Efficient near-field wireless energy transfer using adiabatic system variations
First Claim
1. A method comprising:
- transferring energy from a first resonant object to a second resonant object using a third resonant object to mediate the energy transfer, wherein the third resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, more strongly than the first resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with the second resonant object; and
maintaining a reduced level of energy accumulation in the third resonant object by varying over time a coupling rate between the third resonant object and (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, based on a loss rate of (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both;
wherein the reduced level of energy accumulation is reduced relative to energy accumulation that would occur in the third resonant object without the varying of the coupling rate over time.
3 Assignments
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
Disclosed is a method for transferring energy wirelessly including transferring energy wirelessly from a first resonator structure to an intermediate resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B, transferring energy wirelessly from the intermediate resonator structure to a second resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2, and during the wireless energy transfers, adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 to reduce energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure and improve wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure through the intermediate resonator structure.
479 Citations
No References
TUNING AND GAIN CONTROL IN ELECTRO-MAGNETIC POWER SYSTEMS | ||
Patent #
US 20110018361A1
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q CAPACITIVELY LOADED CONDUCTING LOOPS | ||
Patent #
US 20110043046A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS DELIVERY OF POWER TO A FIXED-GEOMETRY POWER PART | ||
Patent #
US 20110049998A1
Filed 11/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONATORS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110012431A1
Filed 09/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110074347A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS DESKTOP IT ENVIRONMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20110049996A1
Filed 08/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110074218A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
PACKAGING AND DETAILS OF A WIRELESS POWER DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20110025131A1
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Contactless battery charging apparel | ||
Patent #
US 7,863,859 B2
Filed 06/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Cynetic Designs Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Cynetic Designs Ltd.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110089895A1
Filed 11/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20110140544A1
Filed 02/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
SHORT RANGE EFFICIENT WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110148219A1
Filed 02/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20110221278A1
Filed 05/20/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS OF LOAD DETECTION FOR A PLANAR WIRELESS POWER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20110169339A1
Filed 03/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
FLAT, ASYMMETRIC, AND E-FIELD CONFINED WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20110198939A1
Filed 03/04/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20110193419A1
Filed 02/28/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESSLY POWERED SPEAKER | ||
Patent #
US 20110181122A1
Filed 04/01/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE MATCHING, TUNING, AND POWER TRANSFER OF WIRELESS POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20110227528A1
Filed 05/13/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR PORTABLE WIRELESS POWER CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20110227530A1
Filed 05/26/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,022,576 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER RECEIVING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER FEEDING SYSTEM, AND ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20110162895A1
Filed 03/18/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20110241618A1
Filed 06/17/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
OPTIMIZATION OF WIRELESS POWER DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100244576A1
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
PHASED ARRAY WIRELESS RESONANT POWER DELIVERY SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100033021A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER FOR CHARGEABLE AND CHARGING DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100225272A1
Filed 01/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
REDUCED JAMMING BETWEEN RECEIVERS AND WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTERS | ||
Patent #
US 20100151808A1
Filed 11/05/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS HIGH POWER TRANSFER UNDER REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117596A1
Filed 07/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Self-Charging Electric Vehicles and Aircraft, and Wireless Energy Distribution System | ||
Patent #
US 20100231163A1
Filed 09/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Paradigm Shift Solutions
|
Original Assignee
Governing Dynamics LLC
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100289449A1
Filed 12/18/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100187913A1
Filed 04/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
EFFICIENCY INDICATOR FOR INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201513A1
Filed 10/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM AND A LOAD APPARATUS IN THE SAME WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100164295A1
Filed 11/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Maxell Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi Consumer Electronics Company Limited
|
Security for wireless transfer of electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 20100276995A1
Filed 04/29/2009
|
Current Assignee
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR FURNISHINGS AND BUILDING ELEMENTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201202A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESSLY POWERED SPEAKER | ||
Patent #
US 20100081379A1
Filed 09/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
ELECTRICAL POWERED VEHICLE AND POWER FEEDING DEVICE FOR VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100225271A1
Filed 09/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
APPLICATIONS OF WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING COUPLED ANTENNAS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117456A1
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER AND DATA TRANSFER FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194335A1
Filed 11/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
EFFICIENT NEAR-FIELD WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING ADIABATIC SYSTEM VARIATIONS | ||
Patent #
US 20100148589A1
Filed 10/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONANCE-TYPE NON-CONTACT CHARGING APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100156346A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Jidoshi Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha, Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201313A1
Filed 10/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
BIDIRECTIONAL WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100148723A1
Filed 09/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER IN PUBLIC PLACES | ||
Patent #
US 20100201201A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER RECEIVING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING DEVICE, NONCONTACT ELECTRIC POWER FEEDING SYSTEM, AND ELECTRICALLY POWERED VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100065352A1
Filed 08/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR CHARGEABLE DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100225270A1
Filed 10/22/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
PACKAGING AND DETAILS OF A WIRELESS POWER DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100327661A1
Filed 09/10/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER USING COUPLED RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100117455A1
Filed 01/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RETROFITTING WIRELESS POWER AND NEAR-FIELD COMMUNICATION IN ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194334A1
Filed 11/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER DISTANCES TO A MOVING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100187911A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER WITH LIGHTING | ||
Patent #
US 20100194207A1
Filed 02/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
David S. Graham
|
Original Assignee
David S. Graham
|
RESONATORS AND THEIR COUPLING CHARACTERISTICS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER VIA MAGNETIC COUPLING | ||
Patent #
US 20100327660A1
Filed 08/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE MATCHING AND TUNING OF HF WIRELESS POWER TRANSMIT ANTENNA | ||
Patent #
US 20100117454A1
Filed 07/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING AND POWER MANAGEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20100017249A1
Filed 07/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Charge Fusion Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Charge Fusion Technologies LLC
|
Resonator for wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20100156570A1
Filed 12/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER A DISTANCE WITH DEVICES AT VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100207458A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Method and Apparatus of Load Detection for a Planar Wireless Power System | ||
Patent #
US 20100066349A1
Filed 09/12/2008
|
Current Assignee
University of Florida Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
University of Florida Research Foundation Incorporated
|
Multilayer structures for magnetic shielding | ||
Patent #
US 7,795,708 B2
Filed 06/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
CONCURRENT WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION AND NEAR-FIELD COMMUNICATION | ||
Patent #
US 20100190436A1
Filed 08/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Short Range Efficient Wireless Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20100038970A1
Filed 04/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,825,543 B2
Filed 03/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
APPARATUS FOR DRIVING ARTIFICIAL RETINA USING MEDIUM-RANGE WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION TECHNIQUE | ||
Patent #
US 20100094381A1
Filed 06/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
|
RECEIVE ANTENNA ARRANGEMENT FOR WIRELESS POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20100210233A1
Filed 09/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
MULTI POWER SOURCED ELECTRIC VEHICLE | ||
Patent #
US 20100109604A1
Filed 05/09/2008
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER INFRASTRUCTURE | ||
Patent #
US 20100256831A1
Filed 04/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Apparatus and system for transmitting power wirelessly | ||
Patent #
US 7,843,288 B2
Filed 04/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Postech Academy-Industry Foundation
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Postech Academy-Industry Foundation
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q TO MORE THAN ONE DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100127575A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100045114A1
Filed 08/20/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100201310A1
Filed 04/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
Apparatus for wireless power transmission using high Q low frequency near magnetic field resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20100123530A1
Filed 11/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
ANTENNA SHARING FOR WIRELESSLY POWERED DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100222010A1
Filed 01/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
MAXIMIZING POWER YIELD FROM WIRELESS POWER MAGNETIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100171370A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER APPARATUS AND WIRELESS POWER-RECEIVING METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20100244583A1
Filed 03/31/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244839A1
Filed 03/15/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
PASSIVE RECEIVERS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100190435A1
Filed 08/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SPREAD SPECTRUM WIRELESS RESONANT POWER DELIVERY | ||
Patent #
US 20100034238A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100052431A1
Filed 09/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DESIGNING NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100115474A1
Filed 11/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100237708A1
Filed 03/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Noncontact Electric Power Transmission System | ||
Patent #
US 20100219696A1
Filed 02/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co Limited
|
Original Assignee
TOKO Incorporated
|
PARASITIC DEVICES FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100277120A1
Filed 04/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q SUB-WAVELENGTH RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100123355A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q AT HIGH EFFICIENCY | ||
Patent #
US 20100127574A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION SCHEDULING | ||
Patent #
US 20100253281A1
Filed 03/02/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Power Transfer Apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20100244582A1
Filed 03/30/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWERING AND CHARGING STATION | ||
Patent #
US 20100277005A1
Filed 07/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
NONCONTACT POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100295506A1
Filed 09/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
TRANSMITTERS FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100184371A1
Filed 09/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
TRACKING RECEIVER DEVICES WITH WIRELESS POWER SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20100248622A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q DEVICES AT VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100123354A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
IMPEDANCE CHANGE DETECTION IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100217553A1
Filed 12/17/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
INTEGRATED WIRELESS RESONANT POWER CHARGING AND COMMUNICATION CHANNEL | ||
Patent #
US 20100036773A1
Filed 09/30/2008
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corporation
|
FLAT, ASYMMETRIC, AND E-FIELD CONFINED WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20100052811A1
Filed 08/20/2009
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100102639A1
Filed 09/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS VARIABLE DISTANCES | ||
Patent #
US 20100102641A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q SIMILAR RESONANT FREQUENCY RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100096934A1
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER TO A MOVING DEVICE BETWEEN HIGH-Q RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100102640A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100109443A1
Filed 07/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER A DISTANCE AT HIGH EFFICIENCY | ||
Patent #
US 20100127573A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION FOR PORTABLE WIRELESS POWER CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100127660A1
Filed 08/18/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER WITH HIGH-Q FROM MORE THAN ONE SOURCE | ||
Patent #
US 20100123353A1
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Power supply system and method of controlling power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 20100123452A1
Filed 10/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS VARIABLE DISTANCES WITH HIGH-Q CAPACITIVELY-LOADED CONDUCTING-WIRE LOOPS | ||
Patent #
US 20100133919A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,741,734 B2
Filed 07/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER OVER VARIABLE DISTANCES BETWEEN RESONATORS OF SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR RESONANT FREQUENCIES | ||
Patent #
US 20100133918A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ADAPTIVE POWER CONTROL FOR WIRELESS CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100181961A1
Filed 11/10/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER ACROSS A DISTANCE TO A MOVING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20100133920A1
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
HIGH EFFICIENCY AND POWER TRANSFER IN WIRELESS POWER MAGNETIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100181844A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR VEHICLES | ||
Patent #
US 20100201189A1
Filed 10/02/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER FOR CHARGING DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20100194206A1
Filed 11/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER CHARGING TIMING AND CHARGING CONTROL | ||
Patent #
US 20100213895A1
Filed 10/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MAGNETIC POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20100201205A1
Filed 04/23/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
INDUCED POWER TRANSMISSION CIRCUIT | ||
Patent #
US 20100213770A1
Filed 09/15/2008
|
Current Assignee
Hideo Kikuchi
|
Original Assignee
Hideo Kikuchi
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201316A1
Filed 02/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
NON-CONTACT POWER TRANSMISSION APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100201204A1
Filed 02/08/2010
|
Current Assignee
Toyota Industries Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Jidoshokki
|
INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20100237707A1
Filed 02/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLYING APPARATUS AND ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMITTING SYSTEM USING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100219695A1
Filed 02/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
COIL UNIT, AND POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE AND POWER RECEPTION DEVICE USING THE COIL UNIT | ||
Patent #
US 20100244579A1
Filed 03/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
|
WIRELESS ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY METHOD AND WIRELESS ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244581A1
Filed 03/29/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER SYSTEM AND PROXIMITY EFFECTS | ||
Patent #
US 20100237706A1
Filed 02/19/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
POWER TRANSMMISSION APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMISSION/RECEPTION APPARATUS, AND METHOD OF TRANSMITTING POWER | ||
Patent #
US 20100244578A1
Filed 03/16/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER BRIDGE | ||
Patent #
US 20100225175A1
Filed 05/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20100244580A1
Filed 03/24/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
WIRELESS POWER RANGE INCREASE USING PARASITIC RESONATORS | ||
Patent #
US 20100231053A1
Filed 05/26/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND WIRELESS POWER SUPPLY METHOD | ||
Patent #
US 20100244577A1
Filed 03/11/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE, POWER TRANSMISSION METHOD, POWER RECEPTION DEVICE, POWER RECEPTION METHOD, AND POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100259109A1
Filed 04/06/2010
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSMITTING SYSTEM, POWER RECEIVING STATION, POWER TRANSMITTING STATION, AND RECORDING MEDIUM | ||
Patent #
US 20100264746A1
Filed 03/30/2010
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
LONG RANGE LOW FREQUENCY RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20100253152A1
Filed 03/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RESONATORS FOR WIRELESS POWER APPLICATIONS | ||
Patent #
US 20100264745A1
Filed 03/18/2010
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
PLANAR COIL AND CONTACTLESS ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION DEVICE USING THE SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20100277004A1
Filed 12/24/2008
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Panasonic Corporation
|
MOBILE TERMINALS AND BATTERY PACKS FOR MOBILE TERMINALS | ||
Patent #
US 20100295505A1
Filed 05/24/2010
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hanrim Postech Co. Ltd.
