System and method for testing deflated tire handling

• US 6,580,980 B1
• Filed: 03/05/2002
• Issued: 06/17/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 03/05/2002
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Michelin Recherche et Technique SA (Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA)
• Original Assignee: Michelin Recherche et Technique SA (Compagnie Generale DES Etablissements Michelin SCA)
• Inventors: Lhermet, Jean-Marc, Taramasso, Piero, Ludlow, Mark William, Gauthier, Patrice Noël Germain, Kasai, Michiya
• Primary Examiner(s): Cuchlinski, Jr., William A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Hernandez, Olga
• Application Number:
  US10/091,375
• Time in Patent Office: 469 Days
• Field of Search: 701/29, 731/46, 731/462
• US Class Current: 701/29
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 17/02 Tyres

Abstract

A subjective test method for characterizing the deflated handling performance of self-supporting tires includes the steps of positioning tires on selected wheels of a test vehicle and then subjecting the tire—test vehicle combination to a plurality of different driving maneuvers such that a variety of testing objectives can be evaluated. Exemplary driving maneuvers are representative of a vehicle'"'"'s operation in steady state, transient state, throttle lift-off, and/or emergency driving situations. Testing objectives that are obtained in accordance with each test maneuver may include both objective criteria that may be obtained via vehicle instrumentation and subjective criteria that may be assigned grade ratings by a test driver. Uniformity of testing maneuvers and driver solicitation is preferred to minimize dispersion in test results. A standardized reporting grid is also provided in accordance with the disclosed technology such that the results of the testing objectives may be properly documented. Selected test data are then used to provide performance ratings for tire acceptability levels. Some performance ratings are automatically calculated through an established algorithm, and all ratings are preferably provided on a common rating scale.

Claims

1. A method for rating the handling performance of tires, wherein selected tires are positioned on a test vehicle such that a tire—

test vehicle combination is subjected to predetermined maneuvers, and whereby ratings are obtained in accordance with such predetermined maneuvers, said method comprising the steps of;

assigning at least one steady state rating, wherein a steady state rating relates to the handling performance of a tire when such tire in combination with the test vehicle is subjected to a predetermined steady state maneuver;

assigning at least one transient state rating, wherein a transient state rating relates to the handling performance of a tire when such tire in combination with the test vehicle is subjected to a predetermined transient state maneuver;

obtaining a g-value corresponding to the lateral acceleration of the test vehicle during a selected predetermined maneuver at which a predefined level of tire-vehicle instability is exhibited; and

calculating an initial tire performance rating based on the steady state and transient state ratings from said assigning steps and the g-value from said obtaining step.

2. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 1, further including the step of assigning at least one throttle lift-off rating, wherein a throttle lift-off rating relates to the handling performance of a tire when such tire in combination with a test vehicle is subjected to a predetermined throttle lift-off maneuver while cornering with a level of lateral acceleration close to the g-value of said obtaining step, and wherein said step of calculating an initial tire performance rating is further based on the lift-off rating from this additional assigning step.

3. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 2, wherein said throttle lift-off rating is assigned to a variable selected from the group including yaw angle, trajectory grade, and progressivity.

4. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 1, wherein said steady state rating is assigned to a variable selected from the group including yaw velocity, yaw angle, and progressivity.

5. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 4, wherein said transient rating is assigned to a variable selected from the group including symmetry of system response to steering input, yaw velocity, and yaw angle.

6. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 1, wherein the method and predetermined maneuvers are employed with at least one deflated tire such that the method rates the deflated handling performance of selected tires.

7. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 6, further including the steps of:

assigning at least one emergency criteria rating, wherein an emergency criteria rating relates to the handling performance of a tire when such tire in combination with a test vehicle is subjected to a predetermined emergency maneuver; and

determining an overall tire performance rating based on the initial tire performance rating from said calculating step and from the emergency criteria rating from said step of assigning at least one emergency criteria rating.

