Method of matching stereo images and method of measuring disparity between these image
First Claim
1. A method of detecting a disparity between stereo images, comprising the steps of:
- dividing each of first and second images IL and IR into a plurality of blocks each having a size of M×
L pixels;
matching ternary-valued frequency component images of said images IL and IR;
comparing pixels in a micro region defined by a one-dimensional window set on said first image IL with pixels in a designated micro region on said second image IR;
evaluating a similarity between two micro regions using the following equation;
space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Ε
all=Σ
β
k(PN)k+Σ
γ
k(ZN)kwhere PN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "P" while ZN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "Z", and β
k and γ
k represent weighting factors;
searching a first region having a most highest similarity and a second region having a second highest similarity in a concerned block;
specifying a first candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to said first region, and a second candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to said second region;
creating a histogram based on said first and second candidate disparities; and
determining a valid disparity of said concerned block as a disparity corresponding to a peak position of said histogram.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
In the image pickup phase (A), right and left images are taken in through two image-pickup devices (S101, S102). Then, in the next feature extraction phase (B), right and left images are respectively subjected to feature extraction (S103, S104). Thereafter, in the succeeding matching phase (C), the extracted features of right and left images are compared to check how they match with each other (step S105). More specifically, in the matching phase (C), a one-dimensional window is set, this one-dimensional window is shifted along the left image in accordance with a predetermined scanning rule so as to successively set overlapped one-dimensional windows, and a matching operation is performed by comparing the image features within one window and corresponding image features on the right image. Subsequently, in the disparity determination phase (D), the left image is dissected or divided into plural blocks each having a predetermined size, a histogram in each block is created from disparities obtained by the matching operation based on one-dimensional windows involving pixels of a concerned block, and a specific disparity just corresponding to the peak of thus obtained histogram is identified as a valid disparity representing the concerned block (S106).
397 Citations
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,873,187 B2
Filed 08/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Reduction of viewer discomfort for stereoscopic images | ||
Patent #
US 20110074933A1
Filed 09/28/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Laboratories of America Incorporated
|
VISION SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110122249A1
Filed 01/31/2011
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,949,152 B2
Filed 12/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110093179A1
Filed 12/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image processing apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,957,581 B2
Filed 11/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Depth Detection Method and System Using Thereof | ||
Patent #
US 20110141274A1
Filed 07/23/2010
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
IMAGING AND DISPLAY SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110193961A1
Filed 02/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Vehicular image sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 7,994,462 B2
Filed 12/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Compensating for distortion in digital images | ||
Patent #
US 7,974,463 B2
Filed 01/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
Google LLC
|
Original Assignee
Google Inc.
|
IMAGING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110216198A1
Filed 05/13/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicular imaging system in an automatic headlamp control system | ||
Patent #
US 8,017,898 B2
Filed 08/13/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Automatic headlamp control system | ||
Patent #
US 7,972,045 B2
Filed 08/10/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,063,759 B2
Filed 06/05/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicle Imaging System | ||
Patent #
US 20100020170A1
Filed 07/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging System for Vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20100265048A1
Filed 09/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
STEREO VISION SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100066811A1
Filed 01/29/2009
|
Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Vehicular image sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 7,655,894 B2
Filed 11/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL CONSTRUCTION USING UNSTRUCTURED PATTERN | ||
Patent #
US 20100177169A1
Filed 01/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
Google LLC
|
Original Assignee
Google Inc.
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,792,329 B2
Filed 10/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Method for front matching stereo vision | ||
Patent #
US 20100007720A1
Filed 06/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
University of Southern Mississippi
|
Original Assignee
University of Southern Mississippi
|
IMAGING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100045797A1
Filed 10/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Three-dimensional model construction using unstructured pattern | ||
Patent #
US 7,660,458 B1
Filed 12/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Google LLC
|
Original Assignee
Google Inc.
|
COMPOUND EYE IMAGING APPARATUS, DISTANCE MEASURING APPARATUS, DISPARITY CALCULATION METHOD, AND DISTANCE MEASURING METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20100150455A1
Filed 02/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
MARK-ERASABLE PEN CAP | ||
Patent #
US 20100266326A1
Filed 04/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
Cheng-Hua Chuang
|
Original Assignee
Cheng-Hua Chuang
|
Vision system for a vehicle including image processor | ||
Patent #
US 7,859,565 B2
Filed 08/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100312446A1
Filed 08/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Automatic Headlamp Control System | ||
Patent #
US 20090045323A1
Filed 08/13/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,526,103 B2
Filed 04/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Multi-layered real-time stereo matching method and system | ||
Patent #
US 7,545,974 B2
Filed 01/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Postech Foundation
|
Original Assignee
Postech Foundation
|
METHOD FOR PRODUCING IMAGE WITH DEPTH BY USING 2D IMAGES | ||
Patent #
US 20090169057A1
Filed 10/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEASURING IMAGE QUALITY | ||
Patent #
US 20090180682A1
Filed 01/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
SRI International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SRI International Inc.
|
IMAGING SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20090208058A1
Filed 04/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Object Detecting System | ||
Patent #
US 20090237491A1
Filed 10/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Subaru Corp.
|
Original Assignee
Fuji Heavy Industries Limited
|
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME VISUAL ODOMETRY | ||
Patent #
US 20090263009A1
Filed 04/22/2008
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
COMPOUND EYE PHOTOGRAPHING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR, AND PROGRAM | ||
Patent #
US 20090244313A1
Filed 03/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,616,781 B2
Filed 04/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VISION BASED MOTION DETERMINATION | ||
Patent #
US 20090279741A1
Filed 08/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell BV
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,325,935 B2
Filed 01/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,325,934 B2
Filed 01/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image processing apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,330,584 B2
Filed 10/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation
|
IMAGE SENSING SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20080054161A1
Filed 11/07/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 7,344,261 B2
Filed 10/06/2005
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicle headlight control using imaging sensor | ||
Patent #
US 7,339,149 B1
Filed 11/16/1999
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,380,948 B2
Filed 01/04/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for controlling an accessory or headlight of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,388,182 B2
Filed 01/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicle headlight control using imaging sensor with spectral filtering | ||
Patent #
US 7,402,786 B2
Filed 10/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE, CAMERA, VEHICLE AND SURVEILLANCE DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20080158359A1
Filed 11/06/2007
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ENHANCING STEREOSCOPIC EFFECT OF IMAGE | ||
Patent #
US 20080199070A1
Filed 09/18/2007
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Automatic exterior light control for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,423,248 B2
Filed 11/07/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vision system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,425,076 B2
Filed 12/18/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image processing apparatus, image forming apparatus, image processing system, computer program and recording medium | ||
Patent #
US 20080260260A1
Filed 09/18/2007
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,459,664 B2
Filed 01/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 7,164,790 B2
Filed 03/17/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Vehicle headlight control using imaging sensor | ||
Patent #
US 20070023613A1
Filed 10/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20070109651A1
Filed 01/04/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20070109406A1
Filed 01/03/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20070109654A1
Filed 01/10/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20070109653A1
Filed 01/08/2007
|
Current Assignee
Mark Larson, Kenneth Schofield
|
Original Assignee
Mark Larson, Kenneth Schofield
|
Vehicle imaging system | ||
Patent #
US 7,227,459 B2
Filed 11/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20070176080A1
Filed 01/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 7,272,256 B2
Filed 12/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Image sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 7,311,406 B2
Filed 01/10/2007
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Gain and offset correction for efficient stereoscopic coding and improved display | ||
Patent #
US 6,111,596 A
Filed 10/15/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Method of and an apparatus for 3-dimensional structure estimation | ||
Patent #
US 6,480,620 B1
Filed 01/20/2000
|
Current Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Original Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Stereographic image compression with image moment normalization | ||
Patent #
US 6,275,253 B1
Filed 07/09/1998
|
Current Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Method of and an apparatus for 3-dimensional structure estimation | ||
Patent #
US 6,049,625 A
Filed 10/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Original Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 20060028731A1
Filed 10/06/2005
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Measuring apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,016,528 B2
Filed 07/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon
|
Image processing apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 20060083421A1
Filed 10/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Corporation
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 7,106,899 B2
Filed 03/17/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Detection and removal of image occlusion errors | ||
Patent #
US 6,865,289 B1
Filed 02/07/2000
|
Current Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Vehicle imaging system with stereo imaging | ||
Patent #
US 20050083184A1
Filed 11/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image processing apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 20050129325A1
Filed 11/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 20050123190A1
Filed 12/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Image-correspondence position detection device, distance measuring device and apparatus using the same | ||
Patent #
US 6,909,802 B2
Filed 05/16/2001
|
Current Assignee
Minolta Corporation Limited
|
Original Assignee
Minolta Corporation Limited
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 20050163367A1
Filed 03/17/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
System and method for progressive stereo matching of digital images | ||
Patent #
US 20050163366A1
Filed 03/17/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Error detection using a maximum distance among four block-motion-vectors in a macroblock in a corrupted MPEG-4 bitstream | ||
Patent #
US 6,700,934 B2
Filed 03/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
REDROCK SEMICONDUCTOR LTD.
|
Original Assignee
REDROCK SEMICONDUCTOR LTD.
|
Multi-layered real-time stereo matching method and system | ||
Patent #
US 20040151380A1
Filed 01/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Postech Foundation
|
Original Assignee
Postech Foundation
|
Vehicle imaging system with accessory control | ||
Patent #
US 6,822,563 B2
Filed 01/14/2002
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image recognition system | ||
Patent #
US 6,658,150 B2
Filed 12/01/2000
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Vehicle imaging system with stereo imaging | ||
Patent #
US 6,396,397 B1
Filed 08/12/1999
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Measuring apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20020181764A1
Filed 07/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Topcon
|
Process for producing cartographic data by stereo vision | ||
Patent #
US 6,175,648 B1
Filed 08/11/1998
|
Current Assignee
Cassidian Limited
|
Original Assignee
MATRA SYSTEMS ET INFORMATION
|
Object extraction method and system | ||
Patent #
US 6,226,396 B1
Filed 07/31/1998
|
Current Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Original Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Image recognition system | ||
Patent #
US 20010002936A1
Filed 12/01/2000
|
Current Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Image-correspondence position detection device, distance measuring device and apparatus using the same | ||
Patent #
US 20010055418A1
Filed 05/16/2001
|
Current Assignee
Minolta Corporation Limited
|
Original Assignee
Minolta Corporation Limited
|
Method and apparatus for determining image similarity and position | ||
Patent #
US 6,154,566 A
Filed 05/15/1997
|
Current Assignee
Omron Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Omron Corporation
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,090,153 B2
Filed 05/13/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Image processing apparatus, image forming apparatus, image processing system, computer program and recording medium | ||
Patent #
US 8,107,728 B2
Filed 09/18/2007
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
3D image processing apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 8,116,557 B2
Filed 10/12/2006
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Stereo vision system and control method thereof | ||
Patent #
US 8,098,276 B2
Filed 01/29/2009
|
Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Compound eye imaging apparatus, distance measuring apparatus, disparity calculation method, and distance measuring method | ||
Patent #
US 8,090,195 B2
Filed 02/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
Automatic lighting system with adaptive function | ||
Patent #
US 8,070,332 B2
Filed 03/29/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Automatic lighting system | ||
Patent #
US 8,142,059 B2
Filed 11/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Adaptive forward lighting system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,162,518 B2
Filed 06/30/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Object detecting system | ||
Patent #
US 8,174,563 B2
Filed 10/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Subaru Corp.
