Distributed network system architecture for collaborative computing

• US 7,523,163 B2
• Filed: 07/03/2006
• Issued: 04/21/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 12/29/2000
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (Cisco Systems, Inc.)
• Inventors: Shen, Jian, Yang, Guanghong, Li, Steven, Zhao, Bin, Yuan, Zheng, Zhu, Min, Yan, Shi
• Primary Examiner(s): Coulter; Kenneth R
• Application Number:
  US11/480,659
• Publication Number:
  US 20060248144A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,023 Days
• Field of Search: 709/204, 709/205, 709/203, 715751-759, 370/260, 714/4, 714 10- 13
• US Class Current: 709/204
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1827 Network arrangements for conference optimisation or adaptation
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 67/1095 Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/329 in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/40 for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity, e.g. service redundancy protocols, protocol state redundancy or protocol service redirection management of faults, events, alarms or notifications in data switching networks H04L41/06

Abstract

A distributed collaborative computer system is provided that comprises a plurality of server computers interconnected via a high-speed link. Client computers can connect to any available server computer and start or join a conference hosted on either the server computer to which the client computer is connected or any other server in the system. As a result, the system and method of the present invention is easily scalable to support an arbitrary number of participants to a conference by merely adding the appropriate number of server computers to the system. In addition, by replicating the conference information on more than one server computer, the single point of failure limitation is eliminated. In fact, if a server hosting or participating in a conference malfunctions, the failure is detected by other server computers and the client computer is able to reconnect to the conference through a new server computer.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

launching a plurality of logical collaboration servers on one or more physical servers, wherein each collaboration server is operable to host at least a portion of an on-line conference among a plurality of client computers;

storing state information for each of the plurality of collaboration servers at a gatekeeper that is separate from the collaboration servers, the state information for each collaboration server including current meeting data for the at least a portion of an on-line conference hosted at the collaboration server;

detecting a failure of a collaboration server;

in response to detecting the failure, launching a new collaboration server; and

recovering the state information for the failed collaboration server from the gatekeeper to the new collaboration server.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the gatekeeper is a meeting manager that manages the plurality of collaboration servers.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the launching a plurality of collaboration servers is performed by one or more process managers.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

associating at least one logical application server with each collaboration server, the at least one application server to support at least one service for the on-line conference.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one service is selected from the group consisting of:

document viewing, file sharing, video, voice over IP, telephony, polling, chat, and application sharing.

6. The method of claim 4, further comprising:

detecting a failure of an application server;

suspending operation of the collaboration server associated with the failed application server;

launching a new application server; and

resuming operation of the collaboration server associated with the failed application server.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the detecting a failure of the collaboration server is performed by a meeting manager that manages the plurality of collaboration servers.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

allowing the plurality of collaboration servers to communicate with each other to support the on-line conference.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the state information for each collaboration server comprises information describing the collaboration server'"'"'s configuration and quality of service (QoS) parameters.

10. An apparatus comprising:

one or more server computers; and

computer instructions stored in a computer-readable medium, the computer instructions when executed by the one or more server computers operable to,

launch a plurality of logical collaboration servers on the one or more server computers, wherein each collaboration server is operable to host at least a portion of an on-line conference among a plurality of client computers,

store state information for each of the plurality of collaboration servers at a gatekeeper that is separate from the collaboration servers, the state information for each collaboration server including current meeting data for the at least a portion of an on-line conference hosted at the collaboration server,

detect a failure of a collaboration server,

launch a new collaboration server in response to detection of the failure, and

recover the state information for the failed collaboration server from the gatekeeper to the new collaboration server.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the computer instructions when executed by the one or more server computers are further operable to,

associate at least one logical application server with each collaboration server, the at least one application server to support at least one service for the on-line conference.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the computer instructions when executed by the one or more server computers are further operable to,

detect a failure of an application server,

suspend operation of the collaboration server associated with the failed application server,

launch a new application server, and

resume operation of the collaboration server associated with the failed application server.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the state information for each collaboration server comprises information describing the collaboration server'"'"'s configuration and quality of service (QoS) parameters.

14. A system comprising:

one or more physical servers accessible to a plurality of client computers via a wide area network to provide the plurality of client computers collaborative computing, the one or more physical servers including,

a means for launching a plurality of collaborative servers, wherein each collaborative server is operable to host at least a portion of an on-line conference among the plurality of client computers,

a means that is separate from the collaborative servers for storing state information for each of the plurality of collaborative servers, the state information for each collaborative server including current meeting data for the at least a portion of an on-line conference hosted at the collaborative server,

a means to support at least one service for the on-line conference; and

a means for detecting failures of the collaborative servers and upon detecting failure of one of the collaborative servers, to send a request to the means for launching a plurality of collaborative servers to launch a new collaborative server,

wherein the new collaborative server is configured to recover the state information for the failed collaborative server from the means for storing state information.

15. The system of claim 14, wherein the means for launching a plurality of collaborative servers includes one or more process managers.

16. The system of claim 14, wherein the means to support at least one service for the on-line conference includes one or more application servers.

17. The system of claim 16 wherein the means for launching a plurality of collaborative servers is further configured to launch a plurality of the application servers.

18. The system of claim 17 wherein upon detecting failure of one of the application servers, the meeting manager reconnects collaborative servers connected to the failed application server to the new application server.

19. The system of claim 14, wherein the means for detecting failures of the collaborative servers includes one or more meeting managers.

20. The system of claim 14, wherein the one or more physical servers further include one or more web servers accessible to the plurality of client computers via the wide area network.

21. The system of claim 14, further comprising a means for allowing the plurality of collaborative servers to communicate with each other.

22. The system of claim 14, wherein the at least one service for the on-line conference comprises one of document viewing, file sharing, video, voice over IP, telephony, polling, chat, and application sharing.

23. The system of claim 14, wherein the state information for each collaborative server further comprises information describing the collaborative server'"'"'s configuration and quality of service (QoS) parameters.