Method and system for accessing an occupied Wi-Fi channel by a client using a nulling scheme

• US 9,060,362 B2
• Filed: 06/04/2014
• Issued: 06/16/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 09/12/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Magnolia Broadband Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Magnolia Broadband Incorporated
• Inventors: Harel, Haim, Jeffery, Stuart S., Chen, Phil F., Wang, Sherwin J., Kludt, Kenneth
• Primary Examiner(s): Lai, Andrew
• Assistant Examiner(s): LEE, ANDREW CHUNG CHEUNG
• Application Number:
  US14/296,209
• Publication Number:
  US 20150071270A1
• Time in Patent Office: 377 Days
• Field of Search: 370/208, 370/252, 370/295, 370/310, 370/328, 370/334, 370/338, 375/264, 375/267, 375/299
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/28 using beam steering
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/04 TPC
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/42 in systems with time, space, frequency or polarisation diversity
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/50 at the moment of starting communication in a multiple access environment
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/21 in the uplink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards the network
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 74/0816 with collision avoidance
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 84/12 WLAN [Wireless Local Area Networks]

Abstract

A method and system for overriding Carrier-Sense-Multiple-Access/Collision-Avoidance (CSMA/CA) without harming the traffic that occupies the channel are provided. The system and method may include for example detecting at a communication node having a plurality of antennas, a preamble transmitted by a co-channel neighboring node operating in compliance with IEEE 802.11 standard within a clear channel assessment (CCA) range of the communication node; and setting uplink transmit weights of the antennas of the communication node, to isolate the communication node from the neighboring node after the neighboring node has transmitted the preamble, to allow the communication node to access the co-channel, by keeping a transmitted signal level of the communication node as received by the neighboring node, below the CCA signal level at one or more of the antennas of said neighboring node. The system may for example implement the method in software running on a baseband processor.

Claims

1. A communication node comprising:

a plurality of antennas;

a plurality of radio circuitries configured to transmit and receive signals via the plurality of antennas; and

a baseband processor,

wherein said communication node is located within a clear channel assessment (CCA) range of a neighboring node, wherein the communication node and the neighboring node share a co-channel in compliance with an IEEE 802.11 standard, wherein the baseband processor is configured to set uplink transmit weights after said neighboring node has transmitted a preamble, for transmitting a signal power level of said communication node, as received by said neighboring node, below a signal power level associated with the CCA range, at one or more of the antennas of said neighboring node,

wherein said communication node is a station configured to be served by the access point (AP) serving said communication node, and the neighboring node is an AP which is serving its respective stations, and wherein said station and APs operate in compliance with the IEEE 802.11 standard, wherein said station monitors Modulation Coding Scheme (MCS) transmitted by said neighboring AP, and further reduces transmit power if MCS <

4, by a DELTA₂, wherein DELTA₂=10*log(N) dB, and N is the known number of said neighboring transmitting AP'"'"'s antennas.

2. The node according to claim 1, wherein the baseband processor is further configured to adjust the power level of the transmitted signal.

3. The node according to claim 1, wherein said communication node is a station and has at least two transmitting/receiving antennas, and is configured to set the uplink transmit weights while transmitting towards the AP serving said communication node, such that the uplink transmit weights minimize the energy received by said neighboring AP'"'"'s antenna, constituting an uplink transmit null towards said neighboring AP.

4. The node according to claim 3, wherein said station lowers the power level transmitted by said station, by an amount that keeps the estimated power received by said neighboring AP below a CCA threshold at one or more of the antennas of said neighboring AP.

5. The node according to claim 4, wherein station'"'"'s uplink transmit null, and the station power setting are performed in order to protect said neighboring APs'"'"' ACK reception from being jammed by said station'"'"'s transmission.

6. The node according to claim 4, wherein the uplink transmit null weights are set prior to responding to said serving AP'"'"'s request to send (RTS) with clear to send (CTS) signals.

7. The node according to claim 4, wherein said station monitors a destination address associated with a destination node of a packet from said transmitting neighboring AP and if the destination node is recognized within CCA range of said station, said station will not reply a clear to send (CTS).

8. The node according to claim 4, wherein the transmit uplink null formed by said station, is calculated as follows:

said station performs channel estimation and absolute value calculation of the Legacy Long Training Field (L-LTF) field of the Preamble signal transmitted by said neighboring AP, via each of its receiving antennas, and comparing the various said antennas received power level, said station registers the highest-power-level as highest received signal strength indication (RSSI);

said station sets weights for said receiving antenna such that total received power of said Preamble signal'"'"'s L-LTF is minimized, yielding an estimated receive null weighting matrix W, and registering said minimized-power-level as nulled RSSI; and

using reciprocity calibration said station converts said receive null weighting matrix W into a transmit null weighting matrix Ŵ

.

9. The node according to claim 8, wherein said station calculates the difference between highest RSSI and the nulled RSSI, said difference being defined as receive null depth.

