that four has been chosen as an illustrative number only.
An additional advantage of the microcontroller equipped embodiment of FIG. 3 is the inclusion of random access memory 34, which can be used as a buffer for temporary storage of monitored input information, thus creating a short vehicle operation history. This, in conjunction with the multiple input capacity of the device, can be used to monitor one or more additional input signals or combinations thereof which would correspond to the actual occurrence of a catastrophic event such as a crash. A crash or collision can be detected as described above using G force sensors, or by coupling an input channel to airbag deployment circuitry found in many new vehicles. Alternatively, relatively severe collisions can be detected by devices such as microswitches or fragile conductive tape strips, disposed across adjacent body or structural components of the vehicle, so that changed continuity of the device would indicate changed alignment of the vehicle structure, and thus the occurrence of a collision.
Upon the occurrence and detection of such a catastrophic event, the operation history stored in RAM 34 would be transferred to storage unit 26b so that the operating variables in the time period before occurrence of the catastrophic event would be memorialized for crash analysis and accident reconstruction and liability determination, in much the same way as an aircraft flight recorder. This should be distinguished from normal recording operation of the instant invention, where only the input conditions during the uncorrected unsafe driving condition, and perhaps a time and date stamp, would be recorded. Accordingly, the storage unit 26b, which is coupled to processor 14b via line 24b, may take the form of a magnetic or optical disk drive, tape, or card, or non volatile integrated circuit memory, the latter being deemed preferable at the time of this writing for lack of moving parts more subject to failure from the vibrations associated with an automotive environment. Information stored therein may be retrieved by removal of the storage unit or its media, or alternatively by a data terminal connected via cable to the input output interface 30 of processor 14b.
The enhanced embodiment shown in FIG. 3 can be equipped for the monitoring of different or additional operating variables and input sensors contemplated for monitoring with the instant invention. These may also include vehicle pitch to indicate vehicle overloading or inadequate or failing suspension components.
Consequently, it will be clear to those of skill in the art that while primary function of the instant invention is the monitoring of vehicle operating variables for detection of one or more unsafe operating conditions, alerting the operator to the existence of the unsafe condition, and storage for later review of information pertaining to the unsafe condition if not corrected in a reasonable time, it is also useful for numerous applications in addition to the primary use, which include crash analysis and reconstruction, driving habit analysis, and vehicle structure analysis. Accordingly, while the above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations of the scope of the instant invention, but rather as exemplifications of the preferred embodiments thereof. Thus, the scope of the instant invention should not be determined by the embodiments shown, but rather by the claims appended hereto, and their legal equivalents.