Cable tester

• US 7,906,973 B1
• Filed: 08/25/2006
• Issued: 03/15/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 06/09/2006
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Marvell Asia Pte Limited (Marvell Technology Group Limited)
• Original Assignee: Marvell International Limited (Marvell Technology Group Limited)
• Inventors: Orr, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): VALONE, THOMAS F
• Application Number:
  US11/510,007
• Time in Patent Office: 1,663 Days
• Field of Search: 324/539, 324/541, 324/543, 324/533, 324/534
• US Class Current: 324/533
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/50 Testing arrangements

Abstract

A physical layer module (PHY) of a network device includes a control module and a cable-test module. The control module selectively generates a cable-test enable signal to test a cable including four pairs of twisted wire. The cable-test module tests the cable based on the cable-test enable signal. The cable-test module transmits test signals on the four pairs at a first time and receives return signals. The cable-test module determines that the cable is not faulty when the return signals received on first and second pairs of the four pairs have an amplitude less than a first predetermined amplitude, and when the return signals received on third and fourth pairs of the four pairs have an amplitude greater than a second predetermined amplitude and are received substantially contemporaneously.

Claims

1. A physical layer module (PHY), comprising:

a control module that selectively generates a cable-test enable signal to test a cable including four pairs of twisted wire; and

a cable-test module that tests the cable based on the cable-test enable signal,

wherein the cable-test module (i) transmits test signals on the four pairs at a first time, (ii) receives return signals, and (iii) determines that the cable is not faulty when;

the return signals received on a first pair and a second pair of the four pairs have an amplitude less than a first predetermined amplitude; and

the return signals received on a third pair and a fourth pair of the four pairs have an amplitude greater than a second predetermined amplitude and are received substantially contemporaneously, and

wherein the cable-test module determines that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the first pair and the second pair when;

the return signals on at least one of the first pair and the second pair are received before the return signals are received on at least one of the third and the fourth pair; and

the return signals received on at least one of the first pair and the second pair have an amplitude greater than the second predetermined amplitude.

2. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable-test module calculates a length of the cable based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair.

3. The PHY of claim 2, wherein the PHY communicates the length to a network device.

4. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the second predetermined amplitude is greater than the first predetermined amplitude, and wherein values of the first predetermined amplitude and the second predetermined amplitude are based on (i) a length of the cable and (ii) electrical characteristics of the cable.

5. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the third pair and the fourth pair are selectively short-circuited in the PHY when the PHY communicates in a Fast Ethernet mode.

6. The PHY of claim 5, wherein the control module opens short-circuits in the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in the Fast Ethernet mode and when the cable-test module tests the cable.

7. The PHY of claim 5, wherein the control module short-circuits the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in the Fast Ethernet mode and when the cable-test module does not test the cable.

8. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable connects the PHY to a remote PHY that communicates in a Fast Ethernet mode, wherein the first pair and the second pair are terminated in the remote PHY, and wherein the third pair and the fourth pair are short-circuited in the remote PHY.

9. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable-test module determines that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair when the return signals on the third pair and the fourth pair are not received substantially contemporaneously.

10. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable test module determines that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable when at least one of the return signals includes a non-inverted test signal.

11. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable-test module determines (i) that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable or (ii) that the cable is not faulty but disconnected at a remote end when the return signals include non-inverted test signals that are received substantially contemporaneously.

12. The PHY of claim 1, wherein the cable-test module determines a fault distance from the PHY to a point of a fault due to (i) an open circuit in the cable or (ii) a short circuit in the cable by analyzing the return signals.

13. The PHY of claim 12, wherein the cable test module calculates the fault distance based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the four pairs.

14. The PHY of claim 12, wherein the PHY communicates the fault distance to a network device.

15. A network device comprising the PHY of claim 1.

16. A method used by a physical layer module (PHY) of a network device, the method comprising:

selectively generating a cable-test enable signal to test a cable that includes four pairs of twisted wire;

testing the cable based on the cable-test enable signal, wherein the testing includes;

transmitting test signals on the four pairs at a first time;

receiving return signals; and

determining that the cable is not faulty when;

the return signals received on a first pair and a second pair of the four pairs have an amplitude less than a first predetermined amplitude; and

the return signals received on a third pair and a fourth pair of the four pairs have an amplitude greater than a second predetermined amplitude and are received substantially contemporaneously, and

determining that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the first pair and the second pair when;

the return signals on at least one of the first pair and the second pair are received before the return signals are received on at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair; and

the return signals received on at least one of the first pair and the second pair have an amplitude greater than the second predetermined amplitude.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising calculating a length of the cable based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair.