|
Original Assignee
Fuji Heavy Industries Limited
|
Method for producing image with depth by using 2D images | ||
Patent #
US 8,180,145 B2
Filed 10/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20120127163A1
Filed 09/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,189,871 B2
Filed 01/31/2011
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Method and system for real-time visual odometry | ||
Patent #
US 8,213,706 B2
Filed 04/22/2008
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Forward facing sensing system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,217,830 B2
Filed 07/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular image sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 8,222,588 B2
Filed 08/05/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for vision based motion determination | ||
Patent #
US 8,238,612 B2
Filed 08/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Method for front matching stereo vision | ||
Patent #
US 8,264,526 B2
Filed 06/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
University of Southern Mississippi
|
Original Assignee
University of Southern Mississippi
|
REAL-TIME DEPTH EXTRACTION USING STEREO CORRESPONDENCE | ||
Patent #
US 20120249747A1
Filed 03/30/2011
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Reduction of viewer discomfort for stereoscopic images | ||
Patent #
US 8,284,235 B2
Filed 09/28/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Laboratories of America Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,294,608 B1
Filed 07/03/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Machine control system utilizing stereo disparity density | ||
Patent #
US 8,320,627 B2
Filed 06/17/2010
|
Current Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Caterpillar Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,325,986 B2
Filed 12/22/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicular image sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 8,324,552 B2
Filed 07/16/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicular rearview mirror system | ||
Patent #
US 8,362,885 B2
Filed 10/19/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Automatic headlamp control | ||
Patent #
US 8,376,595 B2
Filed 05/17/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Adaptive forward lighting system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,434,919 B2
Filed 04/20/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING DIAGNOSTIC IMAGE AND MEDICAL IMAGE SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20130116562A1
Filed 07/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Combined RGB and IR imaging sensor | ||
Patent #
US 8,446,470 B2
Filed 10/03/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,451,107 B2
Filed 09/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular image sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 8,481,910 B2
Filed 11/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,483,439 B2
Filed 05/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,492,698 B2
Filed 01/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
System and method for measuring image quality | ||
Patent #
US 8,494,251 B2
Filed 01/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
SRI International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SRI International Inc.
|
Depth detection method and system using thereof | ||
Patent #
US 8,525,879 B2
Filed 07/23/2010
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A DISPARITY ESTIMATE | ||
Patent #
US 20130272582A1
Filed 06/30/2011
|
Current Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Original Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,593,521 B2
Filed 11/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,599,001 B2
Filed 11/19/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,614,640 B2
Filed 10/22/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,203,443 B2
Filed 11/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,629,768 B2
Filed 06/18/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,636,393 B2
Filed 05/06/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,637,801 B2
Filed 07/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera vision system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,643,724 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,665,079 B2
Filed 10/15/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Accessory system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,686,840 B2
Filed 01/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle yaw rate correction | ||
Patent #
US 8,694,224 B2
Filed 02/28/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ACTIVE STEREO MATCHING | ||
Patent #
US 20140219549A1
Filed 09/09/2013
|
Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,814,401 B2
Filed 03/22/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,818,042 B2
Filed 11/18/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Real-time depth extraction using stereo correspondence | ||
Patent #
US 8,823,777 B2
Filed 03/30/2011
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Vehicle vision system with yaw rate determination | ||
Patent #
US 8,849,495 B2
Filed 04/07/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Automatic vehicle exterior light control | ||
Patent #
US 8,842,176 B2
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Parking assist system | ||
Patent #
US 8,874,317 B2
Filed 07/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,886,401 B2
Filed 11/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Adaptable wireless vehicle vision system based on wireless communication error | ||
Patent #
US 8,890,955 B2
Filed 02/09/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,908,040 B2
Filed 05/17/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,917,169 B2
Filed 12/02/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,977,008 B2
Filed 07/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,993,951 B2
Filed 07/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,008,369 B2
Filed 08/25/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,014,904 B2
Filed 09/23/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular imaging system with camera misalignment correction and capturing image data at different resolution levels dependent on distance to object in field of view | ||
Patent #
US 9,018,577 B2
Filed 02/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,041,806 B2
Filed 08/31/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
3D imaging device and 3D imaging method | ||
Patent #
US 9,049,434 B2
Filed 03/04/2011
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Rear vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,085,261 B2
Filed 01/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Braking control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,090,234 B2
Filed 11/18/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,092,986 B2
Filed 01/31/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular rear view camera display system with lifecheck function | ||
Patent #
US 9,117,123 B2
Filed 07/05/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20150249814A1
Filed 07/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
3D imaging device and 3D imaging method | ||
Patent #
US 9,128,367 B2
Filed 03/03/2011
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Alert system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,126,525 B2
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera vision system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,131,120 B2
Filed 05/15/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,140,789 B2
Filed 12/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system with algorithm switching | ||
Patent #
US 9,146,898 B2
Filed 10/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,171,217 B2
Filed 03/03/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Lane keeping system and lane centering system | ||
Patent #
US 9,180,908 B2
Filed 11/17/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,187,028 B2
Filed 02/14/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,191,574 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
3D imaging device and 3D imaging method | ||
Patent #
US 9,188,849 B2
Filed 03/03/2011
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,191,634 B2
Filed 04/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,193,303 B2
Filed 04/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Step filter for estimating distance in a time-of-flight ranging system | ||
Patent #
US 9,194,943 B2
Filed 04/11/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,245,448 B2
Filed 06/17/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,244,165 B1
Filed 09/21/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with collision mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 9,260,095 B2
Filed 06/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,264,672 B2
Filed 12/21/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Vehicular collision mitigation system | ||
Patent #
US 9,318,020 B2
Filed 07/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for computing a parallax | ||
Patent #
US 9,324,147 B2
Filed 07/21/2011
|
Current Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
|
Rear collision avoidance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,327,693 B2
Filed 04/09/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,335,411 B1
Filed 01/25/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle lane keep assist system | ||
Patent #
US 9,340,227 B2
Filed 08/12/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with yaw rate determination | ||
Patent #
US 9,346,468 B2
Filed 09/29/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and system for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 9,357,208 B2
Filed 01/20/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,376,060 B2
Filed 11/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,428,192 B2
Filed 11/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,436,880 B2
Filed 01/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, IMAGE CAPTURING APPARATUS, CONTROL SYSTEM APPLICABLE TO MOVEABLE APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM OF PROGRAM OF METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20160261848A1
Filed 02/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Yuji Takahashi, Soichiro Yokota, Hiroyoshi Sekiguchi, Eita Watanabe, Reiko Kuromizu
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,440,535 B2
Filed 01/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer angle detection system | ||
Patent #
US 9,446,713 B2
Filed 09/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Parking assist system | ||
Patent #
US 9,457,717 B2
Filed 10/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,463,744 B2
Filed 01/18/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,469,250 B2
Filed 02/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system utilizing camera synchronization | ||
Patent #
US 9,481,301 B2
Filed 12/05/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Braking control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,481,344 B2
Filed 07/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with adaptive wheel angle correction | ||
Patent #
US 9,487,235 B2
Filed 04/01/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera alignment system | ||
Patent #
US 9,491,450 B2
Filed 07/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Calibration system and method for vehicular surround vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,491,451 B2
Filed 11/14/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular camera with on-board microcontroller | ||
Patent #
US 9,495,876 B2
Filed 07/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 9,499,139 B2
Filed 12/05/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,508,014 B2
Filed 05/05/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle imaging system | ||
Patent #
US 9,509,957 B2
Filed 04/19/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,507,021 B2
Filed 05/09/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
STRUCTURED LIGHT MATCHING OF A SET OF CURVES FROM TWO CAMERAS | ||
Patent #
US 20160350929A1
Filed 02/04/2015
|
Current Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Collision avoidance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,545,921 B2
Filed 05/02/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Image processing method for detecting objects using relative motion | ||
Patent #
US 9,547,795 B2
Filed 01/20/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,558,409 B2
Filed 12/11/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,555,803 B2
Filed 05/16/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,563,809 B2
Filed 04/18/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,563,951 B2
Filed 05/20/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for determining a disparity estimate | ||
Patent #
US 9,591,281 B2
Filed 06/30/2011
|
Current Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Original Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,598,014 B2
Filed 10/17/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,609,289 B2
Filed 08/29/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with image classification | ||
Patent #
US 9,619,716 B2
Filed 08/11/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Personalized driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,623,878 B2
Filed 04/01/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,643,605 B2
Filed 10/26/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,656,608 B2
Filed 06/13/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera image quality improvement in poor visibility conditions by contrast amplification | ||
Patent #
US 9,681,062 B2
Filed 09/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Calibration system and method for multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,688,200 B2
Filed 03/03/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using kinematic model of vehicle motion | ||
Patent #
US 9,701,246 B2
Filed 12/07/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Process for determining state of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,715,769 B2
Filed 05/23/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera image stitching calibration system | ||
Patent #
US 9,723,272 B2
Filed 10/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,731,653 B2
Filed 03/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,736,435 B2
Filed 03/20/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with enhanced display functions | ||
Patent #
US 9,743,002 B2
Filed 11/18/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with reduced image color data processing by use of dithering | ||
Patent #
US 9,751,465 B2
Filed 04/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Lane keeping system and lane centering system | ||
Patent #
US 9,758,163 B2
Filed 11/09/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistant system using influence mapping for conflict avoidance path determination | ||
Patent #
US 9,761,142 B2
Filed 09/03/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 9,762,880 B2
Filed 12/07/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,769,381 B2
Filed 11/28/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for enhancing vehicle camera image quality | ||
Patent #
US 9,774,790 B1
Filed 06/12/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,779,313 B2
Filed 01/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Accessory system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,783,125 B2
Filed 03/31/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,789,821 B2
Filed 05/22/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Information processing apparatus, image capturing apparatus, control system applicable to moveable apparatus, information processing method, and storage medium of program of method | ||
Patent #
US 9,794,543 B2
Filed 02/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Ricoh Company Limited
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,796,332 B2
Filed 05/24/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Collision avoidance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,802,609 B2
Filed 01/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer angle detection system calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,802,542 B2
Filed 09/19/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 9,824,285 B2
Filed 01/26/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with collision mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 9,824,587 B2
Filed 02/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driving assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,142 B2
Filed 05/19/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,216 B2
Filed 01/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and system for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,153 B2
Filed 04/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for determining disparity | ||
Patent #
US 9,842,400 B2
Filed 08/25/2015
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Parking assist system | ||
Patent #
US 9,868,463 B2
Filed 09/28/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using image data transmission and power supply via a coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 9,900,490 B2
Filed 02/22/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
System and method of establishing a multi-camera image using pixel remapping | ||
Patent #
US 9,900,522 B2
Filed 12/01/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver active safety control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,911,050 B2
Filed 09/04/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system utilizing camera synchronization | ||
Patent #
US 9,912,841 B2
Filed 10/31/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Process for determining state of a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,916,699 B2
Filed 07/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with calibration algorithm | ||
Patent #
US 9,916,660 B2
Filed 01/15/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system with image processing and wireless communication | ||
Patent #
US 9,919,705 B2
Filed 09/28/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle collision avoidance system with enhanced pedestrian avoidance | ||
Patent #
US 9,925,980 B2
Filed 09/15/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,940,528 B2
Filed 11/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,948,904 B2
Filed 08/14/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for controlling a vehicle in accordance with parameters preferred by an identified driver | ||
Patent #
US 9,950,707 B2
Filed 04/17/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailering assist system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,950,738 B2
Filed 07/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular imaging system comprising an imaging device with a single image sensor and image processor for determining a totally blocked state or partially blocked state of the single image sensor as well as an automatic correction for misalignment of the imaging device | ||
Patent #
US 9,972,100 B2
Filed 04/23/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,979,957 B2
Filed 01/26/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with traffic driving control | ||
Patent #
US 9,988,047 B2
Filed 12/12/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,003,755 B2
Filed 12/08/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,005,394 B2
Filed 11/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Stereo image processing device and stereo image processing method | ||
Patent #
US 10,009,594 B2
Filed 07/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co. Ltd.
