Computerized method and system for estimating an effect on liability based on the stopping distance of vehicles

• US 7,660,725 B2
• Filed: 11/27/2002
• Issued: 02/09/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 11/27/2002
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Computer Sciences Corporation (DXC Technology Company)
• Original Assignee: Computer Sciences Corporation (DXC Technology Company)
• Inventors: Wahlbin, Stefan, Wiesman, Kimberly, Rourke, Kathleen E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Koppikar; Vivek D
• Application Number:
  US10/306,908
• Publication Number:
  US 20040102985A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,631 Days
• Field of Search: 705 2- 4
• US Class Current: 705/4
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance

Abstract

Computer-implemented methods and systems for estimating liability for a vehicle accident are provided. In one embodiment, at least one stopping distance of a vehicle may be estimated. In some embodiments, a stopping distance may include an approximate distance for the vehicle traveling at a specified speed to stop to avoid the accident. A perception distance that may correspond to an approximate distance from the accident at which the vehicle sensed danger of an accident may be estimated. In certain embodiments, an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident using the perception distance may be assessed. Some embodiments may include estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident.

Claims

1. A method of estimating liability for a vehicle accident using a computer system, comprising:

retrieving vehicle data from a memory of a computer system;

estimating at least one stopping distance of a vehicle based at least in part on the retrieved vehicle data, wherein a stopping distance is an approximate distance for the vehicle traveling at a specified speed to stop;

estimating a perception distance based at least in part on the retrieved vehicle data, wherein a perception distance is an approximate distance between a location of the vehicle when a driver of the vehicle first sensed danger of the accident and a location where the vehicle accident ultimately occurs;

the computer system comparing the estimated perception distance to at least one estimated stopping distance to determine whether the estimated stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance;

assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident based at least in part on the comparison of the estimated perception distance to the at least one estimated stopping distance, wherein assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises determining that the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident if the stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance;

the computer system estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident, wherein estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident comprises;

estimating an increase in liability if it is determined that the driver of the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the stopping distance at the specified speed being less than the estimated perception distance; and

estimating no increase in liability if it is not determined that the driver had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the comparison of the stopping distance to the estimated perception distance; and

storing the estimated effect on liability in a memory of the computer system.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed comprises an actual speed.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed comprises a speed limit.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed comprises a safe speed.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein assessing the opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises assessing whether a vehicle may have stopped before the accident at the specified speed.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed for at least one estimated stopping distance is the vehicle'"'"'s actual speed, wherein the method further comprises applying a factor shift if the stopping distance estimated using the vehicle'"'"'s actual speed is less than the perception distance.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein assessing the opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises assessing whether it is likely that the vehicle, at the actual speed, would have come to a complete stop if the vehicle had braked with full force when the other vehicle was first noticed.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed for at least one estimated stopping distance is a speed limit, wherein the method further comprises applying a factor shift if the stopping distance estimated using the speed limit is less than the perception distance.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein assessing the opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises assessing whether it is likely that the vehicle, if traveling at the speed limit, would have come to a complete stop if the vehicle had braked with full force when the other vehicle was first noticed.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed for at least one estimated stopping distance is a safe speed, wherein the method further comprises applying a factor shift if the stopping distance estimated using the safe speed is less than the perception distance.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein assessing the opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises assessing whether it is likely that the vehicle, if traveling at the safe speed, would have come to a complete stop if the vehicle had braked with full force when the other vehicle was first noticed.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the specified speed for at least one estimated stopping distance is a safe speed, wherein the method further comprises applying a factor shift if the estimated stopping distance estimated using the safe speed is less than the perception distance, and not applying a factor shift if the stopping distance estimated using the safe speed is equal to or greater than the perception distance.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein estimating at least one stopping distance of the vehicle comprises:

estimating a stopping distance for the vehicle traveling at the actual speed; and

estimating a stopping distance for the vehicle traveling at a safe speed, and

wherein comparing the estimated perception distance to at least one estimated stopping distance comprises;

comparing the estimated perception distance to estimated stopping distance at the actual speed; and

comparing the estimated perception distance to estimated stopping distance at the safe speed.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein comparing the estimated perception distance to at least one estimated stopping distance comprises assessing whether the stopping distance at a safe speed is greater than or equal to the estimated perception distance, wherein assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises determining that a driver of the vehicle did not have an opportunity to avoid the accident if the stopping distance at the safe speed is greater than or equal to the estimated perception distance, and wherein estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident comprises estimating no increase in liability if it is determined that the driver did not have an opportunity to avoid the accident.

17. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

assessing a factor shift, wherein the factor shift comprises a value that increases liability of the driver of the vehicle if it is determined that the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the vehicle accident, and

applying the factor shift to increase an estimated liability of the driver of the vehicle.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein assessing a factor shift comprises retrieving a first factor shift value from a memory if the specified speed comprises an actual speed and the perception distance is greater than the stopping distance associated with the actual speed, retrieving a second factor shift value from a memory if the specified speed comprises a speed limit and the perception distance is greater than the stopping distance associated with the speed limit, retrieving a third factor shift value from a memory if the specified speed comprises a safe speed and the perception distance is greater than the stopping distance associated with the safe speed, or retrieving a fourth factor shift value from a memory if the specified speed comprises the safe speed and the perception distance is equal to or less than the stopping distance associated with the safe speed, wherein each of the retrieved first, second, third and fourth factor shift values are predetermined based on a relationship between the specified speed, the perception distance and the stopping distance.

19. The method of claim 1, wherein estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident comprises:

assessing a specified speed factor shift, wherein the value of specified speed factor shift is based on the specified speed of the vehicle is based on a contribution to liability based on the specified speed of the vehicle;

assessing a reaction factor shift, wherein the value of the reaction factor shift based on reaction is based on whether the vehicle reacted by braking to avoid the accident;

assessing an outcome factor shift, wherein the value of the outcome factor shift based on outcome is based on whether the vehicle had an opportunity to stop, delay or maintain a specified speed to avoid the accident; and

applying a sum of the factor shifts to estimate an effect on liability.

5. A system configured to estimate liability, comprising:

a CPU;

a data memory coupled to the CPU; and

a system memory coupled to the CPU, wherein the system memory is configured to store one or more computer programs executable by the CPU, and wherein the computer programs are executable to implement a method for estimating liability, for a vehicle accident, the method comprising;

estimating at least one stopping distance of a vehicle, wherein a stopping distance is an approximate distance for the vehicle traveling at a specified speed to stop;

estimating a perception distance, wherein a perception distance is an approximate distance between a location of the vehicle when a driver of the vehicle first sensed danger of the accident and a location where the vehicle accident ultimately occurs;

comparing the estimated perception distance to at least one estimated stopping distance to determine whether the estimated stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance;

assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident based at least in part on the comparison of the estimated perception distance to the at least one estimated stopping distance, wherein assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises determining that the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident if the stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance; and

estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident, wherein estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident comprises;

estimating an increase in liability if it is determined that the driver of the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the stopping distance at the specified speed being less than the estimated perception distance; and

estimating no increase in liability if it is not determined that the driver had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the comparison of the stopping distance to the estimated perception distance.

6. A computer readable memory medium comprising program instructions stored thereon, wherein the program instructions are computer-executable to implement a method for estimating liability for a vehicle accident, the method comprising:

estimating at least one stopping distance of a vehicle, wherein a stopping distance is an approximate distance for the vehicle traveling at a specified speed to stop;

estimating a perception distance, wherein a perception distance is an approximate distance between a location of the vehicle when driver of the vehicle first sensed danger of the accident and a location where the vehicle accident ultimately occurs;

comparing the estimated perception distance to at least one estimated stopping distance to determine whether the estimated stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance;

assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident based at least in part on the comparison of the estimated perception distance to the at least one estimated stopping distance, wherein assessing an opportunity of the vehicle to avoid the accident comprises determining that the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident if the stopping distance at the specified speed is less than the estimated perception distance; and

estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident, wherein estimating an effect on liability based on the opportunity to avoid the accident comprises;

estimating an increase in liability if it is determined that the driver of the vehicle had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the stopping distance at the specified speed being less than the estimated perception distance; and

estimating no increase in liability if it is not determined that the driver had an opportunity to avoid the accident based on the comparison of the stopping distance to the estimated perception distance.