Electronic markup of executable models
First Claim
1. A computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
- displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model contains at least one executable element;
associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model;
receiving an electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the electronic markup is executed with the executable model;
displaying the electronic markup in the electronic overlay; and
executing, using a processing device, the executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model during execution of the executable model.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
A computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model includes: displaying the executable model; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the contents of the executable model; and indicating an electronic markup to the executable model using the electronic overlay wherein the electronic markup affects functionality of the executable model when the executable model is executed with the electronic overlay.
144 Citations
Imaging System for Vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 20100265048A1
Filed 09/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,451,107 B2
Filed 09/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,593,521 B2
Filed 11/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,599,001 B2
Filed 11/19/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,629,768 B2
Filed 06/18/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,636,393 B2
Filed 05/06/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,637,801 B2
Filed 07/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera vision system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,643,724 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,665,079 B2
Filed 10/15/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,818,042 B2
Filed 11/18/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Automatic vehicle exterior light control | ||
Patent #
US 8,842,176 B2
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,886,401 B2
Filed 11/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 8,917,169 B2
Filed 12/02/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,977,008 B2
Filed 07/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 8,993,951 B2
Filed 07/16/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,008,369 B2
Filed 08/25/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,014,904 B2
Filed 09/23/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,041,806 B2
Filed 08/31/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Rear vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,085,261 B2
Filed 01/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera vision system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,131,120 B2
Filed 05/15/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system with algorithm switching | ||
Patent #
US 9,146,898 B2
Filed 10/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,171,217 B2
Filed 03/03/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,191,574 B2
Filed 03/13/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,191,634 B2
Filed 04/03/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,193,303 B2
Filed 04/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using kinematic model of vehicle motion | ||
Patent #
US 9,205,776 B2
Filed 05/20/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,245,448 B2
Filed 06/17/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,264,672 B2
Filed 12/21/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with lens pollution detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,319,637 B2
Filed 03/27/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and system for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 9,357,208 B2
Filed 01/20/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,376,060 B2
Filed 11/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,428,192 B2
Filed 11/16/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,436,880 B2
Filed 01/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with dirt detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,445,057 B2
Filed 02/19/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,440,535 B2
Filed 01/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer angle detection system | ||
Patent #
US 9,446,713 B2
Filed 09/25/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,463,744 B2
Filed 01/18/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,469,250 B2
Filed 02/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with adaptive wheel angle correction | ||
Patent #
US 9,487,235 B2
Filed 04/01/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera alignment system | ||
Patent #
US 9,491,450 B2
Filed 07/30/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Calibration system and method for vehicular surround vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,491,451 B2
Filed 11/14/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular camera with on-board microcontroller | ||
Patent #
US 9,495,876 B2
Filed 07/27/2010
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,508,014 B2
Filed 05/05/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,558,409 B2
Filed 12/11/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,555,803 B2
Filed 05/16/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,563,951 B2
Filed 05/20/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,598,014 B2
Filed 10/17/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,609,289 B2
Filed 08/29/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,643,605 B2
Filed 10/26/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,656,608 B2
Filed 06/13/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using kinematic model of vehicle motion | ||
Patent #
US 9,701,246 B2
Filed 12/07/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera lens dirt protection via air flow | ||
Patent #
US 9,707,896 B2
Filed 10/14/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera image stitching calibration system | ||
Patent #
US 9,723,272 B2
Filed 10/04/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,731,653 B2
Filed 03/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,736,435 B2
Filed 03/20/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 9,762,880 B2
Filed 12/07/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 9,769,381 B2
Filed 11/28/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,779,313 B2
Filed 01/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,789,821 B2
Filed 05/22/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,796,332 B2
Filed 05/24/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer angle detection system calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,802,542 B2
Filed 09/19/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driving assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,142 B2
Filed 05/19/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,216 B2
Filed 01/24/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and system for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 9,834,153 B2
Filed 04/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
System and method of establishing a multi-camera image using pixel remapping | ||
Patent #
US 9,900,522 B2
Filed 12/01/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with calibration algorithm | ||
Patent #
US 9,916,660 B2
Filed 01/15/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assist system with image processing and wireless communication | ||
Patent #
US 9,919,705 B2
Filed 09/28/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,940,528 B2
Filed 11/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 9,948,904 B2