8. A method for rating the handling performance of tires as in claim 1, further including the steps of:

assigning at least one emergency criteria rating, wherein an emergency criteria rating relates to the handling performance of a tire when such tire in combination with a test vehicle is subjected to a predetermined emergency maneuver; and

determining an overall tire performance rating based on the initial tire performance rating from said calculating step and from the emergency criteria ratings from said step of assigning at least one emergency criteria rating.

9. A method for rating the handling the performance of tires as in claim 8, wherein said emergency criteria rating is assigned to a variable selected from the group including bead unseat class type, instability limit speed, peak input g-level, and trajectory grade.

10. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires, wherein the evaluated tires are positioned on selected wheels of a test vehicle, and wherein said rating process comprises the following steps:

assigning at least one steady state rating, wherein the steady state rating is obtained upon deflating a selected tire and subjecting it to a predetermined steady state maneuver;

assigning at least one transient state rating, wherein the transient state rating is obtained upon subjecting the selected deflated tire to a predetermined transient state maneuver;

assigning at least one emergency state rating, wherein the emergency state rating is obtained upon subjecting the selected deflated tire to a predetermined emergency state maneuver; and

obtaining a tire performance rating by inputting the steady state, transient state, and emergency state subjective ratings into an algorithmic set of formulas such that the tire performance rating is an output of the algorithmic set of formulas.

11. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 10, wherein the steady state ratings, the transient state ratings, and the emergency state ratings are each assigned a value on a scale represented by the values A, A/B, B, B/C, C, C/D, and D.

12. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 10, further including a step of assigning at least one throttle lift-off rating, wherein the throttle lift-off rating is obtained upon subjecting the selected deflated tire to a predetermined throttle lift-off maneuver, and wherein the throttle lift-off rating is also input to the algorithmic set of formulas in said step of obtaining a tire performance rating.

13. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 10, further including a step of obtaining a g-value corresponding to the lateral acceleration of the test vehicle during the predetermined steady state maneuver at the minimum vehicle speed for which instability of the self-supporting tire is first exhibited, and wherein the g-value is also input to the algorithmic set of formulas in said step of obtaining a tire performance rating.

14. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 13, wherein the lateral acceleration g-value is obtained from accelerometer instrumentation provided in conjunction with the test vehicle.

15. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 13, wherein each of said steps is performed at least once for a deflated tire positioned on a selected front wheel of a test vehicle, and wherein each of said steps is additionally performed at least once for a deflated tire positioned on a selected rear wheel of a test vehicle.

16. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 15, wherein the predetermined emergency state maneuver performed for a selected deflated front tire comprises an emergency j-turn maneuver with ABS invoked.

17. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 15, wherein the predetermined emergency state maneuver performed for a selected deflated rear tire comprises an emergency lane change maneuver.

18. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 13, wherein the tire performance rating from said obtaining step comprises a numeric value in a range from 0 to 100.

19. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 18, wherein the potential tire performance rating range of 0 to 100 is divided into at least first and second subranges, such that a tire which obtains a tire performance rating within the first subrange is market acceptable for certain applications and a tire which obtains a tire performance rating within the second subrange is not market acceptable.

20. A rating process for subjectively evaluating the deflated handling performance of tires as in claim 18, wherein the tire performance rating from said obtaining step is automatically calculated via computerized implementation of said algorithmic set of formulas, and the measured g-values and subjective ratings inputted thereto.

21. A subjective test method used to provide a performance rating for self-supporting tires, wherein a selected self-supporting tire is positioned on a test vehicle such that the resulting tire—

test vehicle combination is subjected to a plurality of testing maneuvers, said subjective test method comprising the steps of;

subjecting the tire—

test vehicle combination to a steady state testing maneuver;

obtaining an alphanumeric value for the lateral acceleration of the test vehicle at a point during the steady state testing maneuver at which the tire-vehicle system achieves a predetermined level of initial instability;

assigning alphanumeric values to at least one steady state performance variable, wherein the alphanumeric values relate to the performance of the selected self-supporting tire during subjection to the steady state testing maneuver;

subjecting the tire—

test vehicle combination to a transient state testing maneuver;

assigning alphanumeric values to at least one transient state performance variable, wherein the alphanumeric values relate to the performance of the selected self-supporting tire during subjection to the transient state testing maneuver;

subjecting the tire—

test vehicle combination to an emergency testing maneuver;

assigning alphanumeric values to at least one emergency performance variable, wherein the alphanumeric values relate to the performance of the selected self-supporting tire during subjection to the emergency testing maneuver; and

determining a tire performance rating based on algorithmic combination of the alphanumeric values corresponding to the lateral acceleration and the steady state, transient state and emergency performance variables.

