Wireless energy transfer
First Claim
1. A wireless power system comprising:
- a source resonator and a power supply coupled to the source resonator to provide power to the source resonator, the source resonator having a resonant frequency ω
1, an intrinsic loss rate Γ
1, and an intrinsic quality factor Q1=ω
1/(2Γ
1), the source resonator comprising at least one loop of conductive material; and
a device resonator and a load coupled to the device resonator to receive power from the device resonator and provide power to the load, the device resonator having a resonant frequency ω
2, an intrinsic loss rate Γ
2, and an intrinsic quality factor Q2=ω
2/(2Γ
2), the device resonator comprising at least one loop of conductive material,wherein the device resonator is configured to be movable relative to the source resonator over a range of distances D between the source resonator and the device resonator,wherein the source resonator and the device resonator are configured to resonantly and wirelessly couple electromagnetic power from the source resonator to the device resonator using non-radiative electromagnetic induction having a coupling coefficient κ
, and wherein the intrinsic loss rates satisfy κ
/√
{square root over (Γ
1Γ
2)}>
1 over the range of distances D, andwherein the power provided to the load from the device resonator defines a work drainage rate Γ
w, and wherein the work drainage rateΓ
w, is configured to be set such that Γ
w=Γ
2√
{square root over (1+wp·
(κ
2/Γ
1·
Γ
2))} for some value of the coupling coefficient κ
in the range of distances D, wherein wp is a parameter satisfying wp>
1.
2 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
Disclosed is an apparatus for use in wireless energy transfer, which includes a first resonator structure configured to transfer energy non-radiatively with a second resonator structure over a distance greater than a characteristic size of the second resonator structure. The non-radiative energy transfer is mediated by a coupling of a resonant field evanescent tail of the first resonator structure and a resonant field evanescent tail of the second resonator structure.
491 Citations
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 9,831,722 B2
Filed 03/29/2016
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 10,141,790 B2
Filed 10/25/2017
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 10,666,091 B2
Filed 11/08/2018
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
TUNING AND GAIN CONTROL IN ELECTRO-MAGNETIC POWER SYSTEMS | ||
Patent #
US 20110018361A1
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q CAPACITIVELY LOADED CONDUCTING LOOPS | ||
Patent #
US 20110043046A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS DELIVERY OF POWER TO A FIXED-GEOMETRY POWER PART | ||
Patent #
US 20110049998A1
Filed 11/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONATORS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110012431A1
Filed 09/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110074347A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS DESKTOP IT ENVIRONMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20110049996A1
Filed 08/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110074218A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
PACKAGING AND DETAILS OF A WIRELESS POWER DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20110025131A1
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Contactless battery charging apparel | ||
Patent #
US 7,863,859 B2
Filed 06/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Cynetic Designs Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Cynetic Designs Ltd.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110089895A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20110140544A1
Filed 02/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
SHORT RANGE EFFICIENT WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110148219A1
Filed 02/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20110221278A1
Filed 05/20/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS OF LOAD DETECTION FOR A PLANAR WIRELESS POWER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20110169339A1
Filed 03/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
FLAT, ASYMMETRIC, AND E-FIELD CONFINED WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20110198939A1
Filed 03/04/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110193419A1
Filed 02/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESSLY POWERED SPEAKER | ||
Patent #
US 20110181122A1
Filed 04/01/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE MATCHING, TUNING, AND POWER TRANSFER OF WIRELESS POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20110227528A1
Filed 05/13/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR PORTABLE WIRELESS POWER CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20110227530A1
Filed 05/26/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,022,576 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER RECEIVING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER FEEDING SYSTEM, AND ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110162895A1
Filed 03/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20110241618A1
Filed 06/17/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
OPTIMIZATION OF WIRELESS POWER DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100244576A1
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
PHASED ARRAY WIRELESS RESONANT POWER DELIVERY SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100033021A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER FOR CHARGEABLE AND CHARGING DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100225272A1
Filed 01/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
REDUCED JAMMING BETWEEN RECEIVERS AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTERS | ||
Patent #
US 20100151808A1
Filed 11/05/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS HIGH POWER TRANSFER UNDER REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117596A1
Filed 07/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Self-Charging Electric Vehicles and Aircraft, and Wireless Energy Distribution System | ||
Patent #
US 20100231163A1
Filed 09/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Paradigm Shift Solutions
|
Original Assignee
Governing Dynamics LLC
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100289449A1
Filed 12/18/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100187913A1
Filed 04/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
EFFICIENCY INDICATOR FOR INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201513A1
Filed 10/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM AND A LOAD APPARATUS IN THE SAME WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100164295A1
Filed 11/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Maxell Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi Consumer Electronics Company Limited
|
Security for wireless transfer of electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 20100276995A1
Filed 04/29/2009
|
Current Assignee
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR FURNISHINGS AND BUILDING ELEMENTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201202A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESSLY POWERED SPEAKER | ||
Patent #
US 20100081379A1
Filed 09/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
ELECTRICAL POWERED VEHICLE AND POWER FEEDING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100225271A1
Filed 09/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
APPLICATIONS OF WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING COUPLED ANTENNAS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117456A1
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER AND DATA TRANSFER FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194335A1
Filed 11/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
EFFICIENT NEAR-FIELD WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING ADIABATIC SYSTEM VARIATIONS | ||
Patent #
US 20100148589A1
Filed 10/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONANCE-TYPE NON-CONTACT CHARGING APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100156346A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Jidoshi Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201313A1
Filed 10/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
BIDIRECTIONAL WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100148723A1
Filed 09/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER IN PUBLIC PLACES | ||
Patent #
US 20100201201A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER RECEIVING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER FEEDING SYSTEM, AND ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100065352A1
Filed 08/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR CHARGEABLE DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100225270A1
Filed 10/22/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
PACKAGING AND DETAILS OF A WIRELESS POWER DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100327661A1
Filed 09/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING COUPLED RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117455A1
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RETROFITTING WIRELESS POWER AND NEAR-FIELD COMMUNICATION IN ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194334A1
Filed 11/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER DISTANCES TO A MOVING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100187911A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER WITH LIGHTING | ||
Patent #
US 20100194207A1
Filed 02/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
David S. Graham
|
Original Assignee
David S. Graham
|
RESONATORS AND THEIR COUPLING CHARACTERISTICS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER VIA MAGNETIC COUPLING | ||
Patent #
US 20100327660A1
Filed 08/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE MATCHING AND TUNING OF HF WIRELESS POWER TRANSMIT ANTENNA | ||
Patent #
US 20100117454A1
Filed 07/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND POWER MANAGEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20100017249A1
Filed 07/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Charge Fusion Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Charge Fusion Technologies LLC
|
Resonator for wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20100156570A1
Filed 12/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER A DISTANCE WITH DEVICES AT VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100207458A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Method and Apparatus of Load Detection for a Planar Wireless Power System | ||
Patent #
US 20100066349A1
Filed 09/12/2008
|
Current Assignee
University of Florida Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
University of Florida Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Multilayer structures for magnetic shielding | ||
Patent #
US 7,795,708 B2
Filed 06/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
CONCURRENT WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION AND NEAR-FIELD COMMUNICATION | ||
Patent #
US 20100190436A1
Filed 08/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Short Range Efficient Wireless Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20100038970A1
Filed 04/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,825,543 B2
Filed 03/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
APPARATUS FOR DRIVING ARTIFICIAL RETINA USING MEDIUM-RANGE WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION TECHNIQUE | ||
Patent #
US 20100094381A1
Filed 06/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
RECEIVE ANTENNA ARRANGEMENT FOR WIRELESS POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20100210233A1
Filed 09/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
MULTI POWER SOURCED ELECTRIC VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100109604A1
Filed 05/09/2008
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER INFRASTRUCTURE | ||
Patent #
US 20100256831A1
Filed 04/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Apparatus and system for transmitting power wirelessly | ||
Patent #
US 7,843,288 B2
Filed 04/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Postech Academy-Industry Foundation
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Postech Academy-Industry Foundation
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q TO MORE THAN ONE DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100127575A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100045114A1
Filed 08/20/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100201310A1
Filed 04/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
Apparatus for wireless power transmission using high Q low frequency near magnetic field resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20100123530A1
Filed 11/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
ANTENNA SHARING FOR WIRELESSLY POWERED DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100222010A1
Filed 01/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
MAXIMIZING POWER YIELD FROM WIRELESS POWER MAGNETIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100171370A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER APPARATUS AND WIRELESS POWER-RECEIVING METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20100244583A1
Filed 03/31/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244839A1
Filed 03/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
PASSIVE RECEIVERS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100190435A1
Filed 08/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SPREAD SPECTRUM WIRELESS RESONANT POWER DELIVERY | ||
Patent #
US 20100034238A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100052431A1
Filed 09/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100115474A1
Filed 11/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100237708A1
Filed 03/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Noncontact Electric Power Transmission System | ||
Patent #
US 20100219696A1
Filed 02/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co Limited
|
Original Assignee
TOKO Incorporated
|
PARASITIC DEVICES FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100277120A1
Filed 04/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q SUB-WAVELENGTH RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100123355A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q AT HIGH EFFICIENCY | ||
Patent #
US 20100127574A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING | ||
Patent #
US 20100253281A1
Filed 03/02/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Power Transfer Apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20100244582A1
Filed 03/30/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWERING AND CHARGING STATION | ||
Patent #
US 20100277005A1
Filed 07/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
NONCONTACT POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100295506A1
Filed 09/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
TRANSMITTERS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100184371A1
Filed 09/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
TRACKING RECEIVER DEVICES WITH WIRELESS POWER SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20100248622A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q DEVICES AT VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100123354A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
IMPEDANCE CHANGE DETECTION IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100217553A1
Filed 12/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
INTEGRATED WIRELESS RESONANT POWER CHARGING AND COMMUNICATION CHANNEL | ||
Patent #
US 20100036773A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
FLAT, ASYMMETRIC, AND E-FIELD CONFINED WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100052811A1
Filed 08/20/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100102639A1
Filed 09/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100102641A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q SIMILAR RESONANT FREQUENCY RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100096934A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER TO A MOVING DEVICE BETWEEN HIGH-Q RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100102640A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100109443A1
Filed 07/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER A DISTANCE AT HIGH EFFICIENCY | ||
Patent #
US 20100127573A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR PORTABLE WIRELESS POWER CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100127660A1
Filed 08/18/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q FROM MORE THAN ONE SOURCE | ||
Patent #
US 20100123353A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Power supply system and method of controlling power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 20100123452A1
Filed 10/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS VARIABLE DISTANCES WITH HIGH-Q CAPACITIVELY-LOADED CONDUCTING-WIRE LOOPS | ||
Patent #
US 20100133919A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,741,734 B2
Filed 07/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER VARIABLE DISTANCES BETWEEN RESONATORS OF SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR RESONANT FREQUENCIES | ||
Patent #
US 20100133918A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE POWER CONTROL FOR WIRELESS CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100181961A1
Filed 11/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS A DISTANCE TO A MOVING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100133920A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
HIGH EFFICIENCY AND POWER TRANSFER IN WIRELESS POWER MAGNETIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100181844A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR VEHICLES | ||
Patent #
US 20100201189A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER FOR CHARGING DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194206A1
Filed 11/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER CHARGING TIMING AND CHARGING CONTROL | ||
Patent #
US 20100213895A1
Filed 10/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MAGNETIC POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201205A1
Filed 04/23/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
INDUCED POWER TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT | ||
Patent #
US 20100213770A1
Filed 09/15/2008
|
Current Assignee
Hideo Kikuchi
|
Original Assignee
Hideo Kikuchi
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201316A1
Filed 02/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201204A1
Filed 02/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20100237707A1
Filed 02/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLYING APPARATUS AND ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING SYSTEM USING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100219695A1
Filed 02/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
COIL UNIT, AND POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE AND POWER RECEPTION DEVICE USING THE COIL UNIT | ||
Patent #
US 20100244579A1
Filed 03/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
|
WIRELESS ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY METHOD AND WIRELESS ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244581A1
Filed 03/29/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER SYSTEM AND PROXIMITY EFFECTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100237706A1
Filed 02/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
POWER TRANSMMISSION APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF TRANSMITTING POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20100244578A1
Filed 03/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER BRIDGE | ||
Patent #
US 20100225175A1
Filed 05/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244580A1
Filed 03/24/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER RANGE INCREASE USING PARASITIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100231053A1
Filed 05/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20100244577A1
Filed 03/11/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE, POWER TRANSMISSION METHOD, POWER RECEPTION DEVICE, POWER RECEPTION METHOD, AND POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100259109A1
Filed 04/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTING SYSTEM, POWER RECEIVING STATION, POWER TRANSMITTING STATION, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | ||
Patent #
US 20100264746A1
Filed 03/30/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
LONG RANGE LOW FREQUENCY RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20100253152A1
Filed 03/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONATORS FOR WIRELESS POWER APPLICATIONS | ||
Patent #
US 20100264745A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
PLANAR COIL AND CONTACTLESS ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE USING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100277004A1
Filed 12/24/2008
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
MOBILE TERMINALS AND BATTERY PACKS FOR MOBILE TERMINALS | ||
Patent #
US 20100295505A1
Filed 05/24/2010
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hanrim Postech Co. Ltd.
|
ADAPTIVE IMPEDANCE TUNING IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100277003A1
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATING TO MULTI-DIMENSIONAL WIRELESS CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100289341A1
Filed 09/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Inductively powered secondary assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,474,058 B2
Filed 11/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY, REMOTE DEVICE POWERED BY INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20090010028A1
Filed 09/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless Energy Transfer Using Coupled Antennas | ||
Patent #
US 20090015075A1
Filed 07/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power System and Proximity Effects | ||
Patent #
US 20090045772A1
Filed 06/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Transmitter head and system for contactless energy transmission | ||
Patent #
US 7,492,247 B2
Filed 02/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sew-Eurodrive GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Sew-Eurodrive GmbH Company KG
|
INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20090051224A1
Filed 08/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Deployable Antennas for Wireless Power | ||
Patent #
US 20090033564A1
Filed 08/02/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
LONG RANGE LOW FREQUENCY RESONATOR AND MATERIALS | ||
Patent #
US 20090058189A1
Filed 08/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
CONTACTLESS POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20090067198A1
Filed 08/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Michael Thomas Mcelhinny, David Jeffrey Graham, Jesse Frederick Goellner, Alexander Brailovsky
|
High Efficiency and Power Transfer in Wireless Power Magnetic Resonators | ||
Patent #
US 20090072629A1
Filed 09/16/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Antennas for Wireless Power applications | ||
Patent #
US 20090072628A1
Filed 09/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Maximizing Power Yield from Wireless Power Magnetic Resonators | ||
Patent #
US 20090072627A1
Filed 09/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Transmitters and receivers for wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090079268A1
Filed 09/16/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090108679A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
ATI Technologies ULC
|
Power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 7,514,818 B2
Filed 10/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Electric Works Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDUCTIVE CHARGING OF PORTABLE DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20090096413A1
Filed 05/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Power adapter for a remote device | ||
Patent #
US 7,518,267 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
SYSTEM, DEVICES, AND METHOD FOR ENERGIZING PASSIVE WIRELESS DATA COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20090108997A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS ENERGY AND/OR DATA TRANSMISSION BETWEEN A SOURCE DEVICE AND AT LEAST ONE TARGET DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20090085408A1
Filed 08/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Maquet GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Maquet GmbH Company KG
|
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD COIL | ||
Patent #
US 20090085706A1
Filed 09/24/2008
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Biological Effects of Magnetic Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090102292A1
Filed 09/18/2008
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,525,283 B2
Filed 02/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless Power Range Increase Using Parasitic Antennas | ||
Patent #
US 20090134712A1
Filed 11/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Bridge | ||
Patent #
US 20090127937A1
Filed 02/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
NON-CONTACT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, METHOD OF ADJUSTING RESONANCE FREQUENCY OF NON-CONTACT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ANTENNA, AND MOBILE TERMINAL APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20090146892A1
Filed 11/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan Incorporated
|
ENERGY TRANSFERRING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20090153273A1
Filed 06/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Antenna arrangement for inductive power transmission and use of the antenna arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 7,545,337 B2
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090160261A1
Filed 12/19/2007
|
Current Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Wireless powering and charging station | ||
Patent #
US 20090179502A1
Filed 01/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Transfer using Magneto Mechanical Systems | ||
Patent #
US 20090167449A1
Filed 10/13/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
VEHICLE POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS AND VEHICLE WINDOW MEMBER | ||
Patent #
US 20090189458A1
Filed 01/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY WITH DUTY CYCLE CONTROL | ||
Patent #
US 20090174263A1
Filed 01/07/2009
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090195333A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090195332A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless desktop IT environment | ||
Patent #
US 20090212636A1
Filed 01/11/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Antennas and Their Coupling Characteristics for Wireless Power Transfer via Magnetic Coupling | ||
Patent #
US 20090213028A1
Filed 02/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
APPARATUS, A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR ENABLING ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090237194A1
Filed 09/11/2007
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090224856A1
Filed 05/08/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Packaging and Details of a Wireless Power device | ||
Patent #
US 20090224609A1
Filed 03/09/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Ferrite Antennas for Wireless Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090224608A1
Filed 02/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE COIL PRIMARY | ||
Patent #
US 20090230777A1
Filed 03/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power Transmitting Apparatus, Power Transmission Method, Program, and Power Transmission System | ||
Patent #
US 20090271048A1
Filed 04/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS, POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMISSION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20090271047A1
Filed 04/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Tuning and Gain Control in Electro-Magnetic power systems | ||
Patent #
US 20090243394A1
Filed 03/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Power Exchange Device, Power Exchange Method, Program, and Power Exchange System | ||
Patent #
US 20090251008A1
Filed 04/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090267709A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090267710A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Low frequency transcutaneous energy transfer to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 7,599,743 B2
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Packaging and Details of a Wireless Power device | ||
Patent #
US 20090243397A1
Filed 03/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Charging System | ||
Patent #
US 20090267558A1
Filed 06/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Spacon Co. Ltd.