Filed 08/14/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailering assist system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 9,950,738 B2
Filed 07/20/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular imaging system comprising an imaging device with a single image sensor and image processor for determining a totally blocked state or partially blocked state of the single image sensor as well as an automatic correction for misalignment of the imaging device | ||
Patent #
US 9,972,100 B2
Filed 04/23/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with targetless camera calibration | ||
Patent #
US 9,979,957 B2
Filed 01/26/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,015,452 B1
Filed 04/16/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance systems for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,019,841 B2
Filed 05/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with lens pollution detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,021,278 B2
Filed 04/18/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Control system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,046,702 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging and display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,053,012 B2
Filed 10/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular multi-camera vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,057,489 B2
Filed 09/18/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,071,676 B2
Filed 09/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,071,687 B2
Filed 11/27/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer parking assist system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,086,870 B2
Filed 08/16/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with trailering assist function | ||
Patent #
US 10,089,541 B2
Filed 10/02/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with dirt detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,089,540 B2
Filed 09/12/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,099,614 B2
Filed 11/27/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for a vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,099,610 B2
Filed 10/10/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular camera with on-board microcontroller | ||
Patent #
US 10,106,155 B2
Filed 11/11/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,110,860 B1
Filed 07/02/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 10,118,618 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 10,129,518 B2
Filed 09/11/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision display system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,144,352 B2
Filed 08/14/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer backup assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,160,382 B2
Filed 02/04/2015
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,169,926 B2
Filed 07/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera dynamic top view vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,179,543 B2
Filed 02/27/2014
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera vehicle vision system with image gap fill | ||
Patent #
US 10,187,590 B2
Filed 10/26/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,187,615 B1
Filed 10/22/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle control system with adaptive wheel angle correction | ||
Patent #
US 10,202,147 B2
Filed 11/07/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,202,077 B2
Filed 05/23/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with calibration algorithm | ||
Patent #
US 10,235,775 B2
Filed 03/07/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Calibration system and method for vehicular surround vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,264,249 B2
Filed 11/07/2016
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system using kinematic model of vehicle motion | ||
Patent #
US 10,266,115 B2
Filed 07/10/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera image stitching calibration system | ||
Patent #
US 10,284,818 B2
Filed 07/31/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-sensor interior mirror device with image adjustment | ||
Patent #
US 10,300,859 B2
Filed 06/08/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer driving assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,300,855 B2
Filed 10/25/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular display system | ||
Patent #
US 10,300,856 B2
Filed 08/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,306,190 B1
Filed 01/21/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system with rear backup video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,336,255 B2
Filed 11/29/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system using cameras and radar sensor | ||
Patent #
US 10,351,135 B2
Filed 11/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with lens pollution detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,397,451 B2
Filed 07/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular lane change system | ||
Patent #
US 10,406,980 B2
Filed 10/11/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with multi-paned view | ||
Patent #
US 10,457,209 B2
Filed 03/28/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system | ||
Patent #
US 10,462,426 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system with rear backup video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,486,597 B1
Filed 07/01/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Multi-camera dynamic top view vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,486,596 B2
Filed 01/14/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera system with image manipulation | ||
Patent #
US 10,493,916 B2
Filed 02/22/2013
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular trailer backup assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,493,917 B2
Filed 12/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,509,972 B2
Filed 04/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle vision system with customized display | ||
Patent #
US 10,542,244 B2
Filed 11/12/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver backup assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,559,134 B2
Filed 12/28/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Targetless vehicular camera calibration method | ||
Patent #
US 10,567,748 B2
Filed 05/21/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for displaying video images for a vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,574,885 B2
Filed 08/20/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with trailering assist function | ||
Patent #
US 10,586,119 B2
Filed 10/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular rear backup vision system with video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,589,678 B1
Filed 11/25/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Video processor module for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,611,306 B2
Filed 08/09/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Driver assistance system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,623,704 B2
Filed 03/09/2015
|
Current Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Donnelly Corporation
|
Method for dynamically calibrating vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,640,041 B2
Filed 02/04/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vision system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,640,040 B2
Filed 09/10/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method and system for dynamically ascertaining alignment of vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,654,423 B2
