Method for crash testing a motor vehicle

• US 7,912,607 B2
• Filed: 01/05/2006
• Issued: 03/22/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 01/06/2005
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Honda Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Honda Motor Co., Ltd. (Honda Motor Company)
• Inventors: Allen, Brian T., Miller, Ryan
• Primary Examiner(s): Tran; Khoi
• Assistant Examiner(s): Kiswanto; Nicholas
• Application Number:
  US11/326,086
• Publication Number:
  US 20060175807A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,902 Days
• Field of Search: 340/436, 340/903
• US Class Current: 701/45
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 17/0078 Shock-testing of vehicles

Abstract

A method for crash testing a motor vehicle is disclosed. The method provides a crash test routine where an inflatable restraint is deployed using a single deployment pattern throughout at least one government regulation zone. This helps to prevent overlap of a transition zone and can help make the deployment of the inflatable restraint more predictable. This can increase occupant safety and simply testing.

Claims

1. A method of deploying an inflatable restraint during a series of crash tests comprising the steps of:

providing a firing map, the firing map including only a first deployment pattern and a second deployment pattern, the firing map defining;

a set of conditions under which the restraint deploys in a first deployment pattern; and

a set of conditions under which the restraint deploys in a second deployment pattern;

determining a first regulation zone and a second regulation zone, wherein the first regulation zone comprises a first speed range and a first additional condition and the second regulation zone comprises a second speed range and a second additional condition;

conducting a first crash test in the first regulation zone with a first barrier;

deploying the inflatable restraint in the second deployment pattern according to the firing map as a result of the first crash test;

conducting a second crash test in the first regulation zone with a second barrier;

deploying the inflatable restraint in the second deployment pattern according to the firing map as a result of the second crash test; and

wherein the second deployment pattern is the only deployment pattern in which the inflatable restraint deploys throughout the first regulation zone.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second deployment pattern consists essentially of a delayed deployment pattern.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the first regulation zone includes a speed range that extends from 32 km/h to 40 km/h.

4. The method according to claim 2, wherein the delayed deployment pattern includes a delay of between about 5 milliseconds and 10 milliseconds.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second regulation zone includes a speed range that extends from 0 km/h to 48 km/h.

6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising conducting a third crash test at an upper end speed of the second regulation zone.

7. The method according to claim 6, further comprising:

deploying the inflatable restraint in the second deployment pattern according to the firing map as a result of the third crash test.

8. The method according to claim 1,

wherein each of the first and second barriers is selected from the group consisting of a flat barrier scenario, an angle barrier scenario, and an offset barrier scenario,

wherein the additional condition is an unbelted occupant, and

wherein the crash test is conducted at about 40 km/hr.

9. The method according to claim 1,

wherein each of the first and second barriers is selected from the group consisting of a flat barrier scenario, an angle barrier scenario, and an offset barrier scenario,

wherein the additional condition is a belted occupant, and wherein the crash test is conducted at about 48 km/hr.

10. A method of deploying an inflatable restraint during a series of crash tests comprising the steps of:

providing a firing map, the firing map including only a first deployment pattern and a second deployment pattern, the firing map defining;

a set of conditions under which the restraint deploys in a first deployment pattern; and

a set of conditions under which the restraint deploys in a second deployment pattern;

determining a first regulation zone and a second regulation zone;

wherein the first regulation zone comprises a first speed range and a first additional condition;

wherein the second regulation zone comprises a second speed range and a second additional condition, wherein the second additional condition is different from the first additional condition;

conducting a first crash test in the first regulation zone;

deploying the inflatable restraint according to the firing map in the second deployment pattern as a result of the first crash test;

conducting a second crash test about at an upper speed limit of the second regulation zone; and

deploying the inflatable restraint according to the firing map in the second deployment pattern as a result of the second crash test, wherein the inflatable restraint deploys in the second deployment pattern throughout the first regulation zone.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the second deployment pattern consists essentially of a delayed deployment.

12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the first additional condition is an unbelted passenger.

13. The method according to claim 10, wherein the second additional condition is a belted passenger.

14. The method according to claim 10, wherein the upper speed limit of the first speed range is 40 km/hr.

15. The method according to claim 10, wherein the upper speed limit of the second speed range is 48 km/hr.