Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system
First Claim
Patent Images
1. A method for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
- determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, results for a first plurality of contact-agent interactions;
determining, by the at least one computer processor, results for a second plurality of contact-agent interactions;
determining, by the at least one computer processor, combined results across the first and second pluralities of contact-agent interactions corrected for a Yule-Simpson effect; and
outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the combined results, wherein the combined results demonstrate that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized after correcting for the Yule-Simpson effect.
4 Assignments
0 Petitions
Accused Products
Abstract
Techniques for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system are disclosed. In one particular embodiment, the techniques may be realized as a method for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system including determining results for a first plurality of contact-agent interactions, determining results for a second plurality of contact-agent interactions, and determining combined results across the first and second pluralities of contact-agent interactions corrected for a Yule-Simpson effect.
234 Citations
20 Claims
-
1. A method for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
-
determining, by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, results for a first plurality of contact-agent interactions; determining, by the at least one computer processor, results for a second plurality of contact-agent interactions; determining, by the at least one computer processor, combined results across the first and second pluralities of contact-agent interactions corrected for a Yule-Simpson effect; and outputting, by the at least one computer processor, the combined results, wherein the combined results demonstrate that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized after correcting for the Yule-Simpson effect. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
-
-
8. A system for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system, wherein the at least one computer processor is further configured to; determine results for a first plurality of contact-agent interactions; determine results for a second plurality of contact-agent interactions; determine combined results across the first and second pluralities of contact-agent interactions corrected for a Yule-Simpson effect; and output the combined results, wherein the combined results demonstrate that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized after correcting for the Yule-Simpson effect. - View Dependent Claims (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14)
-
15. An article of manufacture for benchmarking pairing strategies in a contact center system comprising:
-
a non-transitory computer processor readable medium; and instructions stored on the medium; wherein the instructions are configured to be readable from the medium by at least one computer processor communicatively coupled to and configured to operate in the contact center system and thereby cause the at least one computer processor to operate further so as to; determine results for a first plurality of contact-agent interactions; determine results for a second plurality of contact-agent interactions; determine combined results across the first and second pluralities of contact-agent interactions corrected for a Yule-Simpson effect; and output the combined results, wherein the combined results demonstrate that optimizing performance of the contact center system may be realized after correcting for the Yule-Simpson effect. - View Dependent Claims (16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
-
Specification