|
WIRELESS CHARGING MODULE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20090289595A1
Filed 10/09/2008
|
Current Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,615,936 B2
Filed 04/27/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power Transmission Device, Power Transmission Method, Program, Power Receiving Device and Power Transfer System | ||
Patent #
US 20090281678A1
Filed 05/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
REVERSE LINK SIGNALING VIA RECEIVE ANTENNA IMPEDANCE MODULATION | ||
Patent #
US 20090286476A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SIGNALING CHARGING IN WIRELESS POWER ENVIRONMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20090286475A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AN ENLARGED WIRELESS CHARGING AREA | ||
Patent #
US 20090284218A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENTS | ||
Patent #
US 20090284245A1
Filed 11/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL FOR A WIRELESS CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20090284369A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADAPTIVE TUNING OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090284220A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE ENHANCEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20090284083A1
Filed 05/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RECEIVE ANTENNA FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090284227A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Wireless Delivery of power to a Fixed-Geometry power part | ||
Patent #
US 20090273242A1
Filed 05/05/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
REPEATERS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090286470A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH NEGATIVE RESISTANCE IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSFERS | ||
Patent #
US 20090284082A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,639,514 B2
Filed 03/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless delivery of power to a mobile powered device | ||
Patent #
US 20090299918A1
Filed 05/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Downhole Coils | ||
Patent #
US 20080012569A1
Filed 09/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for delivering energy to an electrical or electronic device via a wireless link | ||
Patent #
US 20080014897A1
Filed 01/17/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Flexible Circuit for Downhole Antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20080030415A1
Filed 08/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20080067874A1
Filed 09/14/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Inductive power adapter | ||
Patent #
US 7,378,817 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductive battery charger | ||
Patent #
US 7,375,493 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively charged battery pack | ||
Patent #
US 7,375,492 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,385,357 B2
Filed 11/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
System and method for powering a load | ||
Patent #
US 7,382,636 B2
Filed 10/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
INDUCTIVELY COUPLED BALLAST CIRCUIT | ||
Patent #
US 20080191638A1
Filed 02/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Transmission Of Power Supply For Robot Applications Between A First Member And A Second Member Arranged Rotatable Relative To One Another | ||
Patent #
US 20080197710A1
Filed 11/30/2005
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
WIRELESS POWER APPARATUS AND METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20080211320A1
Filed 01/22/2008
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Amplification Relay Device of Electromagnetic Wave and a Radio Electric Power Conversion Apparatus Using the Above Device | ||
Patent #
US 20080266748A1
Filed 07/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Andong National University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, JC Protek Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Andong National University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, JC Protek Company Limited
|
No point of contact charging system | ||
Patent #
US 7,443,135 B2
Filed 04/11/2005
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hanrim Postech Co. Ltd.
|
High power wireless resonant energy transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 20080265684A1
Filed 10/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Leslie Farkas
|
Original Assignee
Laszlo Farkas
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20080278264A1
Filed 03/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
OPTIMIZING ENERGY TRANSMISSION IN A LEADLESS TISSUE STIMULATION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080294208A1
Filed 05/23/2007
|
Current Assignee
EBR Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
EBR Systems Inc.
|
Resonator structure and method of producing it | ||
Patent #
US 7,466,213 B2
Filed 09/27/2004
|
Current Assignee
Qorvo Inc.
|
Original Assignee
NXP B.V.
|
Portable inductive power station | ||
Patent #
US 7,462,951 B1
Filed 08/11/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power transmission system, apparatus and method with communication | ||
Patent #
US 20070010295A1
Filed 07/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Passive dynamic antenna tuning circuit for a radio frequency identification reader | ||
Patent #
US 20070013483A1
Filed 06/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Allflex USA Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Allflex USA Incorporated
|
Implantable device for vital signs monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20070016089A1
Filed 07/15/2005
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc., Hi-Tronics Designs Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc., Hi-Tronics Designs Inc.
|
Wireless power transmission systems and methods | ||
Patent #
US 20070021140A1
Filed 07/22/2005
|
Current Assignee
Emerson Process Management Power Water Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Emerson Process Management Power Water Solutions Incorporated
|
Tag multiplication | ||
Patent #
US 20070008140A1
Filed 03/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
III Holdings 3 LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Battery Chargers and Methods for Extended Battery Life | ||
Patent #
US 20070024246A1
Filed 07/27/2006
|
Current Assignee
David Flaugher
|
Original Assignee
David Flaugher
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,180,248 B2
Filed 10/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductive power transfer units having flux shields | ||
Patent #
US 20070064406A1
Filed 09/08/2004
|
Current Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
Spatially decoupled twin secondary coils for optimizing transcutaneous energy transfer (TET) power transfer characteristics | ||
Patent #
US 7,191,007 B2
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Resonator system | ||
Patent #
US 7,193,418 B2
Filed 06/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Bruker Switzerland AG
|
Original Assignee
Bruker Biospin AG
|
CHARGING APPARATUS AND CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070069687A1
Filed 08/09/2006
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan Incorporated
|
HIGH PERFORMANCE INTERCONNECT DEVICES & STRUCTURES | ||
Patent #
US 20070105429A1
Filed 11/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Radio-frequency (RF) power portal | ||
Patent #
US 20070117596A1
Filed 11/17/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,212,414 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
RADIO TAG AND SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070096875A1
Filed 05/22/2006
|
Current Assignee
Visible Assets Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Visible Assets Incorporated
|
System and method for contact free transfer of power | ||
Patent #
US 20070145830A1
Filed 12/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Power Science Inc.
|
Original Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Antenna Arrangement For Inductive Power Transmission And Use Of The Antenna Arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 20070126650A1
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 7,233,137 B2
Filed 09/23/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
ADAPTIVE INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20070171681A1
Filed 03/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method for monitoring end of life for battery | ||
Patent #
US 7,251,527 B2
Filed 07/31/2003
|
Current Assignee
Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated
|
Primary units, methods and systems for contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,239,110 B2
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Portable contact-less power transfer devices and rechargeable batteries | ||
Patent #
US 7,248,017 B2
Filed 11/22/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
SPASHPOWER LIMITED
|
Multi-receiver communication system with distributed aperture antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20070176840A1
Filed 02/06/2003
|
Current Assignee
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SOURCE AND CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070182367A1
Filed 01/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Method and system for powering an electronic device via a wireless link | ||
Patent #
US 20070178945A1
Filed 04/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Systems and methods of medical monitoring according to patient state | ||
Patent #
US 20070208263A1
Filed 02/27/2007
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20070222542A1
Filed 07/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless battery charger via carrier frequency signal | ||
Patent #
US 7,288,918 B2
Filed 03/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Michael Vincent Distefano
|
Original Assignee
Michael Vincent Distefano
|
Device and Method of Non-Contact Energy Transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20070267918A1
Filed 04/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Geir Gyland
|
Original Assignee
Geir Gyland
|
Tool for an Industrial Robot | ||
Patent #
US 20070276538A1
Filed 04/06/2004
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Adaptive pulse width modulated resonant Class-D converter | ||
Patent #
US 5,986,895 A
Filed 06/05/1998
|
Current Assignee
Astec International Limited
|
Original Assignee
Astec International Limited
|
Coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 5,959,245 A
Filed 05/29/1997
|
Current Assignee
CommScope Inc.
|
Original Assignee
CommScope Inc.
|
Sizing of an electromagnetic transponder system for an operation in extreme proximity | ||
Patent #
US 7,058,357 B1
Filed 07/13/2000
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Original Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Transcutaneous energy transmission system with full wave Class E rectifier | ||
Patent #
US 6,240,318 B1
Filed 10/27/1999
|
Current Assignee
Richard P. Phillips
|
Original Assignee
Richard P. Phillips
|
Structure of signal transmission line | ||
Patent #
US 6,683,256 B2
Filed 03/27/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ta-San Kao
|
Original Assignee
Ta-San Kao
|
Tunable ferroelectric resonator arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 7,069,064 B2
Filed 02/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
High efficiency channel drop filter with absorption induced on/off switching and modulation | ||
Patent #
US 6,101,300 A
Filed 05/15/1998
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Planar resonator for wireless power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,960,968 B2
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Transponders, Interrogators, systems and methods for elimination of interrogator synchronization requirement | ||
Patent #
US 5,541,604 A
Filed 09/03/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Operation in very close coupling of an electromagnetic transponder system | ||
Patent #
US 6,703,921 B1
Filed 04/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Original Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Systems and methods for automated resonant circuit tuning | ||
Patent #
US 20060001509A1
Filed 06/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Stheno Corp.
|
Original Assignee
Phillip R. Gibbs
|
Wireless and powerless sensor and interrogator | ||
Patent #
US 6,988,026 B2
Filed 11/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC
|
Original Assignee
Automotive Technologies International Incorporated
|
Pulse frequency modulation for induction charge device | ||
Patent #
US 20060022636A1
Filed 07/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
KYE Systems Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KYE Systems Corporation
|
Multilayer cavity slot antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20060044188A1
Filed 08/31/2004
|
Current Assignee
North Star Innovations Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
|
Method for authenticating a user to a service of a service provider | ||
Patent #
US 20060053296A1
Filed 05/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20060061323A1
Filed 10/28/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Self-adjusting RF assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20060066443A1
Filed 09/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Tagsys SA
|
Original Assignee
Tagsys SA
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,027,311 B2
Filed 10/15/2004
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Feedthrough filter capacitor assembly with internally grounded hermetic insulator | ||
Patent #
US 7,035,076 B1
Filed 08/15/2005
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Original Assignee
Greatbatch-Sierra Inc.
|
Ultrasonic rod waveguide-radiator | ||
Patent #
US 20060090956A1
Filed 11/04/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sergei L. Peshkovsky
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Ultrasound Solutions Inc.
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,042,196 B2
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Heating system and heater | ||
Patent #
US 20060132045A1
Filed 12/17/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Optical coupled-resonator filters with asymmetric coupling | ||
Patent #
US 20060159392A1
Filed 01/11/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
CAPACITIVELY COUPLED POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20060164868A1
Filed 10/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings
|
Original Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20060164866A1
Filed 02/17/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Device for brain stimulation using RF energy harvesting | ||
Patent #
US 20060184209A1
Filed 09/02/2005
|
Current Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Original Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Explantation of implantable medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20060184210A1
Filed 04/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Sensor apparatus management methods and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20060181242A1
Filed 03/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Energy harvesting circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,084,605 B2
Filed 10/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Original Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Actuator system for use in control of a sheet or web forming process | ||
Patent #
US 20060185809A1
Filed 02/23/2005
|
Current Assignee
ABB Limited
|
Original Assignee
ABB
|
Battery charging assembly for use on a locomotive | ||
Patent #
US 20060214626A1
Filed 03/25/2005
|
Current Assignee
KIM HOTSTART MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Original Assignee
KIM HOTSTART MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Adapting portable electrical devices to receive power wirelessly | ||
Patent #
US 20060205381A1
Filed 12/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method, apparatus and system for power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20060199620A1
Filed 02/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Inductive powering surface for powering portable devices | ||
Patent #
US 20060202665A1
Filed 05/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,126,450 B2
Filed 02/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Electric vehicle having multiple-use APU system | ||
Patent #
US 20060219448A1
Filed 03/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Aptiv Technologies Limited
|
Original Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,116,200 B2
Filed 04/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,118,240 B2
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Short-range wireless power transmission and reception | ||
Patent #
US 20060238365A1
Filed 09/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
Elio Vecchione, Conor Keegan
|
Original Assignee
Elio Vecchione, Conor Keegan
|
Biothermal power source for implantable devices | ||
Patent #
US 7,127,293 B2
Filed 03/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Biomed Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Biomed Solutions LLC
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,132,918 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power transmission network | ||
Patent #
US 20060270440A1
Filed 05/22/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Dielectrically loaded coaxial resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20060284708A1
Filed 02/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
MANSIONS OF THOUGHT RD L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
MASIONS OF THOUGHT RD L.L.C.
|
High Q factor sensor | ||
Patent #
US 7,147,604 B1
Filed 08/07/2002
|
Current Assignee
St. Jude Medical Luxembourg Holdings Ii S.A.R.L.
|
Original Assignee
CardioMEMS Incorporated
|
Powering devices using RF energy harvesting | ||
Patent #
US 20060281435A1
Filed 06/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
System, method and apparatus for contact-less battery charging with dynamic control | ||
Patent #
US 6,844,702 B2
Filed 05/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Method of rendering a mechanical heart valve non-thrombogenic with an electrical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050021134A1
Filed 06/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
JS Vascular Inc.
|
Original Assignee
JS Vascular Inc.
|
Magnetically coupled antenna range extender | ||
Patent #
US 6,839,035 B1
Filed 10/07/2003
|
Current Assignee
CTT Corporation Systems
|
Original Assignee
CTT Corporation Systems
|
Vehicle interface | ||
Patent #
US 20050007067A1
Filed 06/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Multi-frequency piezoelectric energy harvester | ||
Patent #
US 6,858,970 B2
Filed 10/21/2002
|
Current Assignee
The Boeing Co.
|
Original Assignee
The Boeing Co.
