Electronic scoring system, method and armor for use in martial arts

• US 8,021,281 B2
• Filed: 03/03/2010
• Issued: 09/20/2011
• Est. Priority Date: 10/23/2009
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Chiron Ip Holdco 2 Pty., Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Nedsyp Nominees Pty Ltd., Zatara Nominees Pty Ltd.
• Inventors: Pysden, David, Forsell, Justin
• Primary Examiner(s): Suhol; Dmitry
• Assistant Examiner(s): Liddle; Jay Trent
• Application Number:
  US12/716,388
• Publication Number:
  US 20110098094A1
• Time in Patent Office: 566 Days
• Field of Search: 273/454, 482/8, 482/12, 482/83, 482/84, 482/88, 482/901, 340/323.R, 73/120.9, 463/7, 463/8, 463/47.1
• US Class Current: 482/84
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/004 Multiple detectors or sensors each defining a different zone
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/0043 Systems for locating the point of impact on a specific surface
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2024/0056 for statistical or strategic analysis
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2071/0655 Tactile feedback
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/10 Positions
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/18 Inclination, slope or curvature
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/51 Force
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/53 Force of an impact, e.g. blow or punch
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/801 Contact switches
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2220/803 Motion sensors
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 2225/74 with powered illuminating means, e.g. lights
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 69/02 for fencing , e.g. means for indicating hits
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/06 Indicating or scoring devices for games or players , or for other sports activities
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/0605 Decision makers and devices using detection means facilitating arbitration
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/0622 Visual, audio or audio-visual systems for entertaining, instructing or motivating the user
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/08 Body-protectors for players or sportsmen , i.e. body-protecting accessories affording protection of body parts against blows or collisions protective clothing or garments for sporting purposes A41D13/00
• CPC Class Codes: A63B 71/12 for the body or the legs , e.g. for the shoulders A63B71/081 takes precedence

Abstract

An electronic scoring system for use in a variety of martial arts (including traditional styles of martial arts, mixed martial arts, weapons based martial arts or the fighting arts generally). The scoring system allows an objective determination of the force, location and effectiveness of forces applied during competition, without the need for electric weaponry.

Claims

1. An electronic scoring system for use in various styles of martial arts comprising:

(a) armor to provide impact protection, the armor having at least one force sensing element that is an integral part thereof, the forcing sensing element being configured so that the armor acts as a force sensor, detecting force parameter data of each contact regardless of an origin of each contact, the sensing element generating a force parameter data signal that is based on one or more sensed contact forces, wherein the force parameter data includes data regarding;

(i) magnitude;

(ii) location;

(iii) duration; and

(iv) direction of a force;

(b) a response stimulation means coupled to the armor, the response stimulation means being activated when the force sensing element detects an applied force that is at least equal to a particular threshold damage value, the response stimulation means being configured to simulate a stunned response when a wearer of the armor is subjected to such applied force; and

(c) a scoring machine having;

i. communication means for receiving the force parameter data signal from the sensing element;

ii. calculation means for calculating one or more results using the force parameter data; and

iii. output means for displaying the one or more results.

2. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the force sensing element is part of a force sensing means that further includes a switching mechanism to enable the force sensing element to be switched on directly or indirectly when the force sensing element detects a force, such that the force sensing means records only from an active force sensing element rather than monitoring all force sensing elements at all times.

3. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the armor is divided into segments, each segment of the armor corresponding to different grid co-ordinates on a scoring grid, such that the scoring machine is enabled to record a specific location of a force applied to the armor by reference to the corresponding grid co-ordinates.

4. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the force sensing element is part of a force sensing means that further includes motion-sensing means that detects movement data regarding movement of one or more of the following:

(a) a competitor; and

(b) a weapon;

wherein the motion-sensing means communicates the movement data to the scoring machine such that the system is capable of detecting movement related to competition.

5. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the damage value is based on a combination of the force parameter data including two or more of:

(a) magnitude

(b) location;

(c) duration; and

(d) direction of one or more forces applied to the armor.

6. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the armor comprises a plurality of force sensing elements connected in arrays, each array being connected to the communication means, thereby forming a module that is in communication with the scoring machine.

7. An electronic scoring system according to claim 6, wherein the plurality of modules are weaved through an armor-covering material.

8. An electronic scoring system according to claim 6, wherein each module is configured to contact to one or more other modules and wherein a signal, representing the force parameter data, from an array of force sensors is multiplexed and the scoring machine is configured to receive the multiplexed signal and convert the signal back into multiple discrete signals from discrete force sensing elements and wherein the signal represents one or more of the following:

(a) force parameter data and (b) movement data.

9. An electronic scoring system according to claim 6, wherein the force sensing elements are selected from the group consisting of piezoelectric sensors, tactile sensors, and shape memory alloy (SMA) sensors.

10. An electronic scoring system according to claim 6, wherein the force sensing elements are linked by tuning means, the tuning means defining a force to voltage relationship for each sensing element so that sensitivity of force sensing elements is uniform across one or more arrays.

11. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the at least one force sensing element is part of a sensing means that is configured to detect each discrete location where a force is applied to the armor.

12. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the scoring machine is configured to calculate one or more results in the form of a damage value of individual forces, the damage value can be calibrated according to physical attributes of an individual competitor.

13. An electronic scoring system according to claim 12, wherein the damage value of an applied force is converted into a scoring advantage or disadvantage, the damage value being further represented on the visual display by a visual rendering of a strike contacting an area, the visual rendering showing a relative distribution of forces across the area.

14. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the force sensing element is embedded in a skin worn over traditional armor.

15. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1 wherein the response stimulation means is one or more of the following:

(a) light-emitting means;

(b) electric shock-emitting means.

16. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1 wherein the armor includes a helmet and the response stimulation means is light-emitting means that is associated with the helmet and positioned close to the eyes of the wearer to simulate visual effects of being stunned in competition.

17. An electronic scoring system according to claim 1, wherein the scoring machine includes a means for graphically displaying force parameter data and for multidimensional rendering of computer generated imagery relating to competition, wherein the scoring machine can interpret a result of strike as if it had been effected by a different force generating member than a member actually used to generate the force.