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,015,452 B1
Filed 04/16/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Braking control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,023,161 B2
Filed 10/31/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system utilizing corner detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,025,994 B2
Filed 12/02/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Spectral filtering for vehicular driver assistance systems | ||
Patent #
US 10,027,930 B2
Filed 03/28/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Image processing method for detecting objects using relative motion | ||
Patent #
US 10,043,082 B2
Filed 01/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,046,702 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,053,012 B2
Filed 10/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with enhanced lane tracking | ||
Patent #
US 10,055,651 B2
Filed 03/01/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,057,489 B2
Filed 09/18/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,071,676 B2
Filed 09/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,071,687 B2
Filed 11/27/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle parking assist system with vision-based parking space detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,078,789 B2
Filed 07/14/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,086,747 B2
Filed 08/25/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer parking assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,086,870 B2
Filed 08/16/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with trailering assist function | ||
Patent #
US 10,089,541 B2
Filed 10/02/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with front and rear camera integration | ||
Patent #
US 10,089,537 B2
Filed 05/15/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,099,614 B2
Filed 11/27/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,099,610 B2
Filed 10/10/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with enhanced display functions | ||
Patent #
US 10,104,298 B2
Filed 08/21/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular camera with on-board microcontroller | ||
Patent #
US 10,106,155 B2
Filed 11/11/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward facing sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,107,905 B2
Filed 11/28/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,110,860 B1
Filed 07/02/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistant system using influence mapping for conflict avoidance path determination | ||
Patent #
US 10,115,310 B2
Filed 09/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 10,118,618 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for vehicular control | ||
Patent #
US 10,127,738 B2
Filed 03/12/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 10,129,518 B2
Filed 09/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera with multiple spectral filters | ||
Patent #
US 10,132,971 B2
Filed 03/01/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle monitoring system | ||
Patent #
US 10,137,892 B2
Filed 11/18/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,144,352 B2
Filed 08/14/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle dynamic control system for emergency handling | ||
Patent #
US 10,144,419 B2
Filed 11/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer backup assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,160,382 B2
Filed 02/04/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with reverse assist | ||
Patent #
US 10,160,437 B2
Filed 02/27/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system utilizing multiple cameras and ethernet links | ||
Patent #
US 10,171,709 B2
Filed 03/05/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera dynamic top view vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,179,543 B2
Filed 02/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,187,615 B1
Filed 10/22/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with adaptive wheel angle correction | ||
Patent #
US 10,202,147 B2
Filed 11/07/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,202,077 B2
Filed 05/23/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Collision avoidance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,207,705 B2
Filed 10/25/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Parking assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,214,206 B2
Filed 07/11/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
System for locating a parking space based on a previously parked space | ||
Patent #
US 10,222,224 B2
Filed 04/15/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Rear vision system for vehicle with dual purpose signal lines | ||
Patent #
US 10,232,797 B2
Filed 04/29/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with calibration algorithm | ||
Patent #
US 10,235,775 B2
Filed 03/07/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for enhancing vehicle camera image quality | ||
Patent #
US 10,257,432 B2
Filed 09/25/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Calibration system and method for vehicular surround vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,264,249 B2
Filed 11/07/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using kinematic model of vehicle motion | ||
Patent #
US 10,266,115 B2
Filed 07/10/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Structured light matching of a set of curves from two cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,271,039 B2
Filed 02/04/2015
|
Current Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Multi-camera image stitching calibration system | ||
Patent #
US 10,284,818 B2
Filed 07/31/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision using image data transmission and power supply via a coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 10,284,764 B2
Filed 02/19/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with video compression | ||
Patent #
US 10,286,855 B2
Filed 03/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
System and method for estimating distance between a mobile unit and a vehicle using a TOF system | ||
Patent #
US 10,288,724 B2
Filed 11/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer driving assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,300,855 B2
Filed 10/25/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular display system | ||
Patent #
US 10,300,856 B2
Filed 08/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,306,190 B1
Filed 01/21/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system with enhanced display functions | ||
Patent #
US 10,321,064 B2
Filed 10/11/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with reduction of temporal noise in images | ||
Patent #
US 10,326,969 B2
Filed 08/11/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Parking assist system with annotated map generation | ||
Patent #
US 10,328,932 B2
Filed 06/01/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system with rear backup video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,336,255 B2
Filed 11/29/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 10,351,135 B2
Filed 11/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular lane change system | ||
Patent #
US 10,406,980 B2
Filed 10/11/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Lane keeping system and lane centering system | ||
Patent #
US 10,427,679 B2
Filed 09/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with reduced image color data processing by use of dithering | ||
Patent #
US 10,434,944 B2
Filed 08/30/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Processing method for distinguishing a three dimensional object from a two dimensional object using a vehicular system | ||
Patent #
US 10,452,931 B2
Filed 08/06/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with multi-paned view | ||
Patent #
US 10,457,209 B2
Filed 03/28/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,462,426 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system with rear backup video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,486,597 B1
Filed 07/01/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera dynamic top view vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,486,596 B2
Filed 01/14/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera system with image manipulation | ||
Patent #
US 10,493,916 B2
Filed 02/22/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular trailer backup assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,493,917 B2
Filed 12/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular collision mitigation system | ||
Patent #
US 10,497,262 B2
Filed 11/20/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,509,972 B2
Filed 04/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with front and rear camera integration | ||
Patent #
US 10,515,279 B2
Filed 08/30/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle data recording system | ||
Patent #
US 10,523,904 B2
Filed 04/10/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Hardware disparity evaluation for stereo matching | ||
Patent #
US 10,529,085 B2
Filed 03/30/2018
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 10,542,244 B2
Filed 11/12/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Virtual 3D methods, systems and software | ||
Patent #
US 10,551,913 B2
Filed 03/21/2016
|
Current Assignee
Mine One GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Mine One GmbH
|
Method of synchronizing multiple vehicular cameras with an ECU | ||
Patent #
US 10,560,610 B2
Filed 12/28/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Coaxial cable with bidirectional data transmission | ||
Patent #
US 10,567,705 B2
Filed 06/06/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using image data transmission and power supply via a coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 10,567,633 B2
Filed 05/02/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Targetless vehicular camera calibration method | ||
Patent #
US 10,567,748 B2
Filed 05/21/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Parking assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,569,804 B2
Filed 01/15/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for displaying video images for a vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,574,885 B2
Filed 08/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with trailering assist function | ||
Patent #
US 10,586,119 B2
Filed 10/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular rear backup vision system with video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,589,678 B1
Filed 11/25/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with accelerated object confirmation | ||
Patent #
US 10,609,335 B2
Filed 03/22/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Video processor module for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,611,306 B2
Filed 08/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,616,507 B2
Filed 06/18/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,623,704 B2
Filed 03/09/2015
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Method for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,640,041 B2
Filed 02/04/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,640,040 B2
Filed 09/10/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Structured light matching of a set of curves from three cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,643,343 B2
Filed 04/11/2019
|
Current Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Creaform Inc.