Filed 12/04/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular driving assist system using forward-viewing camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,683,008 B2
Filed 07/15/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular imaging system with blockage determination and misalignment correction | ||
Patent #
US 10,726,578 B2
Filed 05/14/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular control system with traffic lane detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,735,695 B2
Filed 10/28/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicle camera LVDS repeater | ||
Patent #
US 10,750,119 B2
Filed 10/16/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,766,417 B2
Filed 10/23/2017
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for stitching images captured by multiple vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,780,827 B2
Filed 11/25/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for determining misalignment of a vehicular camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,780,826 B2
Filed 04/22/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Adaptive forward lighting system for vehicle comprising a control that adjusts the headlamp beam in response to processing of image data captured by a camera | ||
Patent #
US 10,787,116 B2
Filed 09/10/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Mirrors of America Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Imaging system for vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 10,793,067 B2
Filed 07/25/2012
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailer driving assist system | ||
Patent #
US 10,800,332 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular rear backup vision system with video display | ||
Patent #
US 10,814,785 B2
Filed 03/16/2020
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Trailering assist system with trailer angle detection | ||
Patent #
US 10,858,042 B2
Filed 04/23/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Method for determining alignment of vehicular cameras | ||
Patent #
US 10,868,974 B2
Filed 02/19/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular trailering system | ||
Patent #
US 10,870,449 B2
Filed 10/01/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,455 B2
Filed 05/16/2019
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Vehicular vision system | ||
Patent #
US 10,875,526 B2
Filed 10/22/2018
|
Current Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Magna Electronics Incorporated
|
Control of a computer through a position-sensed stylus | ||
Patent #
US 5,347,295 A
Filed 10/31/1990
|
Current Assignee
Go PLC
|
Original Assignee
Go PLC
|
49 Claims
-
1. A computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model contains at least one executable element; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving an electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the electronic markup is executed with the executable model; displaying the electronic markup in the electronic overlay; and executing, using a processing device, the executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model during execution of the executable model. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21)
-
-
22. A computer-readable medium comprising software, which when executed by a computer system causes the computer system to perform operations for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, the operations comprising:
-
displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model contains at least one executable element; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving an electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the electronic markup is executed with the executable model; displaying the electronic markup in the electronic overlay; and executing, using a processing device, the executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model during execution of the executable model. - View Dependent Claims (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39)
-
-
40. A system for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
means for displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model contains at least one executable element; means for associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the content of the executable model; means for receiving an electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the electronic markup is executed with the executable model; means for displaying the electronic markup in the electronic overlay; and means for executing, using a processing device, the executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model during execution of the executable model.
-
-
41. A computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model includes at least one executable element; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; associating a window with the electronic overlay; receiving a first electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup does not change the executable model but affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the executable model when the electronic markup in the electronic overlay is executed with the executable model; receiving a second electronic markup in the window, wherein the second electronic markup changes the executable model; displaying the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay or the second electronic markup in the window; and executing, using a processing device, the changed executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the executable model when the executable model is executed.
-
-
42. A computer-readable medium comprising software, which when executed by a computer system causes the computer system to perform operations for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, the operations comprising:
-
displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model includes at least one executable element; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; associating a window with the electronic overlay; receiving a first electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup does not change the executable model but affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the executable model when the electronic markup in the electronic overlay is executed with the executable model; receiving a second electronic markup in the window, wherein the second electronic markup changes the executable model; displaying the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay or the second electronic markup in the window; and executing, using a processing device, the changed executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the executable model when the executable model is executed.
-
-
43. A system for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
means for displaying the executable model to a user, wherein the executable model includes at least one executable element; means for associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; means for associating a window with the electronic overlay; means for receiving a first electronic markup in the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup does not change the executable model but affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the executable model when the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay is executed with the executable model; means for receiving a second electronic markup in the window, wherein the second electronic markup changes the executable model; means for displaying the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay or the second electronic markup in the window; and means for executing, using a processing device, the changed executable model with the electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element included in the changed executable model when the executable model is executed.
