Multiple procesor hazard detection system

• US 9,761,124 B2
• Filed: 10/24/2016
• Issued: 09/12/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 07/18/2013
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Google LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)
• Inventors: Matsuoka, Yoky, Fadell, Anthony Michael, Rogers, Matthew Lee, Lee, Jeffery Theodore
• Primary Examiner(s): POPE, DARYL C
• Application Number:
  US15/332,892
• Publication Number:
  US 20170039842A1
• Time in Patent Office: 323 Days
• Field of Search: 340514, 340506, 340511, 340517, 340 31, 3405391, 34053911
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 17/10 Actuation by presence of smoke or gases , e.g. automatic alarm devices for analysing flowing fluid materials by the use of optical means
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 19/00 Alarms responsive to two or more different undesired or abnormal conditions, e.g. burglary and fire, abnormal temperature and abnormal rate of flow
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/14 Toxic gas alarms G08B21/16 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 21/182 Level alarms, e.g. alarms responsive to variables exceeding a threshold
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/001 Alarm cancelling procedures or alarm forwarding decisions, e.g. based on absence of alarm confirmation
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/002 Generating a prealarm to the central station
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/008 Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/14 checking the detection circuits
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 29/20 Calibration, including self-calibrating arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 3/10 using electric transmission; using electromagnetic transmission

Abstract

Systems and methods for using multi-criteria state machines to manage alarming states and pre-alarming states of a hazard detection system are described herein. The multi-criteria state machines can include one or more sensor state machines that can control the alarming states and one or more system state machines that can control the pre-alarming states. Each state machine can transition among any one of its states based on sensor data values, hush events, and transition conditions. The transition conditions can define how a state machine transitions from one state to another. The hazard detection system can use a dual processor arrangement to execute the multi-criteria state machines according to various embodiments. The dual processor arrangement can enable the hazard detection system to manage the alarming and pre-alarming states in a manner that promotes minimal power usage while simultaneously promoting reliability in hazard detection and alarming functionality.

Claims

1. A hazard detector comprising:

a first processor couple to receive readings from at least one sensor; and

a second processor coupled to wireless transceiver circuitry and operative to process external wireless communications;

wherein the hazard detector is characterized by at least six states selected from the group consisting of;

(1) idle state characterized by a first sampling rate;

(2) monitoring state characterized by a second sampling rate that is higher than the first sampling rate and entered into after a first threshold value is sensed by the at least one sensor;

(3) alarming state characterized by a loud shrieking noise corresponding to a detected hazard;

(4) alarm hush state characterized by a silencing of the loud shrieking noise;

(5) pre-alarm state characterized by a voice output; and

(6) pre-alarm hush state characterized by a silencing of the voice output;

wherein states (1)-(4) are controlled by the first processor;

wherein states (5) and (6) are controlled by the second processor; and

wherein operation of the hazard detector is robust against failure of the second processor in that the hazard detector is able to maintain basic operation of states (1)-(4) even while the hazard detector cannot communicate via the wireless transceiver or control operation of states (5) and (6) due to unavailability of the second processor.

2. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the first processor is operative to enter into the alarm hush state in response to a hush command input when the hazard detector is in the alarming state.

3. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the second processor is operative to enter into the pre-alarm state after a second threshold value is sensed by the at least one sensor, wherein the second threshold value is greater than the first threshold value.

4. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the second processor is operative to enter into the pre-alarm hush state in response to a hush command when the hazard detector is in the pre-alarm state.

5. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the first processor is operative is operative to enter into the alarming state after a third threshold value is sensed by the at least one sensor, wherein the third threshold value is greater than the first threshold.

6. The hazard detector of claim 5, wherein the third threshold is an adjustable smoke alarm threshold.

7. The hazard detector of claim 6, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a smoke sensor, a carbon monoxide sensor, a heat sensor, and a humidity sensor, and wherein the adjustable smoke alarm threshold changes based on data values associated with at least one of the carbon monoxide sensor, the heat sensor, and the humidity sensor.

8. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor is a carbon monoxide sensor and the third threshold is an alarm time threshold, and wherein the first processor is operative to:

maintain a plurality of CO buckets by adding time units to at least one of the CO buckets; and

transition to the alarming state when any one of the CO buckets has a time level that exceeds the alarm time threshold for that CO bucket.

9. The hazard detector of claim 8, wherein the second processor is operative to transition to the pre-alarming state when any one of the CO buckets has a time level that exceeds a pre-alarm time threshold associated with that one CO bucket, and wherein the pre-alarm time threshold for any given CO bucket is less than an alarm time threshold for that same CO bucket.

10. The hazard detector of claim 9, wherein the first processor is operative to subtract time units from at least one of the CO buckets.

11. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the first processor is a safety processor and the second processor is a system processor.

12. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the wireless transceiver circuitry comprises 802.11 wireless circuitry.

13. The hazard detector of claim 1, wherein the wireless transceiver circuitry comprises 802.15.4 wireless circuitry.