|
Method and system for dynamically ascertaining alignment of vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,654,423 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,670,713 B2
Filed 10/22/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular driving assist system using forward-viewing camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,683,008 B2
Filed 07/15/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular driver assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,685,243 B2
Filed 08/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with traffic driving control | ||
Patent #
US 10,688,993 B2
Filed 06/04/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with collision mitigation | ||
Patent #
US 10,692,380 B2
Filed 11/20/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular parking assist system that determines a parking space based in part on previously parked spaces | ||
Patent #
US 10,718,624 B2
Filed 03/04/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular imaging system with blockage determination and misalignment correction | ||
Patent #
US 10,726,578 B2
Filed 05/14/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistant system using influence mapping for conflict avoidance path determination | ||
Patent #
US 10,733,892 B2
Filed 10/29/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with traffic lane detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,735,695 B2
Filed 10/28/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with temperature input | ||
Patent #
US 10,744,940 B2
Filed 06/25/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailering assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,755,110 B2
Filed 06/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,766,417 B2
Filed 10/23/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with reverse assist | ||
Patent #
US 10,773,707 B2
Filed 12/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for stitching images captured by multiple vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,780,827 B2
Filed 11/25/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for determining misalignment of a vehicular camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,780,826 B2
Filed 04/22/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Adaptive forward lighting system for vehicle comprising a control that adjusts the headlamp beam in response to processing of image data captured by a camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,787,116 B2
Filed 09/10/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,793,067 B2
Filed 07/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer driving assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,800,332 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular collision mitigation system | ||
Patent #
US 10,803,744 B2
Filed 12/02/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular adaptive headlighting system | ||
Patent #
US 10,807,515 B2
Filed 10/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular rear backup vision system with video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,814,785 B2
Filed 03/16/2020
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with incident recording function | ||
Patent #
US 10,819,943 B2
Filed 05/05/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system using image data transmission and power supply via a coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 10,827,108 B2
Filed 02/17/2020
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,839,233 B2
Filed 03/05/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Facial signature methods, systems and software | ||
Patent #
US 10,853,625 B2
Filed 05/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Mine One GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Mine One GmbH
|
Trailering assist system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,858,042 B2
Filed 04/23/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for determining alignment of vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,868,974 B2
Filed 02/19/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with remote processor | ||
Patent #
US 10,870,427 B2
Filed 11/26/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular trailering system | ||
Patent #
US 10,870,449 B2
Filed 10/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method of synchronizing multiple vehicular cameras with an ECU | ||
Patent #
US 10,873,682 B2
Filed 02/10/2020
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,455 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Collision avoidance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,527 B2
Filed 02/18/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with enhanced night vision | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,403 B2
Filed 10/26/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,526 B2
Filed 10/22/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Forward sensing system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,877,147 B2
Filed 06/01/2020
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system for emergency handling | ||
Patent #
US 10,889,293 B2
Filed 11/29/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Digital 3D/stereoscopic video compression technique utilizing two disparity estimates | ||
Patent #
US 5,612,735 A
Filed 05/26/1995
|
Current Assignee
Lucent Technologies Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Luncent Technologies Incorporated
|
Automated analytic stereo comparator | ||
Patent #
US 5,606,627 A
Filed 01/24/1995
|
Current Assignee
EOTEK INC.
|
Original Assignee
EOTEK INC.
|
Optimal disparity estimation for stereoscopic video coding | ||
Patent #
US 5,652,616 A
Filed 08/06/1996
|
Current Assignee
Google Technology Holdings LLC
|
Original Assignee
General Instrument Corporation
|
Three-dimensional reference image segmenting method and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,684,890 A
Filed 02/24/1995
|
Current Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Original Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Generation of depth image through interpolation and extrapolation of intermediate images derived from stereo image pair using disparity vector fields | ||
Patent #
US 5,530,774 A
Filed 03/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
Intellectual Ventures Fund 83 LLC
|
Original Assignee
Eastman Kodak Company
|
Method and apparatus for determining the distance between an image and an object | ||
Patent #
US 5,577,130 A
Filed 08/05/1991
|
Current Assignee
US Philips Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
|
Stereoscopic computer vision system | ||
Patent #
US 5,383,013 A
Filed 09/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
NEC Corporation
|
Original Assignee
NEC Research Institute Inc.
|
Stereoscopic determination of terrain elevation | ||
Patent #
US 5,309,522 A
Filed 06/30/1992
|
Current Assignee
ERIM INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
Original Assignee
Environmental Research Institute of Michigan
|
Signal processing disparity resolution | ||
Patent #
US 4,745,562 A
Filed 08/16/1985
|
Current Assignee
Schlumberger Limited
|
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Limited
|
4 Claims
-
1. A method of detecting a disparity between stereo images, comprising the steps of:
-
dividing each of first and second images IL and IR into a plurality of blocks each having a size of M×
L pixels;matching ternary-valued frequency component images of said images IL and IR; comparing pixels in a micro region defined by a one-dimensional window set on said first image IL with pixels in a designated micro region on said second image IR; evaluating a similarity between two micro regions using the following equation;
space="preserve" listing-type="equation">Ε
all=Σ
β
k(PN)k+Σ
γ
k(ZN)kwhere PN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "P" while ZN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "Z", and β
k and γ
k represent weighting factors;searching a first region having a most highest similarity and a second region having a second highest similarity in a concerned block; specifying a first candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to said first region, and a second candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to said second region; creating a histogram based on said first and second candidate disparities; and determining a valid disparity of said concerned block as a disparity corresponding to a peak position of said histogram. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4)
-
1 Specification
1. Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to a method of matching stereo images and a method of detecting disparity between these images, which is chiefly used in the industrial field of stereo cameras for detecting positional information in the image pickup space based on stereo images, volume compression of overall stereo images (i.e. three-dimensional video images), display control of these stereo images, and for the optical flow extraction of moving images and so on.
2. Prior Art
Generally known, conventional methods of matching stereo images and of detecting disparity between these images will be hereinafter explained with reference to a so-called stereo image measurement technology where the position or distance information can be obtained in the image-pickup space by performing the matching between two images (stereo images) and detecting a disparity between these images.
FIG. 1 is a view illustrating the principle of a typical stereo image measurement. In FIG. 1, a three-dimensional coordinate, generally defined by variables x, y and z, represents the real space. A two-dimensional coordinate, generally defined by variables X and Y, represents the plane of image (i.e. an image-pickup plane of a camera). There are provided a pair of two-dimensional coordinates for a pair of cameras 23R and 23L. A position on the image plane of right camera 23R can be expressed by variables XR and YR on one two-dimensional coordinate. A position on the image plane of left camera 23L can be expressed by variables XL and YL on the other two-dimensional coordinate.
Axes XL and XR are parallel to the axis x, while axes YL and YR are parallel to the axis y. Axis z is parallel to the optical axes of two cameras 23R and 23L. The origin of the real space coordinate (x, y, z) coincides with a midpoint between the projective centers of right and left cameras 23R and 23L. The distance between the projective centers is generally referred to as a base length denoted by 2a. A distance, denoted by f, is a focal distance between each projective center and its image plane.
It is now assumed that a real-space point p is projected at a point PR(XR,YR) on the right image plane and at the same time a point PL(XL,YL) on the left image plane. According to the stereo image measurement, PR and PL are determined on respective image planes (by performing the matching of stereo images) and then the real-space coordinate (x, y, z) representing the point p is obtained based on the principle of the trigonometrical survey.
YR and YL have identical values in this case, because two optical axes of cameras 23R and 23L exist on the same plane and X axes of cameras 23R and 23L are parallel to axis x. The relationship between the coordinate values XR, YR, XR, YR and the real-space coordinate values x, y, z is expressed in the following equation. ##EQU1## where d represents the disparity (between stereo images).
d=XL-XR (Eq. 3)
As "a" is a positive value (a>0), the following relation is derived from the above equation 2.
XL>XR and YL=YR (Eq. 4)
Understood from the above-given relationship is that a specific point on one image plane has a matching point on the other image plane along the same scanning line serving as an epipolar line within the region define by XL>XR. Accordingly, the matching point corresponding to a specific point on one image plane can be found on the other image plane by checking the similarity of images in each micro area along the line having the possibility of detecting the matching point.
Some of similarity evaluation methods will be explained below FIG. 2 shows a conventional method of detecting a mutual correlation value between two images, disclosed in "Image Processing Handbook" (Shokodo publishing Co. Ltd.) by Morio ONOUE et al., for example.
First of all, designation is given to a pixel 2403 existing somewhere on the left image 2401. A pixel matching to this pixel 2403 is next found along the plane of right image 2402. In other words, the matching point is determined. More specifically, a square micro area 2404 (hereinafter referred to as a micro area) is set on the right image 2401 so as to have a size corresponding to n×m pixels sufficient to involve the designated pixel 2403 at the center thereof. It is now assumed that IL(i,j) represents the brightness of each point (pixel) within the micro area 2404.
On the other hand, a square micro area 2405 on the right image 2402 is designated as a micro area having its center on a pixel satisfying the condition of equation 4. The micro area 2405 has a size corresponding to n x m pixels. It is assumed that IR(i,j) represents the brightness of each point (pixel) within the micro area 2405.
Furthermore, it is assumed that μL, μR, σL2 and σR2 represent averages and variances of the brightness in the micro areas 2404 and 2405. The mutual correlation value of these micro areas can be given by the following equation. ##EQU2##
The value "c" defined by the equation 5 is calculated along the straight line (epipolar line) having the possibility of detecting a matching point. Then, the point where the value "c" is maximized is identified as the matching point to be detected. According to this method, it becomes possible to determine the matching point as having the size identical with a pixel. If the matching point is once found, the disparity "d" can be immediately obtained using the equation 3 based on the coordinate values representing thus found matching point.
However, this conventional method is disadvantageous in that a great amount of computations will be required for completely obtaining all the matching points of required pixels since even a single search of finding only one matching point of a certain pixel requires the above-described complicated computations to be repetitively performed with respect to the entire region having the possibility of detecting the matching point.
The computations for obtaining the correlation can be speeded up with reducing size of the micro area, although the stability in the matching point detection will be worsened due to increase of image distortion and noises. On the contrary, increasing the size of the micro area will not only increase the computation time but deteriorate the accuracy in the matching point detection because of the change of correlation values being undesirably moderated. Thus, it will be required to adequately set the size of the micro area by considering the characteristics of the image to be handled.
Furthermore, as apparent from the equation 3, the characteristics of the above-described conventional method resides in that the determination of the disparity directly reflects the result of stereo image matching. Hence, any erroneous matching will cause an error in the measurement of disparity "d". In short, an error in the stereo image matching leads to an error in the disparity measurement.
In this manner, the method of determining a matching point with respect to each of pixels is disadvantageous in that the volume of computations becomes huge. To solve this problem, one of proposed technologies is a method of dividing or dissecting the image into several blocks each having a predetermined size and determining the matching region based on the dissected blocks. For example, "Driving Aid System based on Three-dimensional Image Recognition Technology", by Jitsuyoshi et al., in the Pre-publishing 924, pp. 169-172 of Automotive Vehicle Technical Institute Scientific Lecture Meeting, October in 1992, discloses such a method of searching the matching region based on the comparison between the blocks of right and left images.
FIG. 3 is a view illustrating the conventional method of performing the matching of stereo images between square micro areas (blocks). The left image 2501, serving as a reference image, is dissected into a plurality of blocks so that each block (2503) has a size equivalent to n×m pixels. To obtain the disparity, each matching region with respect to each block on the left image 2501 is searched along the plane of right image 2502. The following equation is a similarity evaluation used for determining the matching region.
C=Σ|Li -Ri| (Eq. 6)
where Li represents luminance of i-th pixel in the left block 2503, while Ri represents luminance of i-th pixel in the right block 2504.
This evaluation is not so complicated when it is compared with the calculation of equation 5 which includes the computations of subtracting the average values. However, the hardware scale is still large because of line memories used for the evaluation of two-dimensional similarity. Furthermore, the overall processing time required will be fairly long due to too many accesses to the memories.
