System and method for optimizing fuel economy using predictive environment and driver behavior information

• US 9,221,452 B2
• Filed: 07/21/2011
• Issued: 12/29/2015
• Est. Priority Date: 07/21/2010
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Eaton Intelligent Power Limited (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Original Assignee: Eaton Corp. (Wisconsin) (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Inventors: Tang, Zhijun, Nowak, Michael P., Saltsman, Benjamin, Ambhore, Dnyaneshwar L., Morris, Benjamin, Tsourapas, Vasilios, Patil, Chinmaya B., Al-Atat, Hassan
• Primary Examiner(s): Vo, Hieu T
• Assistant Examiner(s): MANLEY, SHERMAN D
• Application Number:
  US13/188,320
• Publication Number:
  US 20120022764A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,622 Days
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 10/06 including control of combustion engines
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 10/10 including control of change-speed gearings
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 10/11 Stepped gearings
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/10 Accelerator pedal position
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/12 Brake pedal position
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/20 Direction indicator values
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2540/30 Driving style
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2552/20 Road profile, i.e. the change in elevation or curvature of a plurality of continuous road segments
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2554/00 Input parameters relating to objects
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2555/60 Traffic rules, e.g. speed limits or right of way
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/10 Historical data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2556/50 of positioning data, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System] data
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2710/0605 Throttle position
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2710/0666 Engine torque
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2710/1005 Transmission ratio engaged
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2720/103 Speed profile
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 2900/00 Indexing codes relating to the purpose of, or problem solved of road vehicle drive control systems not otherwise provided for in groups B60W30/00
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/188 Controlling power parameters of the driveline, e.g. determining the required power
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 30/1882 characterised by the working point of the engine, e.g. by using engine output chart
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/0097 Predicting future conditions
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/087 : where the control system corrects or modifies a request from the driver
• CPC Class Codes: B60W 50/10 : Interpretation of driver requests or demands
• CPC Class Codes: F02D 28/00 : Programme-control of engines
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/40 : Engine management systems
• CPC Class Codes: Y02T 10/84 : Data processing systems or methods, management, administration

Abstract

Disclosed is an exemplary method for optimizing vehicle performance. The method includes determining an optimized drive torque for maximizing vehicle fuel economy and detecting a driver requested drive torque. A determination is made on whether the driver requested drive torque is performance related or safety related. The arbitrated drive torque is set to the optimized drive torque when it is determined that the driver requested drive torque is not performance and safety related. The arbitrated drive torque is set to the driver requested drive torque when it is determined that the driver requested drive torque is either performance or safety related.

Claims

1. A method for optimizing vehicle performance, the method comprising:

identifying at least one operating scenario from a list of predetermined operating scenarios, each of which indicates one of a potential for optimizing and no potential for optimizing;

determining that there is a potential for optimizing fuel economy based on the at least one operating scenario identified;

determining, by at least one computer module, an optimized drive torque;

detecting a driver requested drive torque;

determining if the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition;

setting an arbitrated drive torque to the optimized drive torque when determining the driver requested drive torque is not in response to at least one driving related condition, and setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when determining the driver requested drive torque is in response to the at least one driving related condition;

monitoring a driver resistance to setting the arbitrated drive torque to the optimized drive torque; and

setting the arbitrated drive torque between the driver requested drive torque and the optimized drive torque when driver resistance is detected.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

determining if the detected driver requested drive torque is less than the determined optimized drive torque; and

setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when determining the optimized drive torque to be greater than the driver requested drive torque.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque whenever the optimized drive torque is determined to be greater than the driver requested drive torque.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising monitoring operation of at least one vehicle control in connection with determining if the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition.

5. The method of claim 4, further comprising determining the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition when operation of the monitored vehicle control is detected.

6. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one vehicle control includes at least one of a vehicle brake pedal position, vehicle accelerator pedal position, and vehicle turn signal.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein driver resistance is indicated by at least one of a driver requested drive torque exceeding the optimized drive torque for a selected time period, a fully actuated vehicle accelerator pedal, and a driver initiated request for drive torque occurring under a load condition.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when it is determined there is no potential for optimizing fuel economy.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining at least one static environment constraint and at least one dynamic environment constraint; and

selecting the at least one operating scenario from the list of predetermined operating scenarios based on the at least static environment constraint and the at least one dynamic environment.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein at least one of the static environment constraint and the dynamic environment constraint is determined based on a vehicle speed limit.

11. The method of claim 1, further comprising adjusting a vehicle throttle position in response to the arbitrated drive torque.

12. The method of claim 1, further comprising initiating a transmission gear shift in response to the arbitrated drive torque.

20. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining of the optimized drive torque occurs during operation of the vehicle.

13. A method for optimizing vehicle performance, the method comprising:

determining, by at least one computer module, an optimized drive torque;

detecting a driver requested drive torque;

determining at least one static environment constraint occurring within a predetermined distance in front of the vehicle along a vehicle path of travel;

determining at least one dynamic environment constraint;

selecting an operating scenario from a list of predefined operating scenarios based on both the at least one static environment constraint and the at least one dynamic environment constraint;

determining if there is a potential for optimizing fuel economy based on the at least one operating scenario;

setting an arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when determining there is no potential for optimizing fuel economy;

setting the arbitrated drive torque to the optimized drive torque when determining there is a potential for optimizing fuel economy;

monitoring a driver resistance to setting the arbitrated drive torque to the optimized drive torque; and

setting the arbitrated drive torque between the driver requested drive torque and the optimized drive torque when driver resistance is detected.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

determining if the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition; and

setting the arbitrated drive torque to the optimized drive torque when determining the driver requested drive torque is not in response to at least one driving related condition, and setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when determining the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising monitoring operation of at least one vehicle control in connection with determining if the driver requested drive torque is in response to at least one driving related condition.

16. The method of claim 15, further comprising determining the driver requested drive torque to be in response to at least one driving related condition when operation of the monitored vehicle control is detected.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the at least one vehicle control includes at least one of a vehicle brake pedal position, vehicle accelerator pedal position, and vehicle turn signal.

18. The method of claim 13, wherein driver resistance is indicated by at least one of a driver requested drive torque exceeding the optimized drive torque for a selected time period, a fully actuated vehicle accelerator pedal, and a driver initiated request for drive torque occurring under a load condition.

19. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

determining if the detected driver requested drive torque is less than the determined optimized drive torque; and

setting the arbitrated drive torque to the driver requested drive torque when determining the optimized drive torque to be greater than the driver requested drive torque.