|
ADAPTIVE IMPEDANCE TUNING IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSMISSION | ||
Patent #
US 20100277003A1
Filed 02/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS RELATING TO MULTI-DIMENSIONAL WIRELESS CHARGING | ||
Patent #
US 20100289341A1
Filed 09/25/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Inductively powered secondary assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,474,058 B2
Filed 11/10/2006
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY, REMOTE DEVICE POWERED BY INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAME | ||
Patent #
US 20090010028A1
Filed 09/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless Energy Transfer Using Coupled Antennas | ||
Patent #
US 20090015075A1
Filed 07/09/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power System and Proximity Effects | ||
Patent #
US 20090045772A1
Filed 06/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Transmitter head and system for contactless energy transmission | ||
Patent #
US 7,492,247 B2
Filed 02/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sew-Eurodrive GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Sew-Eurodrive GmbH Company KG
|
INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A RESONATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20090051224A1
Filed 08/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Deployable Antennas for Wireless Power | ||
Patent #
US 20090033564A1
Filed 08/02/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
LONG RANGE LOW FREQUENCY RESONATOR AND MATERIALS | ||
Patent #
US 20090058189A1
Filed 08/11/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
CONTACTLESS POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20090067198A1
Filed 08/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Michael Thomas Mcelhinny, David Jeffrey Graham, Jesse Frederick Goellner, Alexander Brailovsky
|
High Efficiency and Power Transfer in Wireless Power Magnetic Resonators | ||
Patent #
US 20090072629A1
Filed 09/16/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Antennas for Wireless Power applications | ||
Patent #
US 20090072628A1
Filed 09/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Maximizing Power Yield from Wireless Power Magnetic Resonators | ||
Patent #
US 20090072627A1
Filed 09/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Transmitters and receivers for wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090079268A1
Filed 09/16/2008
|
Current Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090108679A1
Filed 10/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
ATI Technologies ULC
|
Power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 7,514,818 B2
Filed 10/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Electric Works Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Company Limited
|
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDUCTIVE CHARGING OF PORTABLE DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20090096413A1
Filed 05/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Power adapter for a remote device | ||
Patent #
US 7,518,267 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
SYSTEM, DEVICES, AND METHOD FOR ENERGIZING PASSIVE WIRELESS DATA COMMUNICATION DEVICES | ||
Patent #
US 20090108997A1
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR WIRELESS ENERGY AND/OR DATA TRANSMISSION BETWEEN A SOURCE DEVICE AND AT LEAST ONE TARGET DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 20090085408A1
Filed 08/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Maquet GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Maquet GmbH Company KG
|
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD COIL | ||
Patent #
US 20090085706A1
Filed 09/24/2008
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Biological Effects of Magnetic Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090102292A1
Filed 09/18/2008
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,525,283 B2
Filed 02/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless Power Range Increase Using Parasitic Antennas | ||
Patent #
US 20090134712A1
Filed 11/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Bridge | ||
Patent #
US 20090127937A1
Filed 02/29/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
NON-CONTACT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, METHOD OF ADJUSTING RESONANCE FREQUENCY OF NON-CONTACT WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ANTENNA, AND MOBILE TERMINAL APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20090146892A1
Filed 11/14/2008
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan Incorporated
|
ENERGY TRANSFERRING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | ||
Patent #
US 20090153273A1
Filed 06/19/2008
|
Current Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Antenna arrangement for inductive power transmission and use of the antenna arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 7,545,337 B2
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090160261A1
Filed 12/19/2007
|
Current Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nokia Corporation
|
Wireless powering and charging station | ||
Patent #
US 20090179502A1
Filed 01/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Transfer using Magneto Mechanical Systems | ||
Patent #
US 20090167449A1
Filed 10/13/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
VEHICLE POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS AND VEHICLE WINDOW MEMBER | ||
Patent #
US 20090189458A1
Filed 01/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY WITH DUTY CYCLE CONTROL | ||
Patent #
US 20090174263A1
Filed 01/07/2009
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090195333A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090195332A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless desktop IT environment | ||
Patent #
US 20090212636A1
Filed 01/11/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Antennas and Their Coupling Characteristics for Wireless Power Transfer via Magnetic Coupling | ||
Patent #
US 20090213028A1
Filed 02/26/2009
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
APPARATUS, A SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR ENABLING ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090237194A1
Filed 09/11/2007
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090224856A1
Filed 05/08/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Packaging and Details of a Wireless Power device | ||
Patent #
US 20090224609A1
Filed 03/09/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Ferrite Antennas for Wireless Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20090224608A1
Filed 02/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE COIL PRIMARY | ||
Patent #
US 20090230777A1
Filed 03/12/2009
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power Transmitting Apparatus, Power Transmission Method, Program, and Power Transmission System | ||
Patent #
US 20090271048A1
Filed 04/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
POWER TRANSMITTING APPARATUS, POWER RECEIVING APPARATUS, POWER TRANSMISSION METHOD, PROGRAM, AND POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20090271047A1
Filed 04/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Tuning and Gain Control in Electro-Magnetic power systems | ||
Patent #
US 20090243394A1
Filed 03/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Power Exchange Device, Power Exchange Method, Program, and Power Exchange System | ||
Patent #
US 20090251008A1
Filed 04/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090267709A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090267710A1
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Low frequency transcutaneous energy transfer to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 7,599,743 B2
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Packaging and Details of a Wireless Power device | ||
Patent #
US 20090243397A1
Filed 03/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Wireless Power Charging System | ||
Patent #
US 20090267558A1
Filed 06/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Spacon Co. Ltd.
|
WIRELESS CHARGING MODULE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | ||
Patent #
US 20090289595A1
Filed 10/09/2008
|
Current Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Darfon Electronics Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,615,936 B2
Filed 04/27/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power Transmission Device, Power Transmission Method, Program, Power Receiving Device and Power Transfer System | ||
Patent #
US 20090281678A1
Filed 05/06/2009
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
REVERSE LINK SIGNALING VIA RECEIVE ANTENNA IMPEDANCE MODULATION | ||
Patent #
US 20090286476A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
SIGNALING CHARGING IN WIRELESS POWER ENVIRONMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20090286475A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AN ENLARGED WIRELESS CHARGING AREA | ||
Patent #
US 20090284218A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER FOR APPLIANCES AND EQUIPMENTS | ||
Patent #
US 20090284245A1
Filed 11/07/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL FOR A WIRELESS CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20090284369A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ADAPTIVE TUNING OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090284220A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE ENHANCEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20090284083A1
Filed 05/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
RECEIVE ANTENNA FOR WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090284227A1
Filed 10/10/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Wireless Delivery of power to a Fixed-Geometry power part | ||
Patent #
US 20090273242A1
Filed 05/05/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
REPEATERS FOR ENHANCEMENT OF WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20090286470A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS WITH NEGATIVE RESISTANCE IN WIRELESS POWER TRANSFERS | ||
Patent #
US 20090284082A1
Filed 11/06/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,639,514 B2
Filed 03/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless delivery of power to a mobile powered device | ||
Patent #
US 20090299918A1
Filed 05/28/2008
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Downhole Coils | ||
Patent #
US 20080012569A1
Filed 09/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for delivering energy to an electrical or electronic device via a wireless link | ||
Patent #
US 20080014897A1
Filed 01/17/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Flexible Circuit for Downhole Antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20080030415A1
Filed 08/02/2006
|
Current Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20080067874A1
Filed 09/14/2007
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Inductive power adapter | ||
Patent #
US 7,378,817 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductive battery charger | ||
Patent #
US 7,375,493 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively charged battery pack | ||
Patent #
US 7,375,492 B2
Filed 12/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,385,357 B2
Filed 11/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
System and method for powering a load | ||
Patent #
US 7,382,636 B2
Filed 10/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
INDUCTIVELY COUPLED BALLAST CIRCUIT | ||
Patent #
US 20080191638A1
Filed 02/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Transmission Of Power Supply For Robot Applications Between A First Member And A Second Member Arranged Rotatable Relative To One Another | ||
Patent #
US 20080197710A1
Filed 11/30/2005
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
WIRELESS POWER APPARATUS AND METHODS | ||
Patent #
US 20080211320A1
Filed 01/22/2008
|
Current Assignee
Witricity Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nigel Power LLC
|
Amplification Relay Device of Electromagnetic Wave and a Radio Electric Power Conversion Apparatus Using the Above Device | ||
Patent #
US 20080266748A1
Filed 07/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Andong National University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, JC Protek Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Andong National University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation, JC Protek Company Limited
|
No point of contact charging system | ||
Patent #
US 7,443,135 B2
Filed 04/11/2005
|
Current Assignee
GE Hybrid Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hanrim Postech Co. Ltd.
|
High power wireless resonant energy transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 20080265684A1
Filed 10/25/2007
|
Current Assignee
Leslie Farkas
|
Original Assignee
Laszlo Farkas
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20080278264A1
Filed 03/26/2008
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
OPTIMIZING ENERGY TRANSMISSION IN A LEADLESS TISSUE STIMULATION SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20080294208A1
Filed 05/23/2007
|
Current Assignee
EBR Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
EBR Systems Inc.
|
Resonator structure and method of producing it | ||
Patent #
US 7,466,213 B2
Filed 09/27/2004
|
Current Assignee
Qorvo Inc.
|
Original Assignee
NXP B.V.
|
Portable inductive power station | ||
Patent #
US 7,462,951 B1
Filed 08/11/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power transmission system, apparatus and method with communication | ||
Patent #
US 20070010295A1
Filed 07/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Passive dynamic antenna tuning circuit for a radio frequency identification reader | ||
Patent #
US 20070013483A1
Filed 06/29/2006
|
Current Assignee
Allflex USA Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Allflex USA Incorporated
|
Implantable device for vital signs monitoring | ||
Patent #
US 20070016089A1
Filed 07/15/2005
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc., Hi-Tronics Designs Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc., Hi-Tronics Designs Inc.
|
Wireless power transmission systems and methods | ||
Patent #
US 20070021140A1
Filed 07/22/2005
|
Current Assignee
Emerson Process Management Power Water Solutions Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Emerson Process Management Power Water Solutions Incorporated
|
Battery Chargers and Methods for Extended Battery Life | ||
Patent #
US 20070024246A1
Filed 07/27/2006
|
Current Assignee
David Flaugher
|
Original Assignee
David Flaugher
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,180,248 B2
Filed 10/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductive power transfer units having flux shields | ||
Patent #
US 20070064406A1
Filed 09/08/2004
|
Current Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
Spatially decoupled twin secondary coils for optimizing transcutaneous energy transfer (TET) power transfer characteristics | ||
Patent #
US 7,191,007 B2
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Resonator system | ||
Patent #
US 7,193,418 B2
Filed 06/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Bruker Switzerland AG
|
Original Assignee
Bruker Biospin AG
|
CHARGING APPARATUS AND CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070069687A1
Filed 08/09/2006
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Japan Incorporated
|
HIGH PERFORMANCE INTERCONNECT DEVICES & STRUCTURES | ||
Patent #
US 20070105429A1
Filed 11/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Georgia Tech Research Corporation
|
Radio-frequency (RF) power portal | ||
Patent #
US 20070117596A1
Filed 11/17/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,212,414 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
RADIO TAG AND SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070096875A1
Filed 05/22/2006
|
Current Assignee
Visible Assets Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Visible Assets Incorporated
|
System and method for contact free transfer of power | ||
Patent #
US 20070145830A1
Filed 12/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Power Science Inc.
|
Original Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Antenna Arrangement For Inductive Power Transmission And Use Of The Antenna Arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 20070126650A1
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Original Assignee
Vacuumschmelze GmbH Company KG
|
Power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 7,233,137 B2
Filed 09/23/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sharp Electronics Corporation
|
ADAPTIVE INDUCTIVE POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20070171681A1
Filed 03/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method for monitoring end of life for battery | ||
Patent #
US 7,251,527 B2
Filed 07/31/2003
|
Current Assignee
Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated
|
Primary units, methods and systems for contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,239,110 B2
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Portable contact-less power transfer devices and rechargeable batteries | ||
Patent #
US 7,248,017 B2
Filed 11/22/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
SPASHPOWER LIMITED
|
Multi-receiver communication system with distributed aperture antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20070176840A1
Filed 02/06/2003
|
Current Assignee
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation
|
INDUCTIVE POWER SOURCE AND CHARGING SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20070182367A1
Filed 01/30/2007
|
Current Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Mojo Mobility Inc.
|
Method and system for powering an electronic device via a wireless link | ||
Patent #
US 20070178945A1
Filed 04/21/2006
|
Current Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Qualcomm Inc.
|
Systems and methods of medical monitoring according to patient state | ||
Patent #
US 20070208263A1
Filed 02/27/2007
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20070222542A1
Filed 07/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Apparatus and Method for inductive Power Transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20070247005A1
Filed 06/17/2004
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
HARDING ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS LIMITED
|
Wireless battery charger via carrier frequency signal | ||
Patent #
US 7,288,918 B2
Filed 03/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Michael Vincent Distefano
|
Original Assignee
Michael Vincent Distefano
|
Device and Method of Non-Contact Energy Transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20070267918A1
Filed 04/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Geir Gyland
|
Original Assignee
Geir Gyland
|
Tool for an Industrial Robot | ||
Patent #
US 20070276538A1
Filed 04/06/2004
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Adaptive pulse width modulated resonant Class-D converter | ||
Patent #
US 5,986,895 A
Filed 06/05/1998
|
Current Assignee
Astec International Limited
|
Original Assignee
Astec International Limited
|
Coaxial cable | ||
Patent #
US 5,959,245 A
Filed 05/29/1997
|
Current Assignee
CommScope Inc.
|
Original Assignee
CommScope Inc.
|
Structure of signal transmission line | ||
Patent #
US 6,683,256 B2
Filed 03/27/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ta-San Kao
|
Original Assignee
Ta-San Kao
|
Tunable ferroelectric resonator arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 7,069,064 B2
Filed 02/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Planar resonator for wireless power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,960,968 B2
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Transponders, Interrogators, systems and methods for elimination of interrogator synchronization requirement | ||
Patent #
US 5,541,604 A
Filed 09/03/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Operation in very close coupling of an electromagnetic transponder system | ||
Patent #
US 6,703,921 B1
Filed 04/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Original Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Systems and methods for automated resonant circuit tuning | ||
Patent #
US 20060001509A1
Filed 06/29/2005
|
Current Assignee
Stheno Corp.
|
Original Assignee
Phillip R. Gibbs
|
Wireless and powerless sensor and interrogator | ||
Patent #
US 6,988,026 B2
Filed 11/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
American Vehicular Sciences LLC
|
Original Assignee
Automotive Technologies International Incorporated
|
Pulse frequency modulation for induction charge device | ||
Patent #
US 20060022636A1
Filed 07/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
KYE Systems Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KYE Systems Corporation
|
Multilayer cavity slot antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20060044188A1
Filed 08/31/2004
|
Current Assignee
North Star Innovations Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
|
Method for authenticating a user to a service of a service provider | ||
Patent #
US 20060053296A1
Filed 05/23/2003
|
Current Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20060061323A1
Filed 10/28/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Self-adjusting RF assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20060066443A1
Filed 09/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Tagsys SA
|
Original Assignee
Tagsys SA
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 7,027,311 B2
Filed 10/15/2004
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Feedthrough filter capacitor assembly with internally grounded hermetic insulator | ||
Patent #
US 7,035,076 B1
Filed 08/15/2005
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Original Assignee
Greatbatch-Sierra Inc.
|
Ultrasonic rod waveguide-radiator | ||
Patent #
US 20060090956A1
Filed 11/04/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sergei L. Peshkovsky
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Ultrasound Solutions Inc.
