Method, apparatus and article for evaluating card games, such as blackjack

• US 7,736,236 B2
• Filed: 11/07/2003
• Issued: 06/15/2010
• Est. Priority Date: 11/07/2003
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Walker Digital Table Systems LLC (Walker Innovation Inc. (f/k/a Patent Properties, Inc.))
• Original Assignee: Bally Gaming International Incorporated (Scientific Games Corporation)
• Inventors: Soltys, Richard, Huizinga, Richard, Mouchou, Robert B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Suhol; Dmitry
• Assistant Examiner(s): Kim; Andrew
• Application Number:
  US10/703,414
• Publication Number:
  US 20050101367A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,412 Days
• Field of Search: 463/1, 463 9- 12, 463/16, 463/22, 463/25, 463/29, 463/40, 463/42, 463/47, 273/292, 273/149.P, 273/149.R
• US Class Current: 463/47
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 1/18 Score computers; Miscellaneous indicators time-testing devices G07C
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 2001/003 Blackjack; Twenty one
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 9/24 Electric games; Games using electronic circuits not otherwise provided for video games A63F13/00; computerized gaming systems G07F17/32

Abstract

A system reads an identifier from a hand of cards to identify the cards. For example, the system can read an identifier from a pair of cards forming the initial hand in blackjack, where the one card is face up and the other card is face down. The system determines the value of a hand of cards form the read identifiers. For example, the system can determine a value of an initial hand of two cards in blackjack, while only one card is face up. The system can inform a dealer of the value, or status based on value, of the hand. The system can determine whether cards forming a hand of cards are authentic by validating the cards based on the read identifier. The system can determine if the cards forming the hand of cards are in an expected sequence based on knowledge of the initial sequence of cards in a deck. A decision tree to validate the results of the card game can be created to provide possible solutions or outcomes for each hand, and then, invalid solutions can be eliminated from the decision tree based on known card identities, rules of the game, possible outcomes of other player hands, and other information.

Claims

1. A method of operating a card game evaluation system for evaluating card games, the method comprising:

for each round of a card game having a plurality of players;

automatically determining a sequence of a set of playing cards in a deck of playing cards by a processor of the card game evaluation system, prior to dealing any of the playing cards from the deck;

for each player, generating a plurality of working solutions representing possible valid and invalid outcomes of each of the player'"'"'s hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system, based at least in part on the determined sequence of the set of playing cards; and

for each player, reducing the plurality of working solutions to a final solution representing a valid outcome of each of the player'"'"'s hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system, based at least in part on identities of playing cards that have been discarded during the card game, wherein validity of each respective working solution is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using a comparison between a number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the card game comprises a blackjack game.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining a number of players in the card game by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

determining an identity of each of a number of playing cards forming the players'"'"' initial hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system, using information from the sequence of playing cards and based on the determined number of players; and

determining an identity of an initial hit card dealt to at least one of the players subsequent to that player'"'"'s initial hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein generating the plurality of working solutions includes:

identifying all player hands in which the identity of the initial hit card dealt subsequent to the initial hand has been determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

for each of such identified player hands, locating a plurality of candidate positions of the playing cards of the initial hand among a sequence of playing cards that have been discarded during the card game by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

for each of the candidate positions, determining whether a next hit card is same as a playing card adjacent to playing cards discarded from the initial hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system, and generating a working solution if the same;

computing a possible number of hit cards required to bust a current player hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system; and

for each possible number, determining if a complete hit card sequence is found next to playing cards discarded from the initial hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system and obtaining a working solution if the complete hit card sequence is found.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein each of the cards in the deck corresponds to an index respectively 0 to m−

1, wherein m is a total number of cards in the deck, wherein reducing the plurality of working solutions in which validity of each respective working solution is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and the subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card includes;

counting a number of hit cards dealt in a working solution by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

locating a next known first hit card for a subsequent player'"'"'s hand by the processor of card game evaluation system;

validating the working solution by the processor of the card game evaluation system if the counted number of hit cards matches an index of the next known hit card for the subsequent player'"'"'s hand; and

otherwise invalidating the working solution by the processor of the card game evaluation system.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein the reducing the plurality of working solutions in which validity of each respective working solution is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and the subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card further includes:

determining that a current working solution corresponds to a dealer by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

counting a number of hit cards assigned to all player hands in this current working solution by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

validating the current working solution if the counted number of hit cards assigned to all player hands equals a number of known hit cards for a round of the card game by the processor of the card game evaluation system; and

otherwise invalidating the current working solution by the processor of the card game evaluation system.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising checking pre-dealer hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system to determine possible outcomes of some player hands prior to a dealer playing a dealer hand.

8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:

resolving player hands that have busted outcomes to determine a number of hit cards to bust the player hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system; and

inferring to automatically complete the player hands that have busted outcomes, based on information obtained by resolving the player hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining, by the processor of the card game evaluation system, a number of players in the card game by either or both:

determining the number of players based on a number of playing cards in the sequence that are between the playing cards forming a dealer'"'"'s initial hand by the processor of card game evaluation system; and

determining the number of players by detecting a number of bets at a start of the card game by the processor of the card game evaluation system.

