Method for classifying vehicles passing a predetermined waypoint

• US 5,446,291 A
• Filed: 02/09/1994
• Issued: 08/29/1995
• Est. Priority Date: 02/15/1993
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Atlas Elektronik GmbH (Thyssenkrupp AG)
• Original Assignee: Atlas Elektronik GmbH (Thyssenkrupp AG)
• Inventors: Becker, Gunnar, Klemp, Jurgen, Tummoscheit, Gunter, Gudesen, Alwin, Borsken, Norbert, Vilmar, Gordian
• Primary Examiner(s): Nelms, David C.
• Assistant Examiner(s): NICHOLS, STEVEN
• Application Number:
  US08/193,846
• Time in Patent Office: 566 Days
• Field of Search: 250/560, 340/942, 382/30, 356/376, 356/384, 356/385, 356/386, 356/387
• US Class Current: 250/559.24
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/015 with provision for distinguishing between two or more types of vehicles, e.g. between motor-cars and cycles

Abstract

A method for classifying vehicles passing a predetermined waypoint, for a refined classification within specific vehicle categories such as tracked or wheeled vehicle categories, where the distance to the vehicle passing the waypoint is continuously actively optically measured along a measuring line extending through the waypoint, from a fixed measuring location disposed transversely on the side of the road, and the speed of the vehicle passing the waypoint is additionally measured. The spatial distance between the measured values in the direction of the longitudinal axis of the vehicle is determined from the vehicle speed and the measuring frequency, and a measurement profile of the undercarriage of the vehicle is created by plotting the measured values spaced at the specific spatial distance in the direction of the longitudinal axis. The measurement profile is compared, either indirectly by the derivation of undercarriage parameters, such as number of axles, axle spacing and wheel diameter, or directly with known reference vehicles. The vehicle is classified as that reference vehicle for which the coincidence or correlation is the greatest.

Claims

1. A method for classifying a vehicle passing a predetermined waypoint on a road, comprising the steps of:

measuring, at a measuring frequency (F), successive measured distance values from a measuring location on a side of the road, along a fixed measuring line extending through the waypoint and across the road, to the undercarriage of the vehicle passing the waypoint;

measuring a speed (v) of the vehicle passing the waypoint;

determining a spatial distance (Δ

L), between adjacent measured distance values along a longitudinal axis of the vehicle, from said speed (v) and said measuring frequency (F);

creating a measurement profile for the undercarriage of the vehicle, with said measurement profile having a series of said successive measured distance values spaced at said spacial distance (Δ

L); and

comparing said measurement profile to reference data of known reference vehicles to classify the vehicle passing the predetermined waypoint.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein said step of comparing said measurement profile to reference data of known reference vehicles includes:

deriving undercarriage parameters for the vehicle from said measurement profile; and

comparing said undercarriage parameters for the vehicle to corresponding reference undercarriage parameters for each known reference vehicle.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein said step of deriving undercarriage parameters includes defining section lengths, each section length (I) being defined by adding said spatial distances (Δ

L) for adjacent measured distance values having substantially the same magnitude, and determining a respective position of each section length (I).

4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the number of wheels of the vehicle is one of said undercarriage parameters.

5. A method according to claim 3, wherein axle spacings between wheel axles of the vehicle are one of said undercarriage parameters.

6. A method according to claim 3, wherein diameters of wheels of the vehicle are one of said undercarriage parameters.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein said step of deriving undercarriage parameters further includes calculating a respective wheel diameter (R) for each wheel according to the following equation:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">R=D+I.sup.2 /4D

where D is a distance of said measuring line above the road surface.

8. A method according to claim 7, wherein said step of deriving undercarriage parameters further includes generating a respective allowed wheel diameter equal to said respective calculated wheel diameter (R) for each wheel only if the following relation is true:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">D/2<

R<

3m.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein said step of deriving undercarriage parameters further includes determining respective spacing between each wheel axle of the vehicle from said positions of section lengths (I) corresponding to said respective allowed wheel diameters.

10. A method according to claim 2, wherein said step of comparing said undercarriage parameters for the vehicle to corresponding reference undercarriage parameters for each known reference vehicle includes identifying the vehicle based on the greatest coincidence between said undercarriage parameters for the vehicle and said corresponding reference undercarriage parameters.

11. A method according to claim 1, further comprising a step of generating respective simulated undercarriage profiles for each known reference vehicle from respective reference undercarriage parameters for each known reference vehicle and a measuring height (D) of said fixed measuring line above the road surface;

wherein said step of comparing said measurement profile to reference data of known reference vehicles includes correlating said measurement profile for the undercarriage of the vehicle to said respective simulated undercarriage profiles for each known reference vehicle; and

further comprising a step of identifying the vehicle based on the greatest correlation between said measurement profile for the undercarriage of the vehicle and said respective simulated undercarriage profiles for each known reference vehicle.

12. A method according to claim 1, wherein said fixed measuring line is oriented substantially horizontally and at a right angle to a driving direction of the vehicle, and is located at a measuring height (D) above the road surface.

13. A method according to claim 12, wherein said measuring height (D) is small relative to the radius of a wheel of a vehicle to be classified.

14. A method according to claim 12, wherein said measuring height (D) is approximately 20 cm.

15. A method according to claim 1, wherein said step of measuring said successive measured distance values is performed by an active optical measuring device.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein said active optical measuring device is an infrared laser distance-measuring device having a laser emitter that emits a sharply focused light beam, a receiver that receives a reflection of said sharply focused light beam from the undercarriage of the vehicle and an evaluation unit that calculates the distance to the vehicle from a time difference between the time said light beam is emitted and the time said reflection of said light beam is received.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said light beam emitted by said laser emitter and said reflection of said light beam received by the receiver are emitted and received via an optical system installed at the edge of the road at a measuring height (D) above the road surface, said optical system having an entrance pupil and an exit pupil and being connected via at least one fiber-optic cable to said laser emitter and said receiver.

18. A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of detecting the vehicle, before the vehicle passes the waypoint, to activate a distance-measuring device.

19. A method according to claim 1, wherein said step of determining said spatial distance (Δ

L) is performed according to the following equation;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Δ

L=v/F.