Network difference reporting

• US 8,589,531 B2
• Filed: 07/13/2005
• Issued: 11/19/2013
• Est. Priority Date: 07/14/2004
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Riverbed Technology, LLC (Riverbed Technology Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Riverbed Technology Incorporated
• Inventors: Mollitor, Robert
• Primary Examiner(s): Fan, Hua
• Application Number:
  US11/180,888
• Publication Number:
  US 20060015604A1
• Time in Patent Office: 3,051 Days
• Field of Search: 709223-224
• US Class Current: 709/224
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0233 Object-oriented techniques, for representation of network management data, e.g. common object request broker architecture [CORBA]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/14 Network analysis or design
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/22 comprising specially adapted graphical user interfaces [GUI]

Abstract

A network difference reporting method and system categorizes the differences between two networks, and provides an output report structured by these categories. The preferred categories include objects common to both networks that have different attributes; objects found only in the first network; objects found only in the second network; and objects common to both networks that have similar attributes. A user-interface is provided to allow a user to identify objects or attributes that are to be included or excluded from the identified differences. Preferably, the output reports includes a graphic display of differences that uses the same hierarchical object attribute structure as the networks, to facilitate a rapid understanding of the reported differences between the networks.

Claims

1. A method of diagnosing a network by a network analysis system implemented on a computer system, said method comprising:

obtaining, by the network analysis system, a first network description file comprising network objects that indicate a baseline state of equipment in the network,

obtaining, by the network analysis system, a second network description file comprising network objects that indicate a current state of equipment in the network,

obtaining, by the network analysis system responsive to a user input, a set of comparison behavior parameters indicating equipment in the network that are of interest by the user,

comparing, by the network analysis system, respective objects in the first network description file and the second network description file corresponding to the same equipment in the network, based on the comparison behavior parameters,

categorizing, by the network analysis system, the comparison between objects in the first network description file and the second network description file based on objects that are unchanged, changed, deleted, and added, and

providing, by the network analysis system, information for displaying a difference report comprising a set of categories to indicate objects that are unchanged, changed, deleted, and added in the network.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one category of the set of categories includes a network object that is common to the first and second network description files, and includes one or more attributes that differ in the first and second network description file.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the difference report includes an identification of the network object and each of the one or more attributes that differ.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the first and second network description files identify a hierarchical network object attribute structure, and the difference report is further structured based on the hierarchical network object attribute structure.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the difference report includes an identification of each hierarchical layer of the hierarchical network object attribute structure corresponding to each of the one or more attributes that differ.

6. The method of claim 5, further including displaying the identification of each hierarchical attribute layer selectively in one of:

a tabular form, and a graphic form.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein the tabular form includes a column corresponding to each hierarchical attribute layer, which is configured to contain the identification of the hierarchical attribute layer.

8. The method of claim 2, wherein at least one other category of the set of categories includes network objects that are included in the first network description file, and not included in the second network description file.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein at least one other category of the set of categories includes network objects that are equivalent in each of the first and second network description files.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one category of the set of categories includes network objects that are included in the first network description file, and not included in the second network description file.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the difference report includes an identification of the network object and each of one or more attributes that differ from default attributes associated with the network object.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first network description file identifies a hierarchical network object attribute structure, and the difference report is further structured based on the hierarchical network object attribute structure.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the difference report includes an identification of each hierarchical layer of the hierarchical network object attribute structure corresponding to each of the one or more attributes that differ from the default attributes.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the comparison behavior parameters include an identification of network objects that are to be excluded from the comparison.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the comparison behavior parameters include an identification of attributes that are to be excluded from the comparison.

16. The method of claim 1, wherein the comparison behavior parameters include an identification of attributes that are to be excluded from the comparison.

17. A network difference reporting system configured to diagnose a network based on analyzing network description files that indicate different states of the network, said system comprising:

a comparator that is configured to compare a first network description file comprising objects identifying equipment in a network at a baseline state and a second network description file comprising objects identifying equipment in the network at a current state; and

a report generator that is configured to display a comparison of the first network description file and the second network description file in a set of categories that indicates objects that are unchanged, changed, added, or deleted,

wherein;

the first and second network description files identify a hierarchical network object based on an attribute structure,

the report generator is configured to display the comparison between objects in the first network description file and the second network description file based on the hierarchical network object attribute structure, and

a categorizer that is configured to categorize the comparison between objects in the first network description file and the second network description file into a set of categories to indicate objects that are unchanged, changed, added, or deleted.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein at least one category of the set of categories includes network objects that are common to both the first and second network description files and include one or more relevant attributes that differ between the first and second network description files.

19. The system of claim 18, wherein at least another category of the set of categories includes network objects that are included in the first network description file and are not included in the second network description file.

20. The system of claim 19, wherein at least another of the categories includes network objects that are not included in the first network description file and are included in the second network description file.

21. The system of claim 20, wherein at least another of the categories includes network objects that are common to both the first and second network description file and do not have any relevant attributes that differ between the first and second network description files.

22. The system of claim 17, wherein the comparator is configured to compare the first and second network description files based on a user-defined set of comparison parameters.

23. The system of claim 22, wherein the user-defined set of comparison parameters are configured to distinguish included network objects from excluded network objects, and the comparator is further configured to determine the differences based on the included network objects only.

24. The system of claim 23, wherein the user-defined set of comparison parameters are configured to distinguish included attributes from excluded attributes, and the comparator is further configured to determine the differences based on the included attributes only.

25. The system of claim 24, wherein the user-defined set of comparison parameters are configured to distinguish included attributes from excluded attributes, and the comparator is further configured to determine the differences based on the included attributes only.

26. The system of claim 17, further including a difference description generator that is configured to receive the differences and to produce therefrom a differences description, and the report generator is configured to display the differences based on the differences description.

27. The system of claim 26, wherein the differences description is XML-encoded.

28. The system of claim 17, wherein the report generator is configured to selectively display the differences in one of:

a tabular form, and a graphic form.

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the report generator is configured to include an identification of each hierarchy of the hierarchical network object attribute structure.

30. The system of claim 29, wherein the identification of each hierarchy is included in a corresponding column of a table when the differences are displayed in the tabular form.

31. The system of claim 17, wherein the report generator is configured to color-code the differences for display.

32. The system of claim 17, wherein the first and second network description files are XML-encoded.