Fault recording and reporting method

• US 6,115,656 A
• Filed: 02/10/1999
• Issued: 09/05/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 06/17/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation (The Boeing Co.)
• Original Assignee: Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation (The Boeing Co.)
• Inventors: Sudolsky, Michael D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cuchlinski, Jr., William A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Donnelly, Arthur D.
• Application Number:
  US09/248,509
• Time in Patent Office: 573 Days
• Field of Search: 701/35, 701/36, 701/14, 701/29, 701/3, 340/500, 340/525, 340/507
• US Class Current: 701/35
• CPC Class Codes: B64F 5/60 Testing or inspecting aircraft components or systems

Abstract

A method for recording and reporting fault information pertaining to various components of an aircraft. The method involves recording a diverse plurality of information output from various line replaceable units (LRU'"'"'s) and other components of the aircraft during takeoff, flight and landing through the use of a bulk storage device, such as an optical quick access recorder (OQAR), on an electronic medium. The electronic medium is then removed from the aircraft after landing and read by an appropriate apparatus. From this information a service technician is able to determine whether or not a fault indication recorded during flight is in fact a legitimate fault requiring the affected LRU to be removed from the aircraft for further diagnostic testing. The method significantly reduces the incidents of no-fault-found diagnostic test results and saves significant man hours which would otherwise be spent testing LRU'"'"'s and other components which are in fact operating properly. Alternative embodiments of the method disclose making all information from the LRUs available and using multiple overlays to systematically reduce the data to be recorded when the data proves to be too voluminous to record. The prioritizing of information is also disclosed so that LRU data of lesser importance is eliminated from consideration before more important information. The preferred methods minimize on aircraft data interpretation rendering unnecessary on-board maintenance processors and technicians for LRU troubleshooting.

Claims

1. A method for analyzing and recording information relating to the operation of a plurality of line replaceable units (LRUs) of an aircraft for subsequent fault analysis, said method comprising the steps of:

a) monitoring and storing all available information generated by a plurality of LRUs relating to a plurality of operational parameters of said aircraft;

b) determining if the information from a first one of said LRUs is of a magnitude which can be recorded in a memory map of an optical quick access recorder (OQAR);

c) if said information from said first one of said LRUs cannot be recorded within said memory map, then overlaying a hierarchical level of information generated by said first one of said LRUs onto said memory map and determining if said hierarchical level of information fits within said memory map;

d) if said hierarchical level of information still cannot be recorded onto said memory map, then overlaying said hierarchical level of information with information from a second LRU to produce a further condensed plurality of information and determining if said further condensed plurality of information from said first and second LRUs can be mapped in said memory of said OQAR; and

e) if said further condensed plurality of information can be stored on said OQAR, then storing said further condensed plurality of information on said OQAR for subsequent analysis.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

generating a first code word for said information generated by said first LRU;

combining it with a second code word for information generated by said second LRU; and

recording said code words on said OQAR together with said hierarchical level of information and said information from said second LRU.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of assigning each one of a subplurality of said information relating to a specific parameter of operation a priority in accordance with its importance to aircraft operation.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising the step of eliminating one or more of said parameters of operation in accordance with said priority such that least ones of said parameters which are of lesser importance to aircraft operation are eliminated prior to ones of said parameters that are of greater importance.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

following the reporting of said stored OQAR information, again performing steps a) through e) in support of continual improvement in reducing no-fault-found incidences with said LRUs of said aircraft.

6. A method for analyzing and recording information relating to the operation of a line replaceable unit (LRU) of an aircraft onto a recording medium for subsequent analysis, wherein the LRU includes a plurality of circuit assemblies, said method comprising the steps of:

a) monitoring and storing all available information generated by an LRU during operation of an aircraft associated with said LRU;

b) determining if the information from said LRU is of a volume which can be recorded in a memory map of an optical quick access recorder (OQAR);

c) if said information does not fit within said memory map, then determining which of said circuit assemblies is generating redundant information and eliminating said redundant information generated by said circuit assemblies, and thereafter creating a first coded overlay word indicating which ones of said circuit assemblies has generated a first condensed plurality of information to be recorded;

d) again determining if said first condensed plurality of information can be recorded on said memory map of said OQAR; and

e) if said first condensed plurality of information cannot be recorded on said memory map, then overlaying said first condensed plurality of information with information generated by a second LRU.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein said information generated by said second LRU is condensed into a second plurality of condensed information and assigned a second coded overlay word combined with the first coded overlay word indicating which ones of a plurality of circuit assemblies of said second LRU have generated said second plurality of condensed information;

and

recording said first and second combined coded overlay words, together with said first and second pluralities of condensed information, on said memory map of said OQAR.

8. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

determining if said first and second pluralities of condensed information are still too voluminous to record on said memory map of said OQAR;

if said first and second pluralities of condensed information are still too voluminous to record, then preventing information relating to a predesignated, least important LRU parameter of operation from being recorded to further reduce the amount of information being generated by said at least one LRU for recording.

9. The method of claim 8, further comprising the steps of:

designating a plurality of LRU parameters of operation which are to be considered for elimination in the event information from said LRU is too voluminous to record on said OQAR, and assigning each said parameter a priority of importance from least important to most important; and

eliminating ones of said parameters in the event further condensing of said information generated by said at least one LRU is required in accordance with said least important to said most important designations.

10. The method of claim 6, further comprising the steps of:

following the reporting of said stored OQAR information, again performing steps a) through e) in support of continual improvement in reducing the incidence of no-fault-found occurrences with said LRUs.

11. A method for analyzing and recording information generated by a line replaceable unit (LRU) of an aircraft onto a recording medium for subsequent analysis, wherein said information comprises information relating to a plurality of distinct operational parameters of said aircraft, said method comprising the steps of:

a) prioritizing at least a sub-plurality of said operational parameters of information generated by said LRU from least important to most important;

b) analyzing said information relating to said sub-plurality of operational parameters;

c) determining if said information is of a volume which can be recorded in a memory map of an optical quick access recorder (OQAR);

d) if said information is too voluminous to be recorded within said memory map, then determining if any of said information is redundant;

e) if any of said information is redundant, then eliminating a redundant portion of said information to create a condensed plurality of information and creating an overlay word indicative of that portion of said information which has been retained for recording;

f) determining if said condensed plurality of information to be recorded can be recorded in said memory map of said OQAR;

g) if said condensed plurality of information cannot be recorded on said memory map, then overlaying said condensed information with information generated by a second LRU to create a further condensed plurality of information;

h) determining if said further condensed plurality of information can be recorded in said memory map of said OQAR; and

i) if said further condensed plurality of information is still too voluminous to be recorded in said memory map, then eliminating information relating to a least most important one of said operational parameters from at least one of said LRUs and again attempting to record said further condensed plurality of information in said memory map.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of:

determining if said further condensed plurality of information still is too voluminous to be recorded in said memory may; and

if said further condensed plurality of information is still too voluminous to be recorded, eliminating information from said second LRU relating to a second operational parameter which is of greater importance than said least most important operational parameter.

13. The method of claim 11, further comprising the steps of:

following the reporting of said stored OQAR information, again performing steps a) through i) in support of continual improvement in the reduction of no-fault-found occurrences associated with said LRUs.