Electronic battery tester with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge
First Claim
1. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic conductance and an open-circuit voltage comprising:
- means operably connected to said cell or battery for detecting said dynamic conductance and for generating a signal proportional thereto;
means operably connected to said cell or battery for sensing said open-circuit voltage;
correction means coupled to said means for detecting said dynamic conductance and directly electrically coupled to said means for sensing said open-circuit voltage, said correction means for responding to said open-circuit voltage by adjusting the level of said signal in accordance with said open-circuit voltage; and
,means for displaying an assessment of said cell or battery in accordance with the adjusted level of said signal.
0 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
Three embodiments of an improved electronic device for testing or monitoring storage batteries that may be only partially charged are disclosed. The device determines the battery'"'"'s small-signal dynamic conductance in order to provide either a proportional numerical readout, displayed in appropriate battery measuring units, or a corresponding qualitative assessment of the battery'"'"'s relative condition based upon its dynamic conductance and electrical rating. Without additional user intervention, the device also determines the battery'"'"'s terminal voltage in an essentially unloaded condition and utilizes this information to automatically correct the measured dynamic conductance. By virtue of this automatic correction, the quantitative or qualitative information displayed to the user conforms with that of a fully-charged battery even though the battery may, in actual fact, be only partially charged. If the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is too low for an accurate assessment to be made, no information is displayed. Instead, an indication is made to the user that the battery must be recharged before testing.
198 Citations
Method and apparatus for monitoring the condition of a battery by measuring its internal resistance | ||
Patent #
US 7,902,828 B2
Filed 11/20/2007
|
Current Assignee
Yung-Sung Huang
|
Original Assignee
BP Power
|
Automotive vehicle battery test system | ||
Patent #
US 7,924,015 B2
Filed 05/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester with promotion feature | ||
Patent #
US 7,940,053 B2
Filed 05/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Interstate Battery Systems Of America Incorporated, Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Interstate Battery Systems Of America Incorporated, Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery test based upon battery requirements | ||
Patent #
US 7,940,052 B2
Filed 02/02/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery performance monitor | ||
Patent #
US 7,928,735 B2
Filed 02/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Battery Technology Holdings LLC
|
Original Assignee
Andrew F Kallfelz, Yung-Sheng Huang
|
In-vehicle battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 7,999,505 B2
Filed 10/05/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery maintenance tool with probe light | ||
Patent #
US 7,977,914 B2
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester with promotion feature to promote use of the battery tester by providing the user with codes having redeemable value | ||
Patent #
US 7,791,348 B2
Filed 02/27/2007
|
Current Assignee
Interstate Battery Systems Of America Incorporated, Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Energy management system for automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,688,074 B2
Filed 06/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Wireless battery tester with information encryption means | ||
Patent #
US 7,772,850 B2
Filed 07/11/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with vehicle type input | ||
Patent #
US 7,656,162 B2
Filed 07/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with databus | ||
Patent #
US 7,728,597 B2
Filed 11/03/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester that calculates its own reference values | ||
Patent #
US 7,710,119 B2
Filed 12/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive vehicle electrical system diagnostic device | ||
Patent #
US 7,642,787 B2
Filed 10/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive vehicle electrical system diagnostic device | ||
Patent #
US 7,705,602 B2
Filed 08/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester capable of identifying faulty battery post adapters | ||
Patent #
US 7,642,786 B2
Filed 05/31/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Alternator tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,706,991 B2
Filed 06/11/2007
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester configured to predict a load test result based on open circuit voltage, temperature, cranking size rating, and a dynamic parameter | ||
Patent #
US 7,723,993 B2
Filed 09/02/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Wireless battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 7,774,151 B2
Filed 12/21/2004
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Theft prevention device for automotive vehicle service centers | ||
Patent #
US 7,777,612 B2
Filed 08/03/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery run down indicator | ||
Patent #
US 7,808,375 B2
Filed 04/09/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for counteracting self discharge in a storage battery | ||
Patent #
US 7,479,763 B2
Filed 03/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery charger with booster pack | ||
Patent #
US 7,501,795 B2
Filed 06/03/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Centralized data storage of condition of a storage battery at its point of sale | ||
Patent #
US 7,498,767 B2
Filed 02/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
Interstate Battery Systems International Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery test module | ||
Patent #
US 7,505,856 B2
Filed 06/02/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for predicting battery capacity and fitness for service from a battery dynamic parameter and a recovery voltage differential | ||
Patent #
US 7,545,146 B2
Filed 12/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,557,586 B1
Filed 05/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for simulating a battery tester with a fixed resistance load | ||
Patent #
US 7,595,643 B2
Filed 08/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Replaceable clamp for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,598,699 B2
Filed 02/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Scan tool for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,598,744 B2
Filed 06/07/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery maintenance device having databus connection | ||
Patent #
US 7,598,743 B2
Filed 02/22/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 7,619,417 B2
Filed 12/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Shunt connection to a PCB of an energy management system employed in an automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,319,304 B2
Filed 07/23/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Query based electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,363,175 B2
Filed 04/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery testers with secondary functionality | ||
Patent #
US 7,398,176 B2
Filed 02/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester having a user interface to configure a printer | ||
Patent #
US 7,408,358 B2
Filed 06/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Broad-band low-inductance cables for making Kelvin connections to electrochemical cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 7,425,833 B2
Filed 09/12/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Scan tool for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,446,536 B2
Filed 10/05/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Kelvin connector for a battery post | ||
Patent #
US 7,198,510 B2
Filed 11/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for predicting the remaining discharge time of a battery | ||
Patent #
US 7,208,914 B2
Filed 12/30/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for monitoring the condition of a battery by measuring its internal resistance | ||
Patent #
US 7,212,006 B2
Filed 07/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
BP Power
|
Original Assignee
BP Power
|
Alternator tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,246,015 B2
Filed 06/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with relative test output | ||
Patent #
US 7,295,936 B2
Filed 02/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
MINIATURIZED BATTERY TESTER | ||
Patent #
US 20070279066A1
Filed 03/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Stan Chism
|
Original Assignee
Stan Chism
|
Testing parallel strings of storage batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,316,914 B1
Filed 09/14/2000
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Test counter for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,225,808 B1
Filed 02/25/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester upgrade using software key | ||
Patent #
US 7,012,433 B2
Filed 09/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive vehicle electrical system diagnostic device | ||
Patent #
US 7,126,341 B2
Filed 07/19/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus for calibrating electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,304,087 B1
Filed 09/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Cable for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,913,483 B2
Filed 06/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Theft prevention device for automotive vehicle service centers | ||
Patent #
US 7,119,686 B2
Filed 04/13/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,172,505 B1
Filed 03/09/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Query based electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 7,034,541 B2
Filed 05/17/2005
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,332,113 B1
Filed 05/03/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Programmable current exciter for measuring AC immittance of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,466,026 B1
Filed 10/12/2001
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Method and apparatus for evaluating stored charge in an electrochemical cell or battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,495,990 B2
Filed 08/27/2001
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Method and apparatus for auditing a battery test | ||
Patent #
US 6,885,195 B2
Filed 03/14/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electrical connection for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,163,156 A
Filed 11/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for auditing a battery test | ||
Patent #
US 6,091,245 A
Filed 10/25/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester cable | ||
Patent #
US 6,933,727 B2
Filed 06/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive battery charging system tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,351,102 B1
Filed 04/16/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery test module | ||
Patent #
US 7,058,525 B2
Filed 08/13/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for charging a battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,313,608 B1
Filed 05/22/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
