Data storage device balancing and maximizing quality metric when configuring arial density of each disk surface

• US 9,082,458 B1
• Filed: 03/10/2014
• Issued: 07/14/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 03/10/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase & Co)
• Original Assignee: Western Digital Technologies Incorporated (Western Digital Corporation)
• Inventors: Tang, Kathy X.
• Primary Examiner(s): MERCEDES, DISMERY E
• Application Number:
  US14/203,126
• Time in Patent Office: 491 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G11B 20/10009 Improvement or modification of read or write signals
• CPC Class Codes: G11B 20/10305 signal quality assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G11B 20/1217 on discs
• CPC Class Codes: G11B 20/1258 where blocks are arranged within multiple radial zones, e.g. Zone Bit Recording or Constant Density Recording discs, MCAV discs, MCLV discs
• CPC Class Codes: G11B 2020/1278 Physical format specifications of the record carrier, e.g. compliance with a specific standard, recording density, number of layers, start of data zone or lead-out

Abstract

A data storage device is disclosed comprising a plurality of disk surfaces, and a head actuated over each disk surface. For each disk surface, a quality metric is measured at a plurality of discrete areal densities including a first areal density comprising a first radial density and a first linear density, and a second areal density comprising a second radial density different from the first radial density and a second linear density different from the first linear density. Based on a target capacity, an areal density is selected for each disk surface such that the combined areal densities satisfies the target capacity and such that the quality metrics across the disk surfaces are substantially equal and substantially maximized.

Claims

1. A data storage device comprising:

a plurality of disk surfaces;

a head actuated over each disk surface; and

control circuitry configured to;

for each disk surface, measure a quality metric at a plurality of discrete areal densities including;

a first areal density comprising a first radial density and a first linear density; and

a second areal density comprising a second radial density different from the first radial density and a second linear density different from the first linear density; and

based on a target capacity, select an areal density for each disk surface such that the combined areal densities satisfies the target capacity and such that the quality metrics across the disk surfaces are substantially equal and substantially maximized.

2. The data storage device as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to generate a polynomial representing a relationship between the areal density and the quality metrics measured a first disk surface.

3. The data storage device as recited in claim 2, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to select the areal density for the first disk surface based on the polynomial.

4. The data storage device as recited in claim 2, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to generate coefficients for a plurality of the polynomials wherein each polynomial corresponds to a discrete linear density for the first disk surface.

5. The data storage device as recited in claim 4, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to select the areal density for the first disk surface based on the plurality of polynomials.

6. The data storage device as recited in claim 5, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to select a linear density for the first disk surface based on the selected areal density for the first disk surface and the plurality of polynomials.

7. The data storage device as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to reduce the target capacity when the maximum quality metric for the selected areal densities corresponds to an insufficient recording quality.

8. The data storage device as recited in claim 1, wherein the quality metric comprises an off-track read capability.

9. The data storage device as recited in claim 1, wherein the quality metric comprises an error rate.

10. The data storage device as recited in claim 1, wherein the quality metric comprises a squeeze margin.

11. A method of operating a data storage device comprising:

for each of a plurality of disk surfaces, measuring a quality metric at a plurality of discrete areal densities including;

a first areal density comprising a first radial density and a first linear density; and

a second areal density comprising a second radial density different from the first radial density and a second linear density different from the first linear density; and

based on a target capacity, selecting an areal density for each disk surface such that the combined areal densities satisfies the target capacity and such that the quality metrics across the disk surfaces are substantially equal and substantially maximized.

12. The method as recited in claim 11, further comprising generating a polynomial representing a relationship between the areal density and the quality metrics measured a first disk surface.

13. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising selecting the areal density for the first disk surface based on the polynomial.

14. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising generating coefficients for a plurality of the polynomials wherein each polynomial corresponds to a discrete linear density for the first disk surface.

15. The method as recited in claim 14, further comprising selecting the areal density for the first disk surface based on the plurality of polynomials.

16. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising selecting a linear density for the first disk surface based on the selected areal density for the first disk surface and the plurality of polynomials.

17. The method as recited in claim 11, further comprising reducing the target capacity when the maximum quality metric for the selected areal densities corresponds to an insufficient recording quality.

18. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the quality metric comprises an off-track read capability.

19. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the quality metric comprises an error rate.

20. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the quality metric comprises a squeeze margin.