|
Temperature regulated implant | ||
Patent #
US 20050033382A1
Filed 08/04/2004
|
Current Assignee
Cochlear Limited
|
Original Assignee
Peter Single
|
Antenna coil and transmission antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20050030251A1
Filed 09/30/2002
|
Current Assignee
Sumida Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sumida Corporation
|
Energy transfer amplification for intrabody devices | ||
Patent #
US 20050027192A1
Filed 07/29/2003
|
Current Assignee
Biosense Webster Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Biosense Webster Incorporated
|
Energy harvesting circuits and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,856,291 B2
Filed 07/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Original Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Method and apparatus for efficient power/data transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20050085873A1
Filed 10/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Original Assignee
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Semiconductor photodetector | ||
Patent #
US 20050104064A1
Filed 03/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
The Provost Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin
|
Original Assignee
The Provost Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 20050093475A1
Filed 10/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20050104453A1
Filed 10/15/2004
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Method of manufacturing a lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20050116650A1
Filed 10/29/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050140482A1
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Lily Ka-Lai Cheng, James Westwood Hay, Pilgrim Giles William Beart
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050116683A1
Filed 05/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,906,495 B2
Filed 12/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Opportunistic power supply charge system for portable unit | ||
Patent #
US 20050127866A1
Filed 12/11/2003
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050127849A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Relaying apparatus and communication system | ||
Patent #
US 20050125093A1
Filed 09/21/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050122059A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050122058A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050127850A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050135122A1
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Lily Ka-Lai Cheng, James Westwood Hay, Pilgrim Giles William Beart
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,917,163 B2
Filed 02/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Mach-Zehnder interferometer using photonic band gap crystals | ||
Patent #
US 6,917,431 B2
Filed 05/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Charging apparatus by non-contact dielectric feeding | ||
Patent #
US 20050156560A1
Filed 04/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
ALPS Electric Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
ALPS Electric Company Limited
|
Transferring power between devices in a personal area network | ||
Patent #
US 20050151511A1
Filed 01/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Magnetic field production system, and configuration for wire-free supply of a large number of sensors and/or actuators using a magnetic field production system | ||
Patent #
US 6,937,130 B2
Filed 09/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Method and apparatus of using magnetic material with residual magnetization in transient electromagnetic measurement | ||
Patent #
US 20050189945A1
Filed 01/18/2005
|
Current Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
|
Wireless battery charger via carrier frequency signal | ||
Patent #
US 20050194926A1
Filed 03/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Michael Vincent Di Stefano
|
Original Assignee
Michael Vincent Di Stefano
|
Non-contact pumping of light emitters via non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050253152A1
Filed 05/11/2004
|
Current Assignee
Los Alamos National Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Los Alamos National Security LLC
|
Subcutaneously implantable power supply | ||
Patent #
US 6,961,619 B2
Filed 07/08/2002
|
Current Assignee
Don E. Casey
|
Original Assignee
Don E. Casey
|
Charging of devices by microwave power beaming | ||
Patent #
US 6,967,462 B1
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
NasaGlenn Research Center
|
Original Assignee
NasaGlenn Research Center
|
Transcutaneous energy transfer primary coil with a high aspect ferrite core | ||
Patent #
US 20050288742A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Medical implant having closed loop transcutaneous energy transfer (TET) power transfer regulation circuitry | ||
Patent #
US 20050288739A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Incorporated
|
Low frequency transcutaneous energy transfer to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050288741A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,975,198 B2
Filed 04/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Low frequency transcutaneous telemetry to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050288740A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Planar resonator for wireless power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20040000974A1
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Radio frequency identification system for a fluid treatment system | ||
Patent #
US 6,673,250 B2
Filed 06/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Low voltage electrified furniture unit | ||
Patent #
US 20040026998A1
Filed 06/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Kimball International Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Kimball International Incorporated
|
Coaxial cable and coaxial multicore cable | ||
Patent #
US 6,696,647 B2
Filed 05/23/2002
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Cable Limited
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi Cable Limited
|
Oscillator module incorporating looped-stub resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20040100338A1
Filed 11/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsemi Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Phasor Technologies Corporation
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,731,071 B2
Filed 04/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Antenna with near-field radiation control | ||
Patent #
US 20040113847A1
Filed 12/12/2002
|
Current Assignee
Blackberry Limited
|
Original Assignee
Blackberry Limited
|
System for a machine having a large number of proximity sensors, as well as a proximity sensor, and a primary winding for this purpose | ||
Patent #
US 6,749,119 B2
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply with communication | ||
Patent #
US 20040130915A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Enhanced RF wireless adaptive power provisioning system for small devices | ||
Patent #
US 20040130425A1
Filed 08/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Original Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20040130916A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Remote power recharge for electronic equipment | ||
Patent #
US 20040142733A1
Filed 12/29/2003
|
Current Assignee
Ronald J. Parise
|
Original Assignee
Ronald J. Parise
|
Adapter | ||
Patent #
US 20040150934A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Transmission of information from an implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 6,772,011 B2
Filed 08/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
TC1 LLC
|
Original Assignee
Thoratec LLC
|
System and method for wireless electrical power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 6,798,716 B1
Filed 06/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
BC SYSTEMS INC.
|
Original Assignee
BC SYSTEMS INC.
|
System and method for inductive charging a wireless mouse | ||
Patent #
US 20040189246A1
Filed 12/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
SelfCHARGE Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SelfCHARGE Inc.
|
Starter assembly for a gas discharge lamp | ||
Patent #
US 6,806,649 B2
Filed 02/18/2003
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Charging system for robot | ||
Patent #
US 20040201361A1
Filed 11/14/2003
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Alignment independent and self aligning inductive power transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 6,803,744 B1
Filed 10/31/2000
|
Current Assignee
Anthony Sabo
|
Original Assignee
Anthony Sabo
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,812,645 B2
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Communication system | ||
Patent #
US 20040233043A1
Filed 11/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Starter assembly for a gas discharge lamp | ||
Patent #
US 20040222751A1
Filed 05/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Scott A. Mollema, Roy W. Kuennen, David W. Baarman
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20040232845A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,825,620 B2
Filed 09/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20040227057A1
Filed 04/07/2004
|
Current Assignee
AILOCOM OY
|
Original Assignee
AILOCOM OY
|
Sensor apparatus management methods and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20040267501A1
Filed 07/10/2004
|
Current Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Method of manufacturing a lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,831,417 B2
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method and apparatus for supplying contactless power | ||
Patent #
US 6,515,878 B1
Filed 08/07/1998
|
Current Assignee
MEINS-SINSLEY PARTNERSHIP
|
Original Assignee
MEINS-SINSLEY PARTNERSHIP
|
Proximity sensor | ||
Patent #
US 20030038641A1
Filed 09/03/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Device for contactless transmission of data | ||
Patent #
US 6,533,178 B1
Filed 11/15/2000
|
Current Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
|
Original Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
|
Vehicle slide door power supply apparatus and method of supplying power to vehicle slide door | ||
Patent #
US 6,535,133 B2
Filed 11/15/2001
|
Current Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
|
Resonant frequency tracking system and method for use in a radio frequency (RF) power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20030071034A1
Filed 11/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ambrell Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Daniel J. Lincoln, Gary A. Schwenck, Leslie L. Thompson
|
Magnetic field production system, and configuration for wire-free supply of a large number of sensors and/or actuators using a magnetic field production system | ||
Patent #
US 20030062794A1
Filed 09/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Configuration for producing electrical power from a magnetic field | ||
Patent #
US 20030062980A1
Filed 09/09/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
RFID passive repeater system and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,563,425 B2
Filed 08/08/2001
|
Current Assignee
Datalogic IP Tech S.r.l.
|
Original Assignee
Escort Memory Systems
|
Method and apparatus for communicating with medical device systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,561,975 B1
Filed 10/25/2000
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
High purity fine metal powders and methods to produce such powders | ||
Patent #
US 20030126948A1
Filed 12/10/2002
|
Current Assignee
PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
NanoProducts Corporation
|
Post-processed nanoscale powders and method for such post-processing | ||
Patent #
US 20030124050A1
Filed 03/29/2002
|
Current Assignee
PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
NANOPRODUCT CORPORATION
|
System for wirelessly supplying a large number of actuators of a machine with electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 6,597,076 B2
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Original Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
System for the detection of cardiac events | ||
Patent #
US 6,609,023 B1
Filed 09/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for charging sterilizable rechargeable batteries | ||
Patent #
US 20030160590A1
Filed 02/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
LIVATEC CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
LIVATEC CORPORATION
|
Apparatus for energizing a remote station and related method | ||
Patent #
US 20030199778A1
Filed 06/11/2003
|
Current Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Original Assignee
Leonid Mats, Carl Taylor, Minhong Mi, Dmitry Gorodetsky, Lorenz Neureuter, Marlin Mickle, Chad Emahizer
|
Charge storage device | ||
Patent #
US 6,631,072 B1
Filed 08/24/2001
|
Current Assignee
Cap-Xx Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Energy Storage Systems Inc.
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20030214255A1
Filed 02/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Reader for a radio frequency identification system having automatic tuning capability | ||
Patent #
US 6,650,227 B1
Filed 12/08/1999
|
Current Assignee
Assa Abloy AB
|
Original Assignee
HID Corporation
|
Wireless power transmission system with increased output voltage | ||
Patent #
US 6,664,770 B1
Filed 10/10/2001
|
Current Assignee
IQ-MOBIL ELECTRONICS GMBH.
|
Original Assignee
IQ- MOBIL GMBH
|
Complex resonant DC-DC converter and high voltage generating circuit driven in a plurality of frequency regions | ||
Patent #
US 20020012257A1
Filed 06/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Low-power, high-modulation-index amplifier for use in battery-powered device | ||
Patent #
US 20020032471A1
Filed 08/31/2001
|
Current Assignee
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Bionics Corporation
|
Electric power transmission device | ||
Patent #
US 6,407,470 B1
Filed 04/24/2000
|
Current Assignee
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC
|
Original Assignee
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC
|
System for wirelessly supplying a large number of actuators of a machine with electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 20020118004A1
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Original Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Water treatment system with an inductively coupled ballast | ||
Patent #
US 6,436,299 B1
Filed 06/12/2000
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
System for a machine having a large number of proximity sensors, as well as a proximity sensor, and a primary winding for this purpose | ||
Patent #
US 20020105343A1
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Food intake restriction with wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,450,946 B1
Filed 02/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Obtech Medical AG
|
Original Assignee
Obtech Medical AG
|
High quality-factor tunable resonator | ||
Patent #
US 6,452,465 B1
Filed 06/27/2000
|
Current Assignee
M-SQUARED FILTERS L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
M-SQUARED FILTERS LLC
|
Inductive coupling system with capacitive parallel compensation of the mutual self-inductance between the primary and the secondary windings | ||
Patent #
US 20020130642A1
Filed 02/27/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Detection of the distance between an electromagnetic transponder and a terminal | ||
Patent #
US 6,473,028 B1
Filed 04/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Original Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Inductively powered lamp unit | ||
Patent #
US 6,459,218 B2
Filed 02/12/2001
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Control of inductive power transfer pickups | ||
Patent #
US 6,483,202 B1
Filed 07/24/2000
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Rechargeable power supply system and method of protection against abnormal charging | ||
Patent #
US 20020167294A1
Filed 03/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Acer Inc.
|
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Reader/writer having coil arrangements to restrain electromagnetic field intensity at a distance | ||
Patent #
US 6,176,433 B1
Filed 05/15/1998
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Contactless battery charger with wireless control link | ||
Patent #
US 6,184,651 B1
Filed 03/20/2000
|
Current Assignee
Google Technology Holdings LLC
|
Original Assignee
Motorola Inc.
|
Miniature milliwatt electric power generator | ||
Patent #
US 6,207,887 B1
Filed 07/07/1999
|
Current Assignee
HI-Z Technology Inc.
|
Original Assignee
HI-Z Technology Inc.
|
Electrosurgical generator | ||
Patent #
US 6,238,387 B1
Filed 11/16/1998
|
Current Assignee
Microline Surgical Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Team Medical LLC
|
Arrangement for coupling an RF-squid magnetometer to a superconductive tank circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,225,800 B1
Filed 09/25/1998
|
Current Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Integrated tunable high efficiency power amplifier | ||
Patent #
US 6,232,841 B1
Filed 07/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
OL Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Rockwell Science Center LLC
|
Rechargeable hybrid battery/supercapacitor system | ||
Patent #
US 6,252,762 B1
Filed 04/21/1999
|
Current Assignee
Rutgers University
|
Original Assignee
Telcordia Technologies Incorporated
|
Bandpass filter with dielectric resonators | ||
Patent #
US 6,262,639 B1
Filed 05/27/1999
|
Current Assignee
Ace Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Ace Technology Corporation
|
Arrangement for coupling an rf-SQUID circuit to a super conducting tank circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,300,760 B1
Filed 05/26/1999
|
Current Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Method for discriminating between used and unused gas generators for air bags during car scrapping process | ||
Patent #
US 6,012,659 A
Filed 09/12/1997
|
Current Assignee
Daicel Chemical Industries Limited, Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Daicel Chemical Industries Limited, Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Composite MRI antenna with reduced stray capacitance | ||
Patent #
US 6,028,429 A
Filed 07/17/1997
|
Current Assignee
Fonar Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Fonar Corporation
|
System and method for powering, controlling, and communicating with multiple inductively-powered devices | ||
Patent #
US 6,047,214 A
Filed 06/09/1998
|
Current Assignee
North Carolina State University
|
Original Assignee
North Carolina State University
|
Adaptive brain stimulation method and system | ||
Patent #
US 6,066,163 A
Filed 02/02/1996
|
Current Assignee
Michael Sasha John
|
Original Assignee
Michael Sasha John
|
Implantable medical device using audible sound communication to provide warnings | ||
Patent #
US 6,067,473 A
Filed 03/31/1999
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Battery monitoring apparatus and method for programmers of cardiac stimulating devices | ||
Patent #
US 6,108,579 A
Filed 04/11/1997
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Band-pass filter comprising series coupled split gap resonators arranged along a circular position line | ||
Patent #
US 6,130,591 A
Filed 05/27/1998
|
Current Assignee
Advanced Mobile Telecommunications Technology Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Mobile Telecommunications Technology Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for wireless powering and recharging | ||
Patent #
US 6,127,799 A
Filed 05/14/1999
|
Current Assignee
Raytheon BBN Technlogies Corp.
|
Original Assignee
GTE Internetworking Incorporated
|
Ring antennas for resonant circuits | ||
Patent #
US 5,864,323 A
Filed 12/19/1996
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Non-contact power distribution system | ||
Patent #
US 5,898,579 A
Filed 11/24/1997
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited, Daifuku Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited, Daifuku Company Limited
|
Inductive battery charger | ||
Patent #
US 5,903,134 A
Filed 05/19/1998
|
Current Assignee
Tdk-Lambda Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nippon Electric Industry Company Limited
|
Noncontact power transmitting apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,923,544 A
Filed 07/21/1997
|
Current Assignee
TDK Corporation
|
Original Assignee
TDK Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for controlling country specific frequency allocation | ||
Patent #
US 5,940,509 A
Filed 11/18/1997
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator having a smaller mass | ||
Patent #
US 5,957,956 A
Filed 11/03/1997
|
Current Assignee
Ela Medical S.A.
|
Original Assignee
Angeion Corporation
|
Carbon supercapacitor electrode materials | ||
Patent #
US 5,993,996 A
Filed 09/16/1997
|
Current Assignee
INORGANIC SPECIALISTS INC.
|
Original Assignee
INORGANIC SPECIALISTS INC.
|
Methods and systems for introducing electromagnetic radiation into photonic crystals | ||
Patent #
US 5,999,308 A
Filed 04/01/1998
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
H-field electromagnetic heating system for fusion bonding | ||
Patent #
US 5,710,413 A
Filed 03/29/1995
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Original Assignee
3M Company
|
Nanostructure multilayer dielectric materials for capacitors and insulators | ||
Patent #
US 5,742,471 A
Filed 11/25/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Regents of the University of California
|
Connection system and connection method for an electric automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 5,821,731 A
Filed 01/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Sumitomo Wiring Systems Limited
|
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Wiring Systems Limited
|
Armature induction charging of moving electric vehicle batteries | ||
Patent #
US 5,821,728 A
Filed 07/22/1996
|
Current Assignee
Stanley A. Tollison
|
Original Assignee
Stanley A. Tollison
|
Method and apparatus for the suppression of far-field interference signals for implantable device data transmission systems | ||
Patent #
US 5,630,835 A
Filed 07/24/1995
|
Current Assignee
SIRROM CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
CARDIAC CONTROL SYSTEMS INC.
