Method for determining the state of charge of rechargeable batteries by integration of the amounts of current flowing during charging and discharging

• US 6,777,914 B2
• Filed: 10/21/2002
• Issued: 08/17/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 11/02/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Varta Automotive Systems GmbH
• Original Assignee: Varta Automotive Systems GmbH
• Inventors: Schmitz, Claus, Ullrich, Matthias, Folge, Hans-Walter
• Primary Examiner(s): Tibbits, Pia
• Application Number:
  US10/278,185
• Publication Number:
  US 20030085688A1
• Time in Patent Office: 666 Days
• Field of Search: 324/426-434, 320/132, 320/134, 320/149
• US Class Current: 320/132
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/3828 using current integration

Abstract

In a method for determining the state of charge of rechargeable batteries by integration of the amounts of current flowing during charging and discharging, a first state of charge value LZ_A is determined by continuous integration of the rechargeable battery current. A second state of charge value LZ_B is determined by measurement of the no-load voltage U₀ after receiving or supplying a defined amount of charge Q which is sufficient in order to leave the region of the mixed potential of the electrodes and to reach a no-load voltage of the rechargeable battery, and by comparison of this measured no-load voltage U₀ with empirically determined no-load voltage characteristics for the rechargeable battery. From the state of charge values obtained in this way, that state of charge value is chosen which is more reliable in the preceding operating conditions, with the assessment of LZ_A taking into account in particular the charge throughput in the assessment of LZ_B, in particular the amount of charge Q which has flowed. The amount of charge Q should be at least 1 to 40%, preferably 5 to 50%, of the rated capacity of the rechargeable battery.

Claims

1. A method for determining the state of charge of a rechargeable battery by integration of amounts of current flowing during charging and discharging comprising:

determining a first state of charge value LZ_A by continuous integration of the rechargeable battery current;

determining a second state of charge value LZ_B by measuring a voltage U₀ under no load after receiving or supplying a selected amount of charge Q sufficient to leave a region of mixed potential of electrodes of the battery and to reach a final no-load voltage of the rechargeable battery and by

comparing the measure no-load voltage U₀ with empirically determined no-load voltage characteristics for the rechargeable battery;

assessing reliability of LZ_A based on charge throughput in the battery;

assessing reliability of LZ_B based on the amount of charge Q which has flowed through the battery, wherein th amount of charge Q is between about 1 and about 40% of the rated capacity of the rechargeable battery; and

selecting the state of charge of the battery from the obtained state of charge values based on a highest value of reliability of LZ_A or LZ_B.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_A is also based on the time since a most recent calibration.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_B is based on a magnitude of current flowing during determination of U₀, wherein a greater residual current means lower reliability.

4. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_B is based on magnitude of current flowing during determination of U₀, wherein a greater residual current means lower reliability.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_B is based on the state of charge of the rechargeable battery, with states of charge between about 70 and about 90% and between about 30 and about 40% indicating higher reliability than other states of charge.

6. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_B is based on the state of charge of the rechargeable battery, with states of charge between about 70 and about 90% and between about 30 and about 40% indicating higher reliability than other states of charge.

7. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein assessing reliability of LZ₃, is based on the state of charge of the rechargeable battery, with states of charge between about 70 and about 90% and between about 30 and about 40% indicating higher reliability than other states of charge.

8. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein assessing reliability of LZ_B is based on the state of charge of the rechargeable battery, with states of charge between about 70 and about 90% and between about 30 and about 40% indicating higher reliability than other states of charge.

9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of charge Q is between about 5 and about 15%.