-
-
44. A computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
displaying the executable model within the executable modeling environment to a user, wherein the executable model has at least one executable element; associating a first electronic overlay with the executable model, the first electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving a first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the first electronic markup is executed with the executable model; associating a second electronic overlay with the executable model, the second electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving a second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the second electronic markup is executed with the executable model; displaying the executable model with the first electronic overlay, the second electronic overlay, or the first and second electronic overlay; and executing, using a processing device, the executable model with; the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the executable model is executed; the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model;
orthe first and the second electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the executable model is executed, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the executable model is executed. - View Dependent Claims (45)
-
-
46. A computer-readable medium comprising software, which when executed by a computer system causes the computer system to perform operations for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, the operations comprising:
-
displaying the executable model within the executable modeling environment to a user, wherein the executable model has at least one executable element; associating a first electronic overlay with the executable model, the first electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving a first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the first electronic markup is executed with the executable model; associating a second electronic overlay with the executable model, the second electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; receiving a second electronic markup to the executable model in the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the second electronic markup is executed with the executable model; displaying the executable model with the first electronic overlay, the second electronic overlay, or the first and second electronic overlay; and executing, using a processing device, the executable model with; the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model; the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model;
orthe first and the second electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model. - View Dependent Claims (47)
-
-
48. A system for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, comprising:
-
means for displaying the executable model within the executable modeling environment to a user, wherein the executable model has at least one executable element; means for associating a first electronic overlay with the executable model, the first electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; means for receiving a first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the first electronic markup is executed with the executable model; means for associating a second electronic overlay with the executable model, the second electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; means for receiving a second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model when the second electronic markup is executed with the executable model; means for displaying the executable model with the first electronic overlay, the second electronic overlay, or the first and second electronic overlay; and means for executing, using at least one processing device, the executable model with; the first electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model; the second electronic overlay, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model;
orthe first and the second electronic overlay, wherein the first electronic markup in the first electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model, wherein the second electronic markup in the second electronic overlay affects the functionality of the at least one executable element of the executable model during execution of the executable model.
-
-
49. A computer-readable medium comprising software, which when executed by a computer system causes the computer system to perform operations for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment, the operations comprising:
-
associating a first electronic overlay, containing at least one electronic markup, with the executable model, where the overlay includes information about the at least one electronic markup, wherein the executable model contains at least one executable element, wherein the at least one electronic markup affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model when the at least one electronic markup is executed with the executable model; executing, using a processing device, the executable model with the overlay, where the executing affects the functionality of the at least one executable element contained in the executable model based on the at least one electronic markup; and displaying a result to a user, where the result is produced by executing the model based on the affected functionality.
-
1 Specification
Tools exist for producing computer-implemented graphical models, such as graphical block element based models, for example, and/or non-graphical models, such as text-based models that may be executable, for example, by means of numerical simulation. Using the tools, models are created, edited, and may be executed within a computing system. However, inspection, review, and annotation of these models may take place primarily outside of the computing system. For example, models may be printed as hard copies on paper and marked-up by hand. Changes annotated on the hard copy of the model are used to edit the electronic version of the model, with the user/human editor referring back and forth between the screen on which the model is displayed and the hard copy. To test changes made to a model, the electronic version needs to be changed, often with a duplicate copy being made for each set of changes being tested. If more review is needed after an initial round of changes, the model will need to be printed out once again and reviewed again as described above.
One embodiment includes a computer-implemented method for marking-up an executable model. The method includes displaying the executable model; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the executable model; and indicating an electronic markup to the executable model using the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects functionality of the executable model when the executable model is executed with the electronic overlay.
One embodiment includes a computer-readable medium comprising software, which when executed by a computer system causes the computer system to perform operations for marking-up an executable model. The operations include displaying the executable model; associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the contents of the executable model; indicating an electronic markup to the executable model using the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects functionality of the executable model when the executable model is executed with the electronic overlay.
One embodiment includes a system for marking-up an executable model in an executable modeling environment. The system includes means for displaying the executable model; means for associating an electronic overlay with the executable model, the electronic overlay operating with the executable model without changing the contents of the executable model; and means for indicating an electronic markup to the executable model using the electronic overlay, wherein the electronic markup affects functionality of the executable model when the executable model is executed with the electronic overlay.
Further features of the invention, as well as the structure and operation of various embodiments of the invention, are described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The foregoing and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers generally indicate identical, functionally similar, and/or structurally similar elements. The left most digits in the corresponding reference number indicate the drawing in which an element first appears.
In describing the invention, the following definitions are applicable throughout (including above).
