Energy arbitrage by load shifting

• US 7,590,472 B2
• Filed: 11/09/2006
• Issued: 09/15/2009
• Est. Priority Date: 11/09/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Gridpoint (Twenty First Century Utilities LLC)
• Original Assignee: Gridpoint (Twenty First Century Utilities LLC)
• Inventors: Hakim, David B., Danley, Douglas Ricardo, Caplan, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): DeCady; Albert
• Assistant Examiner(s): Garland; Steven R
• Application Number:
  US11/558,068
• Publication Number:
  US 20080114499A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,041 Days
• Field of Search: 700/291, 700/296, 700/295, 705/412
• US Class Current: 700/295
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 50/06 Energy or water supply
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 3/32 using batteries with converting means
• CPC Class Codes: Y02B 70/3225 Demand response systems, e.g. load shedding, peak shaving
• CPC Class Codes: Y04S 20/222 Demand response systems, e.g. load shedding, peak shaving

Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for realizing energy cost savings through load shifting utilizing a battery bank that may serve as a battery back-up on a premises for providing power in the event of a grid power outage or curtailment. A budget of unreserved cycles of battery charging and discharging is determined, taking into account the rated battery life in terms of both time (e.g., years) and number of cycles. That cycle budget is allocated to days of the year identified as days on which the greatest savings can be realized through load shifting. These days are identified by taking into account the peak and off-peak usage rates applicable on those days, any rate tiers that may be entered as a result of the additional energy expended to load shift, and the round trip efficiency of the charge/discharge cycles. Load shifting is executed in accordance with an established schedule of the identified days, by discharging the batteries during peak usage hours and charging the batteries during off-peak periods. In the event the budget of unreserved cycles exceeds the number of profitable days for load shifting, the depth of discharge on each cycle may be increased to realize greater savings on the scheduled days, at the tolerable cost of losing cycles not expected to be used in any event.

Claims

1. A computer-assisted method of electrical energy load shifting utilizing an electrical energy storage device connected to receive electrical energy from an electrical power grid, comprising the steps of:

establishing a budget of unreserved cycles of discharging and charging the electrical energy storage device for load shifting purposes within a given time period;

establishing a schedule for load shifting within sub-parts of said time period, based upon said budget and input data regarding multiple rate levels applicable to electrical energy available from the electrical power grid during the sub-parts of said time period; and

executing load shifting cycles within one or more of said sub-parts of said time period, in accordance with said schedule, by discharging electrical energy stored in said electrical energy storage device in a first interval for which a first rate is applicable to energy available from the grid, and charging said electrical energy storage device with electrical energy obtained from the grid during a second interval for which a second rate lower than said first rate is applicable to energy obtained from the grid;

wherein said budget is computed by a data processor based at least in part on of at least one;

an input indicating a cycle life of the electrical energy storage device;

an input indicating a time life of said electrical energy storage device; and

an input reflecting a number of cycles reserved for purposes other than load shifting;

wherein the step of establishing a schedule for load shifting comprises splitting the time period into rate periods, and calculating values of P−

(O/E) for days within each rate period, where P is a peak rate applicable to energy obtained from the grid during a first time interval of any given day, O is an off-peak rate applicable to energy obtained from the grid during a second time interval of the given day, and E is a measure of the efficiency of the electrical energy transfer during a cycle of discharging and charging the electrical energy storage device;

wherein a rate schedule applicable to the rate periods has energy usage level-based tiers, said method further comprising calculating the values P−

(O/E) for days within each rate period so as to account for increased rates applicable to electrical energy usage above a tier boundary representing a maximum energy usage within a rate period before crossing into the next tier, wherein said calculating comprises;

recording an expected energy usage for each rate period apart from any load shifting;

calculating an additional amount of energy that will be used by a load shifting cycle;

calculating for each rate period the number of cycles Y of load shifting that can be executed before crossing into the next tier;

sub-dividing the rate periods into days corresponding to number of cycles Y, and days remaining; and

calculating the quantity P−

(O/E) for days remaining with values for the next highest tier.

2. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said budget is computed by a data processor based at least in part on an input indicating a cycle life of the electrical energy storage device.

3. A computer-assisted method according to claim 2, wherein said budget is computed by said data processor further based upon a specified depth of discharge (DoD) of said electrical energy storage device for said load shifting cycles.

4. A computer-assisted method according to claim 3, wherein said budget is an optimal budget selected so as not to reduce the time life of the electrical energy storage device.

5. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said budget is computed by a data processor based at least in part on an input indicating a time life of said electrical energy storage device.

6. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said budget is computed by a data processor based at least in part on an input reflecting a number of cycles reserved for purposes other than load shifting.

7. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said sub-parts of said time period comprise days and the schedule is computed by a data processor based at least in part on a ranking of days within the time period according to a computation of cost savings realizable by load shifting on those days.

8. A computer-assisted method according to claim 7, wherein the computation of said cost savings (S) is based on the formula S=P−

(O/E), where P is a peak rate applicable to energy obtained from the grid during a first time interval of any given day, O is an off-peak rate applicable to energy obtained from the grid during a second time interval of the given day, and E is a measure of the efficiency of the electrical energy transfer during a cycle of discharging and charging the electrical energy storage device.

9. A computer-assisted method according to claim 8, wherein the unreserved cycles of the budget are allocated to days within the time period in the order of said ranking, from greatest cost savings to least, but only so long as P−

(O/E)>

0.

10. A computer-assisted method according to claim 9, wherein in the event that the budget of unreserved cycles exceeds the number of days when P−

(O/E)>

0, the budget is recomputed based upon an increased depth of discharge (DoD), to more closely match the budget to the number of days when cost savings are realizable through load shifting, and said discharging is set to be carried out down to the increased DoD.

11. A computer-assisted method according to claim 7, wherein said time period is a year.

12. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein the rate periods correspond to billing cycles of a supplier of electrical energy to the grid.

13. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said sub-parts of the time period comprise days, and the executing of load shifting cycles comprises discharging said energy storage device during a first time interval of each day to which a peak rate P is applicable to energy obtained from the grid, and charging the energy storage device with energy obtained from the grid during a second time interval of each day to which an off-peak rate O is applicable.

14. A computer-assisted method according to claim 13, wherein at least a portion of the energy discharged from the electrical energy storage device during the first time interval is supplied back to the grid.

15. A computer-assisted method according to claim 13, wherein said discharging of the electrical energy storage device is carried out down to a target state of charge (SoC), and said SoC is held substantially constant following said discharging and up until said charging during the second time interval.

16. A computer-assisted method according to claim 1, wherein said electrical energy storage device comprises at least one battery.