Computer method and system for automatically creating tests for checking software

• US 7,707,553 B2
• Filed: 12/08/2005
• Issued: 04/27/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 12/08/2005
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Scott, David A., Roques, Olivier
• Primary Examiner(s): Zhen; Wei Y
• Assistant Examiner(s): SWIFT, CHARLES M
• Application Number:
  US11/299,306
• Publication Number:
  US 20070240127A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,601 Days
• Field of Search: 717/123, 717/126, 717/100, 717/124, 717/127, 717/125
• US Class Current: 717/124
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3684 for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 8/315 Object-oriented languages

Abstract

Computer system and method automatically generates a test source code for checking validity of an application written in an object oriented language. The application includes objects accessible through an interface implementing programming rules and object behavior rules. For each object, the invention extracts object methods and attributes of the object interface which are impacted by the object behavior rules and extracts the object identification. The invention fills the variable fields of a source code template with the extracted information. The template non variable source code is in conformance with the programming rules and implements a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules; thus the filled template forms a generated test source code. For distributed applications, the specifications may be EJB or CORBA and the Test Generator uses templates for checking the life-cycle (creation, persistency, removal) of deployed objects.

Claims

1. A method of automatic testing a subject application written in an object oriented language, the subject application having objects accessible through an interface implementing programming rules and object behavior rules, said method comprising the steps of:

a—

selecting one of the objects of the subject application and reading information defining the one object;

b—

using computer automation, extracting information from the selected object, the extracted information including a definition, object methods and attributes of the object interface which are impacted by the object behavior rules and object identification;

c—

using computer automation, providing a template of source code, the template having variable fields and fixed portions of source code; and

d—

using computer automation, filling the variable fields of the template with the extracted information, said template fixed portions of source code being in conformance with the programming rules and implementing a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules, said filling resulting in an automatically generated test source code and in an automatic testing of the subject application by the generated test source code checking logic validity of the subject application independently of testing semantics.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein

the step of extracting information from the selected object includes extracting from interfaces and descriptors defining the object:

a creation method, a find method, a remove method, a setter method, a getter method, the object name and object external name; and

,

the step of filling the variable fields includes use of the template fixed portions of source code being in conformance with the programming rules for development of a distributed application and implementing a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules of a distributed application.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code implementing a scenario for checking object life-cycle rules.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code implementing a scenario for checking object life-cycle rules of EJB or CORBA specifications.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code which implements a scenario for checking creation of the selected object.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising the computer implemented steps of:

creating a deployable object representing the selected object;

finding an object with a same key as the created deployable object;

checking that the found object is the same as the created deployable object by checking that both objects have the same persisted fields;

trying to create another object with the same key;

checking that an error or an exception is raised in response to trying to create said another object; and

removing the created deployable object.

7. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code which implements a scenario for checking persistency of the selected object.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising computer implemented steps of:

creating a new deployable object representing the selected object;

for each object field of the created object;

starting a transaction;

setting the field to a random value;

committing the transaction;

trying to find an object with a same given key as the created object;

getting from the found object a field value;

checking that the field value of the found object is the same as the field value set for the created object; and

removing the created object.

9. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code which implements a scenario for checking removal of the selected object.

10. The method of claim 9 comprising the computer implemented steps of:

creating a new deployable object representing the selected object;

removing the created object;

trying to find an object with a same key as the created object;

checking that an error or an exception is raised;

trying to remove the created object twice; and

checking that an error or an exception is raised.

11. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of filling the variable fields includes using the template fixed portions of source code which implements a scenario for checking robustness of the selected object.

12. The method of claim 2 further comprising the computer implemented steps of:

developing a client application;

compiling and linking the client application and the generated tests;

executing the tests as a client application interfacing a server side of the distributed application; and

collecting test results.

13. A computer program product for automatic testing of a subject application, the computer program product comprising a computer usable storage medium having a computer readable program wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to:

(a) select one object of the subject application and read information defining the object, wherein the subject application is written in an object oriented language and has objects accessible through an interface implementing programming rules and object behavior rules;

(b) extract information from the selected object, the extracted information including a definition, object methods and attributes of the object interface which are impacted by the object behavior rules and object identification;

(c) fill fields of a template with the extracted information, the template being a template of source code and the template having variable fields and fixed portions of source code, said template fixed portions of source code being in conformance with the programming rules and implementing a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules, said filled template resulting in an automatically generated test source code and in an automatic testing of the subject application by the generated test source code checking logic validity of the subject application independently of testing semantics.

14. A computer program product as claimed in claim 13 wherein the computer

extracts information from the selected object including extracting from interfaces and descriptors defining the object a creation method, a find method, a remove method, a setter method, a getter method, the object name and object external name;

and,

fills fields including using template fixed portions of source code being in conformance with the programming rules for development of a distributed application and implementing a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules of a distributed application.

15. A computer program product as claimed in claim 13 wherein the template implements any combination of:

a scenario for checking object life-cycle rules,

a scenario for checking the life-cycle rules of EJB or CORBA specifications;

a scenario for checking creation of the selected object,

a scenario for checking persistency of the selected object,

a scenario for checking removal of the selected object, and

a scenario for checking robustness of the selected object.

16. A computer program product as claimed in claim 14 wherein the computer readable program when executed further causes the computer to:

develop a client application;

compile and link the client application and the generated tests;

execute the tests as a client application interfacing a server side of the distributed application; and

collect test results.

17. Computer apparatus for automatic testing of a subject application comprising:

means for selecting an object of the subject application and reading information defining the object, wherein the subject application is written in an object oriented language and has objects accessible through an interface implementing programming rules and object behavior rules;

means for automatically extracting information from the selected object including extracting a definition, object methods and attributes of the object interface which are impacted by the object behavior rules and object identification; and

means for automatically filling fields of a template of source code with the extracted information, said template having fixed portions of source code being in conformance with the programming rules and implementing a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules, said filled template resulting in an automatically generated test source code and in an automatic testing of the subject application by the generated test source code checking logic validity of the subject application independent of testing semantics.

18. Computer apparatus as claimed in claim 17 wherein the extraction means further extracts from interfaces and descriptors defining the object:

a creation method, a find method, a remove method, a setter method, a getter method, the object name and object external name.

19. Computer apparatus as claimed in claim 18 wherein the filling means utilizes the template fixed portion of source code in conformance with programming rules for development of a distributed application, and the template implements a scenario for checking a set of object behavior rules of a distributed application.

20. Computer apparatus as claimed in claim 17 wherein the template implements any combination of:

a scenario for checking object life-cycle rules,

a scenario for checking the life-cycle rules of EJB or CORBA specifications;

a scenario for checking creation of the selected object,

a scenario for checking persistency of the selected object,

a scenario for checking removal of the selected object, and

a scenario for checking robustness of the selected object.