Systems and methods for adaptive noise cancellation including secondary path estimate monitoring

• US 9,294,836 B2
• Filed: 07/26/2013
• Issued: 03/22/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 04/16/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Cirrus Logic Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Cirrus Logic Incorporated
• Inventors: Zhou, Dayong, Lu, Yang, Li, Ning
• Primary Examiner(s): Sniezek, Andrew L
• Application Number:
  US13/952,221
• Publication Number:
  US 20140307890A1
• Time in Patent Office: 970 Days
• Field of Search: None
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/16 Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general G10K11/36 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17817 between the output signals and the error signals, i.e. secondary path
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17823 Reference signals, e.g. ambient acoustic environment
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17825 Error signals
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17827 Desired external signals, e.g. pass-through audio such as music or speech
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17833 by using a self-diagnostic function or a malfunction prevention function, e.g. detecting abnormal output levels
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17835 using detection of abnormal input signals
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17854 the filter being an adaptive filter
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17881 the reference signal being an acoustic signal, e.g. recorded with a microphone
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 11/17885 additionally using a desired external signal, e.g. pass-through audio such as music or speech
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/108 Communication systems, e.g. where useful sound is kept and noise is cancelled
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/1081 Earphones, e.g. for telephones, ear protectors or headsets
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3017 Copy, i.e. whereby an estimated transfer function in one functional block is copied to another block
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3022 Error paths
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3026 Feedback
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3027 Feedforward
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3035 Models, e.g. of the acoustic system
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3039 Nonlinear, e.g. clipping, numerical truncation, thresholding or variable input and output gain
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3055 Transfer function of the acoustic system
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/3056 Variable gain
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/503 : Diagnostics; Stability; Alarms; Failsafe
• CPC Class Codes: G10K 2210/509 : Hybrid, i.e. combining different technologies, e.g. passive and active
• CPC Class Codes: H04R 3/002 : Damping circuit arrangements for transducers, e.g. motional feedback circuits

Abstract

In accordance with methods and systems of the present disclosure, a processing circuit may implement at least one of: a feedback filter having a response that generates at least a portion of an anti-noise component from a playback corrected error, the playback corrected error based on a difference between the error microphone signal and a secondary path estimate; and a feedforward filter having a response that generates at least a portion of the anti-noise signal from a reference microphone signal. The processing circuit may also implement a secondary path estimate filter configured to model an electro-acoustic path of a source audio signal and have a response that generates a secondary path estimate from the source audio signal and a secondary path estimate performance monitor for monitoring performance of the secondary path estimate filter in modeling the electro-acoustic path.

Claims

1. A personal audio device comprising:

a personal audio device housing;

a transducer coupled to the housing for reproducing an audio signal including both a source audio signal for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;

a reference microphone coupled to the housing for providing a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;

an error microphone coupled to the housing in proximity to the transducer for providing an error microphone signal indicative of the acoustic output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; and

a processing circuit that implements;

an anti-noise generating filter having a response that generates at least a portion of the anti-noise signal;

a secondary path estimate filter configured to model an electro-acoustic path of the source audio signal and have a response that generates a secondary path estimate from the source audio signal; and

a secondary path estimate performance monitor for monitoring performance of the secondary path estimate filter in modeling the electro-acoustic path based on the error microphone signal and a playback correct error signal, wherein the playback corrected error is based on a difference between the error microphone signal and the secondary path estimate.

2. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the secondary path estimate filter is an adaptive filter, and the processing circuit further implements a coefficient control block that shapes the response of the secondary path estimate filter in conformity with the source audio signal and the playback corrected error in order to minimize the playback corrected error.

3. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the anti-noise generating filter comprises an adaptive feedforward filter that generates at least a portion of the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal, and the processing circuit further implements a feedforward coefficient control block that shapes the response of the anti-noise generating filter in conformity with the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal by adapting the response of the anti-noise generating filter to minimize the ambient audio sounds in the error microphone signal.

4. The personal audio device of claim 3, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables adaptation of the anti-noise generating filter.

5. The personal audio device of claim 3, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit resets adaptation of the anti-noise generating filter.

6. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal.

7. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error; and

responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal.

8. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error; and

the processing circuit further implements a programmable feedback gain, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter; and

the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal by setting the programmable feedback gain to zero.

9. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error; and

the processing circuit further implements a programmable feedback gain, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter.

10. The personal audio device of claim 9, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit decreases the programmable feedback gain.

11. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path for a particular frequency range of sound, the processing circuit implements a compensating filter to boost the source audio signal within such frequency range to the source audio signal being communicated to the transducer and the secondary path estimate filter.

12. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the secondary path estimate performance monitor calculates, responsive to a determination that a source audio signal is present, a performance index based on the ratio between a power of the error microphone and a power of the playback corrected error, and the processing circuit controls at least one of the response of the anti-noise generating filter and the response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.

13. The personal audio device of claim 1, wherein the secondary path estimate performance monitor calculates, responsive to a determination that no source audio signal is present, a power ratio as a function of frequency between the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal and the processing circuit controls at least one of the response of the anti-noise generating filter and the response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.