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 7,042,196 B2
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Heating system and heater | ||
Patent #
US 20060132045A1
Filed 12/17/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Optical coupled-resonator filters with asymmetric coupling | ||
Patent #
US 20060159392A1
Filed 01/11/2006
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
CAPACITIVELY COUPLED POWER SUPPLY | ||
Patent #
US 20060164868A1
Filed 10/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings
|
Original Assignee
Thomson Licensing
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20060164866A1
Filed 02/17/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Device for brain stimulation using RF energy harvesting | ||
Patent #
US 20060184209A1
Filed 09/02/2005
|
Current Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Original Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Explantation of implantable medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20060184210A1
Filed 04/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Sensor apparatus management methods and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20060181242A1
Filed 03/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Energy harvesting circuit | ||
Patent #
US 7,084,605 B2
Filed 10/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Original Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Actuator system for use in control of a sheet or web forming process | ||
Patent #
US 20060185809A1
Filed 02/23/2005
|
Current Assignee
ABB Limited
|
Original Assignee
ABB
|
Battery charging assembly for use on a locomotive | ||
Patent #
US 20060214626A1
Filed 03/25/2005
|
Current Assignee
KIM HOTSTART MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Original Assignee
KIM HOTSTART MANUFACTURING COMPANY
|
Adapting portable electrical devices to receive power wirelessly | ||
Patent #
US 20060205381A1
Filed 12/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method, apparatus and system for power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20060199620A1
Filed 02/16/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Llc
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Inductive powering surface for powering portable devices | ||
Patent #
US 20060202665A1
Filed 05/13/2005
|
Current Assignee
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
|
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,126,450 B2
Filed 02/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Electric vehicle having multiple-use APU system | ||
Patent #
US 20060219448A1
Filed 03/08/2006
|
Current Assignee
Aptiv Technologies Limited
|
Original Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc.
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,116,200 B2
Filed 04/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 7,118,240 B2
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Short-range wireless power transmission and reception | ||
Patent #
US 20060238365A1
Filed 09/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
Elio Vecchione, Conor Keegan
|
Original Assignee
Elio Vecchione, Conor Keegan
|
Biothermal power source for implantable devices | ||
Patent #
US 7,127,293 B2
Filed 03/28/2005
|
Current Assignee
Biomed Solutions LLC
|
Original Assignee
Biomed Solutions LLC
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 7,132,918 B2
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Power transmission network | ||
Patent #
US 20060270440A1
Filed 05/22/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Dielectrically loaded coaxial resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20060284708A1
Filed 02/15/2006
|
Current Assignee
MANSIONS OF THOUGHT RD L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
MASIONS OF THOUGHT RD L.L.C.
|
High Q factor sensor | ||
Patent #
US 7,147,604 B1
Filed 08/07/2002
|
Current Assignee
St. Jude Medical Luxembourg Holdings Ii S.A.R.L.
|
Original Assignee
CardioMEMS Incorporated
|
Powering devices using RF energy harvesting | ||
Patent #
US 20060281435A1
Filed 06/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
System, method and apparatus for contact-less battery charging with dynamic control | ||
Patent #
US 6,844,702 B2
Filed 05/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Method of rendering a mechanical heart valve non-thrombogenic with an electrical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050021134A1
Filed 06/30/2004
|
Current Assignee
JS Vascular Inc.
|
Original Assignee
JS Vascular Inc.
|
Magnetically coupled antenna range extender | ||
Patent #
US 6,839,035 B1
Filed 10/07/2003
|
Current Assignee
CTT Corporation Systems
|
Original Assignee
CTT Corporation Systems
|
Vehicle interface | ||
Patent #
US 20050007067A1
Filed 06/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Multi-frequency piezoelectric energy harvester | ||
Patent #
US 6,858,970 B2
Filed 10/21/2002
|
Current Assignee
The Boeing Co.
|
Original Assignee
The Boeing Co.
|
Temperature regulated implant | ||
Patent #
US 20050033382A1
Filed 08/04/2004
|
Current Assignee
Cochlear Limited
|
Original Assignee
Peter Single
|
Antenna coil and transmission antenna | ||
Patent #
US 20050030251A1
Filed 09/30/2002
|
Current Assignee
Sumida Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sumida Corporation
|
Energy transfer amplification for intrabody devices | ||
Patent #
US 20050027192A1
Filed 07/29/2003
|
Current Assignee
Biosense Webster Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Biosense Webster Incorporated
|
Energy harvesting circuits and associated methods | ||
Patent #
US 6,856,291 B2
Filed 07/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Original Assignee
University of Pittsburgh of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
|
Method and apparatus for efficient power/data transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20050085873A1
Filed 10/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Original Assignee
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
|
Semiconductor photodetector | ||
Patent #
US 20050104064A1
Filed 03/03/2003
|
Current Assignee
The Provost Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin
|
Original Assignee
The Provost Fellows and Scholars of the College of the Holy and Undivided Trinity of Queen Elizabeth near Dublin
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 20050093475A1
Filed 10/22/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method and apparatus for a wireless power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20050104453A1
Filed 10/15/2004
|
Current Assignee
Powercast Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Firefly Power Technologies LLC
|
Method of manufacturing a lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20050116650A1
Filed 10/29/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050140482A1
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Lily Ka-Lai Cheng, James Westwood Hay, Pilgrim Giles William Beart
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050116683A1
Filed 05/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,906,495 B2
Filed 12/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Splashpower Limited
|
Opportunistic power supply charge system for portable unit | ||
Patent #
US 20050127866A1
Filed 12/11/2003
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies LLC
|
Original Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050127849A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Relaying apparatus and communication system | ||
Patent #
US 20050125093A1
Filed 09/21/2004
|
Current Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Sony Corporation
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050122059A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050122058A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20050127850A1
Filed 01/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Christopher Houghton, Stephen J. Mcphilliamy, David W. Baarman
|
Contact-less power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050135122A1
Filed 12/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Lily Ka-Lai Cheng, James Westwood Hay, Pilgrim Giles William Beart
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,917,163 B2
Filed 02/18/2004
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Mach-Zehnder interferometer using photonic band gap crystals | ||
Patent #
US 6,917,431 B2
Filed 05/15/2002
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Charging apparatus by non-contact dielectric feeding | ||
Patent #
US 20050156560A1
Filed 04/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
ALPS Electric Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
ALPS Electric Company Limited
|
Transferring power between devices in a personal area network | ||
Patent #
US 20050151511A1
Filed 01/14/2004
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Magnetic field production system, and configuration for wire-free supply of a large number of sensors and/or actuators using a magnetic field production system | ||
Patent #
US 6,937,130 B2
Filed 09/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Method and apparatus of using magnetic material with residual magnetization in transient electromagnetic measurement | ||
Patent #
US 20050189945A1
Filed 01/18/2005
|
Current Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Incorporated
|
Wireless battery charger via carrier frequency signal | ||
Patent #
US 20050194926A1
Filed 03/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Michael Vincent Di Stefano
|
Original Assignee
Michael Vincent Di Stefano
|
Non-contact pumping of light emitters via non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20050253152A1
Filed 05/11/2004
|
Current Assignee
Los Alamos National Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Los Alamos National Security LLC
|
Subcutaneously implantable power supply | ||
Patent #
US 6,961,619 B2
Filed 07/08/2002
|
Current Assignee
Don E. Casey
|
Original Assignee
Don E. Casey
|
Charging of devices by microwave power beaming | ||
Patent #
US 6,967,462 B1
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
NasaGlenn Research Center
|
Original Assignee
NasaGlenn Research Center
|
Transcutaneous energy transfer primary coil with a high aspect ferrite core | ||
Patent #
US 20050288742A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Medical implant having closed loop transcutaneous energy transfer (TET) power transfer regulation circuitry | ||
Patent #
US 20050288739A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Incorporated
|
Low frequency transcutaneous energy transfer to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050288741A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,975,198 B2
Filed 04/27/2005
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Low frequency transcutaneous telemetry to implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 20050288740A1
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc.
|
Planar resonator for wireless power transfer | ||
Patent #
US 20040000974A1
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Radio frequency identification system for a fluid treatment system | ||
Patent #
US 6,673,250 B2
Filed 06/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Low voltage electrified furniture unit | ||
Patent #
US 20040026998A1
Filed 06/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
Kimball International Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Kimball International Incorporated
|
Coaxial cable and coaxial multicore cable | ||
Patent #
US 6,696,647 B2
Filed 05/23/2002
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Cable Limited
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi Cable Limited
|
Oscillator module incorporating looped-stub resonator | ||
Patent #
US 20040100338A1
Filed 11/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Microsemi Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Phasor Technologies Corporation
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,731,071 B2
Filed 04/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Antenna with near-field radiation control | ||
Patent #
US 20040113847A1
Filed 12/12/2002
|
Current Assignee
Blackberry Limited
|
Original Assignee
Blackberry Limited
|
System for a machine having a large number of proximity sensors, as well as a proximity sensor, and a primary winding for this purpose | ||
Patent #
US 6,749,119 B2
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply with communication | ||
Patent #
US 20040130915A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Enhanced RF wireless adaptive power provisioning system for small devices | ||
Patent #
US 20040130425A1
Filed 08/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Original Assignee
MOBILEWISE INC.
|
Adaptive inductive power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20040130916A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Remote power recharge for electronic equipment | ||
Patent #
US 20040142733A1
Filed 12/29/2003
|
Current Assignee
Ronald J. Parise
|
Original Assignee
Ronald J. Parise
|
Adapter | ||
Patent #
US 20040150934A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Transmission of information from an implanted medical device | ||
Patent #
US 6,772,011 B2
Filed 08/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
TC1 LLC
|
Original Assignee
Thoratec LLC
|
System and method for wireless electrical power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 6,798,716 B1
Filed 06/19/2003
|
Current Assignee
BC SYSTEMS INC.
|
Original Assignee
BC SYSTEMS INC.
|
System and method for inductive charging a wireless mouse | ||
Patent #
US 20040189246A1
Filed 12/16/2003
|
Current Assignee
SelfCHARGE Inc.
|
Original Assignee
SelfCHARGE Inc.
|
Starter assembly for a gas discharge lamp | ||
Patent #
US 6,806,649 B2
Filed 02/18/2003
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Charging system for robot | ||
Patent #
US 20040201361A1
Filed 11/14/2003
|
Current Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
|
Alignment independent and self aligning inductive power transfer system | ||
Patent #
US 6,803,744 B1
Filed 10/31/2000
|
Current Assignee
Anthony Sabo
|
Original Assignee
Anthony Sabo
|
Inductively powered lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,812,645 B2
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Communication system | ||
Patent #
US 20040233043A1
Filed 11/13/2003
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Starter assembly for a gas discharge lamp | ||
Patent #
US 20040222751A1
Filed 05/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Scott A. Mollema, Roy W. Kuennen, David W. Baarman
|
Inductive coil assembly | ||
Patent #
US 20040232845A1
Filed 10/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Inductively coupled ballast circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,825,620 B2
Filed 09/18/2002
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Wireless power transmission | ||
Patent #
US 20040227057A1
Filed 04/07/2004
|
Current Assignee
AILOCOM OY
|
Original Assignee
AILOCOM OY
|
Sensor apparatus management methods and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20040267501A1
Filed 07/10/2004
|
Current Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Original Assignee
KLA-Tencor Corporation
|
Method of manufacturing a lamp assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,831,417 B2
Filed 06/05/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Method and apparatus for supplying contactless power | ||
Patent #
US 6,515,878 B1
Filed 08/07/1998
|
Current Assignee
MEINS-SINSLEY PARTNERSHIP
|
Original Assignee
MEINS-SINSLEY PARTNERSHIP
|
Proximity sensor | ||
Patent #
US 20030038641A1
Filed 09/03/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Device for contactless transmission of data | ||
Patent #
US 6,533,178 B1
Filed 11/15/2000
|
Current Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
|
Original Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
|
Vehicle slide door power supply apparatus and method of supplying power to vehicle slide door | ||
Patent #
US 6,535,133 B2
Filed 11/15/2001
|
Current Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
|
Resonant frequency tracking system and method for use in a radio frequency (RF) power supply | ||
Patent #
US 20030071034A1
Filed 11/25/2002
|
Current Assignee
Ambrell Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Daniel J. Lincoln, Gary A. Schwenck, Leslie L. Thompson
|
Magnetic field production system, and configuration for wire-free supply of a large number of sensors and/or actuators using a magnetic field production system | ||
Patent #
US 20030062794A1
Filed 09/16/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Configuration for producing electrical power from a magnetic field | ||
Patent #
US 20030062980A1
Filed 09/09/2002
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
RFID passive repeater system and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 6,563,425 B2
Filed 08/08/2001
|
Current Assignee
Datalogic IP Tech S.r.l.
