Aircraft control system

• US 7,225,063 B2
• Filed: 09/20/2002
• Issued: 05/29/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 09/20/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Keith Raymond Tart
• Original Assignee: Keith R. Tart
• Inventors: Allen, Matthew Emmerson, Tart, Keith Raymond
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, CUONG H
• Application Number:
  US10/247,974
• Publication Number:
  US 20030055564A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,712 Days
• Field of Search: 701/301, 701/302, 701/200, 701/201, 701/202, 701/205, 701/206, 701/207, 701/209, 701/210, 701/211, 701/213, 701/224, 701/225, 701/1, 701/4, 701/3, 701/2, 701/7, 701/9, 701/11, 701/14, 701/16, 701/23, 701/24, 701/26, 701/35, 701/36, 701/13, 244/3.1, 244/3.11, 244/3.15, 244/3.21, 244/75.R, 244/76.R, 244/220, 244/221, 340/901, 340/902, 340/903, 340/945, 340/951, 340/963, 340/967, 340/979, 340/988, 340/995.13, 340/995.21, 340/995.23, 340/500, 340/524, 340/541, 348/117
• US Class Current: 701/4
• CPC Class Codes: B64C 13/18 using automatic pilot
• CPC Class Codes: B64D 45/0015 Devices specially adapted for the protection against criminal attack, e.g. anti-hijacking systems
• CPC Class Codes: B64D 45/0031 means for overriding or restricting access to flight controls
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/106 Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones

Abstract

A flight control system for preventing an aircraft colliding with designated man-made structures in which the geographical position of the aircraft is determined and then compared with predetermined geographical boundaries that represent excluded zones; these zones being defined around the man-made structures; where the system, as appropriate, overrides a normal flight control system (such as a fly-by-wire flight system) to alter the course of the aircraft to avoid all excluded zones, irrespective of any pilot commands.

Claims

1. A flight control system for an aircraft comprising means for continually determining the geographical position of the aircraft and processing means within the aircraft that compare the geographical position of the aircraft with predetermined excluded geographical locations that represent excluded zones;

said excluded zones being defined around man-made structure;

said processing means, when appropriate, activating control means to prevent the aircraft being piloted within said excluded zones.

2. A flight control system according to claim 1 wherein excluded zone avoidance can be triggered within a fraction of a second of a threatening deviation in flight path thereby allowing the system to be used by aircraft where the takeoff or landing flight paths lie very close to structures requiring protection.

3. A flight system according to claim 1 wherein using real time position data, a comparator calculates ground speed and flight direction and on the assumption that the aircraft will continue on its present course triggers zone avoidance when the aircraft is within a predetermined distance or within a minimum time from reaching the boundary of an excluded zone.

4. A flight system according to claim 1 wherein a ground facility may transmit an encrypted signal to the aircraft that passes to a verifier via an interface and thereby returns control to an onboard pilot or alternatively allows the wound facility to directly control or set an auto-pilot such that the aircraft is partly or fully under the control of ground based authorities.

5. A flight control system according to claim 1 that is re-set to allow pilot control following receipt an encrypted command transmitted by a government agency.

6. A flight control system according to claim 1 which takes averting action to avoid the excluded zone based on flight direction and ground velocity data measured by aircraft equipment.

7. A flight system according to claim 1 wherein the excluded zone are defined by polar co-ordinates combined with fixed reference points, the fixed reference points corresponding to points on man made structures or at fixed distances above man made structures.

8. A flight control system according to claim 1 comprising means for ensuring tat the aircraft lands at the nearest secure airport;

irrespective of any pilot commands, subsequent to activation of the system to avoid an excluded zone.

9. A flight control system according to claim 1 wherein following activation of the system to avoid an excluded zone the flight control system propagates a warning signal to alert other aircraft in its vicinity that the aircraft having the said flight control system is no longer under pilot control.

10. A flight control system according to claim 1 wherein following averting action to avoid an excluded zone all vital aircraft functions are subsequently controlled by commands transmitted from the ground by a government agency.

11. A flight system according to claim 1 which switches control of the aircraft from on board pilots to the system of the invention when specified verification checks have been made including confirmation that one or more parallel systems have also been triggered.

12. A flight control system for preventing an aircraft colliding with designated man-made structures, comprising;

means for determining the geographical position of the aircraft;

means for storing excluded zone data relating to excluded zones, said excluded zones being defined as space around man-made structures to be protected;

comparator means for comparing said determined geographical position of the aircraft with said excluded zones;

revised flight path calculator means that calculates a flight path that avoids said excluded zones when the aircraft is proximal and approaching an excluded zone; and

an interface facility that alters the course of the aircraft to the said flight path that avoids said excluded zones, irrespective of any pilot commands.

13. A flight control system according to claim 12 wherein the control system takes averting action to avoid an excluded zone before entering the proximity of that excluded zone, in such a way as not to be immediately detected by an unauthorised pilot.

14. A flight control system according to claim 12 wherein the normal flight control system is a fly-by-wire control system.

15. A flight system according to claim 12 wherein the size of the excluded zone is determined by calculating a boundary for the excluded zone that is dependent upon the approach speed of the aircraft so that the boundary of the excluded zone is larger if an aircraft approaches the zone at a high speed than if an aircraft approaches the zone at a low speed.

16. A flight control system for an aircraft comprising means for determining the position of the aircraft and means for comparing said position with predetermined excluded zones, said excluded zones being defined as space around man-made structures to be protected;

said excluded zones falling in the near term flight path of the aircraft, and control means to prevent the aircraft being piloted within said excluded zones, wherein the system takes action to avoid an excluded zone before entering the proximity of that excluded zone, in such a way as not to be immediately detected by a pilot.

17. A flight system according to claim 16 wherein an excluded zone is defined round a man made structure so that the zone comprises a “

wall”

.