Moreover, using the luminance value for the similarity evaluation will increase the hardware cost because the preprocessing is additionally required for adjusting the sensitivity difference between right and left cameras and for performing the shading correction before executing the stereo image matching processing.
A straight line existing in the image-pickup space may be image-formed as straight lines 2603 and 2604 different in their gradients in blocks 2605 and 2606 of left and right images 2601 and 2602, as shown in FIG. 4. In such a case, it may fail to accurately determine the matching regions.
On the contrary, two different lines may be image-formed as identical lines in blocks 2703 and 2704 on left and right images 2701 and 2702 as shown in FIG. 5. Hence, comparing the pixels between two blocks 2703 and 2704 only will cause a problem that the stereo image matching may be erroneously performed and the succeeding measurement of disparity will be failed.
According to the above-described disparity measuring methods, the unit for measuring each disparity is one pixel at minimum because of image data of digital data sampled at a certain frequency. However, it is possible to perform the disparity measurement more accurately.
FIG. 6 is a view illustrating a conventional disparity measuring method capable of detecting a disparity in a sub-pixel level accuracy. FIG. 6 shows a peak position found in the similarity evaluation value C (ordinate) when the equation 6 is calculated along the search region in each block. The sub-pixel level disparity measurement is performed by using similarity evaluations Ci, Ci-1, Ci+1 corresponding to particular disparities di, di-1, di+1 (in the increment of pixel) existing before and after the peak position. More specifically, a first straight line 2801 is obtained as a line crossing both of two points (di-1, Ci-1) and (di, Ci). A second straight line 2802 is obtained as a line crossing a point (di+1, Ci+1) and having a gradient symmetrical with the line 2801 (i.e. identical in absolute value but opposite in sign). Then, a point 2803 is obtained as an intersecting point of two straight lines 2801 and 2802. A disparity ds, corresponding to thus obtained intersecting point 2803, is finally obtained as a sub-pixel level disparity of the concerned block.
As apparent from the foregoing description, the above-described conventional stereo image matching methods and disparity detecting methods are generally suffering from increase of hardware costs and enlargement of processing time due to four rules'"'"' arithmetic calculations of equations 5 and 6 required for the similarity evaluation in the stereo image matching.
Furthermore, performing the similarity evaluation based on two-dimensional windows necessarily requires the provision of line memories as hardware which possibly requires frequent accesses to the memories, resulting in further increase of hardware costs and enlargement of processing time.
Still further, utilizing the comparison of luminance difference between right and left images definitely increases the hardware costs for the addition of preprocessing components, used in the sensitivity adjustment and shading correction between right and left cameras which are performed before executing the stereo image matching.
Yet further, using a single block as the unit for determining the disparity identical in size with a two-dimensional window serving as the unit for the matching will cause a problem that any error occurring in the matching phase based on the two-dimensional window will directly give an adverse effect on the disparity detection of the corresponding block. In short, there is no means capable of absorbing or correcting the error occurring in the matching phase.
Moreover, determining each matching region using only the pixels existing in a block (=two-dimensional window) will possibly result in the failure in the detection of a true matching region.
Accordingly, in view of above-described problems encountered in the prior art, a principal object of the present invention is to provide a method of matching stereo images and of detecting disparity between these images, small in the volume of computations, compact in the hardware construction, quick in processing, highly reliable, and excellent in accuracy.
In order to accomplish this and other related objects, a first aspect of the present invention provides a novel and excellent method of matching stereo images, comprising the steps of: inputting first and second images IL and IR; developing the images IL and IR into a plurality of frequency component images FL1, FL2, FL3, - - - , FLk, FLk+1, - - - , FLn and a plurality of frequency component images FR1, FR2, FR3, - - - , FRk, FRk+1, - - - , FRn, respectively; applying a secondary differential processing to each of the frequency component images; converting each frequency component image, after being applied the secondary differential processing, into ternary values pixel by pixel, thereby obtaining ternary-valued frequency component images TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn and ternary-valued frequency component images TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn; and performing a matching operation between the first and second images based on the ternary-valued frequency component images.
A second aspect of the present invention provides a method of matching stereo images, comprising the steps of: inputting first and second images IL and IR; developing the images IL and IR into a plurality of frequency component images FL1, FL2, FL3, - - - , FLk, FLk+1, - - - , FLn and a plurality of frequency component images FR1, FR2, FR3, - - - , FRk, FRk+1, - - - , FRn, respectively; applying a secondary differential processing to each of the frequency component images; converting each frequency component image, after being applied the secondary differential processing, into ternary values pixel by pixel by using a positive threshold TH1(>0) and a negative threshold TH2(<0) in such a manner that a pixel larger than TH1 is designated to "p", a pixel in a range between TH1 and TH2 is designated to "z", and a pixel smaller than TH2 is designated to "m", thereby obtaining ternary-valued frequency component images TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn and ternary-valued frequency component images TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn; and performing a matching operation between the first and second images based on the ternary-valued frequency component images.
A third aspect of the present invention provides a method of matching stereo images, comprising the steps of: inputting first and second images IL and IR; developing the images IL and IR into a plurality of frequency component images FL1, FL2, FL3, - - - , FLk, FLk+1, - - - , FLn and a plurality of frequency component images FR1, FR2, FR3, - - - , FRk, FRk+1, - - - , FRn, respectively; applying a secondary differential processing to each of the frequency component images; converting each frequency component image, after being applied the secondary differential processing, into ternary values pixel by pixel in such a manner that a pixel not related to a zero-crossing point is designated to "z", a pixel related to a zero-crossing point and having a positive gradient is designated to "p", and a pixel related to a zero-crossing point and having a negative gradient is designated to "m", thereby obtaining ternary-valued frequency component images TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn and ternary-valued frequency component images TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn; and performing a matching operation between the first and second images based on the ternary-valued frequency component images.
A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a method of matching stereo images, comprising the steps of: inputting first and second images IL and IR; developing the images IL and IR into a plurality of frequency component images FL1, FL2, FL3, - - - , FLk, FLk+1, - - - , FLn and a plurality of frequency component images FR1, FR2, FR3, - - - , FRk, FRk+1, - - - , FRn, respectively; applying a secondary differential processing to each of the frequency component images; converting each low frequency component image of the frequency component images, after being applied the secondary differential processing, into ternary values pixel by pixel by using a positive threshold TH1(>0) and a negative threshold TH2(<0) in such a manner that a pixel larger than TH1 is designated to "p", a pixel in a range between TH1 and TH2 is designated to "z", and a pixel smaller than TH2 is designated to "m", and converting each high frequency component image of the frequency component images, after being applied the secondary differential processing, into ternary values pixel by pixel in such a manner that a pixel not related to a zero-crossing point is designated to "z", a pixel related to a zero-crossing point and having a positive gradient is designated to "p", and a pixel related to a zero-crossing point and having a negative gradient is designated to "m", thereby obtaining ternary-valued frequency component images TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn and ternary-valued frequency component images TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn; and performing a matching operation between the first and second images based on the ternary-valued frequency component images.
According to the features of preferred embodiments of the present invention, the first image IL is designated as a reference image for the matching operation, a one-dimensional window capable of encompassing N pixels therein is set on the ternary-valued frequency component image of the first image IL, and a matching region having the same ternary-value pattern as the N pixels in the one-dimensional window is searched from the ternary-valued frequency component image of the second image IR.
According to the features of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, one of the first and second images IL and IR is designated as a reference image for the matching operation, a plurality of one-dimensional windows are set on the entire surface of the ternary-valued frequency component image of the reference image through a scanning operation along an epipolar line, so that the one-dimensional windows are successively overlapped at the same intervals of N/2 when each of the one-dimensional windows has a size equivalent to N pixels, and the matching operation is carried out with respect to each of the one-dimensional windows.
According to the features of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, pixels in a one-dimensional window of a ternary-valued frequency component image TLk of the first image IL are compared in a one-to-one manner with pixels in a designated region of a ternary-valued frequent component image TRk of the second image IR, when the ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk are identical in their frequency components, wherein an evaluation result "P" is obtained when corresponding two pixels are both "p" or "m", while an evaluation result "Z" is obtained when the corresponding two pixels are both "z", and a similarity between two ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk is evaluated by using the following equation:
Εall=Σβk(PN)k+Σγk(ZN)k
where PN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "P", ZN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "Z", and βk and γk represent weighting factors.
According to the features of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, pixels in a one-dimensional window of a ternary-valued frequency component image TLk of the first image IL are compared in a one-to-one manner with pixels in a designated region of a ternary-valued frequent component image TRk of the second image IR, when the ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk are identical in their frequency components, wherein an evaluation result "P" is obtained when corresponding two pixels are both "p" or "m", while an evaluation result "Z" is obtained when the corresponding two pixels are both "z", a similarity between two ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk is evaluated by using the following equation:
Εall=Σβk(PN)k+Σγk(ZN)k
where PN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "P", ZN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "Z", and βk and γk represent weighting factors, and a matching result in the matching operation is validated only when Σ βk(PN)k is larger than a predetermined threshold TH3(>0).
Furthermore, a fifth aspect of the present invention provides a novel and excellent method of detecting a disparity between stereo images, comprising the steps of: comparing pixels in a micro region defined by a one-dimensional window set on a reference image with pixels in a designated micro region on a non-reference image; evaluating a similarity between two micro regions using the following equation:
Εall=Σβk(PN)k+Σβk(ZN)k
where PN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "P" while ZN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "Z", and βk and γk represent weighting factors; searching a first region having a most highest similarity and a second region having a second highest similarity; specifying a first candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to the first region, and a second candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to the second region; and determining a valid disparity between the stereo images based on the first and second candidate disparities.
Moreover, a sixth aspect of the present invention provides a method of detecting a disparity between stereo images, comprising the steps of: dividing each of first and second images IL and IR into a plurality of blocks each having a size of M=L pixels; matching ternary-valued frequency component images of the images IL and IR; comparing pixels in a micro region defined by a one-dimensional window set on the first image IL with pixels in a designated micro region on the second image IR; evaluating a similarity between two micro regions using the following equation:
Εall=Σβk(PN)k+Σγk(ZN)k
where PN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "P" while ZN represents a total number of pixels having an evaluation result "Z", and βk and γk represent weighting factors; searching a first region having a most highest similarity and a second region having a second highest similarity in a concerned block; specifying a first candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to the first region, and a second candidate disparity as a disparity corresponding to the second region; creating a histogram based on the first and second candidate disparities; and determining a valid disparity of the concerned block as a disparity corresponding to a peak position of the histogram.