14. A method for canceling ambient audio sounds in the proximity of a transducer of a personal audio device, the method comprising:

receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;

receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer;

generating a source audio signal for playback to a listener;

generating an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds at an acoustic output of the transducer;

generating a secondary path estimate from the source audio signal by filtering the source audio signal with a secondary path estimate filter modeling an electro-acoustic path of the source audio signal;

monitoring with a secondary path estimate performance monitor performance of the secondary path estimate filter in modeling the electro-acoustic path based on the error microphone signal and a playback correct error signal, wherein the playback corrected error is based on a difference between the error microphone signal and the secondary path estimate; and

combining the anti-noise signal with a source audio signal to generate an audio signal provided to the transducer.

15. The method of claim 14, further comprising adapting a response of the secondary path estimate filter to minimize the playback corrected error.

16. The method of claim 14, further comprising generating the anti-noise signal by adapting a response of an adaptive feedforward filter that filters an output of the reference microphone to minimize the ambient audio sounds in the error microphone signal.

17. The method of claim 16, further comprising disabling adaptation of the adaptive feedforward filter responsive to a determination that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

18. The method of claim 16, further comprising resetting adaptation of the adaptive feedforward filter responsive to a determination that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

19. The method of claim 14, further comprising disabling generation of the anti-noise signal responsive to a determination that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

20. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

generating the anti-noise signal from a playback corrected error with a feedback filter;

applying a programmable feedback gain to a path of the anti-noise signal, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the anti-noise signal and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the anti-noise signal; and

disabling generation of the anti-noise signal by setting the programmable feedback gain to zero responsive to a determination that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

21. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

generating the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error;

applying a programmable feedback gain to a path of the anti-noise signal, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the anti-noise signal and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the anti-noise signal; and

decreasing the programmable feedback gain responsive to a determination that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

22. The method of claim 14, further comprising boosting, within a frequency range, the source audio signal responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path.

23. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

calculating a performance index based on the ratio between a power of the error microphone and a power of the playback corrected error responsive to a determination that a source audio signal is present; and

controlling at least one of a response of an anti-noise generating filter for generating the anti-noise signal and a response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.

24. The method of claim 14, further comprising:

calculating a power ratio as a function of frequency between the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal responsive to a determination that no source audio signal is present; and

controlling at least one of a response of an anti-noise generating filter for generating the anti-noise signal and a response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.

25. An integrated circuit for implementing at least a portion of a personal audio device, comprising:

an output for providing a signal to a transducer including both a source audio signal for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effect of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer;

a reference microphone input for receiving a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds;

an error microphone input for receiving an error microphone signal indicative of the output of the transducer and the ambient audio sounds at the transducer; and

a processing circuit that implements;

an anti-noise generating filter having a response that generates at least a portion of the anti-noise signal;

a secondary path estimate filter configured to model an electro-acoustic path of the source audio signal and have a response that generates a secondary path estimate from the source audio signal; and

a secondary path estimate performance monitor for monitoring performance of the secondary path estimate filter in modeling the electro-acoustic path based on the error microphone signal and a playback correct error signal, wherein the playback corrected error is based on a difference between the error microphone signal and the secondary path estimate.

26. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein the secondary path estimate filter is an adaptive filter, and the processing circuit further implements a coefficient control block that shapes the response of the secondary path estimate filter in conformity with the source audio signal and the playback corrected error in order to minimize the playback corrected error, the playback corrected error based on a difference between the error microphone signal and the secondary path estimate.

27. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein the anti-noise generating filter comprises an adaptive feedforward filter that generates at least a portion of the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal, and the processing circuit further implements a feedforward coefficient control block that shapes the response of the anti-noise generating filter in conformity with the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal by adapting the response of the anti-noise generating filter to minimize the ambient audio sounds in the error microphone signal.

28. The integrated circuit of claim 27, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables adaptation of the anti-noise generating filter.

29. The integrated circuit of claim 27, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit resets adaptation of the anti-noise generating filter.

30. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal.

31. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error; and

responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal.

32. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error;

the processing circuit further implements a programmable feedback gain, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter; and

the processing circuit disables the anti-noise generating filter from generating the anti-noise signal by setting the programmable feedback gain to zero.

33. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein:

the anti-noise generating filter comprises a feedback filter having a response that generates the anti-noise signal from the playback corrected error; and

the processing circuit further implements a programmable feedback gain, wherein an increasing programmable feedback gain increases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter and a decreasing programmable feedback gain decreases the portion of the anti-noise signal generated by the anti-noise generating filter.

34. The integrated circuit of claim 33, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path, the processing circuit decreases the programmable feedback gain.

35. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein responsive to a determination by the secondary path estimate performance monitor that the secondary path estimate filter is not sufficiently modeling the electro-acoustic path for a particular frequency range of sound, the processing circuit implements a compensating filter to boost the source audio signal within such frequency range to the source audio signal being communicated to the transducer and the secondary path estimate filter.

36. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein the secondary path estimate performance monitor calculates, responsive to a determination that a source audio signal is present, a performance index based on the ratio between a power of the error microphone and a power of the playback corrected error, and the processing circuit controls at least one of the response of the anti-noise generating filter and the response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.

37. The integrated circuit of claim 25, wherein the secondary path estimate performance monitor calculates, responsive to a determination that no source audio signal is present, a power ratio as a function of frequency between the error microphone signal and the reference microphone signal and the processing circuit controls at least one of the response of the anti-noise generating filter and the response of the secondary path estimate filter based on the performance index.