|
Original Assignee
Escort Memory Systems
|
Method and apparatus for communicating with medical device systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,561,975 B1
Filed 10/25/2000
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
High purity fine metal powders and methods to produce such powders | ||
Patent #
US 20030126948A1
Filed 12/10/2002
|
Current Assignee
PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
NanoProducts Corporation
|
Post-processed nanoscale powders and method for such post-processing | ||
Patent #
US 20030124050A1
Filed 03/29/2002
|
Current Assignee
PPG Industries Ohio Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
NANOPRODUCT CORPORATION
|
System for wirelessly supplying a large number of actuators of a machine with electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 6,597,076 B2
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Original Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
System for the detection of cardiac events | ||
Patent #
US 6,609,023 B1
Filed 09/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Angel Medical Systems Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for charging sterilizable rechargeable batteries | ||
Patent #
US 20030160590A1
Filed 02/25/2003
|
Current Assignee
LIVATEC CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
LIVATEC CORPORATION
|
Apparatus for energizing a remote station and related method | ||
Patent #
US 20030199778A1
Filed 06/11/2003
|
Current Assignee
University Of Pittsburgh
|
Original Assignee
Leonid Mats, Carl Taylor, Minhong Mi, Dmitry Gorodetsky, Lorenz Neureuter, Marlin Mickle, Chad Emahizer
|
Charge storage device | ||
Patent #
US 6,631,072 B1
Filed 08/24/2001
|
Current Assignee
Cap-Xx Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Energy Storage Systems Inc.
|
Inductively powered apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 20030214255A1
Filed 02/04/2003
|
Current Assignee
Philips IP Ventures B.V.
|
Original Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Reader for a radio frequency identification system having automatic tuning capability | ||
Patent #
US 6,650,227 B1
Filed 12/08/1999
|
Current Assignee
Assa Abloy AB
|
Original Assignee
HID Corporation
|
Wireless power transmission system with increased output voltage | ||
Patent #
US 6,664,770 B1
Filed 10/10/2001
|
Current Assignee
IQ-MOBIL ELECTRONICS GMBH.
|
Original Assignee
IQ- MOBIL GMBH
|
Low-power, high-modulation-index amplifier for use in battery-powered device | ||
Patent #
US 20020032471A1
Filed 08/31/2001
|
Current Assignee
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Bionics Corporation
|
Electric power transmission device | ||
Patent #
US 6,407,470 B1
Filed 04/24/2000
|
Current Assignee
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC
|
Original Assignee
Daimler Chrysler Company LLC
|
System for wirelessly supplying a large number of actuators of a machine with electrical power | ||
Patent #
US 20020118004A1
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Original Assignee
ABB Patent GmbH
|
Water treatment system with an inductively coupled ballast | ||
Patent #
US 6,436,299 B1
Filed 06/12/2000
|
Current Assignee
Access Business Group International LLC
|
Original Assignee
Amway Corporation
|
System for a machine having a large number of proximity sensors, as well as a proximity sensor, and a primary winding for this purpose | ||
Patent #
US 20020105343A1
Filed 12/11/2001
|
Current Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
ABB Research Ltd.
|
Food intake restriction with wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 6,450,946 B1
Filed 02/11/2000
|
Current Assignee
Obtech Medical AG
|
Original Assignee
Obtech Medical AG
|
High quality-factor tunable resonator | ||
Patent #
US 6,452,465 B1
Filed 06/27/2000
|
Current Assignee
M-SQUARED FILTERS L.L.C.
|
Original Assignee
M-SQUARED FILTERS LLC
|
Inductive coupling system with capacitive parallel compensation of the mutual self-inductance between the primary and the secondary windings | ||
Patent #
US 20020130642A1
Filed 02/27/2002
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Original Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Detection of the distance between an electromagnetic transponder and a terminal | ||
Patent #
US 6,473,028 B1
Filed 04/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Original Assignee
Stmicroelectronics SA
|
Inductively powered lamp unit | ||
Patent #
US 6,459,218 B2
Filed 02/12/2001
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Control of inductive power transfer pickups | ||
Patent #
US 6,483,202 B1
Filed 07/24/2000
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Rechargeable power supply system and method of protection against abnormal charging | ||
Patent #
US 20020167294A1
Filed 03/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
Acer Inc.
|
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Reader/writer having coil arrangements to restrain electromagnetic field intensity at a distance | ||
Patent #
US 6,176,433 B1
Filed 05/15/1998
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Hitachi America Limited
|
Contactless battery charger with wireless control link | ||
Patent #
US 6,184,651 B1
Filed 03/20/2000
|
Current Assignee
Google Technology Holdings LLC
|
Original Assignee
Motorola Inc.
|
Miniature milliwatt electric power generator | ||
Patent #
US 6,207,887 B1
Filed 07/07/1999
|
Current Assignee
HI-Z Technology Inc.
|
Original Assignee
HI-Z Technology Inc.
|
Electrosurgical generator | ||
Patent #
US 6,238,387 B1
Filed 11/16/1998
|
Current Assignee
Microline Surgical Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Team Medical LLC
|
Arrangement for coupling an RF-squid magnetometer to a superconductive tank circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,225,800 B1
Filed 09/25/1998
|
Current Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Integrated tunable high efficiency power amplifier | ||
Patent #
US 6,232,841 B1
Filed 07/01/1999
|
Current Assignee
OL Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Rockwell Science Center LLC
|
Rechargeable hybrid battery/supercapacitor system | ||
Patent #
US 6,252,762 B1
Filed 04/21/1999
|
Current Assignee
Rutgers University
|
Original Assignee
Telcordia Technologies Incorporated
|
Bandpass filter with dielectric resonators | ||
Patent #
US 6,262,639 B1
Filed 05/27/1999
|
Current Assignee
Ace Technology Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Ace Technology Corporation
|
Arrangement for coupling an rf-SQUID circuit to a super conducting tank circuit | ||
Patent #
US 6,300,760 B1
Filed 05/26/1999
|
Current Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Forschungszentrum JLich GmbH
|
Method for discriminating between used and unused gas generators for air bags during car scrapping process | ||
Patent #
US 6,012,659 A
Filed 09/12/1997
|
Current Assignee
Daicel Chemical Industries Limited, Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Daicel Chemical Industries Limited, Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
System and method for powering, controlling, and communicating with multiple inductively-powered devices | ||
Patent #
US 6,047,214 A
Filed 06/09/1998
|
Current Assignee
North Carolina State University
|
Original Assignee
North Carolina State University
|
Adaptive brain stimulation method and system | ||
Patent #
US 6,066,163 A
Filed 02/02/1996
|
Current Assignee
Michael Sasha John
|
Original Assignee
Michael Sasha John
|
Implantable medical device using audible sound communication to provide warnings | ||
Patent #
US 6,067,473 A
Filed 03/31/1999
|
Current Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Medtronic Incorporated
|
Battery monitoring apparatus and method for programmers of cardiac stimulating devices | ||
Patent #
US 6,108,579 A
Filed 04/11/1997
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Band-pass filter comprising series coupled split gap resonators arranged along a circular position line | ||
Patent #
US 6,130,591 A
Filed 05/27/1998
|
Current Assignee
Advanced Mobile Telecommunications Technology Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Advanced Mobile Telecommunications Technology Incorporated
|
Method and apparatus for wireless powering and recharging | ||
Patent #
US 6,127,799 A
Filed 05/14/1999
|
Current Assignee
Raytheon BBN Technlogies Corp.
|
Original Assignee
GTE Internetworking Incorporated
|
Ring antennas for resonant circuits | ||
Patent #
US 5,864,323 A
Filed 12/19/1996
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Non-contact power distribution system | ||
Patent #
US 5,898,579 A
Filed 11/24/1997
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited, Daifuku Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited, Daifuku Company Limited
|
Inductive battery charger | ||
Patent #
US 5,903,134 A
Filed 05/19/1998
|
Current Assignee
Tdk-Lambda Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Nippon Electric Industry Company Limited
|
Noncontact power transmitting apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,923,544 A
Filed 07/21/1997
|
Current Assignee
TDK Corporation
|
Original Assignee
TDK Corporation
|
Method and apparatus for controlling country specific frequency allocation | ||
Patent #
US 5,940,509 A
Filed 11/18/1997
|
Current Assignee
Avago Technologies General IP PTE Limited
|
Original Assignee
Intermec IP Corporation
|
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator having a smaller mass | ||
Patent #
US 5,957,956 A
Filed 11/03/1997
|
Current Assignee
Ela Medical S.A.
|
Original Assignee
Angeion Corporation
|
Carbon supercapacitor electrode materials | ||
Patent #
US 5,993,996 A
Filed 09/16/1997
|
Current Assignee
INORGANIC SPECIALISTS INC.
|
Original Assignee
INORGANIC SPECIALISTS INC.
|
Methods and systems for introducing electromagnetic radiation into photonic crystals | ||
Patent #
US 5,999,308 A
Filed 04/01/1998
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
H-field electromagnetic heating system for fusion bonding | ||
Patent #
US 5,710,413 A
Filed 03/29/1995
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Original Assignee
3M Company
|
Nanostructure multilayer dielectric materials for capacitors and insulators | ||
Patent #
US 5,742,471 A
Filed 11/25/1996
|
Current Assignee
Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC
|
Original Assignee
Regents of the University of California
|
Connection system and connection method for an electric automotive vehicle | ||
Patent #
US 5,821,731 A
Filed 01/30/1997
|
Current Assignee
Sumitomo Wiring Systems Limited
|
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Wiring Systems Limited
|
Armature induction charging of moving electric vehicle batteries | ||
Patent #
US 5,821,728 A
Filed 07/22/1996
|
Current Assignee
Stanley A. Tollison
|
Original Assignee
Stanley A. Tollison
|
Method and apparatus for the suppression of far-field interference signals for implantable device data transmission systems | ||
Patent #
US 5,630,835 A
Filed 07/24/1995
|
Current Assignee
SIRROM CAPITAL CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
CARDIAC CONTROL SYSTEMS INC.
|
Antenna module for a portable radio equipment with a grounding conductor | ||
Patent #
US 5,631,660 A
Filed 11/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Original Assignee
Fujitsu Limited
|
Implantable stimulation device having means for optimizing current drain | ||
Patent #
US 5,697,956 A
Filed 06/02/1995
|
Current Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Pacesetter Incorporated
|
Transmitter-receiver for non-contact IC card system | ||
Patent #
US 5,703,573 A
Filed 01/11/1996
|
Current Assignee
Sony Chemicals Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Sony Chemicals Company Limited
|
Inductive coupler for electric vehicle charger | ||
Patent #
US 5,703,461 A
Filed 06/27/1996
|
Current Assignee
KABUSHIKI KAIHSA TOYODA JIDOSHOKKI SEISAKUSHO
|
Original Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho
|
Oscillator-shuttle-circuit (OSC) networks for conditioning energy in higher-order symmetry algebraic topological forms and RF phase conjugation | ||
Patent #
US 5,493,691 A
Filed 12/23/1993
|
Current Assignee
BARRETT HOLDING LLC
|
Original Assignee
Terence W. Barrett
|
Inductive power pick-up coils | ||
Patent #
US 5,528,113 A
Filed 10/21/1994
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Pacemaker with improved shelf storage capacity | ||
Patent #
US 5,522,856 A
Filed 09/20/1994
|
Current Assignee
VITATRON MEDICAL B.V.
|
Original Assignee
VITATRON MEDICAL B.V.
|
Induction charging apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,550,452 A
Filed 07/22/1994
|
Current Assignee
Kyushu Hitachi Maxell Ltd., Nintendo Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Kyushu Hitachi Maxell Ltd., Nintendo Company Limited
|
Thermoelectric method and apparatus for charging superconducting magnets | ||
Patent #
US 5,565,763 A
Filed 11/19/1993
|
Current Assignee
General Atomics Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Lockheed Martin Corporation
|
Cooled secondary coils of electric automobile charging transformer | ||
Patent #
US 5,408,209 A
Filed 11/02/1993
|
Current Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
|
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Company
|
Wireless communications using near field coupling | ||
Patent #
US 5,437,057 A
Filed 12/03/1992
|
Current Assignee
Xerox Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Xerox Corporation
|
Power connection scheme | ||
Patent #
US 5,455,467 A
Filed 03/02/1994
|
Current Assignee
Apple Computer Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Apple Computer Incorporated
|
High speed read/write AVI system | ||
Patent #
US 5,287,112 A
Filed 04/14/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Inductive power distribution system | ||
Patent #
US 5,293,308 A
Filed 01/30/1992
|
Current Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Original Assignee
Auckland UniServices Limited
|
Contactless battery charging system | ||
Patent #
US 5,341,083 A
Filed 10/20/1992
|
Current Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute
|
Original Assignee
Electric Power Research Institute Incorporated
|
System for charging a rechargeable battery of a portable unit in a rack | ||
Patent #
US 5,367,242 A
Filed 09/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
Ascom Tateco AB
|
Original Assignee
Ericsson Messaging Systems Incorporated
|
High speed read/write AVI system | ||
Patent #
US 5,374,930 A
Filed 11/12/1993
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Inc.
