Encryption switch processing

• US 9,633,351 B2
• Filed: 11/04/2010
• Issued: 04/25/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 11/05/2009
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Visa International Service Association (Visa, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Visa International Service Association (Visa, Inc.)
• Inventors: Reed, Judson, Faith, Patrick, Rewis, Ben
• Primary Examiner(s): Reagan, James A
• Application Number:
  US12/939,675
• Publication Number:
  US 20110106710A1
• Time in Patent Office: 2,364 Days
• Field of Search: 705 67
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/20 Point-of-sale [POS] network systems
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/3829 involving key management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/383 Anonymous user system
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/40 Authorisation, e.g. identification of payer or payee, verification of customer or shop credentials; Review and approval of payers, e.g. check credit lines or negative lists
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/401 Transaction verification
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 2209/56 Financial cryptography, e.g. electronic payment or e-cash
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/3226 using a predetermined code, e.g. password, passphrase or PIN network architectures or network communication protocols for supporting authentication of entities using passwords in a packet data network H04L63/083
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 9/3234 involving additional secure or trusted devices, e.g. TPM, smartcard, USB or software token network architectures or network communication protocols for supporting authentication of entities using an additional device in a packet data network H04L63/0853

Abstract

Techniques for eliminating the need for merchants and acquirers to conduct Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) security audit procedures are provided. Merchants and acquirers can eliminate the operating expenses associated with conducting audits to ensure compliance with PCI Data Security Standards (“DSS”), while at the same time ensuring that cardholders'"'"' data remains secure, thus protecting the cardholders from fraudulent transactions. System security is further enhanced through the use of per transaction audits, with the scope of the audit being directly between the Point of Sale (POS) terminal and the payment processing network. PCI DSS compliance can thus be assured on a per transaction basis, as opposed to only ensuring compliance generally for a merchant or acquirer on a periodic basis. Per transaction PCI DSS compliance is assured, while at the same time eliminating the need for merchants or acquirers to conduct compliance audits.

Claims

1. A system comprising:

a key database; and

a transaction processing server computer coupled to the key database, wherein the transaction processing server computer comprises a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium coupled to the processor, the non-transitory computer readable medium comprising code executable by the processor for implementing a method comprising;

receiving from a terminal, an envelope associated with a transaction, wherein the envelope includes unencrypted transaction details, a token derived from a key associated with a terminal and an account identifier, and at least a first portion of the transaction details in an encrypted format, the at least first portion of the transaction details encrypted using the key associated with the terminal, wherein the envelope further includes a hashed message authentication code computed using the key and the at least first portion of the unencrypted transaction details;

retrieving the key associated with the terminal from the key database;

converting the token to the account identifier using the key;

verifying that the account identifier is associated with a valid account; and

conducting an audit on the transaction, the audit ensuring that the envelope has not been modified between the terminal and the transaction processing server computer, wherein the audit includes decrypting the at least first portion of the transaction details and comparing the decrypted at least first portion of the transaction details with the unencrypted transaction details in the envelope associated with the transaction, and recalculating the hashed message authentication code using the key and the at least first portion of the unencrypted transaction details and comparing the recalculated hashed message authentication code with the hashed message authentication code received in the envelope.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the audit is conducted as part of a transaction authorization, the transaction authorization resulting in a decline of the transaction if the audit does not pass.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the method executable by the processor further comprises:

sending the account identifier and at least a second portion of transaction details to an issuer to determine if the transaction is authorized.

4. The system of claim 3, wherein settlement, clearing, and chargeback processes use the token, which is converted to the account identifier prior to sending to the issuer.

5. The system of claim 3 wherein the first and second portions of transaction details are the same.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein a fee charged by the transaction processing server computer for processing the transaction is dependent on the pass/fail status of the audit.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein the envelope includes a personal identification number associated with the account identifier, wherein the personal identification number is encrypted by the terminal with the key associated with the terminal and is decrypted by the transaction processing server computer.

8. The system of claim 1, wherein a failure of the audit does not cause the transaction to be declined.

9. A method comprising:

receiving, at a server computer, from a terminal, an envelope associated with a transaction, wherein the envelope includes unencrypted transaction details, a token derived from a key associated with a terminal and an account identifier, and at least a first portion of the transaction details in an encrypted format, the at least first portion of the transaction details encrypted using the key associated with the terminal, wherein the envelope further includes a hashed message authentication code computed using the key and the at least first portion of the unencrypted transaction details;

converting the token to the account identifier;

verifying that the account identifier is associated with a valid account; and

conducting an audit on the transaction, the audit ensuring that the envelope has not been modified between the terminal and the server computer, wherein the audit includes decrypting the at least first portion of the transaction details and comparing the decrypted at least first portion of the transaction details with the unencrypted transaction details in the envelope associated with the transaction, and recalculating the hashed message authentication code using the key and the at least first portion of the unencrypted transaction details and comparing the recalculated hashed message authentication code with the hashed message authentication code received in the envelope.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the audit is conducted as part of a transaction authorization, the transaction authorization resulting in a decline of the transaction if the audit does not pass.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein a failure of the audit does not cause the transaction to be declined.

12. The method of claim 9, further comprising:

sending the account identifier and at least a second portion of transaction details to an issuer to determine if the transaction is authorized.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the first and second portions of transaction details are the same.

14. The method of claim 12, wherein settlement, clearing, and chargeback processes use the token, which is converted to the account identifier prior to sending to the issuer.

15. The method of claim 9 wherein the envelope includes a personal identification number associated with the account identifier, wherein the personal identification number is encrypted by the terminal with the key associated with the terminal and is decrypted by the server computer.

16. The method of claim 9 wherein a fee charged by the server computer for processing the transaction is dependent on the pass/fail status of the audit.