In-vehicle battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 6,850,037 B2
Filed 10/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with automotive scan tool communication | ||
Patent #
US 6,967,484 B2
Filed 06/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester/charger with integrated battery cell temperature measurement device | ||
Patent #
US 6,919,725 B2
Filed 10/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Integrated conductance and load test based electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,456,045 B1
Filed 05/30/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Alternator tester with encoded output | ||
Patent #
US 6,914,413 B2
Filed 09/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for protecting a battery from overdischarge | ||
Patent #
US 6,888,468 B2
Filed 01/22/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery clamp with integrated current sensor | ||
Patent #
US 6,544,078 B2
Filed 07/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,781,382 B2
Filed 12/05/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring complex admittance of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,262,563 B1
Filed 02/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electronic battery tester with internal battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,249,124 B1
Filed 11/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester with databus | ||
Patent #
US 6,586,941 B2
Filed 03/23/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with data bus for removable module | ||
Patent #
US 6,998,847 B2
Filed 07/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for charging a battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,104,167 A
Filed 10/08/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for determining battery properties from complex impedance/admittance | ||
Patent #
US 6,222,369 B1
Filed 01/26/2000
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Vehicle electrical system tester with encoded output | ||
Patent #
US 6,445,158 B1
Filed 05/22/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester configured to receive a removable digital module | ||
Patent #
US 6,759,849 B2
Filed 10/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for electronically evaluating the internal temperature of an electrochemical cell or battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,294,897 B1
Filed 10/18/2000
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system | ||
Patent #
US 7,154,276 B2
Filed 09/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Energy management system for automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 6,909,287 B2
Filed 10/29/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery clamp with embedded environment sensor | ||
Patent #
US 6,469,511 B1
Filed 07/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,359,441 B1
Filed 04/28/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with network communication | ||
Patent #
US 6,871,151 B2
Filed 03/07/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,556,019 B2
Filed 03/19/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for evaluating stored charge in an electrochemical cell or battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,313,607 B1
Filed 09/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Booster pack with storage capacitor | ||
Patent #
US 7,015,674 B2
Filed 03/28/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring complex impedance of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,172,483 B1
Filed 12/03/1999
|
Current Assignee
Emerson Electric Company
|
Original Assignee
Emerson Electric Company
|
Programmable current exciter for measuring AC immittance of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,621,272 B2
Filed 10/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Apparatus and method for testing rechargeable energy storage batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,441,585 B1
Filed 06/15/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,707,303 B2
Filed 11/26/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,806,716 B2
Filed 01/29/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Jamey Butteris, Kevin I. Bertness
|
Energy management system for automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 6,331,762 B1
Filed 05/04/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,310,481 B2
Filed 03/26/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus using a circuit model to evaluate cell/battery parameters | ||
Patent #
US 6,737,831 B2
Filed 02/08/2002
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Battery test module | ||
Patent #
US 7,039,533 B2
Filed 12/05/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Alternator diagnostic system | ||
Patent #
US 6,363,303 B1
Filed 11/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring complex self-immitance of a general electrical element | ||
Patent #
US 6,294,896 B1
Filed 11/10/2000
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Apparatus and method for simulating a battery tester with a fixed resistance load | ||
Patent #
US 7,116,109 B2
Filed 11/11/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester with battery replacement output | ||
Patent #
US 6,906,522 B2
Filed 03/29/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
In-vehicle battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 6,633,165 B2
Filed 09/20/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery charger with booster pack | ||
Patent #
US 6,788,025 B2
Filed 06/21/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,891,378 B2
Filed 03/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Broad-band low-inductance cables for making Kelvin connections to electrochemical cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 7,106,070 B2
Filed 07/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,566,883 B1
Filed 10/31/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery test module | ||
Patent #
US 6,795,782 B2
Filed 12/05/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for testing cells and batteries embedded in series/parallel systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,906,523 B2
Filed 04/09/2002
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with battery failure temperature determination | ||
Patent #
US 6,930,485 B2
Filed 03/14/2003
|
Current Assignee
Interstate Battery Systems International Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with network communication | ||
Patent #
US 7,003,411 B2
Filed 08/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for carrying out diagnostic tests on batteries and for rapidly charging batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,424,158 B2
Filed 07/10/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with relative test output | ||
Patent #
US 7,003,410 B2
Filed 06/17/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester capable of predicting a discharge voltage/discharge current of a battery | ||
Patent #
US 7,081,755 B2
Filed 09/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for charging a battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,329,793 B1
Filed 05/22/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,392,414 B2
Filed 06/07/2001
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Query based electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,941,234 B2
Filed 09/30/2003
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Suppressing interference in AC measurements of cells, batteries and other electrical elements | ||
Patent #
US 6,417,669 B1
Filed 06/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,323,650 B1
Filed 04/07/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery charge control device | ||
Patent #
US 6,696,819 B2
Filed 01/08/2002
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for electronically evaluating the internal temperature of an electrochemical cell or battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,137,269 A
Filed 09/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Alternator tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,466,025 B1
Filed 01/13/2000
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method of monitoring motor vehicle's electric power by comparing internal resistance of battery with a predeterminated warning resistance thereof and apparatus therefor | ||
Patent #
US 20060001429A1
Filed 07/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
BP Power
|
Original Assignee
BP Power
|
Method of detecting and resolving memory effect | ||
Patent #
US 6,700,383 B2
Filed 06/17/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
Electronic battery condition tester | ||
Patent #
US 20040100266A1
Filed 11/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Elliot T. Gerard
|
Original Assignee
Leonard N. Liebermann, Elliot T. Gerard
|
Electronic battery condition tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,768,309 B2
Filed 11/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Elliot T. Gerard
|
Original Assignee
Leonard N. Liebermann, Elliot T. Gerard
|
Battery control method for hybrid vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 6,608,482 B2
Filed 02/12/2002
|
Current Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., DENSO Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., DENSO Corporation
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 6,369,577 B1
Filed 03/02/2001
|
Current Assignee
DHC Specialty Corp.
|
Original Assignee
DHC Specialty Corp.
|
Method of detecting and resolving memory effect | ||
Patent #
US 20020195999A1
Filed 06/17/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
Apparatus for use in a DMM for measuring the battery voltage of the DMM | ||
Patent #
US 6,242,920 B1
Filed 09/18/1998
|
Current Assignee
Tektronix Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Tektronix Incorporated
|
Method of calculating dynamic state-of-charge within a battery | ||
Patent #
US 6,300,763 B1
Filed 11/27/2000
|
Current Assignee
Johnson Controls Technology Company
|
Original Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.
|
Electronic battery testing device and method for testing batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,037,778 A
Filed 11/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
SPX Corporation
|
Original Assignee
STAT ENGINEERING COMPANY L.L.C.
|
Method and apparatus for determining battery properties from complex impedance/admittance | ||
Patent #
US 6,037,777 A
Filed 09/11/1998
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 5,914,605 A
Filed 01/12/1998
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring complex impedance of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 6,002,238 A
Filed 09/11/1998
|
Current Assignee
Emerson Electric Company
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Method and apparatus for detecting a bad cell in a storage battery | ||
Patent #
US 5,757,192 A
Filed 05/20/1996
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery impedance monitor | ||
Patent #
US 5,773,978 A
Filed 10/25/1996
|
Current Assignee
Snap-On Technologies Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Snap-On Technologies Incorporated
|
Battery tester for JIS Standard | ||
Patent #
US 5,831,435 A
Filed 04/16/1997
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
BATTERY CAPACITY TEST APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20120049853A1
Filed 12/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Hong Fu Jin Precision Industry Shenzhen Co. Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Hong Fu Jin Precision Industry Shenzhen Co. Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. Ltd.