A “computer” may refer to one or more apparatus and/or one or more systems that are capable of accepting a structured input, processing the structured input according to prescribed rules, and producing results of the processing as output. Examples of a computer may include: a computer; a stationary and/or portable computer; a computer having a single processor, multiple processors, or multi-core processors, which may operate in parallel and/or not in parallel; a general purpose computer; a supercomputer; a mainframe; a super mini-computer; a mini-computer; a workstation; a micro-computer; a server; a client; an interactive television; a web appliance; a telecommunications device with internet access; a hybrid combination of a computer and an interactive television; a portable computer; a tablet PC; a personal digital assistant (PDA); a portable telephone; application-specific hardware to emulate a computer and/or software, such as, for example, a digital signal processor (DSP), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an application specific instruction-set processor (ASIP), a chip, chips, or a chip set; a System on Chip (SoC) and a Multiprocessor System-on-Chip (MPSoC); an optical computer; a quantum computer; a biological computer; and an apparatus that may accept data, may process data in accordance with one or more stored software programs, may generate results, and typically may include input, output, storage, arithmetic, logic, and control units.
“Software” may refer to prescribed rules to operate a computer. Examples of software may include: software; code segments; instructions; applets; pre-compiled code; compiled code; computer programs; executable models; and programmed logic.
A “computer-readable medium” may refer to any storage device used for storing data accessible by a computer. Examples of a computer-readable medium may include: a magnetic hard disk; a floppy disk; an optical disk, such as a CD-ROM and a DVD; a magnetic tape; a memory chip; and/or other types of media that can store machine-readable instructions thereon.
A “computer system” may refer to a system having one or more computers, where each computer may include a computer-readable medium embodying software to operate the computer. Examples of a computer system may include: a distributed computer system for processing information via computer systems linked by a network; two or more computer systems connected together via a network for transmitting and/or receiving information between the computer systems; and one or more apparatuses and/or one or more systems that may accept data, may process data in accordance with one or more stored software programs, may generate results, and typically may include input, output, storage, arithmetic, logic, and control units.
A “network” may refer to a number of computers and associated devices that may be connected by communication facilities. A network may involve permanent connections such as cables or temporary connections such as those that may be made through telephone or other communication links. A network may further include hard-wired connections (e.g., coaxial cable, twisted pair, optical fiber, waveguides, etc.) and/or wireless connections (e.g., radio frequency waveforms, free-space optical waveforms, acoustic waveforms, etc.). Examples of a network may include: an interne, such as the Internet; an intranet; a local area network (LAN); a wide area network (WAN); and a combination of networks, such as an interne and an intranet. Exemplary networks may operate with any of a number of protocols, such as Internet protocol (IP), asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), and/or synchronous optical network (SONET), user datagram protocol (UDP), IEEE 802.x, etc.
Exemplary embodiments are discussed in detail below. While specific exemplary embodiments are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. In describing and illustrating the exemplary embodiments, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. However, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. The examples and embodiments described herein are non-limiting examples.
In block 101, a user may initiate an executable modeling environment. The executable modeling environment may be a graphical executable modeling environment or a non-graphical executable modeling environment.
The graphical executable modeling environment may be an environment in which a graphical model or parts of a graphical model may be executed. Examples of a graphical executable modeling environment may include: Simulink® by The MathWorks, Inc.; Stateflow® by The MathWorks; SimEvents™ by The MathWorks; SimMechanics by The MathWorks; LabView® by National Instruments, Inc.; VisSim by Visual Solutions, Inc.; Dymola by Dynasim; SoftWIRE by Measurement Computing; WiT by DALSA Coreco; VEE Pro or SystemVue by Agilent; Gedae by Gedae, Inc.; Scicos from The French National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control (INRIA); aspects of a Unified Modeling Language (UML) or SysML environment; among others. For example, as depicted in
The non-graphical executable modeling environment may be an executable modeling environment for a non-graphical executable model. Examples of a non-graphical executable modeling environment may include: MATLAB® by The MathWorks; MATHEMATICA® by Wolfram Research; Comsol Script® by Comsol, Inc.; Scilab from INRIA; a C++ Integrated Development Environment; a Java development environment; elements of an integrated development environment such as a textual editor, for example GNU Emacs. For example, as depicted in
It is possible for the executable modeling environment to have aspects that are both graphical and non-graphical. Moreover, the executable modeling environment may include and/or may be implemented using languages, such as programming languages, technical computing languages, etc. The executable modeling environment may be run within a computer operating system, for example, a MacOS, Windows XP, or Unix based operating system. The executable modeling environment may contain program windows in which various aspects of the executable model are displayed. The executable modeling environment may include a hierarchy for the executable model. For example, Simulink® by the MathWorks includes a Simulink® model hierarchy for executable models within Simulink®. The layers of this hierarchy may be implemented by, for example, subsystems that, when opened, show details of how the behavior at the higher level is implemented. A hierarchy for an executable model may allow for the opening of program windows, the windows displaying various aspects of the executable model, or for the aspects of the executable model to be displayed within the same program window. Program windows displaying various aspects of the executable model may be opened and closed in various manners, for example, by pointing device events such as a mouse double-click event, from a command line, from a popup menu, or from callbacks within the executable model. Program windows displaying various aspects of an executable model may be docked within a multi-document interface. An executable modeling environment may contain a model explorer, for example, Model Explorer of Simulink®. A model explorer may display explicitly a hierarchal representation of an executable model and selected elements of the executable model.
