Method of determining railyard status using locomotive location

• US 6,377,877 B1
• Filed: 09/15/2000
• Issued: 04/23/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 09/15/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: GE Transportation Systems Global Signaling LLC (General Electric Company)
• Original Assignee: GE Harris Railway Electronics, LLC (GE Aerospace)
• Inventors: Doner, John R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Beaulieu, Yonel
• Application Number:
  US09/662,777
• Time in Patent Office: 585 Days
• Field of Search: 701/19, 701/20, 701/207, 701/213, 701/205, 340/500, 340/933, 340/988, 246/2.R, 246/122.R
• US Class Current: 701/19
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 17/00 Switching systems for classification yards
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 2205/04 Satellite based navigation systems, e.g. global positioning system [GPS]
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 25/025 Absolute localisation, e.g. providing geodetic coordinates
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 27/57 for vehicles or trains, e.g. trackside supervision of train conditions

Abstract

A system for determining the status of a railyard includes a locomotive itinerary, a computer configured with a comparator algorithm used to compare a locomotive location to the locomotive itinerary, and at least one manager console configured to communicate with the computer. Railcar information is input to the manager console and communicated to the computer, which generates a locomotive task list from the railcar information. The computer then generates a locomotive itinerary, tracks the location of the locomotive and uses the comparator algorithm to determine the schedule status of the railcar.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring a status of railcars and locomotives in a railyard using a system that tracks the location of a plurality of railcars each constituting a dependent object based on known locations of locomotives each constituting an independent object, the system including a comparator algorithm and a computer programmed with the comparator algorithm, said method comprising the steps of:

generating an independent object itinerary based on the requirements on the scheduled activities of the dependent objects;

moving the dependent objects with the independent objects in accordance with the independent object itinerary;

tracking the locations of the independent objects;

comparing the tracked independent object locations with the independent object itinerary; and

determining the locations and status of the dependent objects based on the locations of the independent objects.

2. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the dependent object is a railcar and the independent object is a locomotive, said step of determining the location further comprises the step of determining the progress of scheduled activities for the railcar.

3. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said step of tracking the location further comprises the step of using a global positioning satellite system to track the independent object.

4. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said step of tracking the location further comprises the step of identifying the location of the independent object in reference to a network of paths.

5. A method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the system further includes at least one manager console, said step of generating the independent object itinerary further comprises the steps of:

communicating a set of dependent object information to the manager console, the manager console configured to communicate with the computer;

generating an independent object task list based on the set of dependent object information;

creating a sequence of locations the independent object will occupy;

identifying each of the locations in reference to a network of paths; and

determining a start time and an end time for the independent object to occupy one of the determined locations.

6. A method in accordance with claim 5 wherein said step of computing an independent object task list further comprises the step determining at least one task to be performed by the independent object, the at least one task including positioning a dependent object at a predetermined location on a predetermined path at a predetermined time.

7. A method in accordance with claim 6 wherein said step of comparing the location further comprises the step of utilizing the comparator algorithm to compare the location of the independent object with the independent object itinerary.

8. A system for monitoring a status of railcars and locomotives in a railyard to determine the location of a plurality of railcars each constituting a dependent object based on determined locations of locomotives each constituting an independent object, the dependent objects being selectively associated with and moved by the independent objects, said system comprising:

an independent object itinerary established based on the requirements on the scheduled activities of the associated dependent object;

a list associating the dependent objects to the independent objects for predetermined segments of the independent object itinerary;

an independent object location tracking system for determining the locations of the independent objects;

a comparator algorithm for comparing the tracked independent object locations to the independent object itinerary and determining the location and status of the associated dependent objects;

a computer configured to use said comparator algorithm; and

at least one manager console configured to communicate with said computer to display the status of the locomotives and railcars in the railyard.

9. A system in accordance with claim 8 wherein said dependent object comprises a railcar and the independent object comprises a locomotive.

10. A system in accordance with claim 8 wherein the independent object location tracking system configured to track a location of the independent object in reference to a known network of paths.

11. A system in accordance with claim 10 wherein the independent object location tracking system comprises a global positioning satellite system.

12. A system in accordance with claim 8 wherein said computer further configured to generate the independent object itinerary.

13. A system in accordance with claim 8 wherein said at least one manager console further comprises an input device configured to communicate a set of dependent object information to said at least one manager console.

14. A system in accordance with claim 13 wherein said computer further configured to utilize the set of dependent object information to generate an independent object task list.

15. A system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the independent object itinerary comprises a sequence of locations the independent object will occupy while executing the independent object task list.

16. A system in accordance with claim 14 wherein the independent object task list comprises a sequence of tasks to be performed by the independent object.

17. A system in accordance with claim 16 wherein the at least one task comprises positioning the dependent object at a predetermined location on a predetermined path at a predetermined time.

18. A system in accordance with claim 16 wherein said computer further configured to use said comparator algorithm to compare the location of the independent object with the task.

19. A system in accordance with claim 16 wherein said independent object itinerary further comprises a predetermined start time and a predetermined end time the independent object is projected to occupy a location while executing the independent object task list.

20. A system for monitoring the status of scheduled activities for a plurality of railcars each constituting a dependent object based on determined locations of locomotives each constituting an independent object, the dependent objects being selectively associated with and moved by the independent objects, said system comprising:

a dependent object activity schedule;

a comparator algorithm for comparing the independent object locations and the dependent activity schedule to determine the location of the dependent objects; and

a computer configured to use said comparator algorithm.

21. A system in accordance with claim 20 wherein said computer further comprising a processor configured to execute said comparator algorithm, a display configured to display information, and an input device configured to input information to said computer.

22. A system in accordance with claim 20 further comprising an independent object location tracking system configured to track a location of the independent object.

23. A system in accordance with claim 20 wherein said dependent object activity schedule comprises a sequence of activities and the corresponding locations the dependent object will occupy while executing the dependent object activity schedule.

24. A system in accordance with claim 20 wherein said dependent object activity schedule further comprises a predetermined start time and predetermined end time that the dependent object is scheduled to occupy a location.