Vehicle presence detection system

• US 6,195,020 B1
• Filed: 08/06/1999
• Issued: 02/27/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 08/07/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: John Mcallister Holdings Inc.
• Original Assignee: 3461513 Canada Inc.
• Inventors: Mullin, Eugene, Bader, Clifford J., DeRenzi, Charles S., Brodeur, Ronald E. Sr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Hofsass, Jeffery A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Previl, Daniel
• Application Number:
  US09/369,713
• Time in Patent Office: 571 Days
• Field of Search: 340/933, 340/932, 340/931, 246/125, 246/126, 246/127, 246/293, 246/292
• US Class Current: 340/933
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 29/22 electrically
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/042 using inductive or magnetic detectors
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/164 Centralised systems, e.g. external to vehicles

Abstract

A system and method which can detect the presence of a vehicle within the protected area of a four gate railroad crossing, determine its location and direction it is moving in, and open an appropriate exit gate to allow the vehicle to escape prior to the arrival of a train at the crossing. The system has a series of magnetometer sensors suitably placed in the crossing to detect the presence of a vehicle. The sensors are connected to a controller which analyzes readings from the sensors. Upon the approach of a train, the controller, based on analysis of readings from the sensor, determines if a vehicle has become entrapped and determines which exit gate must be opened or should remain open to allow the entrapped vehicle to escape. The system also has self test capabilities as well as the ability to continuously update, when no vehicles are present, a baseline reading of the ambient magnetic condition of the crossing area, which baseline the controller uses in analyzing data from the sensors.

Claims

1. A method of detecting the presence of a vehicle in a protected area of a four gate railroad crossing and providing for the vehicles timely escape from the protected area of the crossing prior to the arrival of a train at the crossing, said method comprising the steps of:

receiving a signal that a train is approaching the crossing;

commencing sampling of readings from sensors located at the crossing;

analyzing the readings from the sensors to determine if and when the crossing is clear so that exit gates to the crossing can be lowered;

generating an all clear signal when it is determined that the crossing is free of any vehicular traffic; and

lowering into place crossing exit gates.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of analyzing further comprises analyzing readings from a plurality of sensors to determine which of at least two lanes for traffic through the protected area of the crossing is clear and then generating a separate all clear signal for each lane of the at least two lanes so that an exit gate in a traffic lane of the at least two traffic lanes for which the all clear signal is generated can be lowered.

3. The method of claim 1 comprising the additional step of continuing to sample the sensors, and upon receipt of sensor signals that at least one vehicle is in the protected area of the crossing to cease generating the all clear signal whereupon the exit gate is raised so that the at least one vehicle can escape from the protected area of the crossing.

4. The method of claim 1 including the step of periodically sampling readings from the sensors during periods that no vehicles are in the protected crossing area and using the readings taken to establish and verify a baseline for use in the analyzing step in determining when a vehicle is in the protected area.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of receiving the train approach signal further comprises receiving it at least 35 seconds before the train reaches the protected area of the crossing.

6. The method of claim 3 further comprising the steps of:

generating the all clear signal when it is determined the protected area is again clear of vehicles;

monitoring the crossing for the presence of the train in the crossing;

determining when the last car of the train has left the crossing;

taking readings from the sensors after the last car of the train has left the crossing while it is still clear of vehicles;

generating a signal that the crossing is clear of the train; and

resetting the system to await the approach of the next train.

19. The method of claim 1 including the further step of periodically conducting a self test to confirm the sensors which monitor the protected area are operating correctly.

20. The method of claim 19 wherein the step of periodically conducting the self test comprises conducting it approximately every five minutes.

21. The method of claim 19 wherein the step of conducting the self test comprises conducting at least one additional self test upon an indication of a failure in one or more sensors to verify the indication of failure during the first self test was not a false reading.

22. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of establishing and verifying a baseline comprises:

a) continuously collecting, in the absence of vehicle detection or a train passage, minimum and maximum deviations of sensor outputs over fixed, short time periods;

b) averaging the minimum and maximum deviations of sensor outputs so obtained;

c) using the averaged data so obtained as representing a valid baseline only if the maximum and minimum sensor output levels during the sample period fall within a narrow, established range; and

d) adopting the new baseline only if one or more sensors exhibit an average change exceeding a pre-selected value.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the fixed short time periods over which data is sampled is 45 seconds.

24. The method of claim 22 wherein the established range of the maximum and minimum sensor output levels during the sample period is 10 millioersteds peak to peak.

25. The method of claim 22 wherein the pre-selected value in the step of adopting of a new baseline is 7.3 moe.

26. The method of claim 1 including the step of filtering a signal generated by a sensor prior to the step of analyzing the reading from the sensor.

27. The method of claim 26 wherein the step of filtering comprises the step of a low band pass filtering.

37. The method of claim 1 including the further step of lowering gates to entrance lanes to the crossing on receiving the train approach signal.

7. The method of step 3 comprising the additional step of monitoring the movement of the at least one vehicle through the protected area of the crossing.

