Vehicle control

• US 7,263,419 B2
• Filed: 06/13/2002
• Issued: 08/28/2007
• Est. Priority Date: 06/13/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ricardo UK Limited (Ricardo PLC)
• Original Assignee: Ricardo UK Limited (Ricardo PLC)
• Inventors: Wheals, Jonathan Charles, Ramsbottom, Mark
• Primary Examiner(s): NGUYEN, TAN QUANG
• Application Number:
  US10/480,224
• Publication Number:
  US 20040249533A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,902 Days
• Field of Search: 701/1, 701/36, 701/41, 701/37, 701/38, 701/82, 701/90, 701/91, 701/213
• US Class Current: 701/36
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/042 Monitoring means
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/1878 Neural Networks
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/1879 Fuzzy Logic Control
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2800/702 Improving accuracy of a sensor signal
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2210/36 Global Positioning System [GPS]
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 2220/02 Driver type; Driving style; Driver adaptive features
• CPC Class Codes: B60T 8/172 Determining control parameters used in the regulation, e.g. by calculations involving measured or detected parameters B60T8/17551 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/0026 Lookup tables or parameter maps
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2050/0057 Frequency analysis, spectral techniques or transforms
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/30 Driving style
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2552/40 Coefficient of friction
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/50 of positioning data, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System] data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2720/14 Yaw
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/1819 Propulsion control with control means using analogue circuits, relays or mechanical links
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/188 Controlling power parameters of the driveline, e.g. determining the required power
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 40/09 Driving style or behaviour
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/02 Ensuring safety in case of control system failures, e.g. by diagnosing, circumventing or fixing failures
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/06 Improving the dynamic response of the control system, e.g. improving the speed of regulation or avoiding hunting or overshoot

Abstract

A vehicle control system includes at least one driver input, a supervisor and at least one sub-system controlled by the supervisor. The supervisor assesses the driver input to establish actual driver demand and controls the sub-systems accordingly. As a result intuitive driver demand is identified and met.

Claims

1. A control system for a vehicle, having:

a driver input,

a control actuator, and

a control processor, wherein the control processor is arranged to process the driver input, derive actual driver demand, derive a demanded yaw rate, determine actual yaw rate, and control the vehicle via the control actuator to perform in accordance with the driver demand, the control processor receiving as a further input a performance factor for deriving driver demand, the performance factor being determined by one of detecting driver performance and driver control, the performance factor being a progressive value, and the control actuators being adaptable to the same said value to change the lateral responsiveness of the vehicle.

2. The system as claimed on claim 1, in which the driver input is at least one of steering, brake, throttle, clutch or gear input.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the control actuator comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of a transmission actuator, a driveline actuator, a brake actuator, a torque differential actuator, and a chassis control element.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the processor processes the driver input using at least one of look-up tables, neural networks, fuzzy logic and pattern recognition.

5. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the control processor derives a demanded vehicle slip angle.

6. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which a plurality of driver inputs are each processed independently to derive an aspect of driver demand.

7. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the control processor compares the driver demand against vehicle performance limit and controls the vehicle performance to best approximate the driver demand while not exceeding the limit.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the control processor further receives external condition inputs and controls the control actuators accordingly.

9. The system as claimed in claim 8, in which the external condition inputs include at least one of the group consisting of driver skill, vehicle-surface coefficient of friction, vehicle absolute position.

10. The system as claimed in claim 9, in which the vehicle absolute position input is provided by a global positioning system sensor.

11. The system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a driver feedback module for providing feedback to the driver of vehicle performance.

12. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the performance factor comprises a driver sportivity index.

13. The system as claimed in claim 12, in which the driver sportivity index is derived from driver performance.

14. The system as claimed in claim 12, in which the driver sportivity index is controlled by the driver.

15. The system as claimed in claim 12, in which the driver sportivity index is a discrete incremental index.

16. The system as claimed in claim 1, in which the driver has autonomous control of the performance factor.

17. The system as claimed in claim 16, in which the driver can control at least one of front to rear torque bias and steer angle to yaw ratio.

18. The system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising:

a controller arranged to receive external vehicle positional data as a function of time and derive the vehicle attitude from said data.

19. The control system as claimed in claim 18, in which the derived vehicle attitude is vehicle slip angle.

20. The system as claimed in claim 18, in which the controller is further arranged to control vehicle attitude dependent on the derived vehicle attitude.

21. The system as claimed in claim 18, in which the positional data is global positioning system data.

22. A vehicle, including a control system comprising:

a driver input,

a control actuator, and

a control processor, wherein the control processor is arranged to process the driver input, derive actual driver demand, derive a demanded yaw rate, determine actual yaw rate, and control the vehicle via the control actuator to perform in accordance with the driver demand, the control processor receiving as a further input a performance factor for deriving driver demand, the performance factor being determined by one of detecting driver performance and driver control, the performance factor being a progressive value, and the control actuators being adaptable to the same said value to change the lateral responsiveness of the vehicle.

23. A computer readable medium comprising an instruction set configured to implement a system comprising:

a driver input,

a control actuator, and

a control processor, wherein the control processor is arranged to process the driver input, derive actual driver demand, derive a demanded yaw rate, determine actual yaw rate, and control the vehicle via the control actuator to perform in accordance with the driver demand, the control processor receiving as a further input a performance factor for deriving driver demand, the performance factor being determined by one of detecting driver performance and driver control, the performance factor being a progressive value, and the control actuators being adaptable to the same said value to change the lateral responsiveness of the vehicle.