|
Antenna module for a portable radio equipment with a grounding conductor | ||
Patent #
US 5,631,660 A
Filed 11/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Implantable stimulation device having means for optimizing current drain | ||
Patent #
US 5,697,956 A
Filed 06/02/1995
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Transmitter-receiver for non-contact IC card system | ||
Patent #
US 5,703,573 A
Filed 01/11/1996
|
Current Assignee
Sony Chemicals Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Sony Chemicals Company Limited
|
Inductive coupler for electric vehicle charger | ||
Patent #
US 5,703,461 A
Filed 06/27/1996
|
Current Assignee
KABUSHIKI KAIHSA TOYODA JIDOSHOKKI SEISAKUSHO
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho
|
Oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC) networks for conditioning energy in higher-order symmetry algebraic topological forms and RF phase conjugation | ||
Patent #
US 5,493,691 A
Filed 12/23/1993
|
Current Assignee
BARRETT HOLDING LLC
|
Original Assignee
Terence W. Barrett
|
Inductive power pick-up coils | ||
Patent #
US 5,528,113 A
Filed 10/21/1994
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Pacemaker with improved shelf storage capacity | ||
Patent #
US 5,522,856 A
Filed 09/20/1994
|
Current Assignee
VITATRON MEDICAL B.V.
|
Original Assignee
VITATRON MEDICAL B.V.
|
Induction charging apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,550,452 A
Filed 07/22/1994
|
Current Assignee
Kyushu Hitachi Maxell Ltd., Nintendo Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Kyushu Hitachi Maxell Ltd., Nintendo Company Limited
|
Thermoelectric method and apparatus for charging superconducting magnets | ||
Patent #
US 5,565,763 A
Filed 11/19/1993
|
Current Assignee
General Atomics Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lockheed Martin Corporation
|
Cooled secondary coils of electric automobile charging transformer | ||
Patent #
US 5,408,209 A
Filed 11/02/1993
|
Current Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Company
|
Wireless communications using near field coupling | ||
Patent #
US 5,437,057 A
Filed 12/03/1992
|
Current Assignee
Xerox Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Xerox Corporation
|
Power connection scheme | ||
Patent #
US 5,455,467 A
Filed 03/02/1994
|
Current Assignee
Apple Computer Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Apple Computer Incorporated
|
High speed read/write AVI system | ||
Patent #
US 5,287,112 A
Filed 04/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Inductive power distribution system | ||
Patent #
US 5,293,308 A
Filed 01/30/1992
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Contactless battery charging system | ||
Patent #
US 5,341,083 A
Filed 10/20/1992
|
Current Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute Incorporated
|
System for charging a rechargeable battery of a portable unit in a rack | ||
Patent #
US 5,367,242 A
Filed 09/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
Ascom Tateco AB
|
Original Assignee
Ericsson Messaging Systems Incorporated
|
High speed read/write AVI system | ||
Patent #
US 5,374,930 A
Filed 11/12/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Separable inductive coupler | ||
Patent #
US 5,216,402 A
Filed 01/22/1992
|
Current Assignee
General Motors Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Company
|
Non-contact data and power connector for computer based modules | ||
Patent #
US 5,229,652 A
Filed 04/20/1992
|
Current Assignee
Wayne E. Hough
|
Original Assignee
Wayne E. Hough
|
Dual feedback control for a high-efficiency class-d power amplifier circuit | ||
Patent #
US 5,118,997 A
Filed 08/16/1991
|
Current Assignee
General Electric Company
|
Original Assignee
General Electric Company
|
Christmas-tree, decorative, artistic and ornamental object illumination apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,034,658 A
Filed 01/12/1990
|
Current Assignee
Roland Hierig, Vladimir Ilberg
|
Original Assignee
Roland Hierig, Vladimir Ilberg
|
Magnetic induction mine arming, disarming and simulation system | ||
Patent #
US 5,027,709 A
Filed 11/13/1990
|
Current Assignee
Glenn B. Slagle
|
Original Assignee
Glenn B. Slagle
|
Device for transmission and evaluation of measurement signals for the tire pressure of motor vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 5,033,295 A
Filed 02/04/1989
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Transponder arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 5,053,774 A
Filed 02/13/1991
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Electric power transmitting device with inductive coupling | ||
Patent #
US 5,070,293 A
Filed 03/02/1990
|
Current Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Nippondenso Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Nippondenso Co. Ltd.
|
Wide band inductive transdermal power and data link | ||
Patent #
US 4,679,560 A
Filed 04/02/1985
|
Current Assignee
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
|
Original Assignee
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
|
Remote switch-sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 4,588,978 A
Filed 06/21/1984
|
Current Assignee
CONCHA CORPORATION A CA CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
TRANSENSORY DEVICES INC.
|
Transmission channel coupler for antenna | ||
Patent #
US 4,621,243 A
Filed 03/27/1985
|
Current Assignee
Harada Kogyo KK
|
Original Assignee
Harada Kogyo KK
|
Transcutaneous signal transmission system and methods | ||
Patent #
US 4,441,210 A
Filed 09/18/1981
|
Current Assignee
Ingeborg J. Hochmair, Erwin S. Hochmair
|
Original Assignee
Ingeborg J. Hochmair, Erwin S. Hochmair
|
Condition monitoring system (tire pressure) | ||
Patent #
US 4,450,431 A
Filed 05/26/1981
|
Current Assignee
Aisin Seiki Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Peter A Hochstein
|
Variable mutual transductance tuned antenna | ||
Patent #
US 4,280,129 A
Filed 09/10/1979
|
Current Assignee
WELLS FAMILY CORPORATION THE
|
Original Assignee
Donald H. Wells
|
Alarm device for informing reduction of pneumatic pressure of tire | ||
Patent #
US 4,180,795 A
Filed 12/12/1977
|
Current Assignee
Bridgestone Tire Company Limited, Mitaka Instrument Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Tire Company Limited, Mitaka Instrument Company Limited
|
RF beam center location method and apparatus for power transmission system | ||
Patent #
US 4,088,999 A
Filed 05/21/1976
|
Current Assignee
Fletcher James C Administrator of The National Aeronautics and Space Administration With Respect To An Invention of, Richard M. Dickinson
|
Original Assignee
Fletcher James C Administrator of The National Aeronautics and Space Administration With Respect To An Invention of, Richard M. Dickinson
|
Thermoelectric voltage generator | ||
Patent #
US 4,095,998 A
Filed 09/30/1976
|
Current Assignee
The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|
Original Assignee
The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|
Wireless energy transfer, including interference enhancement | ||
Patent #
US 8,076,801 B2
Filed 05/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,076,800 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,097,983 B2
Filed 05/08/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,084,889 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Circuit for transmitting an amplified resonant power to load | ||
Patent #
US 8,077,485 B2
Filed 12/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Seoul National University of Technology Center for Industry Collaboration
|
Original Assignee
Kwang-Jeek Lee
|
Inductive repeater coil for an implantable device | ||
Patent #
US 8,131,378 B2
Filed 10/28/2007
|
Current Assignee
Second Sight Enterprises Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Second Sight Enterprises Incorporated
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE ENHANCEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20120068549A1
Filed 11/03/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Power supply system and method of controlling power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 8,178,995 B2
Filed 10/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20120228960A1
Filed 05/22/2012
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Efficient near-field wireless energy transfer using adiabatic system variations | ||
Patent #
US 8,362,651 B2
Filed 10/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer over a distance at high efficiency | ||
Patent #
US 8,395,283 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,395,282 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q similar resonant frequency resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,022 B2
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q sub-wavelength resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,021 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q devices at variable distances | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,020 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q at high efficiency | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,018 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q from more than one source | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,019 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q capacitively loaded conducting loops | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,023 B2
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across variable distances | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,024 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20130181541A1
Filed 03/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
THERMOELECTRIC UNITS | ||
Patent #
US 3,780,425 A
Filed 01/25/1971
|
Current Assignee
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
|
Original Assignee
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
|
LARGE SODIUM VALVE ACTUATOR | ||
Patent #
US 3,871,176 A
Filed 03/08/1973
|
Current Assignee
Glen Elwin Schukei
|
Original Assignee
Combustion Engineering Incorporated
|
ENERGY TRANSLATING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 3,517,350 A
Filed 07/07/1969
|
Current Assignee
William D. Beaver
|
Original Assignee
William D. Beaver
|
MICROWAVE POWER RECEIVING ANTENNA | ||
Patent #
US 3,535,543 A
Filed 05/01/1969
|
Current Assignee
Carroll C. Dailey
|
Original Assignee
Carroll C. Dailey
|
Wireless energy transfer over variable distances between resonators of substantially similar resonant frequencies | ||
Patent #
US 8,760,008 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q to more than one device | ||
Patent #
US 8,760,007 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer over distances to a moving device | ||
Patent #
US 8,766,485 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across a distance to a moving device | ||
Patent #
US 8,772,972 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across variable distances with high-Q capacitively-loaded conducting-wire loops | ||
Patent #
US 8,772,971 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer to a moving device between high-Q resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,791,599 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Efficient near-field wireless energy transfer using adiabatic system variations | ||
Patent #
US 8,836,172 B2
Filed 11/15/2012
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
EFFICIENT NEAR-FIELD WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING ADIABATIC SYSTEM VARIATIONS | ||
Patent #
US 20140354071A1
Filed 08/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 9,065,286 B2
Filed 06/12/2014
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20150188321A1
Filed 02/24/2015
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
26 Claims
-
1. A wireless power system comprising:
-
a source resonator and a power supply coupled to the source resonator to provide power to the source resonator, the source resonator having a resonant frequency ω
1, an intrinsic loss rate Γ
1, and an intrinsic quality factor Q1=ω
1/(2Γ
1), the source resonator comprising at least one loop of conductive material; anda device resonator and a load coupled to the device resonator to receive power from the device resonator and provide power to the load, the device resonator having a resonant frequency ω
2, an intrinsic loss rate Γ
2, and an intrinsic quality factor Q2=ω
2/(2Γ
2), the device resonator comprising at least one loop of conductive material,wherein the device resonator is configured to be movable relative to the source resonator over a range of distances D between the source resonator and the device resonator, wherein the source resonator and the device resonator are configured to resonantly and wirelessly couple electromagnetic power from the source resonator to the device resonator using non-radiative electromagnetic induction having a coupling coefficient κ
, and wherein the intrinsic loss rates satisfy κ
/√
{square root over (Γ
1Γ
2)}>
1 over the range of distances D, andwherein the power provided to the load from the device resonator defines a work drainage rate Γ
w, and wherein the work drainage rateΓ
w, is configured to be set such that Γ
w=Γ
2√
{square root over (1+wp·
(κ
2/Γ
1·
Γ
2))} for some value of the coupling coefficient κ
in the range of distances D, wherein wp is a parameter satisfying wp>
1. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
-
1 Specification
This application is a continuation and claims the benefit of priority under 35 USC §120 to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/789,860, filed Mar. 8, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/477,459, filed May 22, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/036,177, filed Feb. 28, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/437,641, filed May 8, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,097,983, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/055,963 filed Mar. 26, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,825,543, which: 1) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/481,077, filed Jul. 5, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,741,734, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/698,442, filed Jul. 12, 2005; (2) pursuant to U.S.C. §119(e), claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/908,383, filed Mar. 27, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/908,666, filed Mar. 28, 2007; and (3) pursuant to U.S.C. §120, and U.S.C. §363, is also a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US2007070892, filed Jun. 11, 2007. The contents of the prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention was made with government support awarded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR 02-13282. The government has certain rights in this invention.
The disclosure relates to wireless energy transfer. Wireless energy transfer may for example, be useful in such applications as providing power to autonomous electrical or electronic devices.
Radiative modes of omni-directional antennas (which work very well for information transfer) are not suitable for such energy transfer, because a vast majority of energy is wasted into free space. Directed radiation modes, using lasers or highly-directional antennas, can be efficiently used for energy transfer, even for long distances (transfer distance LTRANS>>LDEV, where LDEV is the characteristic size of the device and/or the source), but require existence of an uninterruptible line-of-sight and a complicated tracking system in the case of mobile objects. Some transfer schemes rely on induction, but are typically restricted to very close-range (LTRANS<<LDEV) or low power (mW) energy transfers.
The rapid development of autonomous electronics of recent years (e.g. laptops, cell-phones, house-hold robots, that all typically rely on chemical energy storage) has led to an increased need for wireless energy transfer.
The inventors have realized that resonant objects with coupled resonant modes having localized evanescent field patterns may be used for non-radiative wireless energy transfer. Resonant objects tend to couple, while interacting weakly with other off-resonant environmental objects. Typically, using the techniques described below, as the coupling increases, so does the transfer efficiency. In some embodiments, using the below techniques, the energy-transfer rate can be larger than the energy-loss rate. Accordingly, efficient wireless energy-exchange can be achieved between the resonant objects, while suffering only modest transfer and dissipation of energy into other off-resonant objects. The nearly-omnidirectional but stationary (non-lossy) nature of the near field makes this mechanism suitable for mobile wireless receivers. Various embodiments therefore have a variety of possible applications including for example, placing a source (e.g. one connected to the wired electricity network) on the ceiling of a factory room, while devices (robots, vehicles, computers, or similar) are roaming freely within the room. Other applications include power supplies for electric-engine buses and/or hybrid cars and medical implantable devices.
In some embodiments, resonant modes are so-called magnetic resonances, for which most of the energy surrounding the resonant objects is stored in the magnetic field; i.e. there is very little electric field outside of the resonant objects. Since most everyday materials (including animals, plants and humans) are non-magnetic, their interaction with magnetic fields is minimal. This is important both for safety and also to reduce interaction with the extraneous environmental objects.
In one aspect, an apparatus is disclosed for use in wireless energy transfer, which includes a first resonator structure configured to transfer energy with a second resonator structure over a distance D greater than a characteristic size L2 of the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, D is also greater than one or more of: a characteristic size L1 of the first resonator structure, a characteristic thickness T1 of the first resonator structure, and a characteristic width W1 of the first resonator structure. The energy transfer is mediated by evanescent-tail coupling of a resonant field of the first resonator structure and a resonant field of the second resonator structure. The apparatus may include any of the following features alone or in combination.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to transfer energy to the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to receive energy from the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, the apparatus includes the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω1, a Q-factor Q1, and a resonance width Γ1, the second resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω2, a Q-factor Q2, and a resonance width Γ2, and the energy transfer has a rate κ. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω1 and ω2 is smaller than the broader of the resonant widths Γ1 and Γ2.
In some embodiments Q1>100 and Q2>100, Q1>300 and Q2>300, Q1>500 and Q2>500, or Q1>1000 and Q2>1000. In some embodiments, Q1>100 or Q2>100, Q1>300 or Q2>300, Q1>500 or Q2>500, or Q1>1000 or Q2>1000.
In some embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/L2 may be as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, or as large as 10.
In some embodiments, Q1>1000 and Q2>1000, and the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/L2 may be as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, as large as 10.
In some embodiments, Qκ=ω/2κ is less than about 50, less than about 200, less than about 500, or less than about 1000. In some such embodiments, D/L2 is as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, or as large as 10.
In some embodiments, the quantity κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)} is maximized at an angular frequency {tilde over (ω)} with a frequency width {tilde over (Γ)} around the maximum, and the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω1 and {tilde over (ω)} is smaller than the width {tilde over (Γ)}, and the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω2 and {tilde over (ω)} is smaller than the width {tilde over (Γ)}.
In some embodiments, the energy transfer operates with an efficiency ηwork greater than about 1%, greater than about 10%, greater than about 30%, greater than about 50%, or greater than about 80%.
In some embodiments, the energy transfer operates with a radiation loss ηrad less that about 10%. In some such embodiments the coupling to loss ratio
In some embodiments, the energy transfer operates with a radiation loss ηrad less
that about 1%. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some embodiments, in the presence of a human at distance of more than 3 cm from the surface of either resonant object, the energy transfer operates with a loss to the human ηh of less than about 1%. In some such embodiments the coupling to loss ratio
In some embodiments, in the presence of a human at distance of more than 10 cm from the surface of either resonant object, the energy transfer operates with a loss to the human ηh of less than about 0.2%. In some such embodiments the coupling to loss ratio
In some embodiments, during operation, a device coupled to the first or second resonator structure with a coupling rate Γwork receives a usable power Pwork from the resonator structure.