10. A method of operating a card game evaluation system for evaluating card games, the method comprising:

for each round of a card game;

determining a number of players in the card game and initial cards dealt to each player to form respective player hands for said players by a processor of the card game evaluation system;

gathering information relating to a timing of events in the card game by the processor of the card game evaluation system, using information associated with rules of the card game and with the determined initial cards, to possibly complete some player hands;

generating a decision tree having a plurality of possible valid and invalid outcomes of each player hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system, the processor of the card game evaluation system using information derived from an initial sequence of cards in the card game to generate the possible outcomes in the decision tree;

comparing identities of discarded cards with the possible outcomes in the decision tree by the processor of the card game evaluation system; and

removing as invalid any possible outcome from said decision tree that is inconsistent with said discarded cards by the processor of the card game evaluation system and validating an outcome of a player'"'"'s hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system if the discarded cards corroborate the outcome, wherein validity of each respective possible outcome is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using a comparison between a number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein each of the cards corresponds to an index respectively 0 to m−

1, wherein m is a total number of cards, wherein validity of each respective possible outcome is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome and the subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card includes;

identifying an initial hit card for at least one of the player hands by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

counting a number of hit cards dealt to a prior player hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system; and

validating an outcome of the at least one player hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system if the counted number of hit cards dealt to the prior player hand matches an index of the identified initial hit card, and otherwise invalidating the outcome by the processor of card game evaluation system.

12. The method of claim 10 wherein generating the decision tree by the processor of card game evaluation system includes iteratively identifying working solutions and generating additional working solutions therefrom by the processor of the card game evaluation system, and wherein validating the outcome of the player hand by the processor of card game evaluation system includes iteratively validating each identified working solution and generated additional working solution.

13. A method of operating a card game evaluation system for evaluating card games, the method comprising:

for each round of a card game having cards indexed respectively 0 to m−

1, wherein m is a total number of the cards;

based on determined information, generating a decision tree by a processor of the card game evaluation system having a plurality of branches, each branch of the decision tree corresponding to a respective one of a plurality of possible valid and invalid outcomes of a player hand of the card game; and

using information derived from playing cards discarded during the card game and based on possible outcomes of a subsequent player hand, reducing the decision tree by the processor of the card game evaluation system to a set of branches, each branch in the set having a valid outcome of a player hand that is previous to the subsequent player hand, wherein validity of each respective possible outcome is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system if a number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome matches an index of a next hit card from the subsequent player hand.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein reducing the decision tree by the processor of the card game evaluation system includes eliminating invalid outcomes from the decision tree according to rules of the card game and based on at least some of the determined information.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the determined information includes at least one of a number of players in the card game, an initial sequence of a deck of cards in the card game, and identities of cards in each player'"'"'s initial hand.

16. A method of operating a card game evaluation system for evaluating card games, the method comprising:

for each round of a card game having a plurality of players;

automatically determining a sequence of a set of playing cards in a deck of playing cards, prior to a dealer dealing any of the playing cards from the deck in the card game by a processor of card game evaluation system;

automatically determining an identity of each of a number of playing cards forming the dealer'"'"'s initial hand by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

determining a number of players in the card game in addition to the dealer by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

determining an identity of each of a number of playing cards forming each player'"'"'s initial hand using the automatically determined sequence of the set of playing cards by the processor of the card game evaluation system;

for each player'"'"'s hand, generating a plurality of working solutions by the processor of the card game evaluation system each representing possible valid and invalid outcomes of the player'"'"'s hand; and

for each player'"'"'s hand, reducing the plurality of working solutions by the processor of card game evaluation system to a final solution representing a valid outcome of the player'"'"'s hand, based at least in part on identities of cards that have been discarded during the card game, wherein validity of each respective working solution is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using a comparison between a number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein generating the plurality of working solutions by the processor of card game evaluation system includes generating the plurality of working solutions based at least in part on determined initial hit cards and rules of the card game.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein each of the cards in the deck corresponds to an index respectively 0 to m−

1, wherein m is a total number of cards in the deck, wherein reducing the plurality of working solutions by the processor of the card game evaluation system in which validity of each respective working solution is determined by the processor of the card game evaluation system using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and the subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card, includes;

eliminating, as invalid by the processor of the card game evaluation system, working solutions for a particular player hand if a number of hit cards dealt in the working solutions for that particular player hand does not match an index of the next hit card of a player hand subsequent to the particular player hand.

19. The method of claim 16 wherein the card came comprises blackjack, and wherein generating the plurality of working solutions by the processor of the card game evaluation system includes generating solutions in accordance with splits and double downs that may possibly occur during the card game.

20. An article of manufacture, comprising:

a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by a processor to evaluate each round of a card game having a plurality of players, by;

automatically determining a sequence of a set of playing cards in a deck of playing cards, prior to dealing any of the playing cards from the deck;

for each player, generating a plurality of working solutions representing possible valid and invalid outcomes of each of the player'"'"'s hands, based at least in part on the determined sequence of the set of playing cards; and

for each player, reducing the plurality of working solutions to a final solution representing a valid outcome of each of the player'"'"'s hands, based at least in part on identities of playing cards that have been discarded during the card game, wherein validity of each respective working solution is determined using a comparison between a number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card.