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Separable inductive coupler | ||
Patent #
US 5,216,402 A
Filed 01/22/1992
|
Current Assignee
General Motors Corporation
|
Original Assignee
Hughes Aircraft Company
|
Non-contact data and power connector for computer based modules | ||
Patent #
US 5,229,652 A
Filed 04/20/1992
|
Current Assignee
Wayne E. Hough
|
Original Assignee
Wayne E. Hough
|
Dual feedback control for a high-efficiency class-d power amplifier circuit | ||
Patent #
US 5,118,997 A
Filed 08/16/1991
|
Current Assignee
General Electric Company
|
Original Assignee
General Electric Company
|
Christmas-tree, decorative, artistic and ornamental object illumination apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,034,658 A
Filed 01/12/1990
|
Current Assignee
Roland Hierig, Vladimir Ilberg
|
Original Assignee
Roland Hierig, Vladimir Ilberg
|
Magnetic induction mine arming, disarming and simulation system | ||
Patent #
US 5,027,709 A
Filed 11/13/1990
|
Current Assignee
Glenn B. Slagle
|
Original Assignee
Glenn B. Slagle
|
Device for transmission and evaluation of measurement signals for the tire pressure of motor vehicles | ||
Patent #
US 5,033,295 A
Filed 02/04/1989
|
Current Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
|
Transponder arrangement | ||
Patent #
US 5,053,774 A
Filed 02/13/1991
|
Current Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Original Assignee
Texas Instruments Deutschland Gesellschaft Mit BeschrNkter Haftung
|
Electric power transmitting device with inductive coupling | ||
Patent #
US 5,070,293 A
Filed 03/02/1990
|
Current Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Nippondenso Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Nippon Soken Inc., Nippondenso Co. Ltd.
|
Remote switch-sensing system | ||
Patent #
US 4,588,978 A
Filed 06/21/1984
|
Current Assignee
CONCHA CORPORATION A CA CORPORATION
|
Original Assignee
TRANSENSORY DEVICES INC.
|
Transmission channel coupler for antenna | ||
Patent #
US 4,621,243 A
Filed 03/27/1985
|
Current Assignee
Harada Kogyo KK
|
Original Assignee
Harada Kogyo KK
|
Condition monitoring system (tire pressure) | ||
Patent #
US 4,450,431 A
Filed 05/26/1981
|
Current Assignee
Aisin Seiki Co. Ltd.
|
Original Assignee
Peter A Hochstein
|
Variable mutual transductance tuned antenna | ||
Patent #
US 4,280,129 A
Filed 09/10/1979
|
Current Assignee
WELLS FAMILY CORPORATION THE
|
Original Assignee
Donald H. Wells
|
Alarm device for informing reduction of pneumatic pressure of tire | ||
Patent #
US 4,180,795 A
Filed 12/12/1977
|
Current Assignee
Bridgestone Tire Company Limited, Mitaka Instrument Company Limited
|
Original Assignee
Bridgestone Tire Company Limited, Mitaka Instrument Company Limited
|
RF beam center location method and apparatus for power transmission system | ||
Patent #
US 4,088,999 A
Filed 05/21/1976
|
Current Assignee
Fletcher James C Administrator of The National Aeronautics and Space Administration With Respect To An Invention of, Richard M. Dickinson
|
Original Assignee
Fletcher James C Administrator of The National Aeronautics and Space Administration With Respect To An Invention of, Richard M. Dickinson
|
Thermoelectric voltage generator | ||
Patent #
US 4,095,998 A
Filed 09/30/1976
|
Current Assignee
The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|
Original Assignee
The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army
|
Wireless energy transfer, including interference enhancement | ||
Patent #
US 8,076,801 B2
Filed 05/14/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,076,800 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,097,983 B2
Filed 05/08/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,084,889 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Inductive repeater coil for an implantable device | ||
Patent #
US 8,131,378 B2
Filed 10/28/2007
|
Current Assignee
Second Sight Enterprises Incorporated
|
Original Assignee
Second Sight Enterprises Incorporated
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER, INCLUDING INTERFERENCE ENHANCEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20120068549A1
Filed 11/03/2011
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Power supply system and method of controlling power supply system | ||
Patent #
US 8,178,995 B2
Filed 10/13/2009
|
Current Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
Original Assignee
Ibaraki Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20120228960A1
Filed 05/22/2012
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Efficient near-field wireless energy transfer using adiabatic system variations | ||
Patent #
US 8,362,651 B2
Filed 10/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer over a distance at high efficiency | ||
Patent #
US 8,395,283 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 8,395,282 B2
Filed 03/31/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q similar resonant frequency resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,022 B2
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q sub-wavelength resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,021 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q devices at variable distances | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,020 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q at high efficiency | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,018 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q from more than one source | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,019 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q capacitively loaded conducting loops | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,023 B2
Filed 12/23/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across variable distances | ||
Patent #
US 8,400,024 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20130181541A1
Filed 03/08/2013
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
THERMOELECTRIC UNITS | ||
Patent #
US 3,780,425 A
Filed 01/25/1971
|
Current Assignee
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
|
Original Assignee
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
|
LARGE SODIUM VALVE ACTUATOR | ||
Patent #
US 3,871,176 A
Filed 03/08/1973
|
Current Assignee
Glen Elwin Schukei
|
Original Assignee
Combustion Engineering Incorporated
|
ENERGY TRANSLATING DEVICE | ||
Patent #
US 3,517,350 A
Filed 07/07/1969
|
Current Assignee
William D. Beaver
|
Original Assignee
William D. Beaver
|
MICROWAVE POWER RECEIVING ANTENNA | ||
Patent #
US 3,535,543 A
Filed 05/01/1969
|
Current Assignee
Carroll C. Dailey
|
Original Assignee
Carroll C. Dailey
|
Wireless energy transfer over variable distances between resonators of substantially similar resonant frequencies | ||
Patent #
US 8,760,008 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer with high-Q to more than one device | ||
Patent #
US 8,760,007 B2
Filed 12/16/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer over distances to a moving device | ||
Patent #
US 8,766,485 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across a distance to a moving device | ||
Patent #
US 8,772,972 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer across variable distances with high-Q capacitively-loaded conducting-wire loops | ||
Patent #
US 8,772,971 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless energy transfer to a moving device between high-Q resonators | ||
Patent #
US 8,791,599 B2
Filed 12/30/2009
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Efficient near-field wireless energy transfer using adiabatic system variations | ||
Patent #
US 8,836,172 B2
Filed 11/15/2012
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Wireless non-radiative energy transfer | ||
Patent #
US 9,065,286 B2
Filed 06/12/2014
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
WIRELESS NON-RADIATIVE ENERGY TRANSFER | ||
Patent #
US 20150188321A1
Filed 02/24/2015
|
Current Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
Original Assignee
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
28 Claims
-
1. A method comprising:
-
transferring energy from a first resonant object to a second resonant object using a third resonant object to mediate the energy transfer, wherein the third resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, more strongly than the first resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with the second resonant object; and maintaining a reduced level of energy accumulation in the third resonant object by varying over time a coupling rate between the third resonant object and (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, based on a loss rate of (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both; wherein the reduced level of energy accumulation is reduced relative to energy accumulation that would occur in the third resonant object without the varying of the coupling rate over time. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5)
-
-
6. A method comprising:
-
transferring energy from a first resonant object to a second resonant object using a third resonant object to mediate the energy transfer, wherein the third resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, more strongly than the first resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with the second resonant object; and maintaining a reduced level of energy accumulation in the third resonant object by varying over time a coupling rate between the third resonant object and (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, based on a loss rate of (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both; wherein; transferring the energy comprises wirelessly transferring energy from the first resonant object to the second resonant object using the third resonant object to mediate the wireless energy transfer; and maintaining the reduced level of energy accumulation in the third resonant object comprises varying both (i) a coupling rate between the first resonant object and the third resonant object and (ii) a coupling rate between the third resonant object and the second resonant object, over time in accordance with an adiabatic time evolution of an eigenstate for the three resonant objects. - View Dependent Claims (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13)
-
-
14. A system comprising:
-
a first resonant object to provide energy; a second resonant object to receive energy; a third resonant object to mediate energy transfer between the first resonant object and the second resonant object, wherein the third resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, more strongly than the first resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with the second resonant object; and a control mechanism configured and arranged to maintain a reduced level of energy accumulation in the third resonant object by varying over time a coupling rate between the third resonant object and (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, based on a loss rate of (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both; wherein the reduced level of energy accumulation is reduced relative to energy accumulation that would occur in the third resonant object without the varying of the coupling rate over time. - View Dependent Claims (15, 16, 17, 18)
-
-
19. A system comprising:
-
a first resonant object to provide energy; a second resonant object to receive energy; a third resonant object to mediate energy transfer between the first resonant object and the second resonant object, wherein the third resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, more strongly than the first resonant object is capable of resonantly coupling with the second resonant object; and a control mechanism configured and arranged to improve energy transfer by varying over time a coupling rate between the third resonant object and (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both, based on a loss rate of (i) the first resonant object, (ii) the second resonant object, or (iii) both; wherein the first resonant object is a first wireless resonator, the second resonant object is a second wireless resonator, the third resonant object is a third wireless resonator, and the control mechanism is configured and arranged to vary both (i) a coupling rate between the first wireless resonator and the third wireless resonator and (ii) a coupling rate between the third wireless resonator and the second wireless resonator, over time in accordance with an adiabatic time evolution of an eigenstate for the three wireless resonators. - View Dependent Claims (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26)
-
-
27. An apparatus comprising:
-
an intermediary wireless resonator to mediate energy transfer between a source wireless resonator and a destination wireless resonator, wherein the intermediary wireless resonator is capable of resonantly coupling with (i) the source wireless resonator, (ii) the destination wireless resonator, or (iii) both, more strongly than the source wireless resonator is capable of resonantly coupling with the destination wireless resonator; and a control mechanism configured and arranged to maintain a reduced level of energy accumulation in the intermediary wireless resonator by varying over time a coupling rate between the source wireless resonator and the intermediary wireless resonator and between the intermediary wireless resonator and the destination wireless resonator; wherein the reduced level of energy accumulation is reduced relative to energy accumulation that would occur in the intermediary wireless resonator without the varying of the coupling rate over time. - View Dependent Claims (28)
-
1 Specification
This application is a continuation, and claims benefit, of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/677,407, filed on Nov. 15, 2012, which is a continuation of, and claims benefit, of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/571,949, filed on Oct. 1, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,362,651 issued on Jan. 29, 2013, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/101,809, filed Oct. 1, 2008. The contents of the prior applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
This invention was made with government support under grant number DE-FG02-99ER45778 awarded by the Department of Energy, grant number DMR-0213282 awarded by the National Science Foundation, and grant number W911NF-07-D-0004 awarded by the Army Research Office. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
The disclosure relates to wireless energy transfer. Wireless energy transfer can for example, be useful in such applications as providing power to autonomous electrical or electronic devices.
Radiative modes of omni-directional antennas (which work very well for information transfer) are not suitable for such energy transfer, because a vast majority of energy is wasted into free space. Directed radiation modes, using lasers or highly-directional antennas, can be efficiently used for energy transfer, even for long distances (transfer distance LTRANS>>LDEV, where LDEV is the characteristic size of the device and/or the source), but may require existence of an uninterruptible line-of-sight and a complicated tracking system in the case of mobile objects. Some transfer schemes rely on induction, but are typically restricted to very close-range (LTRANS<<LDEV) or low power (˜mW) energy transfers.
The rapid development of autonomous electronics of recent years (e.g. laptops, cell-phones, house-hold robots, that all typically rely on chemical energy storage) has led to an increased need for wireless energy transfer.
Disclosed is a method for transferring energy wirelessly. The method includes i) transferring energy wirelessly from a first resonator structure to an intermediate resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B; ii) transferring energy wirelessly from the intermediate resonator structure to a second resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2; and iii) during the wireless energy transfers, adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 to reduce energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure and improve wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure through the intermediate resonator structure.
Embodiments of the method may include one or more of the following features.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to minimize energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure and cause wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to maintain energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system in an eigenstate having substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure. For example, the adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can further cause the eigenstate to evolve substantially adiabatically from an initial state with substantially all energy in the resonator structures in the first resonator structure to a final state with substantially all of the energy in the resonator structures in the second resonator structure.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to include adjustments of both coupling rates κ1B and κB2 during wireless energy transfer.
The resonator structures can each have a quality factor larger than 10.
The first and second resonator structures can each have a quality factor greater than 50.
The first and second resonator structures can each have a quality factor greater than 100.
The resonant energy in each of the resonator structures can include electromagnetic fields. For example, the maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 for inductive coupling between the intermediate resonator structure and each of the first and second resonator structures can each be larger than twice the loss rate Γ for each of the first and second resonators. Moreover, The maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 for inductive coupling between the intermediate resonator structure and each of the first and second resonator structures can each be larger than four (4) times the loss rate Γ for each of the first and second resonators.
Each resonator structure can have a resonant frequency between 50 KHz and 500 MHz.
The maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 can each be at least five (5) times greater than the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the second resonator structure.
The intermediate resonator structure can have a rate of radiative energy loss that is at least twenty (20) times greater than that for either the first resonator structure or the second resonator structure.
The first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to cause peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure to be less than five percent (5%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to cause peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure during the wireless energy transfers to be less than ten percent (10%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures.
Adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can include adjusting a relative position and/or orientation between one or more pairs of the resonator structures. Moreover, adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can include adjusting a resonator property of one or more of the resonator structures, such as mutual inductance.
The resonator structures can include a capacitively loaded loop or coil of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
The resonator structures can include an inductively loaded rod of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
The wireless energy transfers are non-radiative energy transfers mediated by a coupling of a resonant field evanescent tail of the first resonator structure and a resonant field evanescent tail of the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling of the resonant field evanescent tail of the intermediate resonator structure and a resonant field evanescent tail of the second resonator structure.
The adjustment of the at least one of the coupling rates can define a first mode of operation, wherein the reduction in the energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is relative to energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure for a second mode of operation of wireless energy transfer among the three resonator structures having a coupling rate κ′1B for wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling rate κ′B2 for wireless energy transfer from the intermediate resonator structure to the second resonator structure with κ′1B and κ′B2 each being substantially constant during the second mode of wireless energy transfer, and wherein the adjustment of the coupling rates κ1B and κ2B in the first mode of operation can be selected to κ1B,κB2<√{square root over ((κ′1B2+κ′B22)/2)}. Moreover, the first mode of operation can have a greater efficiency of energy transferred from the first resonator to the second resonator compared to that for the second mode of operation. Further, the first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical and each one can have a loss rate ΓA, the intermediate resonator structure can have a loss rate ΓB, and wherein ΓB/ΓA can be greater than 50.
Also, a ratio of energy lost to radiation and total energy wirelessly transferred between the first and second resonator structures in the first mode of operation is less than that for the second mode of operation. Moreover, the first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical and each one can have a loss rate ΓA and a loss rate only due to radiation ΓA,rad, the intermediate resonator structure can have a loss rate ΓB and a loss rate only due to radiation ΓB,rad, and wherein ΓB,rad/ΓB>ΓA,rad/ΓA.