10. The node according to claim 9, wherein said station estimates the transmit null depth, based on the receive null depth, minus a calculated margin DELTA₃ representing imperfection of receive/transmit null calibration due to aging and temperature variations, and due to limited precision of phase and amplitude setting.

11. The node according to claim 10, wherein said margin DELTA₃ is determined by a combination of measured phase and amplitude drift between consecutive off-line reciprocity calibration, and a tolerance of phase and amplitude setting precision measured at factory.

12. The node according to claim 10, wherein said transmit null depth is compared with the highest RSSI level received by a station'"'"'s antenna, and if said highest RSSI minus transmit null depth >

−

82 dBm, the station reduces reduce transmission power by a DELTA₁ so that the highest RSSI minus transmit null depth minus DELTA₁<

−

82 dBm.

13. The node in claim 8, wherein the station performs off-line calibration of receive versus transmit nulls, and calculates a conversion matrix between W and Ŵ

;

said conversion matrix is measured and calculated per frequency subcarrier.

14. The node according to claim 4, wherein following a request to send (RTS) and a Modulation Code Scheme Request (MRQ) sent by the station'"'"'s serving AP, said station will set up transmit null, estimate received RTS Signal to Noise plus Interference Ratio (SINR), and respond to said serving AP with CTS and Modulation Coding Scheme (MCS) that corresponds to said SINR.

15. A method comprising:

detecting at a communication node having a plurality of antennas, a preamble transmitted by a co-channel neighboring node, wherein the communication node is configured to transmit and receive signals in compliance with IEEE 802.11 standard within a clear channel assessment (CCA) range of said neighboring node; and

setting uplink transmit weights of said antennas of said communication node for transmitting a signal power level of said communication node, as received by said neighboring node, below a signal power level associated with the CCA range, at one or more of the antennas of said neighboring node, wherein said communication node is a station configured to be served by its serving Access point (AP) and the neighboring node is an AP which is serving stations associated therewith, and wherein said station, and APs all operate in compliance with the 802.11 standard, wherein said station monitors Modulation Coding Scheme (MCS) transmitted by said neighboring AP, and further reduces transmit power if MCS <

4, by a DELTA₂, wherein DELTA₂=10*log(N) dB, and N is the known number of said neighboring transmitting AP'"'"'s antennas.

16. The method according to claim 15, further comprising adjusting transmit power level of said communication node.

17. The method according to claim 15, wherein said communication node is a station and has at least two transmitting/receiving antennas, and sets the uplink transmit weights while transmitting towards the AP serving said communication node, such that the uplink transmit weights minimize the energy received by said neighboring AP'"'"'s antenna, constituting an uplink transmit null towards said neighboring AP.

18. The method according to claim 15, wherein said station further lowers the power level transmitted by said station, by an amount that keeps the estimated power received by said neighboring AP below CCA threshold at one or more of the antennas of said neighboring AP.

19. The method according to claim 18, wherein station'"'"'s uplink transmit null, and the station power setting are performed in order to protect said neighboring APs'"'"' ACK reception from being jammed by said station'"'"'s transmission.

20. The method according to claim 18, wherein the uplink transmit null weights are set prior to responding to said serving AP'"'"'s request to send (RTS) with clear to send (CTS) signals.

21. The method according to claim 18, wherein said station monitors a destination address associated with a destination node of a packet from said transmitting neighboring AP and if the destination node is recognized within CCA range of said station, said station will not reply a clear to send (CTS).

22. The method according to claim 18, wherein the transmit uplink null formed by said station, is calculated as follows:

said station performs channel estimation and absolute value calculation of the L-LTF field of the Preamble signal transmitted by said neighboring AP, via each of its receiving antennas, and said station compares the various said antennas received power level, and said station registers the highest-power-level as highest received signal strength indication (RSSI);

said station sets weights for said receiving antenna such that total received power of said preamble signal'"'"'s Legacy Long Training Field (L-LTF) is minimized, yielding an estimated receive null weighting matrix W, and registering said minimized-power-level as nulled RSSI; and

using reciprocity calibration said station converts said receive null weighting matrix W into a transmit null weighting matrix Ŵ

.

23. The method according to claim 22, wherein said station calculates the difference between highest RSSI and the nulled RSSI, said difference being defined as receive null depth.

24. The method according to claim 23, wherein said station estimates the transmit null depth, based on the receive null depth, minus a calculated margin DELTA₃ representing imperfection of receive/transmit null calibration due to aging and temperature variations, and due to limited precision of phase and amplitude setting.

25. The method according to claim 24, wherein said margin DELTA₃ is determined by a combination of measured phase and amplitude drift between consecutive off-line reciprocity calibration, and a tolerance of phase and amplitude setting precision measured at factory.

26. The method according to claim 22, wherein the station performs off-line calibration of receive versus transmit nulls, and calculates a conversion matrix between W and Ŵ

;

said conversion matrix is measured and calculated per frequency subcarrier.