|
Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system | ||
Patent #
US 8,164,343 B2
Filed 10/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive battery charging system tester | ||
Patent #
US 8,198,900 B2
Filed 03/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery testers with secondary functionality | ||
Patent #
US 8,237,448 B2
Filed 07/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester for electric vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,306,690 B2
Filed 07/17/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
System for automatically gathering battery information | ||
Patent #
US 8,344,685 B2
Filed 04/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
BATTERY TESTERS WITH SECONDARY FUNCTIONALITY | ||
Patent #
US 20130090870A1
Filed 08/06/2012
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Kevin I. Bertness
|
Integrated tag reader and environment sensor | ||
Patent #
US 8,436,619 B2
Filed 04/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Simplification of inventory management | ||
Patent #
US 8,442,877 B2
Filed 04/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive vehicle electrical system diagnostic device | ||
Patent #
US 8,493,022 B2
Filed 04/22/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester or charger with databus connection | ||
Patent #
US 8,513,949 B2
Filed 09/04/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
In-vehicle battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 8,674,654 B2
Filed 08/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system | ||
Patent #
US 8,674,711 B2
Filed 12/19/2006
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
System for automatically gathering battery information | ||
Patent #
US 8,704,483 B2
Filed 11/28/2012
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Storage battery and battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 8,203,345 B2
Filed 12/04/2008
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery pack maintenance for electric vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 8,738,309 B2
Filed 09/30/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 8,754,653 B2
Filed 07/07/2009
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester mounted in a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,872,516 B2
Filed 02/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with battery age input | ||
Patent #
US 8,872,517 B2
Filed 03/15/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester with network communication | ||
Patent #
US 8,958,998 B2
Filed 04/12/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
System for automatically gathering battery information | ||
Patent #
US 8,963,550 B2
Filed 10/11/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system | ||
Patent #
US 9,018,958 B2
Filed 10/19/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery testers with secondary functionality | ||
Patent #
US 9,052,366 B2
Filed 08/06/2012
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic battery tester for testing storage battery | ||
Patent #
US 9,201,120 B2
Filed 08/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic storage battery diagnostic system | ||
Patent #
US 9,229,062 B2
Filed 05/23/2011
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Current clamp with jaw closure detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,244,100 B2
Filed 03/11/2014
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system | ||
Patent #
US 9,255,955 B2
Filed 05/02/2011
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester for electric vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,274,157 B2
Filed 09/23/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery testing system and method | ||
Patent #
US 9,312,575 B2
Filed 05/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery tester for electric vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,335,362 B2
Filed 11/05/2012
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery maintenance device with thermal buffer | ||
Patent #
US 9,419,311 B2
Filed 06/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Monitor for front terminal batteries | ||
Patent #
US 9,425,487 B2
Filed 03/01/2011
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
System for automatically gathering battery information | ||
Patent #
US 9,496,720 B2
Filed 01/24/2012
|
Current Assignee
Franklin Grid Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for detecting cell deterioration in an electrochemical cell or battery | ||
Patent #
US 9,588,185 B2
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Suppressing HF cable oscillations during dynamic measurements of cells and batteries | ||
Patent #
US 9,851,411 B2
Filed 03/12/2013
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Battery clamp with endoskeleton design | ||
Patent #
US 9,923,289 B2
Filed 01/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Kelvin connector adapter for storage battery | ||
Patent #
US 9,966,676 B2
Filed 09/27/2016
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Hybrid and electric vehicle battery pack maintenance device | ||
Patent #
US 10,046,649 B2
Filed 03/14/2013
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Systems and methods for determining vehicle battery health | ||
Patent #
US 10,197,631 B2
Filed 06/01/2015
|
Current Assignee
Verizon Patent and Licensing Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Verizon Patent and Licensing Incorporated
|
Cable connector for electronic battery tester | ||
Patent #
US 10,222,397 B2
Filed 09/22/2015
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Alternator tester | ||
Patent #
US 10,317,468 B2
Filed 01/26/2016
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery pack tester | ||
Patent #
US 10,429,449 B2
Filed 11/08/2012
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Automotive maintenance system | ||
Patent #
US 10,473,555 B2
Filed 07/14/2015
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Battery clamp | ||
Patent #
US 10,608,353 B2
Filed 06/27/2017
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Calibration and programming of in-vehicle battery sensors | ||
Patent #
US 10,843,574 B2
Filed 04/28/2016
|
Current Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Midtronics Incorporated
|
Electronic tester for assessing battery/cell capacity | ||
Patent #
US 5,140,269 A
Filed 09/10/1990
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Apparatus for measuring internal resistance of wet cell storage batteries having non-removable cell caps | ||
Patent #
US 5,047,722 A
Filed 04/17/1989
|
Current Assignee
Btech Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SSMC Inc.
|
Electronic battery testing device with state-of-charge compensation | ||
Patent #
US 4,912,416 A
Filed 06/16/1989
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Battery monitor | ||
Patent #
US 4,929,931 A
Filed 12/22/1988
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Apparatus for monitoring the state of charge of a battery | ||
Patent #
US 4,968,941 A
Filed 07/13/1988
|
Current Assignee
Electronic Development Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Electronic Development Inc.
|
Electronic battery testing device | ||
Patent #
US 4,816,768 A
Filed 03/18/1988
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electronic battery testing device with automatic voltage scaling | ||
Patent #
US 4,825,170 A
Filed 05/25/1988
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electric battery testing device with automatic voltage scaling to determine dynamic conductance | ||
Patent #
US 4,881,038 A
Filed 11/18/1988
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Storage battery condition tester utilizing low load current | ||
Patent #
US 4,719,428 A
Filed 06/04/1985
|
Current Assignee
TIF Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
TIF Instruments Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for measuring battery condition | ||
Patent #
US 4,697,134 A
Filed 07/31/1986
|
Current Assignee
Commonwealth Edison Company
|
Original Assignee
Commonwealth Edison Company
|
Automotive battery test apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 4,423,378 A
Filed 12/04/1981
|
Current Assignee
SPX Development Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company
|
Automatic battery analyzer | ||
Patent #
US 4,193,025 A
Filed 12/23/1977
|
Current Assignee
Globe-Union Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Globe-Union Inc.
|
Battery state of charge gauge | ||
Patent #
US 3,946,299 A
Filed 02/11/1975
|
Current Assignee
Gould Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Gould Inc.
|
Electronic battery testing device | ||
Patent #
US 3,873,911 A
Filed 02/22/1973
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electronic battery testing device | ||
Patent #
US 3,909,708 A
Filed 01/02/1974
|
Current Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Original Assignee
Keith S Champlin
|
Electric camera shutter with voltage checking circuit | ||
Patent #
US 3,886,443 A
Filed 05/29/1973
|
Current Assignee
Seinan Miyakawa, Mitsuhiko Shimoda
|
Original Assignee
Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
26 Claims
-
1. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic conductance and an open-circuit voltage comprising:
-
means operably connected to said cell or battery for detecting said dynamic conductance and for generating a signal proportional thereto; means operably connected to said cell or battery for sensing said open-circuit voltage; correction means coupled to said means for detecting said dynamic conductance and directly electrically coupled to said means for sensing said open-circuit voltage, said correction means for responding to said open-circuit voltage by adjusting the level of said signal in accordance with said open-circuit voltage; and
,means for displaying an assessment of said cell or battery in accordance with the adjusted level of said signal. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4)
-
-
5. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having an internal resistance and a dc terminal voltage comprising:
-
means directly electrically coupled to said electrochemical cell or battery for generating a time-varying first signal inversely related to said dc terminal voltage; current generating means coupled to said electrochemical cell or battery and to said means for generating a time-varying first signal, said current generating means for producing a second signal directly proportional to said first signal and inversely proportional to said internal resistance; and means coupled to said current generating means for sensing said second signal and for relating said second signal to said condition of said electrochemical cell or battery. - View Dependent Claims (6, 7)
-
-
8. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dc terminal voltage comprising:
-
means directly electrically coupled to said electrochemical cell or battery for generating a time-varying input signal inversely related to said dc terminal voltage; high-gain amplifier means for providing an output signal; internal feedback means including low-pass filter means for coupling said output signal to the input of said high-gain amplifier means; external feedback means including feedback resistor means for coupling said output signal to said electrochemical cell or battery; capacitive coupling means for coupling said input signal and a time-varying voltage across said electrochemical cell or battery to said input of said high-gain amplifier means; and
,means coupled to said high-gain amplifier means for sensing said output signal and for relating said output signal to said condition of said electrochemical cell or battery. - View Dependent Claims (9, 10)
-
-
11. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic parameter and an open-circuit voltage comprising:
-
means operably connected to said cell or battery for measuring said dynamic parameter; means operably connected to said cell or battery for sensing said open-circuit voltage; correction means coupled to said means for measuring said dynamic parameter and directly electrically coupled to said means for sensing said open-circuit voltage, said correction means for responding to said open-circuit voltage by adjusting a measured dynamic parameter value in accordance with said open-circuit voltage to obtain a corrected dynamic parameter value; and means for displaying an assessment of said condition of said electrochemical cell or battery in conformance with said corrected dynamic parameter value. - View Dependent Claims (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18)
