System and method to adjust insurance rate based on real-time data about potential vehicle operator impairment

• US 8,930,269 B2
• Filed: 12/17/2012
• Issued: 01/06/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 12/17/2012
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm)
• Original Assignee: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm)
• Inventors: He, Jibo, Fields, Brian M., Roberson, Steve, Cielocha, Steve, Peng, Jufeng, Coltea, Julian
• Primary Examiner(s): Chang, Edward
• Application Number:
  US13/717,514
• Publication Number:
  US 20140172467A1
• Time in Patent Office: 750 Days
• Field of Search: 705/1, 705/39
• US Class Current: 705/39
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/18 for vehicle drivers or machine operators
• CPC Class Codes: B60K 28/066 actuating a signalling device B60K28/063 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0818 Inactivity or incapacity of driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0827 due to sleepiness
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0836 due to alcohol
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2040/0845 due to drugs
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/221 Physiology, e.g. weight, heartbeat, health or special needs
• CPC Class Codes: G06N 20/00 Machine learning
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0201 Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 40/08 Insurance
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 5/008 communicating information to a remotely located station transmission systems for measured values G08C

Abstract

The method, system, and computer-readable medium facilitates monitoring a vehicle operator, the environment ahead of the vehicle, and/or forces acting on the vehicle during the course of vehicle operation to determine whether the vehicle operator is impaired (e.g., distracted, drowsy), log data relating to vehicle operator impairment for further analysis, and send the data to a server for analysis. The method, system, and computer-readable medium may monitor the vehicle operator, the environment ahead of the vehicle, and/or forces acting on the vehicle using either or both of optical sensors or accelerometers. In particular, one optical sensor may monitor the vehicle operator to detect eye blinks, head nods, head rotations, and/or gaze fixation. Another optical sensor may monitor the road ahead of the vehicle to detect lane deviation, lane centering, and time to collision. The accelerometers may detect acceleration in the direction of vehicle travel and/or lateral acceleration. The data gathered by the various sensors may be scored to determine whether to change a property and casualty insurance rate charged to vehicle operator and/or vehicle owner and/or vehicle policy.

Claims

1. A method implemented on a computer system comprising:

receiving at the computer system data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring a vehicle operator with a first optical sensor, and

monitoring an environment ahead of the vehicle with a second optical sensor, and

wherein the data about potential vehicle operator impairment is stored on a computer-readable medium;

assigning, with one or more processors of the computer system, a plurality of scores based on the data about potential vehicle operator impairment, wherein each of the plurality of scores corresponds to a respective impairment indicator;

determining, with the one or more processors, a vehicle operator impairment score by performing a mathematical operation on the plurality of scores, the vehicle operator impairment score summarizing a level of impairment corresponding to the vehicle operator; and

adjusting, with the one or more processors, a property and casualty insurance rate based on the vehicle operator impairment score.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of scores used to determine the vehicle operator impairment score includes one or more of determining a drowsiness score and determining a distractedness score.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein assigning the plurality of scores includes assessing impairment indicators including one or more of:

vehicle operator head nods,

vehicle operator scanning frequency,

vehicle operator gaze fixation,

vehicle operator mirror checking,

vehicle operator head rotations,

lane deviation,

lane centering, or

time to collision; and

assigning an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the mathematical operation is a weighted sum.

5. The method of claim 1, further including:

receiving at the computer system the data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring the vehicle operator with the first optical sensor,

monitoring the environment ahead of the vehicle with the second optical sensor, and

monitoring force in one or more directions with an accelerometer; and

assigning the plurality of scores including;

assessing impairment indicators corresponding to one or more of;

fore-aft force to detect hard breaking,

fore-aft force change in speed, or

lateral force; and

assigning an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting the vehicle operator impairment score to a remote device configured to alert the vehicle operator using at least one or more of an audible alert, a visual alert, or a tactile alert.

7. A computer system comprising:

a processor;

a program memory storing executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to;

receive data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring a vehicle operator with a first optical sensor, and

monitoring an environment ahead of the vehicle with a second optical sensor, and

wherein the data about potential vehicle operator impairment is stored on a computer-readable medium;

assign a plurality of scores based on the data about potential vehicle operator impairment, wherein each of the plurality of scores corresponds to a respective impairment indicator;

determine a vehicle operator impairment score by performing a mathematical operation on the plurality of scores, the vehicle operator impairment score summarizing a level of impairment corresponding to the vehicle operator; and

adjust a property and casualty insurance rate based on the vehicle operator impairment score.

8. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign a plurality of scores include executable instructions than when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign one or more of a drowsiness score and a distractedness score.

9. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign a plurality of scores include executable instructions than when executed by the processor cause the computer system to:

assess impairment indicators including one or more of;

vehicle operator head nods,

vehicle operator scanning frequency,

vehicle operator gaze fixation,

vehicle operator mirror checking,

vehicle operator head rotations,

lane deviation,

lane centering, or

time to collision; and

assign an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

10. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the mathematical operation is a weighted sum.

11. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the executable instructions, when executed by the processor, further cause the processor to:

receive the data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring the vehicle operator with the first optical sensor,

monitoring the environment ahead of the vehicle with the second optical sensor, and

monitoring force in one or more directions with an accelerometer; and

assign the plurality of scores including;

assessing impairment indicators corresponding to one or more of;

fore-aft force to detect hard breaking,

fore-aft force change in speed, or

lateral force; and

assigning an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

12. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the program memory further storing executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to transmit the vehicle operator impairment score to a remote device configured to alert the vehicle operator using at least one or more of an audible alert, a visual alert, or a tactile alert.

13. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing instructions that when executed by a processor of a computer system cause the computer system to:

receive data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring a vehicle operator with a first optical sensor, and

monitoring an environment ahead of the vehicle with a second optical sensor; and

wherein the data about potential vehicle operator impairment is stored on a computer-readable medium;

assign a plurality of scores based on the data about potential vehicle operator impairment, wherein each of the plurality of scores corresponds to a respective impairment indicator;

determine a vehicle operator impairment score by performing a mathematical operation on the plurality of scores, the vehicle operator impairment score summarizing a level of impairment corresponding to the vehicle operator; and

adjust a property and casualty insurance rate based on the vehicle operator impairment score.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign a plurality of scores include executable instructions than when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign one or more of a drowsiness score and a distractedness score.

15. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to assign a plurality of scores include executable instructions than when executed by the processor cause the computer system to:

assess impairment indicators including one or more of;

vehicle operator head nods,

vehicle operator scanning frequency,

vehicle operator gaze fixation,

vehicle operator mirror checking,

vehicle operator head rotations,

lane deviation,

lane centering, or

time to collision; and

assign an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

16. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the mathematical operation is a weighted sum.

17. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the non-transitory, computer-readable medium further causes the processor to:

receive the data about potential vehicle operator impairment gathered by;

monitoring the vehicle operator with the first optical sensor,

monitoring the environment ahead of the vehicle with the second optical sensor, and

monitoring force in one or more directions with an accelerometer; and

assign the plurality of scores including;

assessing impairment indicators corresponding to one or more of;

fore-aft force to detect hard breaking,

fore-aft force change in speed, or

lateral force; and

assigning an impairment indicator score to each assessed impairment indicator.

18. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 13, wherein the program memory further storing executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the computer system to transmit the vehicle operator impairment score to a remote device configured to alert the vehicle operator using at least one or more of an audible alert, a visual alert, or a tactile alert.