According to the features of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, in the above-described disparity detecting method, the first image IL is designated as a reference image, a one-dimensional window capable of encompassing N pixels therein is set on the ternary-valued frequency component image of the first image IL, and a matching region having the same ternary-value pattern as the N pixels in the one-dimensional window is searched from the ternary-valued frequency component image of the second image IR. Alternatively, one of the first and second images IL and IR is designated as a reference image, a plurality of one-dimensional windows are set on the entire surface of the ternary-valued frequency component image of the reference image through a scanning operation along an epipolar line, so that the one-dimensional windows are successively overlapped at the same intervals of N/2 when each of the one-dimensional windows has a size equivalent to N pixels, and a matching operation is carried out with respect to each of the one-dimensional windows.
According to the features of the preferred embodiments, the valid disparity is calculated as a sub-pixel level parity corresponding to an intersecting point of a first straight line crossing two points (di-1, hi-1), (di, hi) and a second straight line crossing a point (di+1, hi+1) with a gradient symmetrical with the first straight line, where di-1, di, di+1 represent disparities near the peak position of the histogram and hi-1, hi, hi+1 represent the number of occurrences of the disparities di-1, di, di+1 respectively.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description which is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a view illustrating the principle of the stereo image measurement;
FIG. 2 is a view illustrating a conventional method of checking a mutual correlation value between two images;
FIG. 3 is a view illustrating a conventional method of matching stereo images based on the comparison of square micro regions (blocks) of two images;
FIG. 4 is a view illustrating a problem in a conventional method;
FIG. 5 is a view illustrating another problem in a conventional method;
FIG. 6 is a view illustrating a detection of a sub-pixel level disparity in accordance with a conventional disparity detecting method;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing a first embodiment of the present invention, covering the pickup of stereo images through the determination of disparity;
FIG. 8 is a view illustrating a monochrome image used in the explanation of one embodiment method of matching stereo images and of detecting disparity between these images in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a first apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B) of FIG. 7;
FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C and 10D are graphs showing examples of various frequency component images obtained as a result of the feature extraction phase processing shown in FIGS. 9, 23 and 27;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a second apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B) of FIG. 7;
FIG. 12 is a view illustrating a method of transforming or quantizing the frequency component images into ternary values used in the first and third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 13 is a view illustrating a method of dividing an image into plural blocks, each serving as the unit for determining disparity, in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 14 is a view illustrating a scanning method of a one-dimensional window serving as the unit for matching stereo images in the present invention;
FIG. 15 is a view illustrating the relationship between the one-dimensional window serving as the unit for matching stereo images and a block serving as the unit for determining a disparity in the present invention;
FIG. 16 is a view illustrating a method of determining a disparity candidate based on the one-dimensional window search of the present invention;
FIG. 17 is a view illustrating a method of evaluating a similarity based on the one-dimensional window search of the present invention;
FIG. 18 is a view illustrating an example of a storage region used for temporarily storing candidate disparities which are determined in relation to each of one-dimensional windows in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 19 is a view illustrating a method of creating a histogram in relation to blocks, based on candidate disparities temporarily stored in the storing region in relation to one-dimensional windows, in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 20 is a graph showing an example of the histogram created in each block in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 21 is a graph showing a method of measuring a disparity at the accuracy of sub-pixel level based on the histogram creased in relation to blocks of the present invention;
FIG. 22 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing a second embodiment of the present invention, covering the pickup of stereo images through the determination of disparity;
FIG. 23 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a third apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B'"'"') of FIG. 22 in accordance with the second embodiment;
FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a fourth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B'"'"') of FIG. 22 in accordance with the second embodiment;
FIG. 25 is a view illustrating a method of transforming or quantizing the frequency component images into ternary values used in the second and third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 26 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing a third embodiment of the present invention, covering the pickup of stereo images through the determination of disparity;
FIG. 27 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a fifth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B") of FIG. 26 in accordance with the third embodiment; and
FIG. 28 is a block diagram showing an arrangement of a sixth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B") of FIG. 26 in accordance with the third embodiment.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, with reference to the accompanying drawings. Identical parts are denoted by the same reference numeral throughout views.
A method of matching stereo images and a method of detecting a disparity between these images will be hereinafter explained in accordance with the present invention.
First Embodiment
A first embodiment will be explained based on a stereo image measurement using the method of matching stereo images and detecting disparity between the images in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing the first embodiment of the present invention, covering the stereo image pickup phase through the disparity determination phase. In the image pickup phase (A), two, right and left, images are taken in through two, right and left, image-pickup devices in steps S101 and S102. Then, the right and left images, obtained in the image-pickup phase (A), are respectively subjected to feature extraction in the next feature extraction phase (B) in steps S103 and S104. Thereafter, in the succeeding matching phase (C), the extracted features of the right and left images are compared to check how they match with each other in step S105.
More specifically, in the matching phase (C), a one-dimensional window is set, this one-dimensional window is shifted along a referential image plane (one of right and left image planes) in accordance with a predetermined scanning rule so as to successively set windows each serving as the unit for matching stereo images, and a matching operation is performed by comparing the image features within one window and corresponding image features on the other (the other of right and left image planes).
Subsequently, in the disparity determination phase (D), the referential image feature plane is dissected or divided into plural blocks each having a predetermined size, a histogram in each block is created from disparities obtained by the matching operation based on one-dimensional windows involving pixels of a concerned block, and a specific disparity just corresponding to the peak of thus obtained histogram is identified as a valid disparity representing the concerned block in step S106. The processing performed in these phases (A) through (D) will be hereinafter described in greater detail.
A: IMAGE-PICKUP PHASE
Although there will be various methods for arranging the stereo cameras, this embodiment disposes a pair of right and left cameras in a parallel arrangement where two cameras are located at predetermined right and left positions in the horizontal direction so that they have paralleled optical axes. The right-and-left parallel arrangement explained with reference to FIG. 1 shows an ideal arrangement model to be adopted in this embodiment too. However, in practices, it will be impossible to perfectly build the ideal arrangement of stereo cameras without causing any dislocations. In this respect, it is important that the method of matching stereo images and the method of detecting a disparity between these images should be flexible for allowing such dislocations.
In the following explanation, the right and left images obtained in the image-pickup phase (A) will be explained as monochrome images having a predetermined size of 768 (H)×480 (V). However, it is needless to say that the images handled in the present invention are not limited to the disclosed monochrome images. The right and left images, obtained in the image-pickup phase, are defined as follows.
Left Image : IL (x, y)
Right Image : IR (x, y)
where 1≦x≦768, 1 ≦y≦480, 0<IL(x,y)≦255, and 0≦IR(x,y)≦255.
As shown in the monochrome image of FIG. 8, "x" represents a horizontal index of the image, while "y" represents a vertical index (i.e. line number) of the image. The pixel number is expressed by "x" from left to right, while the line number is expressed by "y" from top to bottom.
In performing the stereo image matching, one of two images is designated as a reference image and a matching region corresponding to a specific region of this reference image is searched from the other image. The left image, serving as the reference image in this embodiment, is dissected into numerous blocks each having a size of M×L pixels as shown in FIG. 13. As a practical example, each block has a size of 16×16 pixels (M=L=16). In this case, the left image is divided into a total of 48 pixels in the horizontal direction and a total of 30 pixels in the vertical direction, creating 1440 blocks in amount. Hereinafter, each block is discriminated by the following identification data BL(X,Y).
Block ID : BL(X,Y), where 1≦X≦48, 1≦Y≦30
B: Feature Extraction Phase
The two images, right image IR and left image IL, obtained in the image pickup phase (A), are developed into a plurality of frequency component images in the feature extraction phase (B)
IL: L1, L2, L3, - - - , Lk, Lk+1, - - - , Ln
IR: R1, R2, R3, - - - . Rk, Rk+1,- - - , Rn
Each frequency-component image is applied the secondary differential processing. Thereafter, each image is converted pixel by pixel into ternary values, thus obtaining the following ternary-valued frequency component images.
TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn
TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn
The above-described operation makes it possible to extract edges at various resolutions. The primary object to perform the above-described operation is as follows.
Basically, each edge position receives no adverse effect derived from sensitivity difference between two cameras or shading. By utilizing this preferable nature, it becomes possible to accurately perform the stereo image matching without performing any pre-processing, such as sensitivity difference correction of cameras or shading correction. The provision of ternary-value processing makes it possible to perform the similarity evaluation by -using a compact hardware arrangement.
The secondary object is as follows.
Low-frequency edges are robust against noises, but are inaccurate in their positions. On the other hand, high-frequency edges are accurate in their positions, although they have a tendency of being adversely effected by noises. By utilizing these natures, it becomes possible to realize a robust and accurate stereo image matching.
Next, the ternary-value processing will be explained. FIG. 12 is a view illustrating a method of transforming or quantizing the frequency component images into ternary values used in the first and third embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 12, a positive threshold TH1 (>0) and a negative threshold TH2 (<0) are provided to classify all of frequency component images into three values. For example, ternary values are given to respective pixels as follows. ##EQU3##
The above-described ternary-value processing makes it possible to quantize the images into 1 or -1 at their edges, especially in the vicinity of (positive and negative) peak positions, otherwise the images are expressed by 0. This ternary-value processing is characterized in that its circuit can be simply arranged and relatively robust against noises. However, if any sensitivity difference exists between right and left images IR and IL, there will be the possibility that some pixels near the threshold may cause erroneous edge-position information due to quantization error.
FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a first apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B) of FIG. 7. Left image IL (or right image IR), received in the feature extraction phase (B), is the left image IL (or right image IR) obtained in the image-pickup phase (A) which is band limited to fc (Hz). The input image IL is developed into a plurality of band signals having different frequency components (i.e. frequency component images FLk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) by plural low-pass filters (LPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ) and high-pass filters (HPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) combined as shown in the drawing. Then, each band signal is quantized into a ternary value (i.e. ternary-valued frequency component image TLk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) through the succeeding ternary-value processing (F). The above-described HPFk is a high pass filter having a secondary differential function. FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C and 10D are graphs showing examples of various frequency component images FLk (k=1,2,3, - - - ), i.e. band division examples, obtained as a result of the development using the circuit shown in the block diagram of FIG. 9.
Each of these plural ternary-valued frequency component image TLk, thus obtained, reveals an edge position involved in each frequency component image. Each edge position is used for the matching of right and left images in the succeeding matching phase (C). Regarding the settings, it is noted that the number of frequency component images FLk or the width of each frequency band should be determined by taking the required performance and the allowable cost range into consideration.
FIG. 11 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a second apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B) of FIG. 7. The Laplacian-Gaussian function (∇2G), forming the basis for "σ" of Laplacian-Gaussian filter, is given by taking a second-story differential of Gaussian function. In a one-dimensional case: ##EQU4##
In a two-dimensional case: ##EQU5## where r2 =i2 +j2, and σ2 represents the variance of Gaussian function.