The first mode of operation the intermediate resonator structure interacts less with extraneous objects than it does in the second mode of operation.
During the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure at least one of the coupling rates can be adjusted so that κ1B<<κB2 at a start of the energy transfer and κ1B>>κB2 by a time a substantial portion of the energy has been transferred from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure.
The coupling rate κB2 can be maintained at a fixed value and the coupling rate κ1B is increased during the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure.
The coupling rate κ1B can be maintained at a fixed value and the coupling rate κB2 is decreased during the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure.
During the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure, the coupling rate κ1B can be increased and the coupling rate κB2 is decreased.
The method may further include features corresponding to those listed for one or more of the apparatuses and methods described below.
In another aspect, disclosed is an apparatus including: first, intermediate, and second resonator structures, wherein a coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B and a coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2; and means for adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 during wireless energy transfers among the resonator structures to reduce energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure and improve wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure through the intermediate resonator structure.
Embodiments for the apparatus can include one or more of the following features.
The means for adjusting can include a rotation stage for adjusting the relative orientation of the intermediate resonator structure with respect to the first and second resonator structures.
The means for adjusting can include a translation stage for moving the first and/or second resonator structures relative to the intermediate resonator structure.
The means for adjusting can include a mechanical, electro-mechanical, or electrical staging system for dynamically adjusting the effective size of one or more of the resonator structures.
The apparatus may further include features corresponding to those listed for the method described above, and one or more of the apparatuses and methods described below.
In another aspect, a method for transferring energy wirelessly includes i): transferring energy wirelessly from a first resonator structure to a intermediate resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B; ii) transferring energy wirelessly from the intermediate resonator structure to a second resonator, wherein the coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2; and iii) during the wireless energy transfers, adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 to cause an energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system to have substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure while wirelessly transferring energy from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure through the intermediate resonator structure.
Embodiments for the method above can include one or more of the following features.
Having substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure can mean that peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is less than ten percent (10%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures throughout the wireless energy transfer.
Having substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure can mean that peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is less than five percent (5%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures throughout the wireless energy transfer.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to maintain the energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system in an eigenstate having the substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to further cause the eigenstate to evolve substantially adiabatically from an initial state with substantially all energy in the resonator structures in the first resonator structure to a final state with substantially all of the energy in the resonator structures in the second resonator structure.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can include adjustments of both coupling rates κ1B and κB2 during wireless energy transfers.
The resonant energy in each of the resonator structures comprises electromagnetic fields. For example, the maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 for inductive coupling between the intermediate resonator structure and each of the first and second resonator structures can each be larger than twice the loss rate Γ for each of the first and second resonators. Moreover, the maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 for inductive coupling between the intermediate resonator structure and each of the first and second resonator structures can each be larger than four (4) times the loss rate Γ for each of the first and second resonators.
The resonator structure can have a resonant frequency between 50 KHz and 500 MHz.
The maximum value of the coupling rate κ1B and the maximum value of the coupling rate κB2 can each be at least five (5) times greater than the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the second resonator structure.
The intermediate resonator structure can have a rate of radiative energy loss that is at least twenty (20) times greater than that for either the first resonator structure or the second resonator structure.
The first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical.
Adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can include adjusting a relative position and/or orientation between one or more pairs of the resonator structures.
Adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can include adjusting a resonator property of one or more of the resonator structures, such as mutual inductance.
The resonator structures can include a capacitively loaded loop or coil of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
The resonator structures can include an inductively loaded rod of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
The wireless energy transfers can be non-radiative energy transfers mediated by a coupling of a resonant field evanescent tail of the first resonator structure and a resonant field evanescent tail of the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling of the resonant field evanescent tail of the intermediate resonator structure and a resonant field evanescent tail of the second resonator structure.
The first and second resonator structures can each have a quality factor greater than 50.
The first and second resonator structures can each have a quality factor greater than 100.
The adjustment of at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 can be selected to cause the energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system to have substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure improves wireless energy transfer between the first and second resonator structures.
The adjustment of the at least one of the coupling rates can be selected to define a first mode of operation, wherein energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure during the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure is smaller than that for a second mode of operation of wireless energy transfer among the three resonator structures having a coupling rate κ′1B for wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling rate κ′B2 for wireless energy transfer from the intermediate resonator structure to the second resonator structure with κ′1B and κ′B2 each being substantially constant during the second mode of wireless energy transfer, and wherein the adjustment of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 in the first mode of operation can be selected to satisfy κ1B,κB2<√{square root over ((κ′1B2+κ′B22)/2)}.
The first mode of operation can have a greater efficiency of energy transferred from the first resonator to the second resonator compared to that for the second mode of operation.
The first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical and each one can have a loss rate ΓA, the intermediate resonator structure can have a loss rate ΓB, and wherein ΓB/ΓA can be greater than 50.
A ratio of energy lost to radiation and total energy wirelessly transferred between the first and second resonator structures in the first mode of operation can be less than that for the second mode of operation.
The first and second resonator structures can be substantially identical and each one can have a loss rate ΓA and a loss rate only due to radiation ΓA,rad, the intermediate resonator structure can have a loss rate ΓB and a loss rate only due to radiation ΓB,rad and wherein ΓB,rad/ΓB>ΓA,rad/ΓA.
The first mode of operation the intermediate resonator structure interacts less with extraneous objects than it does in the second mode of operation.
During the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure at least one of the coupling rates can be adjusted so that κ1B<<κB2 at a start of the energy transfer and κ1B>>κB2 by a time a substantial portion of the energy has been transferred from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure.
The coupling rate κB2 can be maintained at a fixed value and the coupling rate κ1B can be increased during the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure.
The coupling rate κ1B can be maintained at a fixed value and the coupling rate κB2 can be decreased during the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure.
During the wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to second resonator structure, the coupling rate κ1B can be increased and the coupling rate κB2 can be decreased.
The method may further include features corresponding to those listed for the apparatus and method described above, and one or more of the apparatuses and methods described below.
In another aspect, disclosed is an apparatus including: first, intermediate, and second resonator structures, wherein a coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B and a coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2; and means for adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 during wireless energy transfers among the resonator structures to cause an energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system to have substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure while wirelessly transferring energy from the first resonator structure to the second resonator structure through the intermediate resonator structure.
Embodiments for the apparatus can include one or more of the following features.
Having substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure can mean that peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is less than ten percent (10%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures throughout the wireless energy transfers.
Having substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure can mean that peak energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is less than five percent (5%) of the peak total energy in the three resonator structures throughout the wireless energy transfers.
The means for adjusting can be configured to maintain the energy distribution in the field of the three-resonator system in an eigenstate having the substantially no energy in the intermediate resonator structure.
The means for adjusting can include a rotation stage for adjusting the relative orientation of the intermediate resonator structure with respect to the first and second resonator structures.
The means for adjusting can include a translation stage for moving the first and/or second resonator structures relative to the intermediate resonator structure.
The means for adjusting can include a mechanical, electro-mechanical, or electrical staging system for dynamically adjusting the effective size of one or more of the resonator structures.
The resonator structures can include a capacitively loaded loop or coil of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
The resonator structures can include an inductively loaded rod of at least one of a conducting wire, a conducting Litz wire, and a conducting ribbon.
A source can be coupled to the first resonator structure and a load can be coupled to the second resonator structure.
The apparatus may further include features corresponding to those listed for the apparatus and methods described above, and the apparatus and method described below.
In another aspect, disclosed is a method for transferring energy wirelessly that includes: i) transferring energy wirelessly from a first resonator structure to a intermediate resonator structure, wherein the coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B; ii) transferring energy wirelessly from the intermediate resonator structure to a second resonator, wherein the coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure with a coupling rate is κB2; and iii) during the wireless energy transfers, adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 to define a first mode of operation in which energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is reduced relative to that for a second mode of operation of wireless energy transfer among the three resonator structures having a coupling rate κ′1B for wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling rate κ′B2 for wireless energy transfer from the intermediate resonator structure to the second resonator structure with κ′1B and κ′B2 each being substantially constant during the second mode of wireless energy transfer, and wherein the adjustment of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 in the first mode of operation can be selected to satisfy κ1B,κB2<√{square root over ((κ′1B2+κ′B22)/2)}.
The method may further include features corresponding to those listed for the apparatuses and methods described above.
In another aspect, disclosed is an apparatus that includes: first, intermediate, and second resonator structures, wherein a coupling rate between the first resonator structure and the intermediate resonator structure is κ1B and a coupling rate between the intermediate resonator structure and the second resonator structure is κB2; and means for adjusting at least one of the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 during wireless energy transfers among the resonator structures to define a first mode of operation in which energy accumulation in the intermediate resonator structure is reduced relative to that for a second mode of operation for wireless energy transfer among the three resonator structures having a coupling rate κ′1B for wireless energy transfer from the first resonator structure to the intermediate resonator structure and a coupling rate κ′B2 for wireless energy transfer from the intermediate resonator structure to the second resonator structure with κ′1B and κ′B2 each being substantially constant during the second mode of wireless energy transfer, and wherein the adjustment of the coupling rates κ12 and κB2 in the first mode of operation can be selected to satisfy κ1B,κB2<√{square root over ((κ′1B2+κ′B22)/2)}.
The apparatus may further include features corresponding to those listed for the apparatuses and methods described above.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, suitable methods and materials are described below. All publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below, including the documents appended hereto. Other features and advantages will be apparent from this disclosure and from the claims.
Efficient wireless energy-transfer between two similar-frequency resonant objects can be achieved at mid-range distances, provided these resonant objects are designed to operate in the ‘strong-coupling’ regime. ‘Strong coupling’ can be realized for a wide variety of resonant objects, including electromagnetic resonant objects such as inductively-loaded conducting rods and dielectric disks. Recently, we have demonstrated wireless energy transfer between strongly coupled electromagnetic self-resonant conducting coils and capacitively-loaded conducting coils, bearing high-Q electromagnetic resonant modes. See, for example, the following commonly owned U.S. patent applications, all of which are incorporated herein by reference: U.S. application Ser. No. 11/481,077, filed on Jul. 5, 2006, and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2007-0222542 A1; U.S. application Ser. No. 12/055,963, filed on Mar. 26, 2008, and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2008-0278264 A1; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/466,065, filed on May 14, 2009, and published as U.S. Patent Publication No. 2009-0284083. In general, the energy-transfer efficiency between similar-frequency, strongly coupled resonant objects decreases as the distance between the objects is increased.
In this work, we explore a further scheme of efficient energy transfer between resonant objects that extends the range over which energy may be efficiently transferred. Instead of transferring energy directly between two resonant objects, as has been described in certain embodiments of the cross-referenced patents, in certain embodiments, an intermediate resonant object, with a resonant frequency equal or nearly-equal to that of the two energy-exchanging resonant objects is used to mediate the transfer. The intermediate resonant object may be chosen so that it couples more strongly to each of the resonant objects involved in the energy transfer than those two resonant objects couple to each other. One way to design such an intermediate resonator is to make it larger than either of the resonant objects involved in the energy transfer. However, increasing the size of the intermediate resonant object may lower its quality factor, or Q, by increasing its radiation losses. Surprisingly enough, this new “indirect” energy transfer scheme may be shown to be very efficient and only weakly-radiative by introducing a meticulously chosen time variation of the resonator coupling rates.
The advantage of this method over the prior commonly owned wireless energy transfer techniques is that, in certain embodiments, it can enable energy to be transferred wirelessly between two objects with a larger efficiency and/or with a smaller radiation loss and/or with fewer interactions with extraneous objects.
Accordingly, in certain embodiments, we disclose an efficient wireless energy transfer scheme between two similar resonant objects, strongly coupled to an intermediate resonant object of substantially different properties, but with the same resonance frequency. The transfer mechanism essentially makes use of the adiabatic evolution of an instantaneous (so called ‘dark’) resonant state of the coupled three-object system. Our analysis is based on temporal coupled mode theory (CMT), and is general. Of particular commercial interest is the application of this technique to strongly-coupled electromagnetic resonators used for mid-range wireless energy transfer applications. We show that in certain parameter regimes of interest, this scheme can be more efficient, and/or less radiative than other wireless energy transfer approaches.
While the technique described herein is primarily directed to tangible resonator structures, the technique shares certain features with a quantum interference phenomenon known in the atomic physics community as Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT). In EIT, three atomic states participate. Two of them, which are non-lossy, are coupled to one that has substantial losses. However, by meticulously controlling the mutual couplings between the states, one can establish a coupled system which is overall non-lossy. This phenomena has been demonstrated using carefully timed optical pulses, referred to as probe laser pulses and Stokes laser pulses, to reduce the opacity of media with the appropriate collection of atomic states. A closely related phenomenon known as Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP) may take place in a similar system; namely, the probe and Stokes laser beams may be used to achieve complete coherent population transfer between two molecular states of a medium. Hence, we may refer to the currently proposed scheme as the “EIT-like” energy transfer scheme.
In certain embodiments, we disclose an efficient near-field energy transfer scheme between two similar resonant objects, based on an EIT-like transfer of the energy through a mediating resonant object with the same resonant frequency. In embodiments, this EIT-like energy transfer may be realized using electromagnetic resonators as have been described in the cross-referenced patents, but the scheme is not bound only to wireless energy transfer applications. Rather, this scheme is general and may find applications in various other types of coupling between general resonant objects. In certain embodiments described below, we describe particular examples of electromagnetic resonators, but the nature of the resonators and their coupling mechanisms could be quite different (e.g. acoustic, mechanical, etc.). To the extent that many resonant phenomena can be modeled with nearly identical CMT equations, similar behavior to that described herein would occur.