-
-
19. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic conductance, an open-circuit voltage, and a state-of-charge comprising:
-
means operably connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said dynamic conductance; means directly electrically connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage; microprocessor means for implementing a firmware correction program, said microprocessor means directly electrically coupled to said means for determining a digital representation of said dynamic conductance and to said means for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage and algorithmically combining said digital representation of said dynamic conductance with said digital representation of said open-circuit voltage to obtain an assessment result representative of said dynamic conductance corrected to represent its presumed value at 100% state-of-charge based upon said firmware correction program; and means for displaying said assessment result. - View Dependent Claims (20, 21, 22)
-
-
23. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic resistance, an open-circuit voltage, a state-of-charge, and an electrical rating, comprising:
-
means operably connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said dynamic resistance; means directly electrically connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage; microprocessor means for implementing a firmware correction program, said microprocessor means directly electrically coupled to said means for determining a digital representation of said dynamic resistance and to said means for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage and algorithmically combining said digital representation of said dynamic resistance with said digital representation of said open-circuit voltage based upon said firmware correction program thereby evaluating a reciprocal dynamic resistance corrected to represent its presumed value at 100% state-of charge; means for inputting said electrical rating to said microprocessor means for determining a reference quantity therefrom; means for comparing said reference quantity with said reciprocal dynamic resistance corrected to represent its presumed value at 100% state-of-charge; and means for displaying a qualitative assessment of said condition of said electrochemical cell or battery in accordance with said comparison. - View Dependent Claims (24)
-
-
25. An electronic device for assessing the condition of an electrochemical cell or battery having a dynamic resistance, an open-circuit voltage, a state-of-charge, and an electrical rating comprising:
-
means operably connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said dynamic resistance; means directly electrically connected to said cell or battery for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage; microprocessor means for implementing a firmware correction program, said microprocessor means directly electrically coupled to said means for determining a digital representation of said dynamic resistance and to said means for determining a digital representation of said open-circuit voltage and algorithmically combining said digital representation of said dynamic resistance with said digital representation of said open-circuit voltage based upon said firmware correction program thereby evaluating a dynamic resistance corrected to represent its presumed value at 100% state-of-charge; means for inputting said electrical rating to said microprocessor means for determining a reference quantity therefrom; means for comparing said reference quantity with said dynamic resistance corrected to represent its presumed value at 100% state-of-charge; and
,means for displaying a qualitative assessment of said condition of said electrochemical cell or battery in accordance with said comparison. - View Dependent Claims (26)
-
1 Specification
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/292,925, filed Aug. 18, 1994, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/877,646, filed May 1, 1992, now abandoned.
This invention relates to an electronic measuring or monitoring device for assessing the ability of a storage battery to deliver power to a load. More specifically, it relates to improved apparatus of the type disclosed previously in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,873,911, 3,909,708, 4,816,768, 4,825,170, 4,881,038, and 4,912,416 issued to Keith S. Champlin.
Storage batteries are employed in many applications requiring electrical energy to be retained for later use. Most commonly, they are employed in motor vehicles utilizing internal combustion engines. In such applications, energy stored by "charging" the battery during engine operation is later used to power lights, radio, and other electrical apparatus when the engine is stopped. The most severe demand upon the battery of a motor vehicle is usually made by the starter motor. Failure to supply the starter motor with sufficient power to crank the engine, particularly in cold weather, is often the first indication of battery deterioration. Clearly, a simple measurement that accurately assesses a battery'"'"'s ability to supply cranking power is of considerable value.
Prior to the introduction of the dynamic conductance testing method disclosed in the six U.S. patents enumerated above, the method most generally available for assessing a battery'"'"'s ability to supply cranking power was the standard load test. This test subjects a battery to a heavy dc current having a predetermined value dictated by the battery'"'"'s rating. After a prescribed time interval, the battery'"'"'s voltage under load is observed. The battery is then considered to have "passed" or "failed" the load test according to whether its voltage under load is greater, or less, than a particular value.
Although the standard load test has been widely used for many years, it has several serious disadvantages. These include:
1. The test draws a large current and therefore requires apparatus that is heavy and cumbersome.
2. Considerable "sparking" can occur if the test apparatus is connected or disconnected under load conditions. Such "sparking" in the presence of battery gasses can cause an explosion with the potential for serious injury to the user.
3. A standard load test leaves the battery in a significantly reduced state-of-charge and therefore less capable of cranking the engine than before the test was performed.
4. The battery'"'"'s terminal voltage decreases with time during performance of the load test. Accordingly, test results are generally imprecise and often dependent upon the skill of the operator.
5. Load test results are not repeatable since the test itself temporarily polarizes the battery. Such test-induced polarization significantly alters the initial conditions of any subsequently-performed tests.
A practical alternative to the standard load test is taught in the six U.S. Patents enumerated above. These documents disclose electronic apparatus for accurately assessing a battery'"'"'s condition by means of small-signal ac measurements of its dynamic conductance. They teach that a battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance is directly proportional to its dynamic power--the maximum power that the battery can deliver to a load. Dynamic conductance is therefore a direct measure of a battery'"'"'s ability to supply cranking power. In comparison with the load test method of battery appraisal, the dynamic conductance testing method has many advantages. For example, dynamic conductance testing utilizes electronic apparatus that is small and lightweight, draws very little current, produces virtually no sparking when connected or disconnected, does not significantly discharge or polarize the battery, and yields accurate, highly reproducible, test results. Virtually millions of battery measurements performed over the years have fully corroborated these teachings and have proven the validity of this alternative testing method.
One disadvantage, however, of the dynamic conductance testing method has been the fact that test results are somewhat dependent upon the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge. Accordingly, the methods and apparatus disclosed in the first five of the six U.S. patents cited above have generally required that the battery be essentially fully charged to be tested. Since many batteries are, in fact, fairly discharged when they are returned for replacement under warranty, or when they are otherwise suspected of being faulty, it has been frequently necessary to recharge a battery before testing it. Such recharging is costly and time-consuming. Clearly, a simple method for performing accurate dynamic conductance tests on batteries "as is"--batteries that may be only partially charged--would be of considerable benefit.
Great progress toward solving this problem has been engendered by the methods and apparatus disclosed in the sixth U.S. patent cited above; U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416. As is well known to those skilled in the art, a battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is directly related to its open-circuit (unloaded) terminal voltage. By utilizing this fact, along with extensive experimental data, an empirical relationship was established between a battery'"'"'s state-of charge, as reflected by its open-circuit voltage, and its relative dynamic conductance, normalized with respect to its fully-charged value. This empirical relationship was first disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416. Further, apparatus disclosed therein utilized this empirical relationship, along with measurements of open-circuit voltage, to appropriately correct dynamic conductance readings--thus yielding battery assessments that were essentially independent of the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge.
However, the measuring apparatus disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416 utilized an inconvenient two-step testing procedure requiring intermediate interaction by the user. The battery'"'"'s open-circuit voltage was first measured. Next, using the results of the voltage measurement, the user adjusted a variable attenuator to an appropriate setting. Finally, the dynamic conductance was measured. By virtue of the previously adjusted variable attenuator, the quantitative or qualitative dynamic conductance information ultimately displayed to the user conformed with that of a fully-charged battery even though the battery may, in actual fact, have been only partially charged when tested.
The state-of-charge problem was thus solved in principle by the methods and apparatus taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416. The required procedure was somewhat inconvenient, however. It is therefore quite apparent that improved apparatus which provides automatic state-of-charge correction--a correction not requiring intermediate interaction by the user--would be highly advantageous. Just such improved electronic battery testing apparatus, providing automatic compensation for low state-of-charge, is disclosed herein below.
Three embodiments of an improved electronic device for testing or monitoring storage batteries that may be only partially charged are disclosed. The device determines the battery'"'"'s small-signal dynamic conductance in order to provide either a proportional numerical readout, displayed in appropriate battery measuring units, or a corresponding qualitative assessment of the battery'"'"'s relative condition based upon its dynamic conductance and electrical rating. Without additional user intervention, the device also determines the battery'"'"'s terminal voltage in an essentially unloaded condition and utilizes this information to automatically correct the measured dynamic conductance. By virtue of this automatic correction, the quantitative or qualitative information displayed to the user conforms with that of a fully-charged battery even though the battery may, in actual fact, be only partially charged. If the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is too low for an accurate assessment to be made, no information is displayed. Instead, an indication is made to the user that the battery must be recharged before testing.
The electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge hereof can be used to obtain either a qualitative or quantitative assessment of a wide variety of electrochemical energy sources other than lead-acid batteries. For example, single electrochemical cells can be tested or monitored in a manner identical to that applied to testing or monitoring batteries of series-connected cells. Furthermore, by utilizing appropriate numerical correction factors, the invention can be used to test or monitor other electrochemical energy sources such as alkaline, nickel-cadmium, or lithium cells and batteries. The invention hereof is widely applicable to such testing or monitoring of energy sources by virtue of its simplicity, its safety, its accuracy, its ease of operation, and its low cost.
FIG. 1 depicts the Thevenin'"'"'s equivalent circuit of a lead-acid storage battery comprising its open-circuit voltage, Vo, and its internal resistance, Rx, connected in series.
FIG. 2 is an empirical plot of normalized dynamic conductance, Gx, versus open-circuit voltage, Vo, showing the correlation with measurements performed upon four different lead-acid storage batteries having differing electrical ratings and fabricated by different manufacturers.
FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device employing automatic compensation for low state-of-charge in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a graphical plot of the state-of-charge correction factor obtained by taking the reciprocal of the empirical normalized dynamic conductance curve of FIG. 2.
FIG. 5 is a plot of a four-segment piecewise-linear approximation to the correction factor curve of FIG. 4 implemented by the correction amplifier circuit disclosed in FIG. 6.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a dc correction amplifier embodiment which implements the four-segment piecewise-linear transfer function disclosed in FIG. 5.
FIG. 7 is a complete schematic diagram of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge configured for testing/monitoring 12-volt automotive batteries in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 is a simplified block diagram of a second embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge.
FIG. 9 is a simplified block diagram of a third embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge.
Referring first to FIG. 1, the Thevenin'"'"'s equivalent circuit of a lead-acid storage battery is shown. In this equivalent representation, the battery is described by its open-circuit voltage, Vo, and its internal resistance, Rx, connected in series.
As has been fully disclosed in the first five of the six U.S. Patents cited above, a conventional dynamic conductance battery test of a fully-charged battery traditionally ignores the open-circuit voltage, Vo. Instead, the electronic test apparatus directly measures the battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance Gx =1/Rx. The testing/monitoring device then provides the operator with either a numerical readout displayed in proportional battery measuring units (such as "Cold Cranking Amps", "Ampere-Hours", or "Watts"), or else with a qualitative display ("Pass/Fail") based upon comparing the measured value of Gx with a corresponding reference value determined from the battery'"'"'s electrical rating and temperature.
Although the open-circuit voltage, Vo, has not been normally used in dynamic conductance testing of fully-charged batteries, it has been previously used to determine state-of-charge. As is well known to those skilled in the art, a battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is directly related to its open-circuit (unloaded) terminal voltage. For example, with automotive-type lead-acid batteries having a nominal voltage of 12 volts, the open-circuit voltage is known to vary from about 11.4 volts, for batteries that are virtually totally discharged, to about 12.6 volts, for batteries that are nearly fully charged.
FIG. 2 shows the observed relationship between normalized dynamic conductance and open-circuit voltage appropriate to a large class of automotive-type lead-acid storage batteries. This information was disclosed previously in U.S. Pat. No. 4,912,416. FIG. 2 displays an empirical graph of relative dynamic conductance, normalized with respect to the fully-charged value, Gx (Vo)/Gx (12.6), plotted as a function of open-circuit voltage, Vo. The solid curve plotted in FIG. 2 is described by a second-order polynomial equation having coefficients adjusted to best fit the experimental data. The appropriately adjusted polynomial equation is: ##EQU1##
FIG. 2 also discloses normalized experimental points which represent actual measurements obtained from four different batteries possessing different electrical ratings and fabricated by different manufacturers. Batteries XM0, XM1, and XM3 are six-cell batteries having nominal voltages of 12 volts. Battery XM2 is actually a three-cell, 6-volt battery. Open-circuit voltage measurements of battery XM2 were multiplied by a factor of two in order to plot XM2 data points on the same graph as the other three batteries. One sees that the normalized measurements obtained from all four batteries agree quite closely with the empirical relation described by Equation 1. The fact that the same empirical relation shows strong correlation with experimental data obtained from both 6-volt and 12-volt batteries indicates that the empirical state-of-charge correction disclosed in FIG. 2 is quite universal and is actually a fundamental property of a single cell.
Referring now to FIG. 3, a simplified block diagram of a first embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge is disclosed. Except for specific details having to do with the circuitry for automatic compensation for low state-of-charge, the explanation of the operation of the block diagram of FIG. 3 is identical with that of the corresponding block diagram referred to as FIG. 1 in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768.
Accordingly, signals representative of the signal at output 10 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 are fed back to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 by means of two feedback paths; internal feedback path 14 and external feedback path 16. Internal feedback path 14 includes low pass filter (LPF) 18 and feeds a signal directly back to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12. The purpose of internal feedback path 14 and low pass filter 18 is to provide large dc feedback but relatively little ac feedback in order to define the operating point of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 and ensure its dc stability without appreciably reducing its ac voltage gain. External feedback path 16 contains resistive network 22 and feeds a signal current back to the battery undergoing test 24. Summation circuitry 26 combines the resulting signal voltage 28 developed thereby across battery 24 with a periodic square-wave signal voltage 30.
In the embodiment disclosed in FIG. 3, the periodic square-wave signal voltage 30 is formed by the action of oscillator 32, chopper switch 34, and dc correction amplifier (Cor Amp) 36. The oscillation frequency of oscillator 32 may, for example, be 100 Hz. The voltage applied to input 38 of dc correction amplifier 36 is the dc terminal voltage of battery 24. By virtue of the fact that the electronic apparatus disclosed in FIG. 3 draws very little load current from the battery, this terminal voltage is essentially the battery'"'"'s open-circuit (unloaded) terminal voltage Vo. Signal output 40 of dc correction amplifier 36 is a dc voltage derived from Vo having a voltage level that is inversely related to Vo --and hence inversely related to the state-of-charge of battery 24. This derived dc voltage 40 is repetitively interrupted by chopping switch 34 whose control input 42 is activated by the output of oscillator 32. The chopped dc voltage thus comprises a periodic square-wave signal voltage 30 having a voltage amplitude that is inversely related to Vo, and hence inversely related to the state-of-charge of battery 24. This signal voltage 30 is presented to summation circuitry 26 along with the signal voltage 28 developed across battery 24. The resulting composite signal voltage 44 at the output of summation circuitry 26 is then capacitively coupled to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 by means of capacitive coupling network 46.
As has been fully explained in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768, the voltage at output 10 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 comprises a constant dc bias component along with an ac signal component that is proportional to the dynamic conductance Gx of the battery undergoing test 24 as well as to the level of the square-wave signal voltage 30. The constant dc bias component is ignored while the variable ac signal component is detected and accurately converted to a dc signal voltage by synchronous detector 48, synchronized to oscillator 32 by means of synchronizing path 50.
The dc signal voltage at output 52 of synchronous detector 48 passes through adjustable resistive network 54 to the input of dc-coupled operational amplifier 56. Feedback path 58 of operational amplifier 56 contains dc milliammeter 60. Accordingly, the reading of dc milliammeter 60 is proportional to the dc signal voltage level at the output 52 of synchronous detector 48, and hence to the dynamic conductance Gx of battery 24. In addition, the constant of proportionality relating the milliammeter reading to Gx is determined by the value assumed by adjustable resistive network 54 as well as by the level of the signal voltage at 30--and hence by the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge as exemplified by its unloaded dc terminal voltage Vo.