In some embodiments, Pwork is greater than about 0.01 Watt, greater than about 0.1 Watt, greater than about 1 Watt, or greater than about 10 Watt.
In some embodiments, if the device is coupled to the first resonator, then ½≦[(Γwork/Γ1)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦2, or ¼≦[(Γwork/Γ1)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦4, or ⅛≦[(Γwork/Γ1)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦8, and, if the device is coupled to the second resonator, then ½≦[(Γwork/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦2, or ¼≦[(Γwork/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦4, or ⅛≦[(Γwork/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦8.
In some embodiments, the device includes an electrical or electronic device. In some embodiments, the device includes a robot (e.g. a conventional robot or a nano-robot). In some embodiments, the device includes a mobile electronic device (e.g. a telephone, or a cell-phone, or a computer, or a laptop computer, or a personal digital assistant (PDA)). In some embodiments, the device includes an electronic device that receives information wirelessly (e.g. a wireless keyboard, or a wireless mouse, or a wireless computer screen, or a wireless television screen). In some embodiments, the device includes a medical device configured to be implanted in a patient (e.g. an artificial organ, or implant configured to deliver medicine). In some embodiments, the device includes a sensor. In some embodiments, the device includes a vehicle (e.g. a transportation vehicle, or an autonomous vehicle).
In some embodiments, the apparatus further includes the device.
In some embodiments, during operation, a power supply coupled to the first or second resonator structure with a coupling rate Γsupply drives the resonator structure at a frequency if and supplies power Ptotal. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies w=2πf and ω1 is smaller than the resonant width Γ1, and the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies w=2πf and ω2 is smaller than the resonant width Γ2. In some embodiments, f is about the optimum efficiency frequency.
In some embodiments, if the power supply is coupled to the first resonator, then ½≦[(Γsupply/Γ1)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦2, or ¼≦[(Γsupply/Γ1)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦4 or ⅛≦[(Γsupply/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦8, and, if the power supply is coupled to the second resonator, then ½≦[(Γsupply/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦2, or ¼≦[(Γsupply/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦4, or ⅛≦[(Γsupply/Γ2)2−1]/(κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)})2≦8.
In some embodiments, the apparatus further includes the power source.
In some embodiments, the resonant fields are electromagnetic. In some embodiments, f is about 50 GHz or less, about 1 GHz or less, about 100 MHz or less, about 10 MHz or less, about 1 MHz or less, about 100 KHz or less, or about 10 kHz or less. In some embodiments, f is about 50 GHz or greater, about 1 GHz or greater, about 100 MHz or greater, about 10 MHz or greater, about 1 MHz or greater, about 100 kHz or greater, or about 10 kHz or greater. In some embodiments, f is within one of the frequency bands specially assigned for industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) equipment.
In some embodiments, the resonant fields are primarily magnetic in the area outside of the resonant objects. In some such embodiments, the ratio of the average electric field energy to average magnetic filed energy at a distance Dp from the closest resonant object is less than 0.01, or less than 0.1. In some embodiments, LR is the characteristic size of the closest resonant object and Dp/LR is less than 1.5, 3, 5, 7, or 10.
In some embodiments, the resonant fields are acoustic. In some embodiments, one or more of the resonant fields include a whispering gallery mode of one of the resonant structures.
In some embodiments, one of the first and second resonator structures includes a self resonant coil of conducting wire, conducting Litz wire, or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include self resonant coils of conducting wire, conducting Litz wire, or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include self resonant coils of conducting wire or conducting Litz wire or conducting ribbon, and Q1>300 and Q2>300.
In some embodiments, one or more of the self resonant conductive wire coils include a wire of length l and cross section radius a wound into a helical coil of radius r, height h and number of turns N. In some embodiments, N=√{square root over (l2−h2)}/2πr.
In some embodiments, for each resonant structure r is about 30 cm, h is about 20 cm, a is about 3 mm and N is about 5.25, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 10.6 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments D/LR is as large as about 2, 3, 5, or 8.
In some embodiments, for each resonant structure r is about 30 cm, h is about 20 cm, a is about 1 cm and N is about 4, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 13.4 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments D/LR is as large as about 3, 5, 7, or 10.
In some embodiments, for each resonant structure r is about 10 cm, h is about 3 cm, a is about 2 mm and N is about 6, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 21.4 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments D/LR is as large as about 3, 5, 7, or 10.
In some embodiments, one of the first and second resonator structures includes a capacitively loaded loop or coil of conducting wire, conducting Litz wire, or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include capacitively loaded loops or coils of conducting wire, conducting Litz wire, or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include capacitively loaded loops or coils of conducting wire or conducting Litz wire or conducting ribbon, and Q1>300 and Q2>300.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size LR of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is less than about 1 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 1 mm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 380 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure LR is less than about 10 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 1 cm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 43 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size LR of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is less than about 30 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 5 cm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some such embodiments, f is about 9 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure LR is less than about 30 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 5 mm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 17 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size LR of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is less than about 1 m, and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 1 cm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 5 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, during operation, one of the resonator structures receives a usable power Pw, from the other resonator structure, an electrical current Is flows in the resonator structure which is transferring energy to the other resonant structure, and the ratio
is less than about 5 Amps/√{square root over (Watts)} or less than about 2 Amps/√{square root over (Watts)}. In some embodiments, during operation, one of the resonator structures receives a usable power Pw from the other resonator structure, a voltage difference Vs appears across the capacitive element of the first resonator structure, and the ratio
is less than about 2000 Volts/√{square root over (Watts)} or less than about 4000 Volts/√{square root over (Watts)}.
In some embodiments, one of the first and second resonator structures includes a inductively loaded rod of conducting wire or conducting Litz wire or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include inductively loaded rods of conducting wire or conducting Litz wire or conducting ribbon. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include inductively loaded rods of conducting wire or conducting Litz wire or conducting ribbon, and Q1>300 and Q2>300.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure LR is less than about 10 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 1 cm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some embodiments, f is about 14 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size LR of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is less than about 30 cm and the width of the conducting wire or Litz wire or ribbon of said object is less than about 5 cm, and, during operation, a power source coupled to the first or second resonator structure drives the resonator structure at a frequency f. In some such embodiments, f is about 2.5 MHz. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, one of the first and second resonator structures includes a dielectric disk. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include dielectric disks. In some embodiments, both of the first and second resonator structures include dielectric disks, and Q1>300 and Q2>300.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is LR and the real part of the permittivity of said resonator structure c is less than about 150. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7, or about 10.
In some embodiments, the characteristic size of the resonator structure receiving energy from the other resonator structure is LR and the real part of the permittivity of said resonator structure c is less than about 65. In some such embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/LR is as large as about 3, about 5, about 7.
In some embodiments, at least one of the first and second resonator structures includes one of: a dielectric material, a metallic material, a metallodielectric object, a plasmonic material, a plasmonodielectric object, a superconducting material.
In some embodiments, at least one of the resonators has a quality factor greater than about 5000, or greater than about 10000.
In some embodiments, the apparatus also includes a third resonator structure configured to transfer energy with one or more of the first and second resonator structures, where the energy transfer between the third resonator structure and the one or more of the first and second resonator structures is mediated by evanescent-tail coupling of the resonant field of the one or more of the first and second resonator structures and a resonant field of the third resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the third resonator structure is configured to transfer energy to one or more of the first and second resonator structures.
In some embodiments, the third resonator structure is configured to receive energy from one or more of the first and second resonator structures.
In some embodiments, the third resonator structure is configured to receive energy from one of the first and second resonator structures and transfer energy to the other one of the first and second resonator structures.
Some embodiments include a mechanism for, during operation, maintaining the resonant frequency of one or more of the resonant objects. In some embodiments, the feedback mechanism comprises an oscillator with a fixed frequency and is configured to adjust the resonant frequency of the one or more resonant objects to be about equal to the fixed frequency. In some embodiments, the feedback mechanism is configured to monitor an efficiency of the energy transfer, and adjust the resonant frequency of the one or more resonant objects to maximize the efficiency.
In another aspect, a method of wireless energy transfer is disclosed, which method includes providing a first resonator structure and transferring energy with a second resonator structure over a distance D greater than a characteristic size L2 of the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, D is also greater than one or more of: a characteristic size L1 of the first resonator structure, a characteristic thickness T1 of the first resonator structure, and a characteristic width W1 of the first resonator structure. The energy transfer is mediated by evanescent-tail coupling of a resonant field of the first resonator structure and a resonant field of the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to transfer energy to the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to receive energy from the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω1, a Q-factor Q1, and a resonance width Γ1, the second resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω2, a Q-factor Q2, and a resonance width Γ2, and the energy transfer has a rate κ. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω1 and ω2 is smaller than the broader of the resonant widths Γ1 and Γ2.
In some embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/L2 may be as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, or as large as 10.
In another aspect, an apparatus is disclosed for use in wireless information transfer which includes a first resonator structure configured to transfer information by transferring energy with a second resonator structure over a distance D greater than a characteristic size L2 of the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, D is also greater than one or more of: a characteristic size L1 of the first resonator structure, a characteristic thickness T1 of the first resonator structure, and a characteristic width W1 of the first resonator structure. The energy transfer is mediated by evanescent-tail coupling of a resonant field of the first resonator structure and a resonant field of the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to transfer energy to the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to receive energy from the second resonator structure. In some embodiments the apparatus includes, the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω1, a Q-factor Q15 and a resonance width Γ1, the second resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω2, a Q-factor Q2, and a resonance width Γ2, and the energy transfer has a rate κ. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω1 and ω2 is smaller than the broader of the resonant widths Γ1 and Γ2.
In some embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/L2 may be as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, or as large as 10.
In another aspect, a method of wireless information transfer is disclosed, which method includes providing a first resonator structure and transferring information by transferring energy with a second resonator structure over a distance D greater than a characteristic size L2 of the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, D is also greater than one or more of: a characteristic size L1 of the first resonator structure, a characteristic thickness T1 of the first resonator structure, and a characteristic width W1 of the first resonator structure. The energy transfer is mediated by evanescent-tail coupling of a resonant field of the first resonator structure and a resonant field of the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to transfer energy to the second resonator structure. In some embodiments, the first resonator structure is configured to receive energy from the second resonator structure.
In some embodiments, the first resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω1, a Q-factor Q15 and a resonance width Γ1, the second resonator structure has a resonant angular frequency ω2, a Q-factor Q2, and a resonance width Γ2, and the energy transfer has a rate κ. In some embodiments, the absolute value of the difference of the angular frequencies ω1 and ω2 is smaller than the broader of the resonant widths Γ1 and Γ2.
In some embodiments, the coupling to loss ratio
In some such embodiments, D/L2 may be as large as 2, as large as 3, as large as 5, as large as 7, or as large as 10.
It is to be understood that the characteristic size of an object is equal to the radius of the smallest sphere which can fit around the entire object. The characteristic thickness of an object is, when placed on a flat surface in any arbitrary configuration, the smallest possible height of the highest point of the object above a flat surface. The characteristic width of an object is the radius of the smallest possible circle that the object can pass through while traveling in a straight line. For example, the characteristic width of a cylindrical object is the radius of the cylinder.
The distance D over which the energy transfer between two resonant objects occurs is the distance between the respective centers of the smallest spheres which can fit around the entirety of each object. However, when considering the distance between a human and a resonant object, the distance is to be measured from the outer surface of the human to the outer surface of the sphere.
As described in detail below, non-radiative energy transfer refers to energy transfer effected primarily through the localized near field, and, at most, secondarily through the radiative portion of the field.
It is to be understood that an evanescent tail of a resonant object is the decaying non-radiative portion of a resonant field localized at the object. The decay may take any functional form including, for example, an exponential decay or power law decay.
The optimum efficiency frequency of a wireless energy transfer system is the frequency at which the figure of merit
is maximized, all other factors held constant.
The resonant width (Γ) refers to the width of an object'"'"'s resonance due to object'"'"'s intrinsic losses (e.g. loss to absorption, radiation, etc.).
It is to be understood that a Q-factor (Q) is a factor that compares the time constant for decay of an oscillating system'"'"'s amplitude to its oscillation period. For a given resonator mode with angular frequency ω and resonant width Γ, the Q-factor Q=ω/2Γ.
The energy transfer rate (κ) refers to the rate of energy transfer from one resonator to another. In the coupled mode description described below it is the coupling constant between the resonators.
It is to be understood that Qκ=ω/2κ.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. In case of conflict with publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned incorporated herein by reference, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
Various embodiments may include any of the above features, alone or in combination. Other features, objects, and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the following detailed description.
Other features, objects, and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the following detailed description.
Referring to
It is to be understood that while two resonant objects are shown in the embodiment of
Initially, we present a theoretical framework for understanding non-radiative wireless energy transfer. Note however that it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not bound by theory.
Coupled Mode Theory
An appropriate analytical framework for modeling the resonant energy-exchange between two resonant objects 1 and 2 is that of “coupled-mode theory” (CMT). The field of the system of two resonant objects 1 and 2 is approximated by F(r,t)r≈a1(t)F1(r)+a2(t)F2(r), where F1,2(r) are the eigenmodes of 1 and 2 alone, normalized to unity energy, and the field amplitudes a1,2(t) are defined so that |a1,2(t)|2 is equal to the energy stored inside the objects 1 and 2 respectively. Then, the field amplitudes can be shown to satisfy, to lowest order:
where ω1,2 are the individual angular eigenfrequencies of the eigenmodes, Γ1,2 are the resonance widths due to the objects'"'"' intrinsic (absorption, radiation etc.) losses, and K is the coupling coefficient. Eqs. (1) show that at exact resonance (ω1=ω2 and Γ1=Γ2), the eigenmodes of the combined system are split by 2κ; the energy exchange between the two objects takes place in time ˜π/2κ and is nearly perfect, apart for losses, which are minimal when the coupling rate is much faster than all loss rates (κ>>Γ1,2). The coupling to loss ratio κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)} serves as a figure-of-merit in evaluating a system used for wireless energy-transfer, along with the distance over which this ratio can be achieved. The regime κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}1 is called “strong-coupling” regime.
In some embodiments, the energy-transfer application preferably uses resonant modes of high Q=ω/2Γ, corresponding to low (i.e. slow) intrinsic-loss rates Γ. This condition may be satisfied where the coupling is implemented using, not the lossy radiative far-field, but the evanescent (non-lossy) stationary near-field.
To implement an energy-transfer scheme, usually finite objects, namely ones that are topologically surrounded everywhere by air, are more appropriate. Unfortunately, objects of finite extent cannot support electromagnetic states that are exponentially decaying in all directions in air, since, from Maxwell'"'"'s Equations in free space: {right arrow over (k)}2=ω2/c2 where {right arrow over (k)} is the wave vector, ω the angular frequency, and c the speed of light. Because of this, one can show that they cannot support states of infinite Q. However, very long-lived (so-called “high-Q”) states can be found, whose tails display the needed exponential or exponential-like decay away from the resonant object over long enough distances before they turn oscillatory (radiative). The limiting surface, where this change in the field behavior happens, is called the “radiation caustic”, and, for the wireless energy-transfer scheme to be based on the near field rather than the far/radiation field, the distance between the coupled objects must be such that one lies within the radiation caustic of the other.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, small Qκ=ω/2κ corresponding to strong (i.e. fast) coupling rate κ is preferred over distances larger than the characteristic sizes of the objects. Therefore, since the extent of the near-field into the area surrounding a finite-sized resonant object is set typically by the wavelength, in some embodiments, this mid-range non-radiative coupling can be achieved using resonant objects of subwavelength size, and thus significantly longer evanescent field-tails. As will be seen in examples later on, such subwavelength resonances can often be accompanied with a high Q, so this will typically be the appropriate choice for the possibly-mobile resonant device-object. Note, though, that in some embodiments, the resonant source-object will be immobile and thus less restricted in its allowed geometry and size, which can be therefore chosen large enough that the near-field extent is not limited by the wavelength. Objects of nearly infinite extent, such as dielectric waveguides, can support guided modes whose evanescent tails are decaying exponentially in the direction away from the object, slowly if tuned close to cutoff, and can have nearly infinite Q.