Obtaining a convolution of this function and the image (Laplacian-Gaussian filter) is equivalent to smoothing the image through the Gaussian filter (LPF) and then obtaining a second-story differential (Laplacean, HPF).
Changing the value of a will make it possible to extract edges at a plurality of resolutions (scales), which is widely applicable to the image processing technologies.
With the above-described method, the image is developed into a plurality of frequency component images which are then quantized into ternary-valued frequency component images as follows.
Left ternary-valued frequency component image:
TL1(x,y), TL2(x,y), TL3(x,y)
Right ternary-valued frequency component image:
TR1(x,y), TR2(x,y), TR3(x,y)
where 1≦x≦768, 1≦y≦480,
-1≦TL1(x,y), TL2(x,y), TL3(x,y), - - - ≦1, and -1≦TR1(x,y), TR2(x,y), TR3(x,y), - - - ≦1 (Eq. 10)
Thus obtained right and left ternary-valued frequency component images are sent to the succeeding matching phase (C) and used to check the matching of stereo images.
C: Matching Phase
In the matching phase, matching of right and left images is performed using the plurality of ternary-valued frequency component images obtained through ternary-value processing in the feature extraction phase (B). One of two stereo images is designated as a reference image in this matching operation, and a matching region of a specific region of the reference image is searched from the other image.
As explained in the image-pickup phase (A), this embodiment designates the left image as the reference image. Like the left image, serving as the reference image, which is dissected into numerous blocks each having the same size of M×L pixels as shown in FIG. 13, each of left ternary-valued frequency component images TLk is dissected into numerous blocks as shown in FIG. 14. Hereinafter, block identification data BLk(X,Y) is used for discriminating the left ternary-valued frequency component image TLk.
Block ID : BLk(X,Y), where 1≦X≦48, 1≦Y≦30
The matching operation of this embodiment is carried out along the odd number lines only. A scanning line is referred to as an objective scanning line when it is an object of the matching operation, hereinafter. All the information relating to the even number lines are not used at all in the matching phase and the succeeding.
First, as shown in FIG. 14, there is provided a one-dimensional window having a size of 1×16 pixels (i.e. L=1, M=16) for performing a window scan along a concerned odd number line (i.e. along one of objective scanning lines) of the left ternary-valued frequency component image TLk(x,y). Each stroke of the one-dimensional window scan is 8 pixels which is just a half (M/2) of the window size (16 pixels). In other words, the above-described window is shifted in the x direction by an amount identical with a half thereof so as to carry out the window scan by successively overlapping the area occupied by the window. This scanning operation provides a total of 95 windows successively overlapped along one objective scanning line.
A matching candidate region corresponding to each of one-dimensional windows thus provided is searched from the right ternary-valued frequency component image TRk(x,y). Each of one-dimensional windows is specified by identification data WNk(I,J).
Window ID : WNk(I,J), where 1≦I≦95 and 1≦J≦240
As shown in FIG. 15, a block BLk(X,Y) completely involves a total of 8 one-dimensional windows 901, which are generally expressed by the following equation using the block indexes X and Y.
Wnk(I,J)=WNk(2X-1, 8(Y-1)+u), where 1≦u≦8 (Eq. 11)
Meanwhile, there are existing a total of 8 one-dimensional windows 902 each bridging 8 (M/2) pixels of block BLk(X,Y) and 8 (M/2) pixels of block BLk(X-1,Y). These one-dimensional windows 902 are generally expressed by the following equation.
Wnk(I,J)=WNk(2X-2, 8(Y-1)+u), where 1≦u≦8 (Eq. 12)
On the other hand, there are existing a total of 8 one-dimensional windows 903 each bridging 8 (M/2) pixels of block BLk(X,Y) and 8 (M/2) pixels of block BLk(X+1,Y). These one-dimensional windows 903 are generally expressed by the following equation.
Wnk(I,J)=WNk(2X,8(Y-1)+u), where 1≦u≦8 (Eq. 13)
As apparent from the foregoing description, this embodiment is characterized by one-dimensional windows each serving as the unit for the matching operation. The purpose of using such one-dimensional windows is to reduce the size of hardware compared with the conventional two-dimensional window, and also to shorten the processing time as a result of reduction of accesses to the memories.
Furthermore, this embodiment is characterized in that one-dimensional windows are successively arranged in an overlapped manner at the same intervals of 8 (M/2) pixels. The purpose of adopting such an overlap arrangement is to enhance the reliability of each matching operation by allowing the supplementary use of adjacent pixels in the event that the matching region cannot be univocally determined based on only the pixels in a given block, when the disparity of the block is determined.
Next, a method of determining a matching region of each of the one-dimensional windows thus provided will be explained. As shown in FIG. 16, a matching region of each one-dimensional window being set on the left ternary-valued frequency component image TLk is searched from the right ternary-valued frequency component image TRk.
In the search, the previously-described equation 8 is used to evaluate the similarity between right and left ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk involved in the designated one-dimensional windows. With respect to each of one-dimensional windows, a region having the most highest similarity is specified as a primary candidate disparity (disp1) and a region having the second highest similarity is specified as a secondary candidate disparity (disp2).
These primary and secondary candidate disparities, obtained in the above-described matching operation based on one-dimensional windows are mere candidates and are not the final disparity. The final disparity of each block is determined in the succeeding disparity determination phase (D) based on these primary and secondary candidate disparities.
Next, a method of evaluating similarity will be explained in more detail, with reference to FIG. 17. In the evaluation of similarity, all of 16 pixels in a given one-dimensional window on the left ternary-valued frequency component image TLk are compared with consecutive 16 pixels arrayed in the horizontal direction within a predetermined zone on the right ternary-valued frequency component image TRk, this predetermined zone having the possibility of detecting a matching region.
More specifically, the similarity between corresponding two pixels is evaluated using the following codes.
______________________________________Both pixels valued 0 ZBoth pixels valued 1 PBoth pixels valued -1 POther cases 0______________________________________
The coding operation for evaluating the similarity (i.e. evaluation between corresponding pixels) is carried out with respect to all of 16 pixels in the given one-dimensional window. In this manner, all of ternary-valued frequency component images TLk and TRk are applied the evaluation of similarity, finally obtaining the overall similarity evaluation result as follows.
Εall=Σβk(PN)k+Σγk(ZN)k (Eq. 14)
where PN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "P", ZN represents a total number of pixels having the evaluation result "Z", and βk and γk represent weighting factors.
Having a large value in the overall similarity evaluation result Εall indicates that the similarity is high. Although "k" represents consecutive integers 1,2, - - - ,n in the equation 14, it is possible to use some of them. Furthermore, the first term on the right side of the equation 14 expresses the number of pixels coinciding with each other with respect to the edge points serving as matching features. It is believed that this number reflect the reliability in the result of matching operation. The larger this number, the higher the reliability. The smaller this number, the lower the reliability.
Accordingly, if the first term on the right side is smaller than a predetermined threshold TH3 in the similarity evaluation result based on the primary candidate disparity, this candidate disparity should be nullified or voided in order to eliminate any erroneous matching operations.
Numerous primary candidate disparities (disp1) and secondary candidate disparities (disp2) will be obtained as a result of the scan based on a one-dimensional window successively shifted at strokes of 8 (M/2) pixels in an overlapped manner along the odd number line of the left image. The primary candidate disparities (disp1) and secondary candidate disparities (disp2), thus obtained, are stored in the predetermined regions of a storage memory shown in FIG. 18. Although FIG. 18 shows the memory regions in one-to-one relationship to the image data, it is noted that vacant regions in the storage memory can be eliminated. D: Disparity Determination Phase
In the disparity determination, a disparity in each of blocks (totaling 1440 blocks) is finally determined based on the primary candidate disparities (disp1) and the secondary candidate disparities (disp2) determined with respect to each of one-dimensional window.
A method of determining a disparity of each block will be explained with reference to FIG. 19, which explains how the disparity of block BL(X,Y) is determined. To determine a disparity of block BL(X,Y), a histogram is created based on a total of 24 sets of primary candidate disparities (disp1) and secondary candidate disparities (disp2) existing in the region encircled by a dotted line in FIG. 19, considering the fact that all of these selected primary and secondary candidate disparities are obtained through the matching operation of the specific one-dimensional windows each comprising at least 8 pixels existing in the region of block BL(X,Y). FIG. 20 is a graph showing an example of the histogram of disparities created based on the primary and secondary candidate disparities.
Then, a disparity having the largest number of occurrences is finally determined as the disparity of block BL(X,Y).
Returning to the second example of prior art methods, the characteristic point was that, after the image is dissected into a plurality of blocks, the similarity evaluation for the matching was independently performed in each block using only the pixels existing in this concerned block. Hence, there was the possibility of causing a mismatching due to the accidental presence of similar but different plural regions. And, the mismatching was a direct cause of the failure in the detection of disparity for each block.
However, according to the disparity detecting method of the present invention, these problems are completely solved. That is, the present invention is characterized in that a histogram is created in each block using the matching data resultant from the setting of a plurality of one-dimensional windows successively overlapped, and then the disparity of the concerned block BL(X,Y) is determined by detecting the peak position in the histogram. Hence, even if an erroneous matching may arise in the matching operation performed with respect to each of one-dimensional windows (i.e. even if an erroneous candidate disparity is accidentally detected), the present invention is sufficiently flexible to absorb or correct such an error.
Furthermore, as a superior effect of using overlapped one-dimensional windows, it becomes possible to supplementarily use the pixels existing out of the concerned block in the determination of disparity. This will surely prevent the failure in the detection of disparity even if similar but different regions are accidentally measured.
In general, in this kind of disparity detecting method, the image is obtained as digital data sampled at a predetermined frequency. Hence the measurable minimum unit for the disparity is limited to one pixel. If high accuracy in the disparity measurement is strictly requested, the following sub-pixel level measurement will be available.
The method of sub-pixel level measurement will be explained with reference to FIG. 21. FIG. 21 shows a histogram created in a certain block in accordance with the previously-described method, especially showing the distribution of the number of occurrences in the vicinity of a specific disparity corresponding to a peak position. The sub-pixel level disparity measurement is performed by using the number of occurrences hi, hi-1, hi+1 corresponding to the designated disparities di, di-1, di+1 (in the increment of pixel) existing before and after a peak position ds.
More specifically, a first straight line 1501 is obtained as a line crossing both of two points (di-1, hi-1) and (di, hi) . A second straight line 1502 is obtained as a line crossing a point (di+1, hi+1) and having a gradient symmetrical with the line 1501 (i.e. identical in absolute value but opposite in sign). Then, a point 1503 is obtained as an intersecting point of two straight lines 1501 and 1502. A disparity ds, corresponding to thus obtained intersecting point 1503, is finally obtained as a sub-pixel level disparity of the concerned block.