In block 102, an executable model may be generated through the executable modeling environment or a previously generated executable model may be loaded into the executable modeling environment. The executable model may be displayed to a user via a display, for example a computer monitor. The executable model may be displayed within a program window. The executable model may be a graphical executable model, for example, a graphical model, or a non-graphical executable model, for example, a non-graphical model. An example of a non-graphical executable model may be a text written executable model such as a text-based model written in a technical computing language such as MATLAB®, or in a programming language such as C++. Alternatively, the executable model may be a graphical executable model, such as a model created with Simulink®, or model created with Stateflow® by the MathWorks. In one implementation, a graphical executable model may use text based code.
In block 103, an electronic overlay may be associated with the executable model. The electronic overlay may be suitable for various kinds of electronic markup. Electronic markup may refer to any edit or notation made electronically. Electronic markup may be, for example, free-form electronic markup, including typewritten and hand written notes and hand drawn symbols indicated on the electronic overlay, as, discussed below in block 202. Electronic markup may be, for example, functional element electronic markup, including functional elements used to create the executable model in the executable modeling environment, as discussed below in block 203. The electronic overlay may be two-dimensionally aware, such that it can take into account the positioning of electronic markup on the electronic overlay relative to the executable model or another electronic overlay. Additionally, the two-dimensionally aware electronic overlay may take into account zoom levels and/or orientations of the executable model. The electronic overlay may be electronically associated with the graphical executable model that has been created in or loaded into the executable modeling environment. The electronic overlay may be displayed with the executable model within the executable modeling environment. The electronic overlay may be displayed in a program window displaying all or an aspect of the executable model to which the electronic overlay is associated. The electronic markup may be used with conventional electronic markup techniques.
In
In block 104, once the electronic overlay has been placed over the executable model, a variety of operations may be performed on the electronic overlay. Such operations may include indicating free-form electronic markup on the electronic overlay, indicating functional elements electronic markup on the electronic overlay, associating a window with the electronic overlay, and editing the executable model through the window. Input from an input device of the computer may be used to provide the electronic markup on the electronic overlay, associate a window with the electronic overlay, and edit the executable model through the window. Examples of an input device may include a computer keyboard, a mouse, a touch-pad, a touch-screen, an accelerometer or gyroscope based device, a stylus, a biometric input device, etc.
Free-form electronic markup may refer to electronic markup that does not take the form of the functional elements used in the executable modeling environment. Examples of free-form electronic markup may include: handwritten notes, hand drawn lines, hand drawn symbols and typed text characters.
Functional element electronic markup may refer to edits or modifications (e.g., adding, deleting, or changing) of functional elements used by the executable modeling environment. The graphical executable modeling environment may contain block elements which represent various types of instrumentation or perform validation or signal transformation functions. For example, a graphical executable modeling environment may contain a block element to represent the clutch control system of a car in a graphical executable model. The various block elements may be the functional elements of a graphical executable model. Functional element electronic markup may be the indication of functional elements on the electronic overlay. Functional element electronic markup may be indicated on the electronic overlay that has free-form electronic markup indicated on the electronic overlay. Block 104 is further discussed below in
In an exemplary embodiment, operations may be performed on the electronic overlay associated with the executable model within a networked computing environment, for example, the Internet. Multiple users may have simultaneous access to the electronic overlay, and electronic markup indicated on the electronic overlay by a user may be displayed to the other users via a monitor, using, for example, a web-based interface such as Scalable Vector Graphics, AJAX, or FLASH. Electronic markup may be received from users over a remote access connection. Additionally, communication between the multiple users may occur through a communications device, for example, a phone, or an internet-based chat service, to allow, for example, a user to explain an electronic markup being made on the electronic overlay to other users.