In the following, we describe several examples of systems suitable for energy transfer of the type described above. We will demonstrate how to compute the CMT parameters ω1,2, Q1,2 and Qκ described above and how to choose these parameters for particular embodiments in order to produce a desirable figure-of-merit κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}=√{square root over (Q1Q2)}/Qκ. In particular, this figure of merit is typically maximized when ω1,2 are tuned to a particular angular frequency {tilde over (ω)}, thus, if {tilde over (Γ)} is half the angular-frequency width for which √{square root over (Q1Q2)}/Qκ is above half its maximum value at {tilde over (ω)}, the angular eigenfrequencies ω1,2 should typically be tuned to be close to {tilde over (ω)} to within the width {tilde over (Γ)}.
In addition, as described below, Q1,2 can sometimes be limited not from intrinsic loss mechanisms but from external perturbations. In those cases, producing a desirable figure-of-merit translates to reducing Qκ (i.e. increasing the coupling). Accordingly we will demonstrate how, for particular embodiments, to reduce Qκ.
Self-Resonant Conducting Coils
In some embodiments, one or more of the resonant objects are self-resonant conducting coils. Referring to
is the maximum amount of positive charge accumulated in one side of the coil (where an equal amount of negative charge always also accumulates in the other side to make the system neutral) and Io=max {|I(x)|} is the maximum positive value of the linear current distribution, then Io=ωqo. Then, one can define an effective total inductance L and an effective total capacitance C of the coil through the amount of energy U inside its resonant mode:
where μo and ∈o are the magnetic permeability and electric permittivity of free space. With these definitions, the resonant angular frequency and the effective impedance are given by the common formulas ω=1/√{square root over (LC)} and Z=√{square root over (L/C)} respectively.
Losses in this resonant system consist of ohmic (material absorption) loss inside the wire and radiative loss into free space. One can again define a total absorption resistance Rabs from the amount of power absorbed inside the wire and a total radiation resistance Rrad from the amount of power radiated due to electric- and magnetic-dipole radiation:
where c=1/√{square root over (μo∈o )} and ζo=√{square root over (μo/∈o)} are the light velocity and light impedance in free space, the impedance ζc is ζc=1/σδ=√{square root over (μoω/2σ)} with σ the conductivity of the conductor and δ the skin depth at the frequency ω,
p=∫dxrρl(x) is the electric-dipole moment of the coil and
is the magnetic-dipole moment of the coil. For the radiation resistance formula Eq. (5), the assumption of operation in the quasi-static regime (h, rλ=2πc/ω) has been used, which is the desired regime of a subwavelength resonance. With these definitions, the absorption and radiation quality factors of the resonance are given by Qabs=Z/Rabs and Qrad=Z/Rrad respectively.
From Eq. (2)-(5) it follows that to determine the resonance parameters one simply needs to know the current distribution j in the resonant coil. Solving Maxwell'"'"'s equations to rigorously find the current distribution of the resonant electromagnetic eigenmode of a conducting-wire coil is more involved than, for example, of a standard LC circuit, and we can find no exact solutions in the literature for coils of finite length, making an exact solution difficult. One could in principle write down an elaborate transmission-line-like model, and solve it by brute force. We instead present a model that is (as described below) in good agreement (˜5%) with experiment. Observing that the finite extent of the conductor forming each coil imposes the boundary condition that the current has to be zero at the ends of the coil, since no current can leave the wire, we assume that the resonant mode of each coil is well approximated by a sinusoidal current profile along the length of the conducting wire. We shall be interested in the lowest mode, so if we denote by x the coordinate along the conductor, such that it runs from −l/2 to +l/2, then the current amplitude profile would have the form I(x)=Io cos(πx/l), where we have assumed that the current does not vary significantly along the wire circumference for a particular x, a valid assumption provided ar. It immediately follows from the continuity equation for charge that the linear charge density profile should be of the form ρl(x)=ρo sin (πx/l), and thus qo=∫01/2dxρo|sin(πx/l)|=ρol/π. Using these sinusoidal profiles we find the so-called “self-inductance” Ls, and “self-capacitance” Cs of the coil by computing numerically the integrals Eq. (2) and (3); the associated frequency and effective impedance are ωs and Zs respectively. The “self-resistances” Rs are given analytically by Eq. (4) and (5) using
and therefore the associated Qs factors may be calculated.
The results for two particular embodiments of resonant coils with subwavelength modes of λs/r≧70 (i.e. those highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) are presented in Table 1. Numerical results are shown for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for the two different cases of subwavelength-coil resonant modes. Note that, for conducting material, copper (σ=5.998·10^−7 S/m) was used. It can be seen that expected quality factors at microwave frequencies are Qsabs≧1000 and Qsad≧5000.
Referring to 2r and, oppositely, the magnetic coupling highly dominates over the electric coupling for coils with h
2r. Defining the charge and current distributions of two coils 1,2 respectively as ρ1,2 (x) and j1,2 (x), total charges and peak currents respectively as q1,2 and I1,2, and capacitances and inductances respectively as C1,2 and L1,2, which are the analogs of ρ(x), j(x), qo, Io, C and L for the single-coil case and are therefore well defined, we can define their mutual capacitance and inductance through the total energy:
where
and the retardation factor of u=exp(iω|x−x′|/c) inside the integral can been ignored in the quasi-static regime Dλ of interest, where each coil is within the near field of the other. With this definition, the coupling coefficient is given by κ=ω√{square root over (C1C2)}/2MC+ωML/2√{square root over (L1L2)}
Qκ−1=(MC/√{square root over (C1C2)})−1+(√{square root over (L1L2)}/ML)−1.
Therefore, to calculate the coupling rate between two self-resonant coils, again the current profiles are needed and, by using again the assumed sinusoidal current profiles, we compute numerically from Eq. (6) the mutual capacitance MC,s and inductance ML,s between two self-resonant coils at a distance D between their centers, and thus Qκ,s is also determined.
Referring to Table 2, relevant parameters are shown for exemplary embodiments featuring pairs or identical self resonant coils. Numerical results are presented for the average wavelength and loss rates of the two normal modes (individual values not shown), and also the coupling rate and figure-of-merit as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases of modes presented in Table 1. It can be seen that for medium distances D/r=10−3 the expected coupling-to-loss ratios are in the range κ/Γ˜2−70.
Capacitively-Loaded Conducting Loops or Coils
In some embodiments, one or more of the resonant objects are capacitively-loaded conducting loops or coils. Referring to C→Cs
ω→ωs, as Cp→0.
In general, the desired CMT parameters can be found for this system, but again a very complicated solution of Maxwell'"'"'s Equations is required. Instead, we will analyze only a special case, where a reasonable guess for the current distribution can be made. When CpCs>C, then ω≈1/√{square root over (LCp)}
ωs and Z≈√{square root over (L/Cp)}
Zs, while all the charge is on the plates of the loading capacitor and thus the current distribution is constant along the wire. This allows us now to compute numerically L from Eq. (2). In the case h=0 and N integer, the integral in Eq. (2) can actually be computed analytically, giving the formula L=μor[ln(8r/a)−2]N2. Explicit analytical formulas are again available for R from Eq. (4) and (5), since Irms=Io, |p|≈0 and |m|=IoNπr2 (namely only the magnetic-dipole term is contributing to radiation), so we can determine also Qabs=ωL/Rabs and Qrad=ωL/Rrad. At the end of the calculations, the validity of the assumption of constant current profile is confirmed by checking that indeed the condition Cp
Cs
ω
ωs is satisfied. To satisfy this condition, one could use a large external capacitance, however, this would usually shift the operational frequency lower than the optimal frequency, which we will determine shortly; instead, in typical embodiments, one often prefers coils with very small self-capacitance Cs to begin with, which usually holds, for the types of coils under consideration, when N=1, so that the self-capacitance comes from the charge distribution across the single turn, which is almost always very small, or when N>1 and h
2Na, so that the dominant self-capacitance comes from the charge distribution across adjacent turns, which is small if the separation between adjacent turns is large.
The external loading capacitance Cp provides the freedom to tune the resonant frequency (for example by tuning A or d). Then, for the particular simple case h=0, for which we have analytical formulas, the total Q=ωL/(Rabs+Rrad) becomes highest at the optimal frequency
reaching the value
At lower frequencies it is dominated by ohmic loss and at higher frequencies by radiation. Note, however, that the formulas above are accurate as long as {tilde over (ω)}<<ωs and, as explained above, this holds almost always when N=1, and is usually less accurate when N>1, since h=0 usually implies a large self-capacitance. A coil with large h can be used, if the self-capacitance needs to be reduced compared to the external capacitance, but then the formulas for L and {tilde over (ω)}, {tilde over (Q)} are again less accurate. Similar qualitative behavior is expected, but a more complicated theoretical model is needed for making quantitative predictions in that case.
The results of the above analysis for two embodiments of subwavelength modes of λ/r≧70 (namely highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) of coils with N=1 and h=0 at the optimal frequency Eq. (7) are presented in Table 3. To confirm the validity of constant-current assumption and the resulting analytical formulas, mode-solving calculations were also performed using another completely independent method: computational 3D finite-element frequency-domain (FEFD) simulations (which solve Maxwell'"'"'s Equations in frequency domain exactly apart for spatial discretization) were conducted, in which the boundaries of the conductor were modeled using a complex impedance ζc=√{square root over (μoω/2σ)} boundary condition, valid as long as ζc/ζo1(<10−5 for copper in the microwave). Table 3 shows Numerical FEFD (and in parentheses analytical) results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-loop resonant modes. Note that for conducting material copper (σ=5.998·107S/m) was used. (The specific parameters of the plot in
Referring to ωs. In the case h=0, the coupling is only magnetic and again we have an analytical formula, which, in the quasi-static limit r<<D<<λ and for the relative orientation shown in
which again is more accurate for N1=N2=1.
From Eq. (9) it can be seen that the optimal frequency {tilde over (ω)}, where the figure-of-merit is maximized to the value , is that where √{square root over (Q1Q2)} is maximized, since Qκ does not depend on frequency (at least for the distances D<<λ of interest for which the quasi-static approximation is still valid). Therefore, the optimal frequency is independent of the distance D between the two coils and lies between the two frequencies where the single-coil Q1 and Q2 peak. For same coils, it is given by Eq. (7) and then the figure-of-merit Eq. (9) becomes
Typically, one should tune the capacitively-loaded conducting loops or coils, so that their angular eigenfrequencies are close to {tilde over (ω)} within {tilde over (Γ)}, which is half the angular frequency width for which √{square root over (Q1Q2)}>/2.
Referring to Table 4, numerical FEFD and, in parentheses, analytical results based on the above are shown for two systems each composed of a matched pair of the loaded coils described in Table 3. The average wavelength and loss rates are shown along with the coupling rate and coupling to loss ratio figure-of-merit κ/Γ as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases. Note that the average numerical Γrad shown are again slightly different from the single-loop value of
Optimization of √{square root over (Q1Q2)}/Qκ
In some embodiments, the results above can be used to increase or optimize the performance of a wireless energy transfer system which employs capacitively-loaded coils. For example, the scaling of Eq. (10) with the different system parameters one sees that to maximize the system figure-of-merit κ/Γ one can, for example:
- Decrease the resistivity of the conducting material. This can be achieved, for example, by using good conductors (such as copper or silver) and/or lowering the temperature. At very low temperatures one could use also superconducting materials to achieve extremely good performance.
- Increase the wire radius a. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations. The purpose of this action is mainly to reduce the resistive losses in the wire by increasing the cross-sectional area through which the electric current is flowing, so one could alternatively use also a Litz wire or a ribbon instead of a circular wire.
- For fixed desired distance D of energy transfer, increase the radius of the loop r. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance vs. loop-size ratio Dr, decrease the radius of the loop r. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations.
- Increase the number of turns N. (Even though Eq. (10) is expected to be less accurate for N>1, qualitatively it still provides a good indication that we expect an improvement in the coupling-to-loss ratio with increased N.) In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size and possible voltage considerations, as will be discussed in following sections.
- Adjust the alignment and orientation between the two coils. The figure-of-merit is optimized when both cylindrical coils have exactly the same axis of cylindrical symmetry (namely they are “facing” each other). In some embodiments, particular mutual coil angles and orientations that lead to zero mutual inductance (such as the orientation where the axes of the two coils are perpendicular) should be avoided.
- Finally, note that the height of the coil h is another available design parameter, which has an impact to the performance similar to that of its radius r, and thus the design rules are similar.
The above analysis technique can be used to design systems with desired parameters. For example, as listed below, the above described techniques can be used to determine the cross sectional radius a of the wire which one should use when designing as system two same single-turn loops with a given radius in order to achieve a specific performance in terms of κ/Γ at a given D/r between them, when the material is copper (σ=5.998·107S/m):
D/r=5,κ/Γ≧10,r=30 cma≧9 mm
D/r=5,κ/Γ≧10,r=5 cma≧3.7 mm
D/r=5,κ/Γ≧20,r=30 cma≧20 mm
D/r=5,κ/Γ≧20,r=5 cma≧8.3 mm
D/r=10,κ/Γ≧1,r=30 cma≧7 mm
D/r=10,κ/Γ≧1,r=5 cma≧2.8 mm
D/r=10,κ/Γ≧3,r=30 cma≧25 mm
D/r=10,κ/Γ≧3,r=5 cma≧10 mm
Similar analysis can be done for the case of two dissimilar loops. For example, in some embodiments, the device under consideration is very specific (e.g. a laptop or a cell phone), so the dimensions of the device object (rd, hd, ad, Nd) are very restricted. However, in some such embodiments, the restrictions on the source object (rs, hs, as, Ns) are much less, since the source can, for example, be placed under the floor or on the ceiling. In such cases, the desired distance is often well defined, based on the application (e.g. D˜1 m for charging a laptop on a table wirelessly from the floor). Listed below are examples (simplified to the case Ns=Nd=1 and hs=hd=0) of how one can vary the dimensions of the source object to achieve the desired system performance in terms of κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}, when the material is again copper (σ=5.998·107S/m):
D=1.5m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧15,rd=30 cm,ad=6 mmrs=1.158m,as≧5 mm
D=1.5m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧30,rd=30 cm,ad=6 mmrs=1.15m,as≧33 mm
D=1.5m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧1,rd=5 cm,ad=4 mmrs=1.119m,as≧7 mm
D=1.5m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧2,rd=5 cm,ad=4 mmrs=1.119m,as≧52 mm
D=2m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧10,rd=30 cm,ad=6 mmrs=1.518m,as≧7 mm
D=2m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧20,rd=30 cm,ad=6 mmrs=1.514m,as≧50 mm
D=2m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧0.5,rd=5 cm,ad=4 mmrs=1.491m,as≧5 mm
D=2m,κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}≧1,rd=5 cm,ad=4 mmrs=1.491m,as≧36 mm
Optimization of Qκ
As will be described below, in some embodiments the quality factor Q of the resonant objects is limited from external perturbations and thus varying the coil parameters cannot lead to improvement in Q. In such cases, one may opt to increase the coupling to loss ratio figure-of-merit by decreasing Qκ (i.e. increasing the coupling). The coupling does not depend on the frequency and the number of turns. Therefore, the remaining degrees of freedom are:
- Increase the wire radii a1 and a2. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance D of energy transfer, increase the radii of the coils r1 and r2. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance vs. coil-sizes ratio D/√{square root over (r1r2)}, only the weak (logarithmic) dependence of the inductance remains, which suggests that one should decrease the radii of the coils r1 and r2. In typical embodiments, this action is limited by physical size considerations.
- Adjust the alignment and orientation between the two coils. In typical embodiments, the coupling is optimized when both cylindrical coils have exactly the same axis of cylindrical symmetry (namely they are “facing” each other). Particular mutual coil angles and orientations that lead to zero mutual inductance (such as the orientation where the axes of the two coils are perpendicular) should obviously be avoided.