22. A subjective test method used to provide a performance rating for self-supporting tires as in claim 21, wherein at least one self-supporting tire is deflated before subjecting the tire—

test vehicle combination to each testing maneuver such that the determined tire performance rating corresponds to deflated handling performance.

23. A subjective test method used to provide a performance rating for self-supporting tires as in claim 21, wherein said steady state performance values comprise yaw velocity and yaw angle.

24. A subjective test method used to provide a performance rating for self-supporting tires as in claim 21, wherein said transient performance variables comprise symmetry of steering response, yaw angle, and yaw velocity.

25. A subjective test method as in claim 21, further including the steps of:

subjecting the tire—

test vehicle combination to a throttle lift-off driving maneuver; and

assigning alphanumeric values to at least one throttle lift-off performance value, wherein the alphanumeric values relate to the performance of the selected self-sup tire during subjection to the throttle lift-off driving manuver; and

wherein said step of determining a performance variable is based on algorithmic combination of the alphanumeric values corresponding to the lateral acceleration and the steady state, transient state, emergency, and throttle lift-off performance variables.

26. A standardized procedure for obtaining a deflated performance rating for self-supporting tires, wherein a selected deflated self-supporting tire is positioned on a selected wheel of a test vehicle such that the resultant tire—

test vehicle combination is subjected to various maneuvers, and wherein predefined test ratings related to deflated tire performance upon the vehicle being subjected to selected of the various maneuvers are obtained for use in accordance with selected steps of said standardized procedure, said standardized procedure comprising the following steps;

obtaining a g-value for the lateral acceleration of the test vehicle when the tire—

test vehicle is subjected to a steady state maneuver and when the tire vehicle system achieves a predetermined level of initial instability;

assigning a plurality of performance values for predefined testing criteria based on the tire'"'"'s deflated performance when subjected to selected maneuvers;

calculating an initial tire rating based on the obtained g-value and the assigned plurality of performance values;

assigning at least one emergency performance value for predefined emergency performance criteria based on the tire'"'"'s performance when subjected to an emergency maneuver; and

determining an overall tire rating based on the initial tire rating and the assigned emergency performance value.

27. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 26, wherein the maneuvers that the tire—

test vehicle combination is subjected to include at least one steady state maneuver, at least one transient maneuver, at least one longitudinal load transfer maneuver, and at least one emergency maneuver.

28. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 26, wherein the predefined testing criteria for which performance values are assigned are selected from the group yaw velocity, yaw angle, trajectory grade, symmetry, initial instability limit speed, and unseating class.

29. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 26, wherein said overall tire rating is determined subjectively by a test driver, who adjusts the calculated initial tire rating based on selected subjective performance measures of the tested self-supporting tire.

30. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 26, wherein the initial tire rating and the overall tire rating are provided on a point scale from 0 to 100, and wherein the overall tire rating may only be positively or negatively adjusted in said determining step by a maximum of 10 points from the calculated initial tire rating.

31. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 30, wherein the rating point scale from 0 to 100 is divided into at least first and second subranges, such that a tire which obtains a tire rating within the first subrange is market acceptable for certain applications and a tire which obtains a tire rating within the second subrange is not market acceptable.

32. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 31, wherein the emergency performance value comprises an unseating class grade related to the number of beads that remain seated on the wheel rim for a tested tire an emergency maneuver, and wherein a tire which has both beads unseat during the emergency maneuver will never receive an overall tire rating in the acceptable first subrange of the rating point scale.

33. A standardized procedure for obtaining a performance rating for deflated self-supporting tires as in claim 31, wherein said initial tire is automatically calculated via computerized manipulation of inputted parameters including the obtained g-value and assigned plurality of performance values.