In block 202, free-form electronic markup may be indicated on the electronic overlay.
In an exemplary embodiment, free-form electronic markup may be interpreted by the executable modeling environment to be functional electronic markup. For example, a hand drawn symbol 313 may be interpreted by the executable modeling environment as a command to exclude the functional element of the executable model over which it is marked when the executable model is executed. In an exemplary embodiment, functional electronic markup may be merged with the executable model. For example, after the free-form electronic markup is interpreted as functional electronic markup, the user may make a selection to merge functional electronic markup with the executable model. For example, a selection to merge the hand drawn symbol 313 with the executable model 302 may result in the deletion of the functional element of the executable model over which the symbol 313 is drawn as well as the deletion of the symbol 313.
In an exemplary embodiment, free-form electronic markup may be anchored to an element of the executable model or to another electronic markup. When a free-form electronic markup is anchored to an element of the executable model or another electronic markup, editing the executable model or electronic markup in a way that causes the element or electronic markup to move may result in the anchored electronic markup moving with element or electronic markup in order to maintain the same position relative to the element or electronic markup to which the free-form electronic markup is anchored.
In block 203, functional element electronic markup may be indicated on the electronic overlay.
In block 205, a window may be associated with the electronic overlay to allow for direct access to the executable model. The window associated with the electronic overlay may be a section of the electronic overlay that is cut away, permitting direct access to all or a portion of the executable model. For example as depicted in
In block 206, the executable model may be edited directly through the window associated with the electronic overlay. The window associated with the electronic overlay may allow for direct editing of the executable model. When the electronic overlay is in an on-state, input from any the input devices may be directed to the electronic overlay. For example, when the electronic overlay is in an on-state, holding down a mouse button and moving the mouse may draw a line on the electronic overlay. In order to send input such as input from a mouse to the executable model, the electronic overlay may be switched to an off-state. To edit the executable model by sending input to the executable model while the electronic overlay is still in an on-state, a window may be associated with the electronic overlay. Input from any of the input devices may be sent to the executable model when that input occurs in the area defined by the window associated with the electronic overlay. Input may be sent to the electronic overlay when that input occurs in all other non-window areas of the electronic overlay. In this way it may be possible to directly edit the executable model while the electronic overlay is in an on-state. For example, as depicted in
Referring back to
In block 106, the executable model may be executed. The executable model may be executed with or without the functional elements from the electronic overlay. If the executable model is executed without the functional elements from the electronic overlay, the executable model is executed as if no modifications were made to the program. If the executable model is executed with the functional elements from the electronic overlay, the executable model may be executed as if the functional elements were actually inserted into the executable model based on the place where they are positioned on the electronic overlay relative to the executable model, although the executable model itself is not changed.
In block 107, an additional electronic overlay may be associated with the executable model. If the additional electronic overlay is associated, a variety of operations may be performed to the additional electronic overlay as in block 104. A single executable model may have more than a single electronic overlay associated with it. An example of multiple electronic overlays is depicted in
In block 108, the electronic overlay may be saved. The electronic overlay may be saved as part of the same file as the executable model to which it has been associated, or as a separate file from the file in which the executable model is saved. The electronic overlay may exist as part of the file used to store the executable model, and be saved as part of the file used to store the executable model, or it may also exist as a separate file linked to the file used to store the executable model, and be saved as separate file from the file used to store the executable model.
In block 109, one of the previously associated electronic overlays may be selected, allowing for further operations to be performed on the selected electronic overlay as in block 104. Additionally, two or more electronic overlays may be selected at the same time, and the two or more electronic overlays may have their properties adjusted at the same time. For example, two electronic overlays may be selected at the same time and have their opaqueness adjusted together.
In block 110, if no more operations involving the management of electronic overlays are performed, flow ends.
Bus 710 may include one or more interconnects that permit communication among the components of computer 602. Processor 720 may include any type of processor, microprocessor, or processing logic that may interpret and execute instructions (e.g., a field programmable gate array (FPGA)). Processor 720 may include a single device (e.g., a single core) and/or a group of devices (e.g., multi-core). Memory 730 may include a random access memory (RAM) or another type of dynamic storage device that may store information and instructions for execution by processor 720. Memory 730 may also be used to store temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 720.