The sub-pixel level disparity measurement, above described, uses a histogram created by the number of occurrences; accordingly, this method is essentially different from the prior art method which basically uses the similarity evaluations C derived from the equation 6.
Second Embodiment
A second embodiment will be explained based on a stereo image measurement using the method of matching stereo images and detecting disparity between the images in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 22 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing the second embodiment of the present invention, covering the stereo image pickup phase through the disparity determination phase. In the image pickup phase (A), two, right and left, images are taken in through two, right and left, image-pickup devices in steps S1601 and S1602. The processing performed in the image-pickup phase (A) is identical with that of the first embodiment. Then, the right and left images, obtained in the image-pickup phase (A), are respectively subjected to feature extraction in the next feature extraction phase (B'"'"') in steps S1603 and S1604. Thereafter, in the succeeding matching phase (C), the extracted features of the right and left images are compared to check how they match with each other in step S1605. Furthermore, in a disparity determination phase (D), a disparity is determined in each block (Step S1606). The processing performed in the matching phase (C) and the disparity determination phase (D) are identical with those of the first embodiment.
Hereinafter, only the portion different from the first embodiment, i.e. the processing of feature extraction phase (B'"'"'), will be explained in greater detail.
B'"'"' : Feature Extraction Phase
The two images, right image IR and left image IL, obtained in the image pickup phase (A), are developed into a plurality of frequency component images in the feature extraction phase (B'"'"').
IL: L1, L2, L3, - - - , Lk, Lk+1, - - - , Ln
IR: R1, R2, R3, - - - . Rk, Rk+1, - - - , Rn
Each frequency-component image is applied the secondary differential processing. Thereafter, each image is converted pixel by pixel into ternary values, thus obtaining the following ternary-valued frequency component images.
TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn
TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn
The flow of processing and its purposes are identical with those of the feature extraction phase (B) of the first embodiment.
Next, the essential portion different from the first embodiment, i.e. a ternary-value processing, will be explained.
FIG. 25 is a view illustrating a method of transforming or quantizing the frequency component images into ternary values used in the second embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 25, all of frequency component images are classified into three values by judging whether the pixel of a concerned image is related to a zero-crossing point, or whether the sign of its gradient is positive or negative when it corresponds to the zero-crossing point. For example, ternary values are given to respective pixels as follows.
Other than zero-crossing point - - - 0
Zero-crossing point, and Positive gradient - - - 1
Zero-crossing point, and Negative gradient - - - -1
The above-described ternary-value processing makes it possible to quantize the images into 1 or -1 at their edges, especially at the inflection points (=zero-crossing points) otherwise the images are expressed by 0. This ternary-value processing (G) is comparative with or superior to the ternary-value processing (F) of the first embodiment in the accurate detection of edge positions, and also robustness against sensitivity difference between right and left images, although a little bit weak against noises.
FIG. 23 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a third apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B'"'"') of FIG. 22. Left image IL, received in the feature extraction phase (B'"'"'), is the image obtained in the image-pickup phase (A) which is band limited to fc (Hz). The input image IL is developed into a plurality of band signals having different frequency components (i.e. frequency component images FLk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) by plural low-pass filters (LPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ) and high-pass filters (HPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) combined as shown in the drawing. This processing is identical with that of the first embodiment. The developed frequency component images FLk are converted or quantized into ternary-valued data (i.e. ternary-valued frequency component images TLk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) through the above-described ternary-value processing (G).
Each of these plural ternary-valued frequency component image TLk, thus obtained, reveals an edge position involved in each frequency component image. Each edge position is used for the matching of right and left images in the succeeding matching phase (C). Regarding the settings, it is noted that the number of frequency component images FLk or the width of each frequency band should be determined by taking the required performance and the allowable cost range into consideration, in the same manner as in the first embodiment.
FIG. 24 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a fourth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B'"'"') of FIG. 22. This fourth apparatus is identical with the second apparatus of the first embodiment shown in FIG. 11 except for the ternary-value processing (G).
In this manner, the image is developed into a plurality of frequency component images FLk which are then converted into ternary-valued frequency component images TLk through ternary-value processing. Subsequently, ternary-valued frequency component images TLk are sent to the succeeding matching phase (C) to perform the stereo image matching operation based on one-dimensional windows. And, a disparity of each block is finally determined in the disparity determination phase (D).
Third Embodiment
A third embodiment will be explained based on a stereo image measurement using the method of matching stereo images and detecting disparity between the images in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 26 is a flow diagram showing sequential processes for executing the third embodiment of the present invention, covering the stereo image pickup phase through the disparity determination phase. In the image pickup phase (A), two, right and left, images are taken in through two, right and left, image-pickup devices in steps S2001 and S2002. The processing performed in the image-pickup phase (A) is identical with those of the first and second embodiments. Then, the right and left images, obtained in the image-pickup phase (A), are respectively subjected to feature extraction in the next feature extraction phase (B") in steps S2003 and S2004. Thereafter, in the succeeding matching phase (C), the extracted features of the right and left images are compared to check how they match with each other in step S2005. Furthermore, in a disparity determination phase (D), a disparity is determined in each block (Step S2006). The processing performed in the matching phase (C) and the disparity determination phase (D) are identical with those of the first and second embodiments.
Hereinafter, only the portion different from the first and second embodiments, i.e. the processing of feature extraction phase (B"), will be explained in greater detail.
B": Feature Extraction Phase
The two images, right image IR and left image IL, obtained in the image pickup phase (A), are developed into a plurality of frequency component images in the feature extraction phase (B").
IL: L1, L2, L3, - - - , Lk, Lk+1, - - - , Ln
IR: R1, R2, R3, - - - . Rk, Rk+1, - - - , Rn
Each frequency-component image is applied the secondary differential processing. Thereafter, each image is converted pixel by pixel into ternary values, thus obtaining the following ternary-valued frequency component images.
TL1, TL2, TL3, - - - , TLk, TLk+1, - - - , TLn
TR1, TR2, TR3, - - - , TRk, TRk+1, - - - , TRn
The flow of processing and its purposes are identical with those of the feature extraction phases (B), (B'"'"') of the first and second embodiments.
Next, the essential portion different from the first and second embodiments, i.e. a ternary-value processing, will be explained. The ternary-value processing of the third embodiment is characterized in that the low-frequency component images are processed through the previously-described ternary-value processing (F) of the first embodiment while the high-frequency component images are processed through the above-described ternary-value processing (G) of the second embodiment.
The high-frequency component images have accurate information with respect to the edge positions when they are compared with the low-frequency component images. To utilize these accurate information effectively, the zero-crossing point classification is used for converting high-frequency component images into ternary values. However, the edge information, obtained through the ternary-value processing (G), tends to involve erroneous edge information due to noises. To the contrary, the low-frequency component images are converted into ternary values by using the threshold classification since low-frequency component images are not so accurate information for representing the edge positions. The edge information, obtained through the ternary-value processing (F), seldom involves erroneous edge information derived from noises.
FIG. 27 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a fifth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B") of FIG. 26. Left image IL, received in the feature extraction phase (B"), is the image obtained in the image-pickup phase (A) which is band limited to fc (Hz). The input image IL is developed into a plurality of band signals having different frequency components (i.e. frequency component images FLk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) by plural low-pass filters (LPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ) and high-pass filters (HPFk, k=1,2,3, - - - ,n) combined as shown in the drawing. This processing is identical with those of the first and second embodiments. The low-frequency component images of the developed frequency component images FLk are converted or quantized into ternary-valued data through the ternary-value processing (F) explained in the first embodiment. On the other hand, the high-frequency component images of the developed frequency component images FLk are converted or quantized into ternary-valued data through the ternary-value processing (G) explained in the second embodiment. Thus, ternary-valued frequency component images TLk (k=1,2,3 - - - ,n) are obtained.
Each of these plural ternary-valued frequency component image TLk, thus obtained, reveals an edge position involved in each frequency component image. Each edge position is used for the matching of right and left images in the succeeding matching phase (C). Regarding the settings, it is noted that the number of frequency component images FLk or the width of each frequency band, as well as selection between the ternary-value processing (F) and the ternary-value processing (G), should be determined by taking the required performance and the allowable cost range into consideration.
FIG. 28 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of a sixth apparatus which realizes the processing of feature extraction phase (B") of FIG. 26. This sixth apparatus is identical with the second and fourth apparatuses of the first and second embodiments shown in FIG. 11 and 24 except for the ternary-value processing portion.
In this manner, the image is developed into a plurality of frequency component images FLk which are then converted into ternary-valued frequency component images TLk through ternary-value processing. Subsequently, ternary-valued frequency component images TLk are sent to the succeeding matching phase (C) to perform the stereo image matching operation based on one-dimensional windows. And, a disparity of each block is finally determined in the disparity determination phase (D).
Miscellaneous
As apparent from the foregoing, the method of the present invention for matching stereo images and detecting a disparity between the images is explained based on the stereo image measurement system embodied into the first, second and third embodiment described above. Although the embodiments of the present invention use the stereo cameras disposed in parallel with each other in the right-and-left direction, it is needless to say that the arrangement of stereo cameras is not limited to the disclosed one.
Furthermore, although the embodiments of the present invention use the odd-number lines only for the scanning operation, the same effect will be obtained by using the objective scanning lines of the even-number lines only. If all the lines are used for the scanning operation, the reliability in the measurement of disparity will be enhanced although the processing volumes is doubled.
Moreover, the embodiments of the present invention adopt a window size of 1×16 (M=16) pixels extending in the horizontal direction and a block size of 16×16 (M=L=16) pixels. Needless to say, practical values for M and L can be varied flexibly.
As explained in the foregoing description, the present invention provides a novel and excellent method of matching stereo images and of detecting a disparity of these images which is small in the computation amount, compact and cheap in the hardware arrangement, speedy in the processing, and reliable and accurate in the performance of the stereo image matching and the disparity detection.
Accordingly, the present invention can be applied, for example, to various industrial monitoring systems, such as an obstacle monitor at a railroad crossing or an invader monitor in a building, by utilizing its capability of always measuring a disparity based on successively sampled stereo images and detecting the change of the disparity.
As this invention may be embodied in several forms without departing from the spirit of essential characteristics thereof, the present embodiments as described are therefore intended to be only illustrative and not restrictive, since the scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims rather than by the description preceding them, and all changes that fall within metes and bounds of the claims, or equivalents of such metes and bounds, are therefore intended to be embraced by the claims.