18. The method of claim 17, further comprising communicating the length to the network device.

19. The method of claim 16, wherein the second predetermined amplitude is greater than the first predetermined amplitude, and wherein values of the first predetermined amplitude and the second predetermined amplitude are based on (i) the length of the cable and (ii) electrical characteristics of the cable.

20. The method of claim 16, further comprising selectively short-circuiting the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode.

21. The method of claim 20, further comprising opening short-circuits in the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode and during the test.

22. The method of claim 20, further comprising short-circuiting the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode and when the cable is not tested.

23. The method of claim 16, wherein the cable connects the PHY to a remote PHY that communicates in Fast Ethernet mode, wherein the first pair and the second pair are terminated in the remote PHY, and wherein the third pair and the fourth pair are short-circuited in the remote PHY.

24. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair when the return signals on the third pair and the fourth pair are not received substantially contemporaneously.

25. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable when at least one of the return signals includes a non-inverted test signal.

26. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining (i) that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable or (ii) that the cable is not faulty but disconnected at a remote end when the return signals include non-inverted test signals that are received substantially contemporaneously.

27. The method of claim 16, further comprising determining a fault distance from the PHY to a point of a fault due to (i) an open circuit in the cable or (ii) a short circuit in the cable by analyzing the return signals.

28. The method of claim 27, further comprising calculating the fault distance based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the four pairs.

29. The method of claim 27, further comprising communicating the fault distance to the network device.

30. A physical layer module (PHY), comprising:

control means for selectively generating a cable-test enable signal to test a cable including four pairs of twisted wire; and

cable-test means for testing the cable based on the cable test enable signal, wherein the cable-test means (i) transmits test signals on the four pairs at a first time, (ii) receives return signals, and (iii) determines that the cable is not faulty when;

the return signals received on a first pair and a second pair of the four pairs have an amplitude less than a first predetermined amplitude; and

the return signals received on a third pair and a fourth pair of the four pairs have an amplitude greater than a second predetermined amplitude and are received substantially contemporaneously, and

wherein the cable-test means determines that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the first pair and the second pair when;

the return signals on at least one of the first pair and the second pair are received before the return signals are received on at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair; and

the return signals received on at least one of the first pair and the second pair have an amplitude greater than the second predetermined amplitude.

31. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable test means calculates a length of the cable based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair.

32. The PHY of claim 31, wherein the PHY communicates the length to a network device.

33. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the second predetermined amplitude is greater than the first predetermined amplitude, and wherein values of the first predetermined amplitude and the second predetermined amplitude are based on (i) the length of the cable and (ii) electrical characteristics of the cable.

34. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the third pair and the fourth pair are selectively short-circuited in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode.

35. The PHY of claim 34, wherein the control means opens short-circuits in the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode and during the test.

36. The PHY of claim 34, wherein the control means short-circuits the third pair and the fourth pair in the PHY when the PHY communicates in Fast Ethernet mode and when the cable-test means does not test the cable.

37. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable connects the PHY to a remote PHY that communicates in Fast Ethernet mode, wherein the first pair and the second pair are terminated in the remote PHY, and wherein the third pair and the fourth pair are short-circuited in the remote PHY.

38. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable test means determines that the cable is faulty due to a short-circuit in at least one of the third pair and the fourth pair when the return signals on the third pair and the fourth pair are not received substantially contemporaneously.

39. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable-test means determines that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable when at least one of the return signals includes a non-inverted test signal.

40. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable test means determines (i) that the cable is faulty due to an open circuit in the cable or (ii) that the cable is not faulty but disconnected at a remote end when the return signals include non-inverted test signals that are received substantially contemporaneously.

41. The PHY of claim 30, wherein the cable-test means determines a fault distance from the PHY to a point of a fault due to (i) an open circuit in the cable or (ii) a short circuit in the cable by analyzing the return signals.

42. The PHY of claim 41, wherein the cable test means calculates the fault distance based on a time difference between the first time and a second time when the return signals are received on at least one of the four pairs.

43. The PHY of claim 41, wherein the PHY communicates the fault distance to a network device.

44. A network device comprising the PHY of claim 30.