Providing graphical representations of search results in multiple related histograms

• US 8,484,207 B2
• Filed: 06/30/2008
• Issued: 07/09/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 08/04/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Oral, Tolga, Newbold, David L., Wattenberg, Martin M., Bolin, Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): Lee, Wilson
• Application Number:
  US12/164,834
• Publication Number:
  US 20080301106A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,835 Days
• Field of Search: 707713-731, 707735-771
• US Class Current: 707/727
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/338 Presentation of query results
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99933 Query processing, i.e. searching
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99934 Query formulation, input preparation, or translation

Abstract

A system and method are provided for enabling a user to search for documents that the user has previously viewed on its local machine. The system includes three main components: the desktop integration module, the index module, and the graphical user interface module. The desktop integration module is an application which monitors documents with which the user interacts for predetermined events, and obtains content data and metadata from the monitored documents. The index module indexes the content data and metadata received from the desktop integration module. The graphical user interface module then permits a user to utilize the desktop integration module and index module by allowing a user to search for a document.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving a search query including one or more keywords;

initiating a search of an index of documents that a user has previously accessed using the one or more keywords;

graphically presenting a chronological histogram characterizing documents matching the search, wherein

the chronological histogram includes;

a first axis displaying time intervals when the matching documents were accessed,

a second axis displaying two dissimilar variables characterizing individual ones of the matching documents, and

the two dissimilar variables are displayed, along the second axis, using a single bar for a particular one of the matching documents, wherein

the two dissimilar variables have different units of measure.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein

a first of the two dissimilar variables indicates relevance, to the search, of a respective one of the matching documents, and

a second of the two dissimilar variables indicates an amount of time the user spent accessing the respective one of the matching documents.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein

the index includes parameters, and

the parameters are determined from metadata and content data associated with documents being monitored for a predetermined event while the documents being monitored are accessed by the user.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein

the metadata includes at least one of:

a date and a time a particular document was created, opened, closed, modified, or accessed,

an amount of time spent on the particular document,

a number of times the particular document had been viewed or accessed, and

whether or not the particular document was printed or emailed.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein

the content data includes at least one of:

words found within a particular document,

a keyword stored with the particular document,

a title of the particular document,

an author of the particular document,

a document type of the particular document, and

a document size of the particular document.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein

the predetermined event includes at least one of:

opening a particular document,

closing the particular document,

printing the particular document, and

emailing the particular document.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein

at least one of the matching documents is accessed by the user multiple times, and

an amount of time the user spent accessing the at least one matching document is determined as a total time, of all accesses, the user spent accessing the at least one matching document.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein

the first axis indicates a time interval in which the matching documents were accessed.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein

the first axis chronologically indicates an order in the matching documents were accessed.

10. A computer hardware system, comprising:

at least one processor, wherein the at least one processor is configured to initiate and/or perform;

receiving a search query including one or more keywords;

searching an index of documents that a user has previously accessed using the one or more keywords;

graphically presenting a chronological histogram characterizing documents matching the search, wherein

the chronological histogram includes;

a first axis displaying time intervals when the matching documents were accessed,

a second axis displaying two dissimilar variables characterizing individual ones of the matching documents, and

the two dissimilar variables are displayed, along the second axis, using a single bar for a particular one of the matching documents, wherein

the two dissimilar variables have different units of measure.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein

a first of the two dissimilar variables indicates relevance, to the search, of a respective one of the matching documents, and

a second of the two dissimilar variables indicates an amount of time the user spent accessing the respective one of the matching documents.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein

the index includes parameters, and

the parameters are determined from metadata and content data associated with documents being monitored for a predetermined event while the documents being monitored are accessed by the user.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein

the metadata includes at least one of:

a date and a time a particular document was created, opened, closed, modified, or accessed,

an amount of time spent on the particular document,

a number of times the particular document had been viewed or accessed, and

whether or not the particular document was printed or emailed.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein

the content data includes at least one of:

words found within a particular document,

a keyword stored with the particular document,

a title of the particular document,

an author of the particular document,

a document type of the particular document, and

a document size of the particular document.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein

the predetermined event includes at least one of:

opening a particular document,

closing the particular document,

printing the particular document, and

emailing the particular document.

16. The system of claim 10, wherein

at least one of the matching documents is accessed by the user multiple times, and

an amount of time the user spent accessing the at least one matching document is determined as a total time, of all accesses, the user spent accessing the at least one matching document.

17. The system of claim 10, wherein

the first axis indicates a time interval in which the matching documents were accessed.

18. The system of claim 10, wherein

the first axis chronologically indicates an order in the matching documents were accessed.