By utilizing an appropriate fixed resistance value in resistive network 54 and then calibrating milliammeter 60 in battery measuring unit numbers that are proportional to the battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance, the embodiment disclosed in FIG. 3 will emulate the direct reading battery tester disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,873,911. In addition, as is fully taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,768, the resistance value of resistive network 54 which brings the reading of dc milliammeter 60 to a particular fixed value is directly proportional to the dynamic conductance of battery 24. Hence, by calibrating resistive network 54 in traditional battery rating units, and then designating "pass" and "fail" regions on the face of milliammeter 60, the embodiment disclosed in FIG. 3 will also emulate the "pass-fail" battery testing device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,909,708. Furthermore, one can employ a switch to select either a fixed-valued resistive network 54 or an adjustable-valued network 54 and can arrange both a number scale and "pass-fail" regions on the face of milliammeter 60. One can therefore realize both a direct-reading battery tester and a "pass-fail" battery tester with a single device.
For either emulation, the amplitude of the detected signal at the output 52 of synchronous detector 48 is directly proportional to the amplitude of the square-wave signal 30 at the output of chopper switch 34. Hence, both the level of the numerical quantity displayed during direct-reading operation as well as the relative qualitative assessment provided in "pass-fail" operation are influenced by the battery'"'"'s "state-of-charge", as exemplified by its unloaded terminal voltage Vo. In order for this displayed information to be independent of the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge, one must require Vout, the dc output voltage at 40 of dc correction amplifier 36, to be proportional to the reciprocal of Gx (Vo). Under these conditions, Vout can be written as: ##EQU2## is an appropriate state-of-charge "correction factor" imposed by correction amplifier 36. Rearranging Equation 2 leads to: ##EQU3## which shows that F(Vo) may be simply regarded as the dc output voltage of amplifier 36 normalized with respect to the corresponding dc output voltage obtained with a fully-charged battery; i.e., a battery for which Vo =12.6 volts.
In addition to providing a dc signal output 40, the dc correction amplifier 36 also provides a "Chopper Disable" output 62 and an LED output 64. These two additional outputs become activated whenever the battery'"'"'s terminal voltage Vo, and hence its state-of-charge, is too small for an accurate dynamic conductance test to be made. Under these special conditions, chopper switch 34 becomes disabled so that no qualitative or quantitative information is displayed to the user. Instead, LED 66 lights to indicate to the user that the battery must be recharged before it can be tested.
FIG. 4 displays a graphical plot of the state-of-charge correction factor F(Vo) obtained by taking the reciprocal of the empirical [Gx (Vo)/Gx (12.6)] curve disclosed in FIG. 2. A four-segment piecewise-linear approximation to this empirical curve is disclosed in FIG. 5. The parameters which specify the four breakpoints of this piecewise-linear approximation are listed in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________PIECEWISE-LINEAR APPROXIMATION PARAMETERSBreakpoint V.sub.o (Volts) Correction Factor-F______________________________________A 12.60 1.00B 12.15 1.21C 11.80 1.78D 11.60 2.91______________________________________
The piecewise-linear input-output relationship of FIG. 5 is implemented by the transfer function of the dc correction amplifier circuit embodiment disclosed in FIG. 6. Referring now to FIG. 6, the dc correction amplifier contained generally in block 36 comprises the interconnection of four operational amplifiers, 70, 72, 74, and 76 along with comparator 78. Circuit input lead 38 connects to the positive terminal of the battery 24 under test, while the negative battery terminal is grounded. By virtue of the fact that very little current is drawn from battery 24, the circuit'"'"'s input voltage at 38, Vin, measured with respect to ground, is essentially equal to the battery'"'"'s open-circuit terminal voltage Vo.
Within the dc correction amplifier circuit disclosed in FIG. 6, a constant reference voltage VR is established by means of voltage reference diode 80 receiving operating current through series resistor 82. Reference voltage VR may, for example, be 2.5 volts. VR is further operated on by a voltage divider chain comprising resistors 84, 86, 88, and 90. Accordingly, the voltage level applied to the noninverting inputs of operational amplifiers 70 and 72 is VR, while increasingly smaller fractions of reference voltage VR are applied to the noninverting inputs of operational amplifiers 74 and 76 and to the inverting input of comparator 78, respectively. In addition to these fixed voltage levels, a variable voltage Vx, that is proportional to battery voltage Vo is derived from Vin by means of voltage divider resistors 92 and 94. This variable voltage is applied directly to the non-inverting input of comparator 78 and to the inverting inputs of operational amplifiers 72, 74, and 76 through resistors 98, 102, and 106, respectively.
The outputs of the four operational amplifiers, 70, 72, 74, and 76, are connected to a common output bus, Vout, through the four diodes, 108, 110, 112, and 114, respectively. Because of the operation of these four diodes, only one of the operational amplifiers will be active at any one given time--the amplifier having the largest (most positive) output voltage. That operational amplifier alone will be connected to the output bus and will thus be controlling the output voltage Vout. The other three operational amplifiers, those having smaller output voltages, will be disconnected from the output bus by virtue of their having reverse-biased diodes in their output circuits.
Operational amplifier 70 has its inverting input connected directly to the output bus and is therefore configured as a unity-gain voltage-follower amplifying the reference voltage VR. Operational amplifiers 72, 74, and 76 utilize feedback resistors and are configured as inverting amplifiers; each amplifying the variable voltage Vx ; and each providing a negative incremental voltage gain given, respectively, by the appropriate resistance ratio {R(96)/R(98)}, {R(100)/R(102)}, or {R(104)/R(106)}.
The circuit of FIG. 6 functions as follows: For Vin >VA =12.6 volts, the output voltage of operational amplifier 70 will be larger than the output voltages of the other three operational amplifiers. Accordingly, the output bus will be controlled by the unity-gain voltage-follower amplifier 70 so that Vout =VR. This region of constant output-voltage is represented by segment 1 in the piecewise-linear transfer function displayed in FIG. 5.
When Vin has decreased to VA =12.6 volts, Vx will have become sufficiently less than VR that the output of inverting amplifier 72 will equal that of amplifier 70. Thus, for Vin <VA, diode 108 will be reverse biased while diode 110 will be forward biased, and amplifier 72 will control the output bus. Due to the amplification of inverting amplifier 72, further decreases in Vin will cause Vout to increase with incremental gain or "slope" of -{(R96)/R(98)}. This region of amplification, which continues until Vin =VB, is represented by segment 2 in FIG. 5.
When Vin has decreased to VB, Vx will have decreased sufficiently that the output of inverting amplifier 74 will exceed that of amplifier 72. Diode 110 will therefore be reverse biased while diode 112 will be forward biased, and amplifier 74 will now control the output bus. Due to the amplification of inverting amplifier 74, further decreases in Vin will cause Vout to increase with the larger incremental gain or "slope" of -{R(100)/R(102)}. This region of amplification continues until Vin =Vc and is represented by segment 3 in FIG. 5.
When Vin has decreased to Vc, Vx will have decreased sufficiently that the output of inverting amplifier 76 will exceed that of amplifier 74. Diode 112 will therefore be reverse biased while diode 114 will be forward biased. Thus, amplifier 76 will now control the output bus. Due to the amplifying action of inverting amplifier 76, any further decreases in Vin will cause Vout to increase with the still larger incremental gain or "slope" -{R(104)/R(106)}. This region of largest amplification is represented by segment 4 in FIG. 5.
Finally, for Vin <VD, the derived voltage Vx will be less than the tapped-down reference voltage existing at the point of interconnection of resistors 88 and 90. Under these special conditions, the noninverting input of comparator 78 will be at a lower potential than the inverting input thus causing comparator 78'"'"'s output to be in a "low" state. As a consequence, LED 66 will be lit to provide an indication to the user that the battery must be recharged before it can be tested. In addition, output line 62 will be in a "low" state, thus disabling chopper switch 34 and preventing any qualitative or quantitative dynamic conductance information from being conveyed to the user.
FIG. 7 discloses a complete schematic diagram of a first embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic state-of-charge compensation configured for testing/monitoring 12-volt batteries in accordance with the present invention. Operational amplifiers 120, 122, 124, and 126 comprise four elements of a quad operational amplifier integrated circuit, IC1. Bilateral analog switches 34 and 128 comprise two elements of a quad CMOS bilateral switch integrated circuit, IC2. Operational amplifiers 70, 72, 74, and 76 comprise four elements of a quad operational amplifier integrated circuit, IC3. Comparator 78 comprises one element of a quad comparator integrated circuit IC4. All four integrated circuits, IC1, IC2, IC3, and IC4 are powered by means of common power connections, V+ 130 and V- 132, connected to the battery undergoing test 24 through battery contacts 134 and 136, respectively.