1. Efficient Energy-Transfer by Two ‘Strongly Coupled’ Resonances
The characteristic size of an object can be regarded as being equal to the radius of the smallest sphere which can fit around the entire object. The characteristic thickness of an object can be regarded as being, when placed on a flat surface in any arbitrary configuration, the smallest possible height of the highest point of the object above a flat surface. The characteristic width of an object can be regarded as being the radius of the smallest possible circle that the object can pass through while traveling in a straight line. For example, the characteristic width of a cylindrical object is the radius of the cylinder.
Initially, we present a theoretical framework for understanding near-field wireless energy transfer. Note however that it is to be understood that the scope of the invention is not bound by theory.
Different temporal schemes can be employed, depending on the application, to transfer energy between two resonant objects. Here we will consider two particularly simple but important schemes: a one-time finite-amount energy-transfer scheme and a continuous finite-rate energy-transfer (power) scheme.
1.1 Finite-Amount Energy-Transfer Efficiency
Let the source and device objects be 1, 2 respectively and their resonance modes, which we will use for the energy exchange, have angular frequencies ω1,2, frequency-widths due to intrinsic (absorption, radiation etc.) losses Γ1,2 and (generally) vector fields F1,2(r), normalized to unity energy. Once the two resonant objects are brought in proximity, they can interact and an appropriate analytical framework for modeling this resonant interaction is that of the well-known coupled-mode theory (CMT). This model works well, when the resonances are well defined by having large quality factors and their resonant frequencies are relatively close to each other. In this picture, the field of the system of the two resonant objects 1, 2 can be approximated by F(r,t)=a1(t)F1(r)+a2 (t)F2(r), where a1,2(t) are the field amplitudes, with |a1,2(t)|2 equal to the energy stored inside the object 1, 2 respectively, due to the normalization. Then, using e−iωt time dependence, the field amplitudes can be shown to satisfy, to lowest order:
where κ11,22 are the shifts in each object'"'"'s frequency due to the presence of the other, which are a second-order correction and can be absorbed into the resonant frequencies (eigenfrequencies) by setting ω1,2→ω1,2+κ11,22, and κ12,21 are the coupling coefficients, which from the reciprocity requirement of the system satisfy κ21=κ12≡κ.
The resonant modes of the combined system are found by substituting [a1(t),a2(t)]=[A1,A2]e−i
where ω12=[(ω1+ω2)−i(Γ1+Γ2)]/2, Δω12=[(ω1−ω2)−i(Γ1−Γ2)]/2 and whose splitting we denote as δE≡
Note that, at exact resonance ω1=ω2=ωA and for Γ1=Γ2=ΓA, we get Δω12=0, δE=2κ, and then
namely we get the known result that the resonant modes split to a lower frequency even mode and a higher frequency odd mode.
Assume now that at time t=0 the source object 1 has finite energy |a1(0)|2, while the device object has |a2(0)|2=0. Since the objects are coupled, energy will be transferred from 1 to 2. With these initial conditions, Eqs. (1) can be solved, predicting the evolution of the device field-amplitude to be
The energy-transfer efficiency will be ηE≡|a2(t)|2/|a1(0)|2. The ratio of energy converted to loss due to a specific loss mechanism in resonators 1 and 2, with respective loss rates Γ1,loss and Γ2,loss will be ηloss,E=∫0tdτ[2Γ1,loss|a1(τ)|2+2Γ2,loss|a2(τ)|2]/|a1(0)|2. Note that, at exact resonance ω1=ω2=ωA (an optimal condition), Eq. (3) can be written as
where ≡κt, Δ−1=2κ/(Γ2−Γ1) and U=2κ/(Γ1+Γ2).
In some examples, the system designer can adjust the duration of the coupling t at will. In some examples, the duration t can be adjusted to maximize the device energy (and thus efficiency ηE). Then, it can be inferred from Eq. (4) that ηE is maximized for
resulting in an optimal energy-transfer efficiency
which is a monotonically increasing function of the coupling-to-loss ratio U=2κ/(Γ1+Γ2) and tends to unity when U>>1|Δ|−1>>1. Therefore, the energy transfer is nearly perfect, when the coupling rate is much faster than all loss rates (κ/Γ1,2>1). In
Δ=0:
In a real wireless energy-transfer system, the source object can be connected to a power generator (not shown in
1.2 Finite-Rate Energy-Transfer (Power-Transmission) Efficiency
Let the generator be continuously supplying energy to the source object 1 at a rate κ1 and the load continuously draining energy from the device object 2 at a rate κ2. Field amplitudes s±1,2(t) are then defined, so that |s±1,2(t)|2 is equal to the power ingoing to (for the + sign) or outgoing from (for the − sign) the object 1, 2 respectively, and the CMT equations are modified to
where again we can set ω1,2→ω1,2+κ11,22 and κ21=κ12≡κ.
Assume now that the excitation is at a fixed frequency ω, namely has the form s+1(t)=S+1e−iωt. Then the response of the linear system will be at the same frequency, namely a1,2(t)=A12e−iωt and s−1,2(t)=S−1,2e−iωt. By substituting these into Eqs. (7), using δ1,2≡ω−ω1,2, and solving the system, we find the field-amplitude transmitted to the load (S21 scattering-matrix element)
and the field-amplitude reflected to the generator (S11 scattering-matrix element)
where D1,2≡δ1,2/Γ1,2, U1,2≡κ1,2/Γ1,2 and U≡κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}. Similarly, the scattering-matrix elements S12, S22 are given by interchanging 12 in Eqs. (8), (9) and, as expected from reciprocity, S21=S12. The coefficients for power transmission (efficiency) and reflection and loss are respectively ηP≡|S21|2=|S−2|2/—S+1|2 and |S11−2=|S−1−2/|S+1|2 and 1−|S21|2−|S11|2=(2θ1|A1|2+2Γ2|A2|2)/|S+1|2.
In some implementations, the parameters D1,2, U1,2 can be designed (engineered), since one can adjust the resonant frequencies ω1,2 (compared to the desired operating frequency ω) and the generator/load supply/drain rates κ1,2. Their choice can target the optimization of some system performance-characteristic of interest.
In some examples, a goal can be to maximize the power transmission (efficiency) ηP≡|S21|2 of the system, so one would require
η′P(D1,2)=η′P(U1,2)=0 (10)
Since S21 (from Eq. (8)) is symmetric upon interchanging 12, the optimal values for D1,2 (determined by Eqs. (10)) will be equal, namely D1=D2≡Do, and similarly U1=U2≡Uo. Then,
and from the condition η′P(Do)=0 we get that, for fixed values of U and Uo, the efficiency can be maximized for the following values of the symmetric detuning
which, in the case U>1+Uo, can be rewritten for the two frequencies at which the efficiency peaks as
whose splitting we denote as δP≡
which is known as ‘critical coupling’ condition, whereas for Uo<Uo* the system is called ‘undercoupled’ and for Uo>Uo* it is called ‘overcoupled’. The dependence of the efficiency on the frequency detuning Do for different values of Uo (including the ‘critical-coupling’ condition) are shown in
which is again only a function of the coupling-to-loss ratio U=κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)} and tends to unity when U>>1, as depicted in
In some examples, a goal can be to minimize the power reflection at the side of the generator |s11|2 and the load |s22|2, so one would then need
S11,22=0(1
U1−iD1)(1±U2−iD2)+U2=0, (16)
The equations above present ‘impedance matching’ conditions. Again, the set of these conditions is symmetric upon interchanging 12, so, by substituting D1=D2≡Do and U1=U2≡Uo into Eqs. (16), we get
(1−iDo)2−Uo2+U2=0, (17)
from which we easily find that the values of Do and Uo that cancel all reflections are again exactly those in Eqs. (14).
It can be seen that, the two goals and their associated sets of conditions (Eqs. (10) and Eqs. (16)) result in the same optimized values of the intra-source and intra-device parameters D1,2, U1,2. Note that for a lossless system this would be an immediate consequence of power conservation (Hermiticity of the scattering matrix), but this is not apparent for a lossy system.
Accordingly, for any temporal energy-transfer scheme, once the parameters specific only to the source or to the device (such as their resonant frequencies and their excitation or loading rates respectively) have been optimally designed, the efficiency monotonically increases with the ratio of the source-device coupling-rate to their loss rates. Using the definition of a resonance quality factor Q=ω/2Γ and defining by analogy the coupling factor k≡1/Qκ=2κ/√{square root over (ω1ω2)}, it is therefore exactly this ratio
that has been set as a figure-of-merit for any system under consideration for wireless energy-transfer, along with the distance over which this ratio can be achieved (clearly, U will be a decreasing function of distance). The operating regime U>1 is sometimes called ‘strong-coupling’ regime and is a sufficient condition for efficient energy-transfer. In particular, for U>1 we get, from Eq. (15), ηP*>17%, large enough for many practical applications. Note that in some applications, U>0.1 may be sufficient. In applications where it is impossible or impractical to run wires to supply power to a device, U<0.1 may be considered sufficient. One skilled in the art will recognize that the sufficient U is application and specification dependent. The figure-of-merit U may be called the strong-coupling factor. We will further show how to design systems with a large strong-coupling factor.
To achieve a large strong-coupling factor U, in some examples, the energy-transfer application preferably uses resonant modes of high quality factors Q, corresponding to low (i.e. slow) intrinsic-loss rates Γ. This condition can be satisfied by designing resonant modes where all loss mechanisms, typically radiation and absorption, are sufficiently suppressed.
This suggests that the coupling be implemented using, not the lossy radiative far-field, which should rather be suppressed, but the evanescent (non-lossy) stationary near-field. To implement an energy-transfer scheme, usually more appropriate are finite objects, namely ones that are topologically surrounded everywhere by air, into where the near field extends to achieve the coupling. Objects of finite extent do not generally support electromagnetic states that are exponentially decaying in all directions in air away from the objects, since Maxwell'"'"'s Equations in free space imply that k2=ω2/c2, where k is the wave vector, ω the angular frequency, and c the speed of light, because of which one can show that such finite objects cannot support states of infinite Q, rather there always is some amount of radiation. However, very long-lived (so-called “high-Q”) states can be found, whose tails display the needed exponential or exponential-like decay away from the resonant object over long enough distances before they turn oscillatory (radiative). The limiting surface, where this change in the field behavior happens, is called the “radiation caustic”, and, for the wireless energy-transfer scheme to be based on the near field rather than the far/radiation field, the distance between the coupled objects must be such that one lies within the radiation caustic of the other. One typical way of achieving a high radiation-Q (Qrad) is to design subwavelength resonant objects. When the size of an object is much smaller than the wavelength of radiation in free space, its electromagnetic field couples to radiation very weakly. Since the extent of the near-field into the area surrounding a finite-sized resonant object is set typically by the wavelength, in some examples, resonant objects of subwavelength size have significantly longer evanescent field-tails. In other words, the radiation caustic is pushed far away from the object, so the electromagnetic mode enters the radiative regime only with a small amplitude.
Moreover, most realistic materials exhibit some nonzero amount of absorption, which can be frequency dependent, and thus cannot support states of infinite Q, rather there always is some amount of absorption. However, very long-lived (“high-Q”) states can be found, where electromagnetic modal energy is only weakly dissipated. Some typical ways of achieving a high absorption-Q (Qabs) is to use materials which exhibit very small absorption at the resonant frequency and/or to shape the field to be localized more inside the least lossy materials.
Furthermore, to achieve a large strong-coupling factor U, in some examples, the energy-transfer application may use systems that achieve a high coupling factor k, corresponding to strong (i.e. fast) coupling rate κ, over distances larger than the characteristic sizes of the objects.
Since finite-sized subwavelength resonant objects can often be designed to have high Q, as was discussed above and will be seen in examples later on, such objects may typically be chosen for the resonant device-object. In these cases, the electromagnetic field is, in some examples, of a quasi-static nature and the distance, up to which sufficient coupling can be achieved, is dictated by the decay-law of this quasi-static field.
Note that in some examples, the resonant source-object may be immobile and thus less restricted in its allowed geometry and size. It can be therefore chosen to be large enough that the near-field extent is not limited by the wavelength, and can thus have nearly infinite radiation-Q. Some objects of nearly infinite extent, such as dielectric waveguides, can support guided modes, whose evanescent tails are decaying exponentially in the direction away from the object, slowly if tuned close to cutoff, therefore a good coupling can also be achieved over distances quite a few times larger than a characteristic size of the source- and/or device-object.
2 ‘Strongly-Coupled’ Resonances at Mid-Range Distances for Realistic Systems
In the following, examples of systems suitable for energy transfer of the type described above are described. We will demonstrate how to compute the CMT parameters ω1,2, Q1,2 and k described above and how to choose or design these parameters for particular examples in order to produce a desirable figure-of-merit U=κ/√{square root over (Γ1Γ2)}=k√{square root over (Q1Q2)} at a desired distance D. In some examples, this figure-of-merit is maximized when ω1,2 are tuned close to a particular angular frequency ωU.
2.1 Self-Resonant Conducting Coils
In some examples, one or more of the resonant objects are self-resonant conducting coils. Referring to
is the maximum amount of positive charge accumulated in one side of the coil (where an equal amount of negative charge always also accumulates in the other side to make the system neutral) and Io=max{|I(x)|} is the maximum positive value of the linear current distribution, then Io=wqo. Then, one can define an effective total inductance L and an effective total capacitance C of the coil through the amount of energy W inside its resonant mode:
where μo and ∈o are the magnetic permeability and electric permittivity of free space.
With these definitions, the resonant angular frequency and the effective impedance can be given by the formulas ω=1/√{square root over (LC)} and Z=√{square root over (L/C)} respectively.
