Method and apparatus for providing pre-screened content

• US 6,571,256 B1
• Filed: 02/18/2000
• Issued: 05/27/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 02/18/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: The Thekidsconnection.com Incorporated
• Original Assignee: The Thekidsconnection.com Incorporated
• Inventors: Dorian, Peter, Drago, Joseph Salvatore, Dorian, Paul Jacob
• Primary Examiner(s): CHOULES, JACK M
• Application Number:
  US09/507,217
• Time in Patent Office: 1,194 Days
• Field of Search: 707/1, 707/10, 707/104.1
• US Class Current: 726/2
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/955 using information identifiers, e.g. uniform resource locators [URL]
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/915 Image
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/959 Network
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99945 Object-oriented database structure processing

Abstract

A method of providing only pre-screened content is described. The method includes maintaining a database on a server including a plurality of pre-screened sites. When a universal resource locator (URL) is received, the method verifies that the URL represents one of the plurality of pre-screened sites. If the URL represents one of the plurality of prescreened sites, displaying data associated with the URL, otherwise, not displaying the data.

Claims

1. A method of providing only pre-screened content comprising:

maintaining a database on a server including a database of a plurality of pre-screened sites;

when a universal resource locator (URL) is received from a user;

determining if the URL is in a history database of allowed sites for the user;

if the URL is not in the history database, determining whether the URL is in the database as one of the plurality of pre-screened sites; and

if the URL represents one of the plurality of prescreened sites, displaying data associated with the URL, otherwise, not displaying the data.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

adding the URL to a history database if the URL was not in the history database, including an indication of whether the site was allowed or not allowed.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

maintaining an account database of excluded and included sites for a specific user on the server;

determining if the URL is specifically excluded or included by the user by testing if the site is in the database of excluded sites; and

not displaying the site if the site is in the account database as an excluded site.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the database comprises:

a domain database; and

a directory database.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the domain database further includes a flag, indicating a type of verification needed for the site.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining whether the URL is in the database comprises:

determining if the URL is in the domain database; and

if the URL is in the domain database, determining the flag associated with the domain; and

performing further verification based on the flag, to determine if the site should be displayed.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the further verification comprises:

if the flag indicates that all directories within the domain are allowable, displaying the site; and

if the flag indicates that only-certain directories within the domain are allowable, determining if the directory is in the directory database, and displaying the site only if the directory is in the directory database.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the flag further indicates whether any of the directories in the domain are in an exclusion database, which contains specific exclusions, on a user-by-user bases.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the database comprises a plurality of database accessed through a network.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the history database is on a local client computer.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the history database is purged periodically.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the history database is purged after each session.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the history database is on a server.

14. A method of providing content comprising:

receiving a URL;

connecting to a server;

determining if the URL is in a database on the server as an approved site, comprising;

determining if a domain of the URL is in a domain database;

if the domain is in the domain database, determining a flag associated with the domain indicates that all directories within the domain are acceptable, or whether a directory database should further be tested; and

based on the flag, allowing the site, if appropriate. connecting to the site associated with the URL if the URL is an approved site.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the flag further indicates whether the domain has any exclusions associated with it.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising an exclusion database storing user-specific exclusions.

17. A method of providing content comprising:

receiving a URL from a user;

determining if the URL is in a historical list of URLs for the user, to which permission to connect has been granted; and

connecting to the URL if the URL is in the historical list as a pre-screened site.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising, if the URL is not on the historical list:

determining if the URL is in a list of approved URLs; and

connecting to the URL if the URL is in the list of approved URLs.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the list of approved URLs comprises a database on the server.

20. The method of claim 18, wherein determining if the URL is the list of approved URLs comprises:

determining if URL is excluded for an account associated with the current user.

21. An apparatus for providing pre-screened content comprising:

a client comprising;

a user interface for receiving an address selection from a user;

a history database of allowed sites for the user;

a server interface for providing the address selection for verification to a server if the address selection is not in the history database;

the server comprising;

a database listing a plurality of URLs of pre-screened allowable sites;

domain validation logic for determining whether the address selection is in a database, and thus may be displayed to the user; and

the client for displaying a site associated with the address selection if the history database includes the address selection or if server determined that the site may be displayed to the user.

22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the database comprises:

a domain database including a plurality of acceptable domains.

23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the domain database includes a flag for each domain of the plurality of acceptable domains.

24. The apparatus of claim 23, further comprising:

a directory database including a plurality of directories;

wherein the flag indicates whether all directories in the domain are acceptable, or the directory database should be queried for the directory of the requested URL.

25. The apparatus of claim 23, further comprising:

an exclusion database including a plurality of excluded directories, the exclusion database being user-specific;

wherein the flag indicates whether all directories in the domain are acceptable, or the exclusion database should be queried for the directory of the requested URL.

26. A server comprising:

a database listing a plurality of pre-screened allowable sites;

a domain validation logic for receiving a universal resource locator (URL) from a user and for determining whether the URL is in the database, and thus may be displayed to the user, the domain validation logic including a flag associated with a domain to indicate whether all directories within the domain are acceptable or whether a directory database should be further tested; and

if the URL is an allowable site, the server sending an indication to the client.