- Finally, note that the heights of the coils h1 and h2 are other available design parameters, which have an impact to the coupling similar to that of their radii r1 and r2, and thus the design rules are similar.
Further practical considerations apart from efficiency, e.g. physical size limitations, will be discussed in detail below.
It is also important to appreciate the difference between the above described resonant-coupling inductive scheme and the well-known non-resonant inductive scheme for energy transfer. Using CMT it is easy to show that, keeping the geometry and the energy stored at the source fixed, the resonant inductive mechanism allows for ˜Q2 (˜106) times more power delivered for work at the device than the traditional non-resonant mechanism. This is why only close-range contact-less medium-power (˜W) transfer is possible with the latter, while with resonance either close-range but large-power (˜kW) transfer is allowed or, as currently proposed, if one also ensures operation in the strongly-coupled regime, medium-range and medium-power transfer is possible. Capacitively-loaded conducting loops are currently used as resonant antennas (for example in cell phones), but those operate in the far-field regime with D/r>>1, r/λ˜1, and the radiation Q'"'"'s are intentionally designed to be small to make the antenna efficient, so they are not appropriate for energy transfer.
Inductively-Loaded Conducting Rods
A straight conducting rod of length 2h and cross-sectional radius a has distributed capacitance and distributed inductance, and therefore it supports a resonant mode of angular frequency ω. Using the same procedure as in the case of self-resonant coils, one can define an effective total inductance L and an effective total capacitance C of the rod through formulas (2) and (3). With these definitions, the resonant angular frequency and the effective impedance are given again by the common formulas ω=1/√{square root over (LC)} and Z=√{square root over (L/C)} respectively. To calculate the total inductance and capacitance, one can assume again a sinusoidal current profile along the length of the conducting wire. When interested in the lowest mode, if we denote by x the coordinate along the conductor, such that it runs from −h to +h, then the current amplitude profile would have the form I(x)=Io cos (πx/2h), since it has to be zero at the open ends of the rod. This is the well-known half-wavelength electric dipole resonant mode.
In some embodiments, one or more of the resonant objects are inductively-loaded conducting rods. A straight conducting rod of length 2h and cross-sectional radius a, as in the previous paragraph, is cut into two equal pieces of length h, which are connected via a coil wrapped around a magnetic material of relative permeability μ, and everything is surrounded by air. The coil has an inductance Lc, which is added to the distributed inductance of the rod and thus modifies its resonance. Note however, that the presence of the center-loading inductor modifies significantly the current distribution inside the wire and therefore the total effective inductance L and total effective capacitance C of the rod are different respectively from Ls and Cs, which are calculated for a self-resonant rod of the same total length using a sinusoidal current profile, as in the previous paragraph. Since some current is running inside the coil of the external loading inductor, the current distribution j inside the rod is reduced, so L<Ls, and thus, from the charge conservation equation, the linear charge distribution ρl flattens out towards the center (being positive in one side of the rod and negative in the other side of the rod, changing abruptly through the inductor), so C>Cs. The resonant frequency for this system is ω=1/√{square root over ((L+Lc)C)}<ωs=1/√{square root over (LsCs)}, and I(x)→Io cos (πx/2h)L→Ls
ω→ωs, as Lc→0.
In general, the desired CMT parameters can be found for this system, but again a very complicated solution of Maxwell'"'"'s Equations is required. Instead, we will analyze only a special case, where a reasonable guess for the current distribution can be made. When Lc Ls>L, then ω≈1/√{square root over (LcC)}
ωs and Z≈√{square root over (Lc/C)}
Zs, while the current distribution is triangular along the rod (with maximum at the center-loading inductor and zero at the ends) and thus the charge distribution is positive constant on one half of the rod and equally negative constant on the other side of the rod. This allows us now to compute numerically C from Eq. (3). In this case, the integral in Eq. (3) can actually be computed analytically, giving the formula 1/C=1 (π∈oh)[ln(h/a)−1]. Explicit analytical formulas are again available for R from Eq. (4) and (5), since Irms=Io, |p|=qoh and |m|=0 (namely only the electric-dipole term is contributing to radiation), so we can determine also Qabs=1/ωCRabs and Qrad=1/ωCRrad. At the end of the calculations, the validity of the assumption of triangular current profile is confirmed by checking that indeed the condition Lc
Ls
ω
ωs is satisfied. This condition is relatively easily satisfied, since typically a conducting rod has very small self-inductance Ls to begin with.
Another important loss factor in this case is the resistive loss inside the coil of the external loading inductor Lc and it depends on the particular design of the inductor. In some embodiments, the inductor is made of a Brooks coil, which is the coil geometry which, for fixed wire length, demonstrates the highest inductance and thus quality factor. The Brooks coil geometry has NBc turns of conducting wire of cross-sectional radius aBc wrapped around a cylindrically symmetric coil former, which forms a coil with a square cross-section of side rBc, where the inner side of the square is also at radius rBc (and thus the outer side of the square is at radius 2rBc), therefore NBc≈(rBc/2aBc)2. The inductance of the coil is then Lc=2.0285 μorBcNBc2≈2.0285μorBc5/8aBc4 and its resistance
where the total wire length is lBc≈2π(3rBc/2)NBc≈3πrBc3/4aBc2 and we have used an approximate square-root law for the transition of the resistance from the dc to the ac limit as the skin depth varies with frequency.
The external loading inductance Lc provides the freedom to tune the resonant frequency. (For example, for a Brooks coil with a fixed size rBc, the resonant frequency can be reduced by increasing the number of turns NBc by decreasing the wire cross-sectional radius aBc. Then the desired resonant angular frequency ω=1/√{square root over (LcC)} is achieved for aBc ≈(2.0285μorBc5ω2C)1/4 and the resulting coil quality factor is
Then, for the particular simple case LcLs, for which we have analytical formulas, the total Q=1/ωC(Rc+Rabs+Rrad) becomes highest at some optimal frequency {tilde over (ω)}, reaching the value {tilde over (Q)}, both determined by the loading-inductor specific design. (For example, for the Brooks-coil procedure described above, at the optimal frequency {tilde over (Q)}≈Qc≈0.8(μoσ2rBc3/C)1/4) At lower frequencies it is dominated by ohmic loss inside the inductor coil and at higher frequencies by radiation. Note, again, that the above formulas are accurate as long as {tilde over (ω)}
ωs and, as explained above, this is easy to design for by using a large inductance.
The results of the above analysis for two embodiments, using Brooks coils, of subwavelength modes of λ/h≧200 (namely highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) at the optimal frequency {tilde over (ω)} are presented in Table 5. Table 5 shows in parentheses (for similarity to previous tables) analytical results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-loop resonant modes. Note that for conducting material copper (σ=5.998·107S/m) was used. The results show that, in some embodiments, the optimal frequency is in the low-MHz microwave range and the expected quality factors are Qabs≧1000 and Qrad≧100000.
In some embodiments, energy is transferred between two inductively-loaded rods. For the rate of energy transfer between two inductively-loaded rods 1 and 2 at distance D between their centers, the mutual capacitance MC can be evaluated numerically from Eq. (6) by using triangular current distributions in the case ωωs. In this case, the coupling is only electric and again we have an analytical formula, which, in the quasi-static limit h<<D<<λ and for the relative orientation such that the two rods are aligned on the same axis, is 1/MC≈½π∈∈o·(h1h2)2/D3, which means that Qκ∝(D/√{square root over (h1h2)})3 is independent of the frequency ω. Consequently, one can get the resultant coupling figure-of-merit of interest
It can be seen that the optimal frequency {tilde over (ω)}, where the figure-of-merit is maximized to the value , is that where √{square root over (Q1Q2)} is maximized, since Qκ does not depend on frequency (at least for the distances D<<λ of interest for which the quasi-static approximation is still valid). Therefore, the optimal frequency is independent of the distance D between the two rods and lies between the two frequencies where the single-rod Q1 and Q2 peak. Typically, one should tune the inductively-loaded conducting rods, so that their angular eigenfrequencies are close to {tilde over (ω)} within {tilde over (Γ)}, which is half the angular frequency width for which √{square root over (Q1Q2)}/Qκ>
/2.
Referring to Table 6, in parentheses (for similarity to previous tables) analytical results based on the above are shown for two systems each composed of a matched pair of the loaded rods described in Table 5. The average wavelength and loss rates are shown along with the coupling rate and coupling to loss ratio figure-of-merit κ/Γ as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases. Note that for Γrad the single-rod value is used. Again we chose Lc Ls to make the triangular-current assumption a good one and computed MC numerically from Eq. (6). The results show that for medium distances D/h=10−3 the expected coupling-to-loss ratios are in the range κ/Γ˜0.5-100.
Dielectric Disks
In some embodiments, one or more of the resonant objects are dielectric objects, such as disks. Consider a two dimensional dielectric disk object, as shown in
The results for two TE-polarized dielectric-disk subwavelength modes of λ/r≧10 are presented in Table 7. Table 7 shows numerical FDFD (and in parentheses analytical SV) results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-disk resonant modes. Note that disk-material loss-tangent Im{∈}Re {∈}=10−4 was used. (The specific parameters corresponding to the plot in
The required values of ∈, shown in Table 7, might at first seem unrealistically large. However, not only are there in the microwave regime (appropriate for approximately meter-range coupling applications) many materials that have both reasonably high enough dielectric constants and low losses (e.g. Titania, Barium tetratitanate, Lithium tantalite etc.), but also c could signify instead the effective index of other known subwavelength surface-wave systems, such as surface modes on surfaces of metallic materials or plasmonic (metal-like, negative-c) materials or metallo-dielectric photonic crystals or plasmono-dielectric photonic crystals.
To calculate now the achievable rate of energy transfer between two disks 1 and 2, as shown in
Note that even though particular embodiments are presented and analyzed above as examples of systems that use resonant electromagnetic coupling for wireless energy transfer, those of self-resonant conducting coils, capacitively-loaded resonant conducting coils and resonant dielectric disks, any system that supports an electromagnetic mode with its electromagnetic energy extending much further than its size can be used for transferring energy. For example, there can be many abstract geometries with distributed capacitances and inductances that support the desired kind of resonances. In any one of these geometries, one can choose certain parameters to increase and/or optimize √{square root over (Q1Q2)}/Qκ or, if the Q'"'"'s are limited by external factors, to increase and/or optimize for Qκ.
System Sensitivity to Extraneous Objects
In general, the overall performance of particular embodiment of the resonance-based wireless energy-transfer scheme depends strongly on the robustness of the resonant objects'"'"' resonances. Therefore, it is desirable to analyze the resonant objects'"'"' sensitivity to the near presence of random non-resonant extraneous objects. One appropriate analytical model is that of “perturbation theory” (PT), which suggests that in the presence of an extraneous object e the field amplitude a1 (t) inside the resonant object 1 satisfies, to first order:
where again ω1 is the frequency and Γ1 the intrinsic (absorption, radiation etc.) loss rate, while κ11-e is the frequency shift induced onto 1 due to the presence of e and Γ1-e is the extrinsic due to e (absorption inside e, scattering from e etc.) loss rate. The first-order PT model is valid only for small perturbations. Nevertheless, the parameters κ11-e, Γ1-e are well defined, even outside that regime, if a1 is taken to be the amplitude of the exact perturbed mode. Note also that interference effects between the radiation field of the initial resonant-object mode and the field scattered off the extraneous object can for strong scattering (e.g. off metallic objects) result in total radiation—Γ1-e'"'"'s that are smaller than the initial radiation—Γ1 (namely Γ1-e is negative).
The frequency shift is a problem that can be “fixed” by applying to one or more resonant objects a feedback mechanism that corrects its frequency. For example, referring to
As another example, referring to
In various embodiments, other frequency adjusting schemes may be used which rely on information exchange between the resonant objects. For example, the frequency of a source object can be monitored and transmitted to a device object, which is in turn synched to this frequency using frequency adjusters as described above. In other embodiments the frequency of a single clock may be transmitted to multiple devices, and each device then synched to that frequency.
Unlike the frequency shift, the extrinsic loss can be detrimental to the functionality of the energy-transfer scheme, because it is difficult to remedy, so the total loss rate Γ1[e]=Γ1+Γ1-e (and the corresponding figure-of-merit κ[e]/√{square root over (Γ1[e]Γ2[e])}, where κ[e] the perturbed coupling rate) should be quantified. In embodiments using primarily magnetic resonances, the influence of extraneous objects on the resonances is nearly absent. The reason is that, in the quasi-static regime of operation (r<<2) that we are considering, the near field in the air region surrounding the resonator is predominantly magnetic (e.g. for coils with h2r most of the electric field is localized within the self-capacitance of the coil or the externally loading capacitor), therefore extraneous non-conducting objects e that could interact with this field and act as a perturbation to the resonance are those having significant magnetic properties (magnetic permeability Re{μ}>1 or magnetic loss Im{μ}>0). Since almost all every-day non-conducting materials are non-magnetic but just dielectric, they respond to magnetic fields in the same way as free space, and thus will not disturb the resonance of the resonator. Extraneous conducting materials can however lead to some extrinsic losses due to the eddy currents induced on their surface.
As noted above, an extremely important implication of this fact relates to safety considerations for human beings. Humans are also non-magnetic and can sustain strong magnetic fields without undergoing any risk. A typical example, where magnetic fields B˜1T are safely used on humans, is the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technique for medical testing. In contrast, the magnetic near-field required in typical embodiments in order to provide a few Watts of power to devices is only B˜10−4T, which is actually comparable to the magnitude of the Earth'"'"'s magnetic field. Since, as explained above, a strong electric near-field is also not present and the radiation produced from this non-radiative scheme is minimal, it is reasonable to expect that our proposed energy-transfer method should be safe for living organisms.
One can, for example, estimate the degree to which the resonant system of a capacitively-loaded conducting-wire coil has mostly magnetic energy stored in the space surrounding it. If one ignores the fringing electric field from the capacitor, the electric and magnetic energy densities in the space surrounding the coil come just from the electric and magnetic field produced by the current in the wire; note that in the far field, these two energy densities must be equal, as is always the case for radiative fields. By using the results for the fields produced by a subwavelength (rλ) current loop (magnetic dipole) with h=0, we can calculate the ratio of electric to magnetic energy densities, as a function of distance Dp, from the center of the loop (in the limit r
Dp) and the angle θ with respect to the loop axis:
where the second line is the ratio of averages over all angles by integrating the electric and magnetic energy densities over the surface of a sphere of radius Dp. From Eq. (12) it is obvious that indeed for all angles in the near field (x1) the magnetic energy density is dominant, while in the far field (x
1) they are equal as they should be. Also, the preferred positioning of the loop is such that objects which may interfere with its resonance lie close to its axis (θ=0), where there is no electric field. For example, using the systems described in Table 4, we can estimate from Eq. (12) that for the loop of r=30 cm at a distance Dp=10r=3 m the ratio of average electric to average magnetic energy density would be ˜12% and at Dp=3r=90 cm it would be ˜1%, and for the loop of r=10 cm at a distance Dp=10r=1 m the ratio would be ˜33% and at Dp=3r=30 cm it would be ˜2.5%. At closer distances this ratio is even smaller and thus the energy is predominantly magnetic in the near field, while in the radiative far field, where they are necessarily of the same order (ratio→1), both are very small, because the fields have significantly decayed, as capacitively-loaded coil systems are designed to radiate very little. Therefore, this is the criterion that qualifies this class of resonant system as a magnetic resonant system.
To provide an estimate of the effect of extraneous objects on the resonance of a capacitively-loaded loop including the capacitor fringing electric field, we use the perturbation theory formula, stated earlier, Γ1-eabs=ω1/4·∫d3rIm{∈e(r)}|E1(r)|2/U with the computational FEFD results for the field of an example like the one shown in the plot of
Self-resonant coils are more sensitive than capacitively-loaded coils, since for the former the electric field extends over a much larger region in space (the entire coil) rather than for the latter (just inside the capacitor). On the other hand, self-resonant coils are simple to make and can withstand much larger voltages than most lumped capacitors.