ROM 740 may include a ROM device and/or another type of static storage device that may store static information and instructions for processor 720. Storage device 750 may include a magnetic disk and/or optical disk and its corresponding drive for storing information and/or instructions. Storage device 750 may include a single storage device or multiple storage devices, such as multiple storage devices operating in parallel. Moreover, storage device 750 may reside locally on computer 602 and/or may be remote with respect to computer 602 and connected thereto via network 604 and/or another type of connection, such as a dedicated link or channel.
Input device 760 may include any mechanism or combination of mechanisms that permit an operator to input information to computer 602, such as a keyboard, a mouse, a touch sensitive display device, a microphone, a pen-based pointing device, a camera, video camera, motion-based input devices, neuro-machine interface devices and/or a biometric input device, such as a voice recognition device and/or a finger print scanning device. Output device 770 may include any mechanism or combination of mechanisms that outputs information to the operator, including a display, a printer, a speaker, etc.
Communication interface 780 may include any transceiver-like mechanism that enables computer 602 to communicate with other devices and/or systems. For example, communication interface 780 may include one or more interfaces, such as a first interface coupled to network 604. Alternatively, communication interface 780 may include other mechanisms (e.g., a wireless interface) for communicating via a network, such as a wireless network. In one implementation, communication interface 780 may include logic to send code to a destination device, such as a target device that can include general purpose hardware (e.g., a personal computer form factor), dedicated hardware (e.g., a digital signal processing (DSP) device adapted to execute a compiled version of a model or a part of a model), etc.
Computer 602 may perform certain functions in response to processor 720 executing software instructions contained in a computer-readable medium, such as memory 730. In alternative embodiments, hardwired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement features consistent with principles of the invention. Thus, implementations consistent with principles of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention may be embodied in many different ways as a software component. For example, it may be a stand-alone software package, or it may be a software package incorporated as a “tool” in a larger software product, such as, for example, a mathematical analysis product or a statistical analysis product. It may be downloadable from a network, for example, a website, as a stand-alone product or as an add-in package for installation in an existing software application. It may also be available as a client-server software application, or as a web-enabled software application.
The examples and embodiments described herein are non-limiting examples and many alternative embodiments are possible in view of the teachings herein. For example, a first alternative embodiment may include an entity relationship diagram, such as a block diagram, a flow chart, an organizational chart, etc. An entity relationship diagram may include electronic diagrams that include representations (e.g., blocks, icons, symbols, etc.) that can have relationships therebetween. For example, a block diagram may include a first block that is linked to a second block using a line, where the line may indicate a direction for information flow. The block diagram may represent the blocks (entities) in a manner that indicates the relationship between the blocks (e.g., one block being a parent or a superior block with respect to another block). Entity relationship diagrams may include representations that are non-executable (i.e., that do not include executable code) and/or that are executable.
In the first alternative embodiment, one or more overlays (e.g., electronic markup layers) can be used with the entity relationship diagram to associate additional information with the diagram (e.g., annotations, instructions, additional entities, additional relationships, etc.). For example, a first manager may add annotations to the entity relationship diagram using a first electronic markup overlay and a second manager may add a series of instructions and/or additional entities to a second electronic markup overlay that can be associated with the diagram. The first and second electronic overlays may be arranged in substantially any order and/or can be used with substantially any number of additional overlays.
A second alternative embodiment may include one or more electronic markup overlays that are used with a graphical or non-graphical executable model, where the one or more of the overlays affects functionality of the executable model. For example, a first overlay may include handwritten blocks and lines (e.g., signal lines) that connect the handwritten blocks to blocks in the model. A second overlay may include handwritten changes that are related to both the first overlay and information, such as blocks, in the model. The first overlay and/or the second overlay may be executable alone or in combination with the model and may alter functionality of the model. For example, a user may receive the first and second overlay from a first and second reviewer. The user may run the model with the overlays to determine how proposed edits/changes made by the reviewers will impact the model. The user may accept or reject changes related to the first or second overlays alone or in combination. In addition, the user may be able to add his/her own handwritten edits to one or more of the overlays to further affect the functionality of the model.
While various exemplary embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should instead be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.