Statistical analytic method for the determination of the risk posed by file based content

• US 9,330,264 B1
• Filed: 01/20/2015
• Issued: 05/03/2016
• Est. Priority Date: 11/26/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Glasswall (Ip) Limited
• Original Assignee: Glasswall (Ip) Limited
• Inventors: Hutton, Samuel Harrison
• Primary Examiner(s): Ho, Dao
• Application Number:
  US14/600,431
• Publication Number:
  US 20160147998A1
• Time in Patent Office: 469 Days
• Field of Search: 726/25
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/24578 using ranking
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 16/285 Clustering or classification
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/53 by executing in a restricted environment, e.g. sandbox or secure virtual machine
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/55 Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/56 Computer malware detection or handling, e.g. anti-virus arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/562 Static detection
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/577 Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/034 Test or assess a computer or a system
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1408 by monitoring network traffic monitoring network traffic per se H04L43/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1416 Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1425 Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection

Abstract

A system and method for calculating a risk assessment for an electronic file is described. A database of checks, organized into categories, can be used to scan electronic files. The categories of checks can include weights assigned to them. An analyzer can analyze electronic files using the checks. Issues identified by the analyzer can be weighted using the weights to determine a risk assessment for the electronic file.

Claims

1. A system, comprising:

a computer;

a memory in the computer;

a database stored in the memory, the database including;

a plurality of checks organized into a plurality of categories; and

for each of the plurality of categories, a weight assigned to the category, including default weights assigned to the plurality of categories;

a receiver to receive an electronic file;

an analyser to analyse a first corpus of files with known non-conformities to produce a first result and to analyse a second corpus of safe files to produce a second result, and to analyse the electronic file using the plurality of checks in the database;

a statistical analyser to statistically review the first result and the second result and to adjust the default weights assigned to the plurality of categories so that a first calculated risk assessment for the first corpus of files is higher than a second calculated risk assessment for the second corpus of files; and

a threat calculator to calculate a risk assessment for the electronic file using a result from the analyser and the weights assigned to the plurality of categories,

wherein when the risk assessment indicates that the electronic file is likely a threat, the electronic file can be detonated in an electronic sandbox.

2. A system according to claim 1, wherein:

the database further includes for each of the plurality of checks, a second weight assigned to the check; and

the threat calculator is operative to calculate the risk assessment for the electronic file using the result from the analyser and the second weights assigned to the plurality of checks.

3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the receiver is operative to receive the weights assigned to the plurality of categories from a user.

4. A system according to claim 1, wherein:

the weights assigned to the plurality of categories include default weights assigned to the plurality of categories; and

the receiver is operative to receive second weights from a user to assign to the plurality of categories.

5. A system according to claim 1, further comprising a statistical analyser to use the result from the analyser adjust the weights.

6. A system according to claim 1, wherein the system is operative to deliver the electronic file to a second user when the calculated risk assessment is greater than a pre-determined threshold.

7. A system according to claim 1, further comprising the electronic sandbox, the electronic file placed in the electronic sandbox when the risk assessment for the file does not exceed a pre-determined threshold.

8. A system according to claim 7, wherein the system is operative to deliver the electronic file to a second user when an observed operation of the electronic sand box indicates that the electronic file is not a threat.

9. A method, comprising:

receiving an electronic file;

analysing the electronic file using a plurality of checks to determine when the electronic file conforms to an expected format, the plurality of checks organized into a plurality of categories;

determining a weight for each of the plurality of categories, including;

receiving a default weight to assign to each of the plurality of categories;

receiving a first corpus of files with known non-conformities and a second corpus of safe files;

scanning the first corpus of files to produce a first result and the second corpus of files to produce a second result;

statistically analysing the first result and the second result; and

using the analysis of the first result and the second result to adjust the default weight assigned to each of the plurality of categories so that a first calculated risk assessment for the first corpus of files is higher than a second calculated risk assessment for the second corpus of files; and

calculating a final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories,

wherein when the final risk assessment indicates that the electronic file is likely a threat, the electronic file can be detonated in an electronic sandbox.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein:

analysing the electronic file using a plurality of categories to determine when the electronic file conforms to an expected format includes analysing the electronic file using a second plurality of checks from one of the plurality of categories;

determining a weight for each of the plurality of categories includes determining a second weight for each of the second plurality of checks from the one of the plurality of categories; and

calculating a final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories includes calculating the final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of checks from the one of the plurality of categories and the second weights assigned to each of the plurality of checks.

11. A method according to claim 9, further comprising receiving the weight assigned to each of the plurality of categories from a user.

12. A method according to claim 9, wherein determining a weight for each of the plurality of categories further includes adjusting the default weight assigned to each of the plurality of categories according to instruction from a user.

13. A method according to claim 9, further comprising using the final risk assessment of the electronic file to adjust the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories.

14. A method according to claim 9, wherein calculating a final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories includes:

calculating a threat score for the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories;

comparing the threat score with a threshold score; and

when the threat score exceeds the threshold score;

determining that the electronic file is likely not a threat; and

delivering the electronic file to a user.

15. A method according to claim 14, wherein calculating a final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories further includes, when the threat score does not exceed the threshold score, determining that the electronic file is likely a threat.

16. A method according to claim 15, wherein determining that the electronic file is likely a threat includes:

placing the electronic file in the sandbox;

detonating the electronic file in the sandbox; and

observing the operation of the sandbox after detonating the electronic file.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein determining that the electronic file is likely a threat further includes, when the observed operation of the sandbox indicates that the electronic file is not a threat, delivering the electronic file to the user.

18. A tangible computer-readable medium storing non-transitory instructions that, when executed by a machine, result in:

receiving an electronic file;

analysing the electronic file using a plurality of checks to determine when the electronic file conforms to an expected format, the plurality of checks organized into a plurality of categories;

determining a weight for each of the plurality of categories, including;

receiving a default weight to assign to each of the plurality of categories;

receiving a first corpus of files with known non-conformities and a second corpus of safe files;

scanning the first corpus of files to produce a first result and the second corpus of files to produce a second result;

statistically analysing the first result and the second result; and

using the analysis of the first result and the second result to adjust the default weight assigned to each of the plurality of categories so that a first calculated risk assessment for the first corpus of files is higher than a second calculated risk assessment for the second corpus of files; and

calculating a final risk assessment of the electronic file using the plurality of categories and the weights assigned to each of the plurality of categories,

wherein when the final risk assessment indicates that the electronic file is likely a threat, the electronic file can be detonated in an electronic sandbox.