8. A system for determining if a protected area of a four gate railroad grade crossing is clear of vehicles and providing for the safe escape of any vehicles which maybe become entrapped from the protected area prior to the arrival of a train at the crossing, said system comprising:

a plurality of strategically placed sensors located within the protected area of a railroad crossing;

a controller analyzer apparatus to which each of the sensors have a communicative link; and

wherein upon receipt of a train approach signal the control analyzer apparatus periodically takes readings from the sensors, compares those readings with a baseline and upon analyzing the comparison of the readings taken from the sensors with the baseline generates an exit gate control lowering signal when it determines no vehicles are present in the protected area of the crossing.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein at least two separate lanes traverse the protected area of the crossing and the controller analyzer can determine which lane or lanes are clear and generate a separate all clear signal for each of the at least two lanes individually so that exit gates for only the lane or lanes for which the all clear signals are generated will be lowered.

10. The system of claim 9 wherein a total of six sensors are strategically placed in the protected area and there are three in each lane of the at least two lanes.

11. The system of claim 8 wherein the controller analyzer continues to take readings from the sensors after generating the all clear signal, but before the train arrives at the crossing and upon obtaining readings from the sensors that a vehicle may be in the protected area ceases generation of the all clear signal which allows the exit gate to be raised until the controller analyzer determines the vehicle has exited the protected area whereupon it generates the all clear signal.

12. The system of claim 8 wherein the controller analyzer takes readings from the sensors to establish and verify the baseline.

28. The system of claim 8 wherein the sensors are magnetometers.

29. The system of claim 28 wherein the magnetometers are fluxgate-type magnetometers.

30. The system of claim 8 wherein the sensors placed in the protected area are buried between 18 to 24 inches deep.

31. The system of claim 9 wherein the plurality of strategically placed sensors are placed with a separation of no more than eight feet between each in the protected area such that they provide complete coverage of the protected area.

32. The system of claim 9 wherein the plurality of strategically placed sensors are placed with a separation of no more than eight feet to twelve feet between each in the protected area such that they provide complete coverage of the protected area.

33. The system of claim 28 wherein the sensors are three axis sensors with the three axis of each sensor in an orthogonal relationship with each other.

34. The system of claim 29 wherein a first axis is in a vertical relationship with the protected area, a second axis is in a parallel relationship with the direction of the vehicle lanes of travel and a third axis is in a perpendicular relationship with the direction of the vehicle lanes of travel.

35. The system of claim 8 wherein the plurality of sensors have at least a vertical axis and a pre-selected number have at least one horizontal axis parallel to the vehicle lanes of travel such that the sensors are able to provide sufficient data for the controller analyzer to determine vehicle presence, location and direction of travel within the protected area without undue redundancy.

36. The system of claim 8 wherein the controller analyzer comprises:

a. a top level gate control state machine which coordinates the operation of five subordinate state machines by acting on the readings taken by these subordinate state machines, upon receipt of a train approach signal, and to control the exit gate of the crossing;

(i.) a first lane state machine for detecting vehicles in a first lane;

(ii.) a second lane state machine for detecting vehicles in a second lane;

(iii.) a stealth vehicle state machine for detecting vehicles not detected by the first lane or the second lane state machines;

(iv.) a train detection state machine which can detect the presence of a train in the protected area;

(v.) a center state machine for detecting the presence of vehicles between the first and second lanes;

b. a self test mechanism for verifying the proper functioning of the components of the system; and

c. a baseline update mechanism for updating a baseline the sensors of the system use to determine if a vehicle is present.

38. The system of claim 8 further including auxiliary sensors for train detection placed adjacent to railroad tracks but outside the protected area of the crossing for determining when a train has entered or left the protected area of the crossing.

39. The system of claim 38 wherein the auxiliary sensors are placed 10 to 20 feet outside of the crossing adjacent to the railroad track where the track enters and leaves the crossing.

13. A method for detecting the presence of a vehicle in a protected area of a railroad crossing and providing for the vehicles timely escape from the protected area of the crossing prior to the arrival of a train at the crossing, said method comprising the steps of:

receiving a signal that a train is approaching the crossing;

commencing sampling of readings from sensors located in at least one lane located in the protected area of the crossing;

analyzing the readings from the sensors to determine if and when the at least one lane is clear so that an exit gate for the at least one lane can be lowered;

generating an all clear signal when it is determined that the at least one lane in the protected area is free of any vehicular traffic; and

lowering into place the exit gate.

14. The method of claim 13 comprising the additional step of continuing to sample the sensors, and upon receipt of sensor signals that at least one vehicle is in the at least one lane of the protected area of the crossing to cease generating the all clear signal whereupon the exit gate is raised so that the at least one vehicle can escape from the protected area of the crossing.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising the steps of:

generating the all clear signal for the at least one lane when it is determined the at least one lane in the protected area is again clear of the at least one vehicle;

monitoring the crossing for the presence of the train in the crossing;

determining when the last car of the train has left the crossing;

taking readings from the sensors after the last car of the train has left the crossing while it is still clear of vehicles;

generating a signal that the crossing is clear of the train; and

resetting the system to await the approach of the next train.

16. The method of claim 13 including the step of periodically sampling readings from the sensors during periods that no vehicles are in the at least one lane of the protected crossing area and using the readings taken to establish and verify a baseline for use in the analyzing step in determining when a vehicle is in the at least one lane of the protected area.

17. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of receiving the train approach signal further comprises receiving it at least 15 seconds before the train reaches the protected area of the crossing.

18. The apparatus of 8 wherein the strategically placed sensors comprises the sensors being placed so that they cover the entire protected area of the crossing and allow the controller analyzer to determine the location of a vehicle within the protected area.