In general, different embodiments of resonant systems have different degree of sensitivity to external perturbations, and the resonant system of choice depends on the particular application at hand, and how important matters of sensitivity or safety are for that application. For example, for a medical implantable device (such as a wirelessly powered artificial heart) the electric field extent must be minimized to the highest degree possible to protect the tissue surrounding the device. In such cases where sensitivity to external objects or safety is important, one should design the resonant systems so that the ratio of electric to magnetic energy density ue/um is reduced or minimized at most of the desired (according to the application) points in the surrounding space.
In embodiments using resonances that are not primarily magnetic, the influence of extraneous objects may be of concern. For example, for dielectric disks, small, low-index, low-material-loss or far-away stray objects will induce small scattering and absorption. In such cases of small perturbations these extrinsic loss mechanisms can be quantified using respectively the analytical first-order perturbation theory formulas
Γ1-erad=ω1∫d3rRE{∈e(r)}|E1(r)|2/U
and
Γ1-eabs=ω14·∫d3rIm{∈e(r)}|E1(r)|2/U
where U=½∫d3r∈(r)|E1(r)|2 is the total resonant electromagnetic energy of the unperturbed mode. As one can see, both of these losses depend on the square of the resonant electric field tails E1 at the site of the extraneous object. In contrast, the coupling rate from object 1 to another resonant object 2 is, as stated earlier,
κ=ω1/2·∫d3r∈2(r)E*2(r)E1(r)/∫d3r∈(r)|E1(r)|2
and depends linearly on the field tails E1 of 1 inside 2. This difference in scaling gives us confidence that, for, for example, exponentially small field tails, coupling to other resonant objects should be much faster than all extrinsic loss rates (κΓ1-e), at least for small perturbations, and thus the energy-transfer scheme is expected to be sturdy for this class of resonant dielectric disks. However, we also want to examine certain possible situations where extraneous objects cause perturbations too strong to analyze using the above first-order perturbation theory approach. For example, we place a dielectric disk c close to another off-resonance object of large Re{∈}, Im{∈} and of same size but different shape (such as a human being h), as shown in
Inductively-loaded conducting rods may also be more sensitive than capacitively-loaded coils, since they rely on the electric field to achieve the coupling.
System Efficiency
In general, another important factor for any energy transfer scheme is the transfer efficiency. Consider again the combined system of a resonant source s and device d in the presence of a set of extraneous objects e. The efficiency of this resonance-based energy-transfer scheme may be determined, when energy is being drained from the device at rate Γwork for use into operational work. The coupled-mode-theory equation for the device field-amplitude is
where Γd[e]=Γd[e]rad+Γd[e]abs=Γd[e]rad+(Γdabs+Γd-eabs) is the net perturbed-device loss rate, and similarly we define Γs[e] for the perturbed-source. Different temporal schemes can be used to extract power from the device (e.g. steady-state continuous-wave drainage, instantaneous drainage at periodic times and so on) and their efficiencies exhibit different dependence on the combined system parameters. For simplicity, we assume steady state, such that the field amplitude inside the source is maintained constant, namely as(t)=Ase−iωt, so then the field amplitude inside the device is ad (t)=Ade−iωt with Ad As=iκ[e]/(Γd[e]+Γwork). The various time-averaged powers of interest are then: the useful extracted power is Pwork=2Γwork|Ad|2, the radiated (including scattered) power is Prad=2Γs[e]rad|As|2+2Γd[e]rad|Ad|2, the power absorbed at the source/device is Ps/d=2Γs/dabs|As/d|2, and at the extraneous objects Pe=2/Γs-eabs|As|2+2Γd-eabs|Ad|2. From energy conservation, the total time-averaged power entering the system is Ptotal=Pwork+Prad+Ps+Pd+Pe. Note that the reactive powers, which are usually present in a system and circulate stored energy around it, cancel at resonance (which can be proven for example in electromagnetism from Poynting'"'"'s Theorem) and do not influence the power-balance calculations. The working efficiency is then:
where fom[e]=κ[e]/√{square root over (Γs[e]Γd[e])} is the distance-dependent figure-of-merit of the perturbed resonant energy-exchange system. To derive Eq. (14), we have assumed that the rate Γsupply, at which the power supply is feeding energy to the resonant source, is Γsupply=Γs[e]+κ2/(Γd[e]+Γwork), such that there are zero reflections of the fed power Ptotal back into the power supply.
Referring to
Then from the source circuit at resonance (ωLs=1/ωCs):
and from the device circuit at resonance (ωLd=1 ωCd):
0=Id(Rd+Rw)−jωMIsjωMIs=Id(Rd+Rw)
So by substituting the second to the first:
Now we take the real part (time-averaged powers) to find the efficiency:
Namely,
which with Γwork Rw/2Ld, Γd=Rd/2Ld, Γs=Rs/2Ls, and κ=ωM/2√{square root over (LsLd)}, becomes the general Eq. (14). [End of Example]
From Eq. (14) one can find that the efficiency is optimized in terms of the chosen work-drainage rate, when this is chosen to be Γwork /Γd[e]=Γsupply/Γs[e]=√{square root over (1+fom[e]2)}>1. Then, ηwork is a function of the fom[e], parameter only as shown in
For example, consider the capacitively-loaded coil embodiments described in Table 4, with coupling distance D/r=7, a “human” extraneous object at distance Dh from the source, and that Pwork=10 W must be delivered to the load. Then, we have (based on
Overall System Performance
In many cases, the dimensions of the resonant objects will be set by the particular application at hand. For example, when this application is powering a laptop or a cell-phone, the device resonant object cannot have dimensions larger that those of the laptop or cell-phone respectively. In particular, for a system of two loops of specified dimensions, in terms of loop radii rs,d and wire radii as,d, the independent parameters left to adjust for the system optimization are: the number of turns Ns,d, the frequency f, the work-extraction rate (load resistance) Γwork and the power-supply feeding rate Γsupply.
In general, in various embodiments, the primary dependent variable that one wants to increase or optimize is the overall efficiency η. However, other important variables need to be taken into consideration upon system design. For example, in embodiments featuring capacitively-loaded coils, the design may be constrained by, for example, the currents flowing inside the wires Is,d and the voltages across the capacitors Vs,d. These limitations can be important because for Watt power applications the values for these parameters can be too large for the wires or the capacitors respectively to handle. Furthermore, the total loaded Qtot=ωLd/(Rd+Rw) of the device is a quantity that should be preferably small, because to match the source and device resonant frequencies to within their Q'"'"'s, when those are very large, can be challenging experimentally and more sensitive to slight variations. Lastly, the radiated powers Prad,s,d should be minimized for safety concerns, even though, in general, for a magnetic, non-radiative scheme they are already typically small.
In the following, we examine then the effects of each one of the independent variables on the dependent ones. We define a new variable wp to express the work-drainage rate for some particular value of fom[e] through Γwork/Γd[e]=√{square root over (1+wp·fom[e]2)}. Then, in some embodiments, values which impact the choice of this rate are: Γwork/Γd[e]=1wp=0 to minimize the required energy stored in the source (and therefore Is and Vs)Γwork/Γd[e]=√{square root over (1+fom[e]2)}>1
wp=1 to increase the efficiency, as seen earlier, or Γwork Pd[e]
1
wp
1 to decrease the required energy stored in the device (and therefore Id and Vd) and to decrease or minimize Qtot=ωLd (Rd+Rw)=ω/[2(Γd+Γwork)]. Similar is the impact of the choice of the power supply feeding rate Γsupply, with the roles of the source and the device reversed.
Increasing Ns and Nd increases κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)} and thus efficiency significantly, as seen before, and also decreases the currents Is and Id because the inductance of the loops increases, and thus the energy
required for given output power Pwork can be achieved with smaller currents. However, increasing Nd increases Qtot, and the voltage across the device capacitance Vd, which unfortunately ends up Prad,d being, in typical embodiments one of the greatest limiting factors of the system. To explain this, note that it is the electric field that really induces breakdown of the capacitor material (e.g. 3 kV/mm for air) and not the voltage, and that for the desired (close to the optimal) operational frequency, the increased inductance Ld implies reduced required capacitance Cd, which could be achieved in principle, for a capacitively-loaded device coil by increasing the spacing of the device capacitor plates dd and for a self-resonant coil by increasing through hd the spacing of adjacent turns, resulting in an electric field (≈Vd /dd for the former case) that actually decreases with Nd; however, one cannot in reality increase dd or hd too much, because then the undesired capacitance fringing electric fields would become very large and/or the size of the coil might become too large; and, in any case, for certain applications extremely high voltages are not desired. A similar increasing behavior is observed for the source Prad,s and Vs upon increasing Ns. As a conclusion, the number of turns Ns and Nd have to be chosen the largest possible (for efficiency) that allow for reasonable voltages, fringing electric fields and physical sizes.
With respect to frequency, again, there is an optimal one for efficiency, and Qtot is approximately maximum, close to that optimal frequency. For lower frequencies the currents get worse (larger) but the voltages and radiated powers get better (smaller). Usually, one should pick either the optimal frequency or somewhat lower.
One way to decide on an operating regime for the system is based on a graphical method. In
Finally, one could additionally optimize for the source dimensions, since usually only the device dimensions are limited, as discussed earlier. Namely, one can add rs and as in the set of independent variables and optimize with respect to these too for all the dependent variables of the problem (we saw how to do this only for efficiency earlier). Such an optimization would lead to improved results.
An experimental realization of an embodiment of the above described scheme for wireless energy transfer consists of two self-resonant coils of the type described above, one of which (the source coil) is coupled inductively to an oscillating circuit, and the second (the device coil) is coupled inductively to a resistive load, as shown schematically in
The parameters for the two identical helical coils built for the experimental validation of the power transfer scheme were h=20 cm, a=3 mm, r=30 cm, N=5.25. Both coils are made of copper. Due to imperfections in the construction, the spacing between loops of the helix is not uniform, and we have encapsulated the uncertainty about their uniformity by attributing a 10% (2 cm) uncertainty to h. The expected resonant frequency given these dimensions is fo=10.56±0.3 MHz, which is about 5% off from the measured resonance at around 9.90 MHz.
The theoretical Q for the loops is estimated to be ˜2500 (assuming perfect copper of resistivity ρ=1/σ=1.7×10−8 Ωm) but the measured value is 950±50. We believe the discrepancy is mostly due to the effect of the layer of poorly conducting copper oxide on the surface of the copper wire, to which the current is confined by the short skin depth (˜20 μm) at this frequency. We have therefore used the experimentally observed Q (and Γ1=Γ2=Γ=ω/(2Q) derived from it) in all subsequent computations.
The coupling coefficient κ can be found experimentally by placing the two self-resonant coils (fine-tuned, by slightly adjusting h, to the same resonant frequency when isolated) a distance D apart and measuring the splitting in the frequencies of the two resonant modes in the transmission spectrum. According to coupled-mode theory, the splitting in the transmission spectrum should be Δω=2√{square root over (κ2−Γ2)}. The comparison between experimental and theoretical results as a function of distance when the two the coils are aligned coaxially is shown in
As noted above, the maximum theoretical efficiency depends only on the parameter κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}=κ/Γ, plotted as a function of distance in
The power supply circuit was a standard Colpitts oscillator coupled inductively to the source coil by means of a single loop of copper wire 25 cm in radius (see
In order to isolate the efficiency of the transfer taking place specifically between the source coil and the load, we measured the current at the mid-point of each of the self-resonant coils with a current-probe (which was not found to lower the Q of the coils noticeably.) This gave a measurement of the current parameters I1 and I2 defined above. The power dissipated in each coil was then computed from P1,2=ΓL|I1,2|2, and the efficiency was directly obtained from η=Pwork/(P1+P2+Pwork) To ensure that the experimental setup was well described by a two-object coupled-mode theory model, we positioned the device coil such that its direct coupling to the copper loop attached to the Colpitts oscillator was zero. The experimental results are shown in
Using this embodiment, we were able to transfer significant amounts of power using this setup, fully lighting up a 60 W light-bulb from distances more than 2 m away, for example. As an additional test, we also measured the total power going into the driving circuit. The efficiency of the wireless transfer itself was hard to estimate in this way, however, as the efficiency of the Colpitts oscillator itself is not precisely known, although it is expected to be far from 100%. Nevertheless, this gave an overly conservative lower bound on the efficiency. When transferring 60 W to the load over a distance of 2 m, for example, the power flowing into the driving circuit was 400 W. This yields an overall wall-to-load efficiency of ˜15%, which is reasonable given the expected ˜40% efficiency for the wireless power transfer at that distance and the low efficiency of the driving circuit.
From the theoretical treatment above, we see that in typical embodiments it is important that the coils be on resonance for the power transfer to be practical. We found experimentally that the power transmitted to the load dropped sharply as one of the coils was detuned from resonance. For a fractional detuning Δf/f0 of a few times the inverse loaded Q, the induced current in the device coil was indistinguishable from noise.
The power transfer was not found to be visibly affected as humans and various everyday objects, such as metallic and wooden furniture, as well as electronic devices large and small, were placed between the two coils, even when they drastically obstructed the line of sight between source and device. External objects were found to have an effect only when they were closer than 10 cm from either one of the coils. While some materials (such as aluminum foil, styrofoam and humans) mostly just shifted the resonant frequency, which could in principle be easily corrected with a feedback circuit of the type described earlier, others (cardboard, wood, and PVC) lowered Q when placed closer than a few centimeters from the coil, thereby lowering the efficiency of the transfer.
We believe that this method of power transfer should be safe for humans. When transferring 60 W (more than enough to power a laptop computer) across 2 m, we estimated that the magnitude of the magnetic field generated is much weaker than the Earth'"'"'s magnetic field for all distances except for less than about 1 cm away from the wires in the coil, an indication of the safety of the scheme even after long-term use. The power radiated for these parameters was ˜5 W, which is roughly an order of magnitude higher than cell phones but could be drastically reduced, as discussed below.
Although the two coils are currently of identical dimensions, it is possible to make the device coil small enough to fit into portable devices without decreasing the efficiency. One could, for instance, maintain the product of the characteristic sizes of the source and device coils constant.
These experiments demonstrated experimentally a system for power transfer over medium range distances, and found that the experimental results match theory well in multiple independent and mutually consistent tests.
We believe that the efficiency of the scheme and the distances covered could be appreciably improved by silver-plating the coils, which should increase their Q, or by working with more elaborate geometries for the resonant objects. Nevertheless, the performance characteristics of the system presented here are already at levels where they could be useful in practical applications.
Applications
In conclusion, we have described several embodiments of a resonance-based scheme for wireless non-radiative energy transfer. Although our consideration has been for a static geometry (namely κ and Γe were independent of time), all the results can be applied directly for the dynamic geometries of mobile objects, since the energy-transfer time κ−1 (˜1 μs-1 ms for microwave applications) is much shorter than any timescale associated with motions of macroscopic objects. Analyses of very simple implementation geometries provide encouraging performance characteristics and further improvement is expected with serious design optimization. Thus the proposed mechanism is promising for many modern applications.
For example, in the macroscopic world, this scheme could potentially be used to deliver power to for example, robots and/or computers in a factory room, or electric buses on a highway. In some embodiments source-object could be an elongated “pipe” running above the highway, or along the ceiling.
Some embodiments of the wireless transfer scheme can provide energy to power or charge devices that are difficult or impossible to reach using wires or other techniques. For example some embodiments may provide power to implanted medical devices (e.g. artificial hearts, pacemakers, medicine delivery pumps, etc.) or buried underground sensors.
In the microscopic world, where much smaller wavelengths would be used and smaller powers are needed, one could use it to implement optical inter-connects for CMOS electronics, or to transfer energy to autonomous nano-objects (e.g. MEMS or nano-robots) without worrying much about the relative alignment between the sources and the devices. Furthermore, the range of applicability could be extended to acoustic systems, where the source and device are connected via a common condensed-matter object.
In some embodiments, the techniques described above can provide non-radiative wireless transfer of information using the localized near fields of resonant object. Such schemes provide increased security because no information is radiated into the far-field, and are well suited for mid-range communication of highly sensitive information.
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.