High-gain amplifier cascade 12 of FIG. 3 comprises operational amplifier 120 and npn transistor 138 connected as an emitter follower. Resistor 140 conducts a dc bias voltage to the noninverting (+) input of operational amplifier 120 from voltage divider resistors 142 and 144 which are connected to battery 24 through battery contacts 146 and 148. The output voltage of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 is established across external-path feedback resistor 22. An internal feedback path comprising resistors 150 and 152 conducts the dc voltage at the common connection between the emitter of npn transistor 138 and resistor 22 to the inverting (-) input of operational amplifier 120. Resistors 150 and 152 along with capacitor 154 comprise low-pass filter 18 of FIG. 3.
The ac signal voltage developed across battery 24 is sensed at battery contacts 146 and 148 and added in series to an input signal voltage component established across viewing resistor 156. The resultant composite ac signal voltage is coupled to the differential input of operational amplifier 120 by means of a capacitive coupling network comprising capacitors 158 and 160. A feedback current that is proportional to the voltage established across resistor 22 passes through battery 24 by means of external feedback path conductors 162 and 164 along with battery contacts 134 and 136.
An ac square-wave input signal voltage is established across viewing resistor 156 and is formed by the action of oscillator 32, chopper switch 34, and correction amplifier 36. Oscillator 32, which generates a 100 Hz square-wave synchronizing signal, is a conventional astable multivibrator comprising operational amplifier 122 along with resistors 168, 170, 172, 174, and capacitor 176. The synchronizing output signal of oscillator 32 is conducted to the control input of chopper switch 34 through resistor 178. Accordingly, chopper switch 34 turns on and off periodically at a 100 Hz rate. The signal terminals of chopper switch 118 interconnect the dc signal output 40 of correction amplifier 36 with the input lead of trimmer potentiometer 180 used for initial calibration adjustment. The signal voltage across trimmer potentiometer 180 therefore comprises a 100 Hz square wave having amplitude proportional to the dc output voltage of correction amplifier 36. A signal current proportional to the signal output voltage of trimmer potentiometer 180 passes through injection resistor 184 and is injected into viewing resistor 156 thereby developing a 100 Hz signal voltage across viewing resistor 156. By virtue of the action of correction amplifier 36 described with reference to FIG. 6, the signal voltage across viewing resistor 156 will contain an automatic correction for the state-of-charge of the battery undergoing test. If, however, the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is too low for an accurate battery assessment to be made, the correction amplifier'"'"'s output lines 62 and 64 will be in logic low states. These output lines will, in turn, pull the control input of chopper switch 34 low and pull the cathode of LED 66 low. As a result, chopper switch 34 will be disabled so that no ac signal will be injected into viewing resistor 156, and LED 66 will light to indicate to the user that the battery must be recharged before a dynamic conductance test can be performed.
Analog switch 128 along with operational amplifier 124, which is connected as an integrator, comprise synchronous detector 48 of FIG. 3. Resistor 194 and bypass capacitor 196 comprise a low-pass filter which biases the noninverting input of operational amplifier 124 to the voltage level of the dc bias component developed across feedback resistor 22. A signal current derived from the total voltage at the common connection between resistor 22 and transistor 138 passes through resistor 198 and analog switch 128 to the inverting input of operational amplifier 124. This signal current is periodically interrupted at the oscillator frequency by virtue of the control input of analog switch 128 being connected to the synchronizing output of oscillator 32. Resistor 200 provides negative dc feedback to operational amplifier 124. Integration capacitor 202 serves to smooth the detected voltage signal outputted by operational amplifier 124.
The noninverting input of operational amplifier 126 is biased to the dc level of the noninverting input of operational amplifier 124 while the inverting input of operational amplifier 126 is connected to SPDT selector switch 206. Accordingly, a dc current proportional to the detected signal voltage at the output of operational amplifier 124 passes through milliammeter 60 to the output of operational amplifier 116 by way of one of the two paths selected by selector switch 206. With switch 206 in position 1, the meter current passes through fixed resistor 208. Under these conditions, the disclosed invention emulates a direct reading battery testing device providing a quantitative output displayed in battery measuring units that are proportional to the dynamic conductance of battery 24. With switch 206 in position 2, the meter current passes through fixed resistor 210 and variable resistor 212. Under these conditions the disclosed invention emulates a qualitative, "pass-fail", battery testing device having a manually adjusted battery rating scale that is linearly related to the setting of variable resistance 212, and a rating offset that is determined by the value of fixed resistor 210.
The improved battery testing/monitoring device embodiment having automatic compensation for low state-of-charge disclosed in FIG. 7 is operated as follows: The operator simply connects the device to the battery undergoing test and selects one of the two positions of selector switch 206. If position 1 is selected, meter 60 will display the battery'"'"'s quantitative condition in appropriate battery measuring units--with the displayed quantitative results having been automatically adjusted to conform with those of a fully-charged battery. If switch 206 is in position 2, and variable resistance 212 has been set in accordance with the battery'"'"'s rating, meter 60 will display the battery'"'"'s qualitative ("pass/fail") condition. Again, the displayed results will have been automatically adjusted to conform with those of a fully-charged battery. With either selection, if the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge is too low for an accurate assessment to be made, no information will be displayed to the user. Instead, an LED will light to indicate to the user that the battery must be recharged before testing.
Table II contains a listing of component types and values for the first embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge disclosed in FIG. 7.
TABLE II______________________________________COMPONENT TYPES AND VALUESFOR CIRCUIT OF FIG. 7REFERENCE NUMBER COMPONENT______________________________________Semiconductor Devices120, 122, 124, 126 IC1 - LM324N34, 128 IC2 - CD4066B70, 72, 74, 76 IC3 - LM324N78 IC4 - LM33980 IC5 - LM336-.25138 TIP31C Power Transistor108, 110, 112, 114 1N4148 Diodes66 T-13/4 LEDResistors - Ohms (1/4-W unless specified)5 Watts 22Ω82 4.7K84 5.36K86 6.19K88 6.04K90 200K92 2.25K94 57696, 100, 104 1.00M98 174K102 49.9K106 13.7K116, 142, 144 1.0K156, 210 100208 470212 500 Variable180 10K Trimpot184 470K140, 200 47K178, 194, 198 100K172 150K174 270K150, 152, 168, 170 1 MegCapacitors - Mfd176 0.022154, 158, 160, 196 0.47202 1.0Meter204 1 mA dc milliammeterSwitch206 SPDT______________________________________
FIG. 8 discloses a simplified block diagram of a second embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge. This embodiment eliminates the correction amplifier 36 and chopper switch 34 of the first embodiment disclosed in block diagram form in FIG. 3. Instead, it contains a microprocessor represented generally by block 220 of FIG. 8. Microprocessor block 220 includes all of the usual elements which comprise a microprocessor system such as the requisite logic elements, a clock oscillator, a random access memory, a firmware program contained in read-only memory, and, of course, the processor itself. With the embodiment of FIG. 8, the appropriate correction for low state-of-charge is performed by microprocessor block 220 under the control of the firmware program contained therein.
A description of operation of most of the elements of FIG. 8 parallels the description of operation of the embodiment disclosed in FIG. 3. Signals representative of the signal at output 10 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 are fed back to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 by means of two feedback paths; internal feedback path 14 and external feedback path 16. Internal feedback path 14 includes low pass filter (LPF) 18 and feeds a signal voltage directly back to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12. External feedback path 16 contains resistive network 22 and feeds a signal current back to the battery undergoing test 24. Summation circuitry 26 combines the resulting signal voltage 28 developed thereby across battery 24 with a periodic square-wave signal voltage 30.