21. The article of manufacture of claim 20 wherein the computer-readable medium further includes instructions stored thereon that are executable by the processor to evaluate the card game, by:

determining a number of players in the card game;

determining an identity of each of a number of playing cards forming the players'"'"' initial hands using information from the sequence of playing cards and based on the determined number of players; and

determining an identity of an initial hit card dealt to at least one of the players subsequent to that player'"'"'s initial hand.

22. The article of manufacture of claim 21 wherein the instructions for generating the plurality of working solutions include instructions executable by the processor to evaluate the card game, by:

identifying all player hands in which the identity of the initial hit card dealt subsequent to the initial hand has been determined;

for each of such identified player hands, locating a plurality of candidate positions of the playing cards of the initial hand among a sequence of playing cards that have been discarded during the card game;

for each of the candidate positions, determining whether a next hit card is same as a playing card adjacent to playing cards discarded from the initial hand, and generating a working solution if the same;

computing a possible number of hit cards required to bust a current player hand; and

for each possible number, determining if a complete hit card sequence is found next to playing cards discarded from the initial hand and obtaining a working solution if the complete hit card sequence is found.

23. The article of manufacture of claim 22 wherein each of the cards in the deck corresponds to an index respectively 0 to m, wherein m−

1 is a total number of cards in the deck, wherein the instructions executable by the processor to evaluate the card game by reducing the plurality of working solutions in which validity of each respective working solution is determined using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective working solution and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card, includes instructions executable by the processor to evaluate the card game by;

counting a number of hit cards dealt in a working solution;

locating a next known first hit card for a subsequent player'"'"'s hand;

validating the working solution if the counted number of hit cards matches an index of the next known hit card for the subsequent player'"'"'s hand; and

invalidating the working solution otherwise.

24. A system, comprising:

discard card reader means for reading discarded cards from a card game in which cards are indexed respectively 0 to m, wherein m−

1 is a total number of the cards; and

means for generating, for each round of the card game and based on determined information, a decision tree having a plurality of branches, each branch of the decision tree corresponding to a respective one of a plurality of possible valid and invalid outcomes of a player hand of the card game, and for reducing for each round of the card game the decision tree to a set of branches, each branch in the set having a valid outcome of a player hand that is previous to a subsequent player hand, by using information derived from playing cards discarded during the card game into the discard card reader means and based on possible outcomes of the subsequent player hand, wherein validity of each respective possible outcome is determined if a number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome matches an index of a next hit card from the subsequent player hand.

25. The system of claim 24 wherein the means for generating and reducing further performs:

checking pre-dealer hands;

resolving busted player hands;

inferring hands; and

parsing a round of the card game, including the means for generating and reducing the decision tree.

26. The system of claim 24, further comprising:

card deck reader means for reading an initial deck sequence of the playing cards;

dealer hand reader means for reading a dealer'"'"'s hand; and

means for determining a number of players in the card game.

27. A system, comprising:

a card deck reader to read identifying information from a number of playing cards forming a deck of playing cards;

a dealer hand reader to read identifying information from a number of the playing cards forming a dealer'"'"'s initial hand;

a discard card reader to read identifying information from a number of the playing cards forming a dealer'"'"'s complete hand and a player'"'"'s complete hand; and

at least one processor coupled to receive the read identifying information from the card deck reader, the dealer hand reader and the discard card reader and programmed for each round of the card game to process the read identifying information to;

generate a decision tree having a plurality of possible valid and invalid outcomes of each player hand, via use of information derived from an initial sequence of cards read by the card deck reader, to generate the possible outcomes in the decision tree; and

compare identities of discarded cards with the possible outcomes in the decision tree; and

validate an outcome of a player hand if the discarded cards read by the discard card reader corroborate that outcome, wherein validity of each respective possible outcome is determined using a comparison between a number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome and a subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card.

28. The system of claim 27 wherein each of the cards in the deck corresponds to an index respectively 0 to m, wherein m−

1 is a total number of cards in the deck, and wherein to determine validity of each respective possible outcome using the comparison between the number of hit cards dealt in each respective possible outcome and the subsequent player'"'"'s next hit card, the processor is also programmed to;

identify an initial hit card for at least one of the player hands;

count a number of hit cards dealt to a prior player hand; and

validate an outcome of the at least one player hand if the counted number of hit cards dealt to the prior player hand matches an index of the identified initial hit card, and invalidating the outcome otherwise.

29. The system of claim 27 wherein to generate the decision tree, the processor is programmed to iteratively identify working solutions and generate additional working solutions therefrom, and wherein to validate the outcome of the player hand, the processor is programmed to iteratively validate each identified working solution and generated additional working solution.

30. The system of claim 29 wherein the processor is also programmed to eliminate inconsistent results from the working solution.