Systems and methods for regulation of engine variables

• US 7,660,660 B2
• Filed: 02/09/2007
• Issued: 02/09/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 02/09/2007
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Toyota Motor Corporation, Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (University of Michigan)
• Original Assignee: Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Incorporated (Toyota Motor Corporation), Board of Regents of the University of Michigan (University of Michigan)
• Inventors: Sun, Jing, Butts, Kenneth Roy, Vermillion, Christopher R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Vo; Hieu T
• Application Number:
  US11/673,450
• Publication Number:
  US 20080190384A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,096 Days
• Field of Search: 701/102, 701/101, 701/115, 123/41.02, 123/41.21, 123/41.25, 123/41.31, 123/41.33
• US Class Current: 701/102
• CPC Class Codes: F01P 2037/00 Controlling
• CPC Class Codes: F01P 7/167 by adjusting the pre-set temperature according to engine parameters, e.g. engine load, engine speed

Abstract

A method for controlling an engine output with at least two actuators, including applying inputs to actuators which regulate a variable of an engine, evaluating the response of the system, determining the ability of the actuators to change the engine variable, determining the capability of the actuators to reject a disturbance, calculating an optimum actuator feedforward control function based upon the ability and capability determined and controlling the actuators using the calculated function and a feedforward control algorithm.

Claims

1. An engine control system comprising:

at least two actuators wherein the at least two actuators regulate one or more engine variables, the number of engine variables being less than the number of actuators; and

at least one controller operative to apply inputs to the at least two actuators to evaluate a response of the actuators, wherein the at least one controller is further operative to use the response for simultaneous feedforward control of the actuators for control of the engine variable.

2. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the actuators comprise a heater configured to heat liquid for an engine and a mixing regulator configured to mix hot and cool liquid.

3. The system as recited in claim 1, wherein the controller is operative to evaluate the response to determine the ability of the actuators to change the engine variable;

and determine the capability of the actuators to reject a disturbance.

4. The system as recited in claim 3, wherein the controller is operative to calculate a fitness based upon the capacity and capability determined.

5. The system as recited in claim 4, wherein the controller is further operative to calculate an optimum actuator feedforward control setting based upon the fitness;

and control the actuators with the calculated setting.

6. The system as recited in claim 1, further comprising an engine;

wherein the engine comprises a coolant system having coolant system media;

wherein the actuators comprise a heater configured to heat the coolant system media and a valve configured to mix the coolant system media.

7. A method for controlling an engine variable with at least two actuators, the method comprising:

providing inputs to at least two actuators which regulate the variable;

evaluating the response of the actuators;

determining the ability of the actuators to change the engine variable;

determining the capability of the actuators to reject a disturbance;

calculating a fitness function based upon the ability and capability determined; and

controlling the actuators using the calculated function and a feedforward control algorithm.

8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the actuators comprise a heater configured to heat liquid for an engine and a mixing regulator configured to mix hot and cool liquid, and wherein the providing operation is conducted by simulating the inputs.

9. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the evaluation operation comprises applying a weighing function to the response of the actuators for a given input.

10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the evaluation operation further comprises integrating the response of the actuators for a given input.

11. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the capability is determined by calculating a disturbance authority based upon disturbance inputs in the direction of variable increase and variable decrease.

12. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the ability is determined by determining an actuator authority based upon saturating control inputs in the direction of variable increase and variable decrease.

13. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein an optimum actuator setting is determined from the fitness function, and wherein the method further comprises using a feedback loop to provide robustness to uncertainties and unmeasured disturbances.

14. A method for feedforward control of an engine variable wherein at least two actuators regulate an engine variable, the method comprising:

establishing an engine variable setpoint;

evaluating the fitness of the actuators to produce the setpoint;

generating optimal actuator input settings; and

controlling the actuators with the optimal actuator input settings using a feedforward control.

15. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the actuators comprise a heater configured to heat engine fluid and a mixing regulator configured to mix hot and cool liquid.

16. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein evaluating the fitness includes determining the authority of the actuators to change the variable.

17. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein evaluating the fitness includes determining the authority of the actuators to reject a disturbance.

18. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein evaluating the fitness includes evaluating the ability of the actuators to effect a change in the variable.

19. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein evaluating the fitness includes applying disturbance inputs to said actuators in the direction of variable increase and variable decrease, and evaluating the response of said actuators.

20. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein evaluating the fitness includes applying saturating control inputs to said actuators in the direction of variable increase and variable decrease, and evaluating the response of said actuators.