In the embodiment of FIG. 8, signal voltage 30 simply comprises the constant output signal of oscillator 32. The oscillation frequency of oscillator 32 may, for example, be 100 Hz. This periodic signal voltage is presented to summation circuitry 26 along with the signal voltage 28 developed across battery 24. The resulting composite signal voltage 44 at the output of summation circuitry 26 is then capacitively coupled to input 20 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 by means of capacitive coupling network 46. Accordingly, the voltage at output 10 of high-gain amplifier cascade 12 comprises a constant dc bias component along with an ac signal component that is proportional to the dynamic conductance Gx of the battery undergoing test 24. The constant dc bias component is ignored while the variable ac signal component is detected and accurately converted to a dc signal voltage by synchronous detector 48, synchronized to the oscillator by means of synchronizing path 50.
The dc signal level at output 52 of synchronous detector 50 is proportional to the battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance Gx. This analog voltage is converted to a corresponding digital representation of Gx by analog to digital (A/D) converter 222 and then inputted to microprocessor block 220 through input port 224. In addition, the battery'"'"'s unloaded voltage Vo is connected via dc path 38 to the input of analog to digital converter 226. A corresponding digital representation of Vo at the output of A/D converter 226 is thereby inputted to microprocessor block 220 through input port 228.
By programmed algorithmic techniques that are well-known to those skilled in the art, the microprocessor'"'"'s firmware program utilizes the digital representation of Vo to correct the digital representation of Gx for the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge. This can be done, for example, by inputting Vo to a "look-up table" whose output is the corresponding correction factor F, and then multiplying Gx by the resulting factor F to obtain the corrected conductance value, Gx (12.6). Alternatively, the appropriate value of Gx (12.6) could be calculated directly by numerically evaluating the reciprocal of the empirical relationship disclosed in Equation 1.
In order to emulate of a quantitative-type electronic battery tester, a numerical value proportional to Gx (12.6) is outputted and displayed on a digital display such as 236 interfaced through output port 234, or printed by a printer such as 240 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output port 238. In addition, whenever Vo is less than a predetermined minimum value, the firmware program suppresses the numerical display and instead provides an indication to the user that the battery must be recharged before testing. This special information can, for example, be displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by an LED 66 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output port 242.
For emulation of a qualitative ("pass/fail") electronic battery tester, the battery'"'"'s rating is first inputted to microprocessor 220 through an input device such as a shaft encoder 230 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through input port 232. A dial associated with shaft encoder 230 is calibrated in battery rating units such as cold cranking amperes or ampere-hours. By programmed algorithmic techniques that are well-known to those skilled in the art, the microprocessor'"'"'s firmware program then directs microprocessor block 220 to compare the dynamic conductance corrected for state-of-charge, Gx (12.6), with a reference value appropriate to the inputted battery rating and to output the resulting pass/fail information to the user. This qualitative output information can, for example, be displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by an LED 246 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output port 244. Again, if Vo is less than a predetermined minimum value, the displayed information is suppressed and the user is informed that the battery must be recharged before testing. This special information can, for example, be displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by LED 66.
FIG. 9 discloses a simplified block diagram of a third embodiment of an improved electronic battery testing/monitoring device with automatic compensation for low state-of-charge. Like the embodiment disclosed in FIG. 8, this third embodiment employs a microprocessor block 220 to implement the appropriate correction for low state-of-charge. It differs from the embodiment of FIG. 8, however, in that the hardware inputs a digital representation of the battery'"'"'s dynamic resistance Rx to microprocessor 220 which then utilizes its firmware program to calculate the reciprocal quantity, the battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance Gx =1/Rx, as well as to correct for the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge.
The hardware disclosed in FIG. 9 functions as follows: Oscillator 32 generates a periodic square-wave signal 42 which is inputted to directly to current amplifier 244. The oscillation frequency of oscillator 32 may, for example, be 100 Hz. The output of current amplifier 244, a periodic signal current 246, then passes through battery 24. By virtue of the fact that the output resistance of current amplifier 244 is much larger than the battery'"'"'s dynamic resistance Rx, the amplitude of signal current 246 will be virtually independent of Rx. Accordingly, the resultant ac signal voltage 248 appearing across the battery'"'"'s terminals will be directly proportional to the battery'"'"'s dynamic resistance Rx. Capacitive coupling network 250 couples the ac signal voltage 248 to input 252 of voltage amplifier 254. This coupling network suppresses the battery'"'"'s dc terminal voltage but permits amplification of the ac signal voltage by voltage amplifier 254. The output voltage 256 of voltage amplifier 254 provides the input to synchronous detector 48 which is synchronized to oscillator 32 by means of synchronizing path 50. Accordingly, a dc signal voltage 52 appears at the output of synchronous detector 48 that is directly proportional to the battery'"'"'s dynamic resistance Rx.
The analog voltage 52 is converted to a corresponding digital representation of Rx by analog to digital (A/D) converter 222 and then inputted to microprocessor block 220 through input port 224. In addition, the battery'"'"'s unloaded voltage Vo is connected via dc path 38 to the input of analog to digital converter 226. A corresponding digital representation of Vo at the output of A/D converter 226 is thereupon inputted to microprocessor block 220 through input port 228.
By programmed algorithmic techniques that are well-known to those skilled in the art, the microprocessor'"'"'s firmware program directs microprocessor block 220 to invert the digital representation of Rx to obtain a digital representation of the battery'"'"'s dynamic conductance Gx. It then utilizes the digital representation of Vo to correct the digital representation of Gx for the battery'"'"'s state-of-charge. This can be done, for example, by inputting Vo to a "look-up table" whose output is the corresponding correction factor F, and then multiplying Gx by the resulting factor F to obtain the corrected conductance value, Gx (12.6); or by computing Gx (12.6) directly from the reciprocal of the empirical relationship disclosed in Equation 1. Alternatively, a temperature-corrected value of Rx, Rx (12.6), can be computed first and then algorithmically inverted to obtain Gx (12.6).
In order to emulate a quantitative-type electronic battery tester, a numerical result proportional to Gx (12.6) is outputted and displayed on a digital display such as 236 interfaced through output port 234, or printed by a printer such as 240 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output port 238. In addition, whenever Vo is less than a predetermined minimum value, the firmware program suppresses the numerical display and instead provides an indication to the user that the battery must be recharged before testing. This information can, for example, be displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by an LED 66 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output port 242.
For emulation of a qualitative ("pass/fail") type of electronic battery tester, the battery'"'"'s rating is inputted to microprocessor 220 through an input device such as a shaft encoder 230 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through input port 232. A dial associated with shaft encoder 230 is calibrated in battery rating units such as cold cranking amperes or ampere-hours. By programmed algorithmic techniques that are well-known to those skilled in the art, the microprocessor'"'"'s firmware program directs microprocessor block 220 to compare the computed quantity, Gx (12.6), with a reference quantity appropriate to the inputted battery rating to determine whether the battery passes or fails. For a computed quantity larger than the reference quantity, the battery passes. Otherwise it fails. Alternatively, a comparison can be made between the computed quantity Rx (12.6) and a corresponding reference quantity appropriate to the inputted battery rating to determine whether the battery passes or fails. For a computed quantity less than the reference quantity, the battery passes. Otherwise it fails. In either case, this qualitative information is outputted and displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by an LED 246 interfaced to microprocessor 220 through output Port 244. Again, if Vo is less than a predetermined minimum value, the display of qualitative information is suppressed and the user is informed that the battery must be recharged before testing. This special information can, for example, be displayed by digital display 236, printed by printer 240, or conveyed to the user by LED 66.
Although three specific modes for carrying out the invention hereof have been described, it should be understood that many modifications and variations can be made without departing from what is regarded to be the scope and subject matter of the invention. For example, the invention may comprise a single, self-contained, instrument that is temporarily connected to the battery to test the battery on-site. Alternatively, the device may comprise a monitoring device that is semi-permanently connected to the battery to provide continuous monitoring of the battery'"'"'s condition at a remote location. In this latter case, the device will probably be separated into two parts--one part connected to the battery and located at the battery'"'"'s site; the other part containing the remote display and located at the remote location. The division between the two parts can be made somewhat arbitrarily. However, I contend that all such divisions, modifications, and variations fall within the scope of the invention disclosed herein and are therefore intended to be covered by the appended claims.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.