Losses in this resonant system consist of ohmic (material absorption) loss inside the wire and radiative loss into free space. One can again define a total absorption resistance Rabs from the amount of power absorbed inside the wire and a total radiation resistance Rrad from the amount of power radiated due to electric- and magnetic-dipole radiation:
where c=1/√{square root over (μo∈o)} and ζo=√{square root over (μo/∈o)} are the light velocity and light impedance in free space, the impedance ζc is ζc=1/σζ=√{square root over (μoω/2σ)} with σ the conductivity of the conductor and δ the skin depth at the frequency ω,
is the electric-dipole moment of the coil and
is the magnetic-dipole moment of the coil. For the radiation resistance formula Eq. (22), the assumption of operation in the quasi-static regime (h,r<<λ=2πc/ω) has been used, which is the desired regime of a subwavelength resonance. With these definitions, the absorption and radiation quality factors of the resonance may be given by Qabs=Z/Rabs and Qrad=Z/Rrad respectively.
From Eq. (19)-(22) it follows that to determine the resonance parameters one simply needs to know the current distribution j in the resonant coil. Solving Maxwell'"'"'s equations to rigorously find the current distribution of the resonant electromagnetic eigenmode of a conducting-wire coil is more involved than, for example, of a standard LC circuit, and we can find no exact solutions in the literature for coils of finite length, making an exact solution difficult. One could in principle write down an elaborate transmission-line-like model, and solve it by brute force. We instead present a model that is (as described below) in good agreement (˜5%) with experiment. Observing that the finite extent of the conductor forming each coil imposes the boundary condition that the current has to be zero at the ends of the coil, since no current can leave the wire, we assume that the resonant mode of each coil is well approximated by a sinusoidal current profile along the length of the conducting wire. We shall be interested in the lowest mode, so if we denote by x the coordinate along the conductor, such that it runs from −l/2 to +l/2, then the current amplitude profile would have the form I(x)=Io cos(πx/l), where we have assumed that the current does not vary significantly along the wire circumference for a particular x, a valid assumption provided a<<r. It immediately follows from the continuity equation for charge that the linear charge density profile should be of the form ρl(x)=ρo sin(πx/l), and thus qo=∫0l/2dxρo| sin(πx/l)|=ρol/π. Using these sinusoidal profiles we find the so-called “self-inductance” Ls and “self-capacitance” Cs of the coil by computing numerically the integrals Eq. (19) and (20); the associated frequency and effective impedance are ωs and Zs respectively. The “self-resistances” Rs are given analytically by Eq. (21) and (22) using
and therefore the associated Qs factors can be calculated.
The results for two examples of resonant coils with subwavelength modes of λs/r≧70 (i.e. those highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) are presented in Table 1. Numerical results are shown for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for the two different cases of subwavelength-coil resonant modes. Note that, for conducting material, copper (σ=5.998·10^−7 S/m) was used. It can be seen that expected quality factors at microwave frequencies are Qs,abs≧1000 and Qs,rad≧5000.
Referring to
and the retardation factor of u=exp(iω|x−x′|/c) inside the integral can been ignored in the quasi-static regime D<<λ of interest, where each coil is within the near field of the other. With this definition, the coupling factor is given by k=√{square root over (C1C2)}/MC+ML/√{square root over (L1L2)}.
Therefore, to calculate the coupling rate between two self-resonant coils, again the current profiles are needed and, by using again the assumed sinusoidal current profiles, we compute numerically from Eq. (23) the mutual capacitance MC,s and inductance ML,s between two self-resonant coils at a distance D between their centers, and thus k=1/Qκ is also determined.
Referring to Table 2, relevant parameters are shown for exemplary examples featuring pairs or identical self resonant coils. Numerical results are presented for the average wavelength and loss rates of the two normal modes (individual values not shown), and also the coupling rate and figure-of-merit as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases of modes presented in Table 1. It can be seen that for medium distances D/r=10−3 the expected coupling-to-loss ratios are in the range U˜2-70.
2.1.1 Experimental Results
An experimental realization of an example of the above described system for wireless energy transfer consists of two self-resonant coils, one of which (the source coil) is coupled inductively to an oscillating circuit, and the second (the device coil) is coupled inductively to a resistive load, as shown schematically in
The parameters for the two identical helical coils built for the experimental validation of the power transfer scheme were h=20 cm, a=3 mm, r=30 cm and N=5.25. Both coils are made of copper. Due to imperfections in the construction, the spacing between loops of the helix is not uniform, and we have encapsulated the uncertainty about their uniformity by attributing a 10% (2 cm) uncertainty to h. The expected resonant frequency given these dimensions is f0=10.56±0.3 MHz, which is approximately 5% off from the measured resonance at around 9.90 MHz.
The theoretical Q for the loops is estimated to be ˜2500 (assuming perfect copper of resistivity ρ=1/σ=1.7×10−8 Ωm) but the measured value is 950±50. We believe the discrepancy is mostly due to the effect of the layer of poorly conducting copper oxide on the surface of the copper wire, to which the current is confined by the short skin depth (˜20 μm) at this frequency. We have therefore used the experimentally observed Q (and Γ1=Γ2=Γ=ω/(2Q) derived from it) in all subsequent computations.
The coupling coefficient κ can be found experimentally by placing the two self-resonant coils (fine-tuned, by slightly adjusting h, to the same resonant frequency when isolated) a distance D apart and measuring the splitting in the frequencies of the two resonant modes in the transmission spectrum. According to Eq. (13) derived by coupled-mode theory, the splitting in the transmission spectrum should be δP=2√{square root over (κ2−Γ2)}, when κA,B are kept very small by keeping A and B at a relatively large distance. The comparison between experimental and theoretical results as a function of distance when the two the coils are aligned coaxially is shown in
The power-generator circuit was a standard Colpitts oscillator coupled inductively to the source coil by means of a single loop of copper wire 25 cm in radius (see
In order to isolate the efficiency of the transfer taking place specifically between the source coil and the load, we measured the current at the mid-point of each of the self-resonant coils with a current-probe (which was not found to lower the Q of the coils noticeably.) This gave a measurement of the current parameters I1 and I2 defined above. The power dissipated in each coil was then computed from P1,2=ΓL|I1,2|2, and the efficiency was directly obtained from η=PB/(P1+P2+PB). To ensure that the experimental setup was well described by a two-object coupled-mode theory model, we positioned the device coil such that its direct coupling to the copper loop attached to the Colpitts oscillator was zero. The experimental results are shown in
Using this example, we were able to transmit significant amounts of power using this setup from the source coil to the device coil, fully lighting up a 60 W light-bulb from distances more than 2 m away, for example. As an additional test, we also measured the total power going into the driving circuit. The efficiency of the wireless power-transmission itself was hard to estimate in this way, however, as the efficiency of the Colpitts oscillator itself is not precisely known, although it is expected to be far from 100%. Nevertheless, this gave an overly conservative lower bound on the efficiency. When transmitting 60 W to the load over a distance of 2 m, for example, the power flowing into the driving circuit was 400 W. This yields an overall wall-to-load efficiency of ˜15%, which is reasonable given the expected ˜40% efficiency for the wireless power transmission at that distance and the low efficiency of the driving circuit.
From the theoretical treatment above, we see that in typical examples it is important that the coils be on resonance for the power transmission to be practical. We found experimentally that the power transmitted to the load dropped sharply as one of the coils was detuned from resonance. For a fractional detuning Δf/f0 of a few times the inverse loaded Q, the induced current in the device coil was indistinguishable from noise.
The power transmission was not found to be visibly affected as humans and various everyday objects, such as metallic and wooden furniture, as well as electronic devices large and small, were placed between the two coils, even when they drastically obstructed the line of sight between source and device. External objects were found to have an effect only when they were closer than 10 cm from either one of the coils. While some materials (such as aluminum foil, styrofoam and humans) mostly just shifted the resonant frequency, which could in principle be easily corrected with a feedback circuit of the type described earlier, others (cardboard, wood, and PVC) lowered Q when placed closer than a few centimeters from the coil, thereby lowering the efficiency of the transfer.
This method of power transmission is believed safe for humans. When transmitting 60 W (more than enough to power a laptop computer) across 2 m, we estimated that the magnitude of the magnetic field generated is much weaker than the Earth'"'"'s magnetic field for all distances except for less than about 1 cm away from the wires in the coil, an indication of the safety of the scheme even after long-term use. The power radiated for these parameters was ˜5 W, which is roughly an order of magnitude higher than cell phones but could be drastically reduced, as discussed below.
Although the two coils are currently of identical dimensions, it is possible to make the device coil small enough to fit into portable devices without decreasing the efficiency. One could, for instance, maintain the product of the characteristic sizes of the source and device coils constant.
These experiments demonstrated experimentally a system for power transmission over medium range distances, and found that the experimental results match theory well in multiple independent and mutually consistent tests.
The efficiency of the scheme and the distances covered can be improved by silver-plating the coils, which may increase their Q, or by working with more elaborate geometries for the resonant objects. Nevertheless, the performance characteristics of the system presented here are already at levels where they could be useful in practical applications.
2.2 Capacitively-Loaded Conducting Loops or Coils
In some examples, one or more of the resonant objects are capacitively-loaded conducting loops or coils. Referring to C→Cs
ω→ωs,as Cp→0.
In general, the desired CMT parameters can be found for this system, but again a very complicated solution of Maxwell'"'"'s Equations is required. Instead, we will analyze only a special case, where a reasonable guess for the current distribution can be made. When Cp>>Cs>C, then ω≈1/√{square root over (LCp)}<<ωs and Z≈√{square root over (L/Cp)}<<Zs, while all the charge is on the plates of the loading capacitor and thus the current distribution is constant along the wire. This allows us now to compute numerically L from Eq. (19). In the case h=0 and N integer, the integral in Eq. (19) can actually be computed analytically, giving the formula L=μor[ln(8r/a)−2]N2. Explicit analytical formulas are again available for R from Eq. (21) and (22), since Irms=Io, |p|≈0 and |m|=IoNπr2 (namely only the magnetic-dipole term is contributing to radiation), so we can determine also Qabs=ωL/Rabs and Qrad=ωL/Rrad. At the end of the calculations, the validity of the assumption of constant current profile is confirmed by checking that indeed the condition Cp>>Csω<<ωs is satisfied. To satisfy this condition, one could use a large external capacitance, however, this would usually shift the operational frequency lower than the optimal frequency, which we will determine shortly; instead, in typical examples, one often prefers coils with very small self-capacitance Cs to begin with, which usually holds, for the types of coils under consideration, when N=1, so that the self-capacitance comes from the charge distribution across the single turn, which is almost always very small, or when N>1 and h>>2Na, so that the dominant self-capacitance comes from the charge distribution across adjacent turns, which is small if the separation between adjacent turns is large.
The external loading capacitance CP provides the freedom to tune the resonant frequency (for example by tuning A or d). Then, for the particular simple case h=0, for which we have analytical formulas, the total Q=ωL/(Rabs+Rrad) becomes highest at the optimal frequency
reaching the value
At lower frequencies Q is dominated by ohmic loss and at higher frequencies by radiation. Note, however, that the formulas above are accurate as long as ωQ<<ωs and, as explained above, this holds almost always when N=1, and is usually less accurate when N>1, since h=0 usually implies a large self-capacitance. A coil with large h can be used, if the self-capacitance needs to be reduced compared to the external capacitance, but then the formulas for L and ωQ, Qmax are again less accurate. Similar qualitative behavior is expected, but a more complicated theoretical model is needed for making quantitative predictions in that case.
The results of the above analysis for two examples of subwavelength modes of λ/r≧70 (namely highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) of coils with N=1 and h=0 at the optimal frequency Eq. (24) are presented in Table 3. To confirm the validity of constant-current assumption and the resulting analytical formulas, mode-solving calculations were also performed using another completely independent method: computational 3D finite-element frequency-domain (FEFD) simulations (which solve Maxwell'"'"'s Equations in frequency domain exactly apart for spatial discretization) were conducted, in which the boundaries of the conductor were modeled using a complex impedance ζc=√{square root over (μoω/2σ)} boundary condition, valid as long as ζc/ζo<<1 (<10−5 for copper in the microwave). Table 3 shows Numerical FEFD (and in parentheses analytical) results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-loop resonant modes. Note that copper was used for the conducting material (σ=5.998·107 S/m). Specific parameters of the plot in
Referring to
which again is more accurate for N1=N2=1.
From Eq. (26) it can be seen that the optimal frequency ωU, where the figure-of-merit is maximized to the value Umax, is close to the frequency ωQ
In some examples, one can tune the capacitively-loaded conducting loops or coils, so that their angular resonant frequencies are close to ωU within ΓU, which is half the angular frequency width for which U>Umax/2.
Referring to Table 4, numerical FEFD and, in parentheses, analytical results based on the above are shown for two systems each composed of a matched pair of the loaded coils described in Table 3. The average wavelength and loss rates are shown along with the coupling rate and coupling to loss ratio figure-of-merit U=κ/Γ as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases. Note that the average numerical Γrad shown are slightly different from the single-loop value of
2.2.1 Derivation of Optimal Power-Transmission Efficiency
Referring to
Then from the source circuit at resonance (wLs=1/wCs):
and from the device circuit at resonance (wLd=1/wCd)
0=Id(Rd+Rl)−jwMIsjwMIs=Id(Rd+Rl) (29)
So by substituting Eq. (29) to Eq. (28) and taking the real part (for time-averaged power) we get:
where we identified the power delivered by the generator Pg=Re{V*gIs/2}, the power lost inside the source Ps=|Is|2Rs/2, the power lost inside the device Pd=|Id|2Rd/2 and the power delivered to the load Pl=|Id|2Rl/2. Then, the power transmission efficiency is:
If we now choose the load impedance Rl to optimize the efficiency by η′P(Rl)=0, we get the optimal load impedance
and the maximum possible efficiency
To check now the correspondence with the CMT model, note that κl=Rl/2Ld, Γd=Rd/2Ld, Γs=Rs/2Ls, and κ=ωM/2√{square root over (LsLd)}, so then Ul=κl/Γd=Rl/Rd and U=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}=ωM/√{square root over (RsRd)}. Therefore, the condition Eq. (32) is identical to the condition Eq. (14) and the optimal efficiency Eq. (33) is identical to the general Eq. (15). Indeed, as the CMT analysis predicted, to get a large efficiency, we need to design a system that has a large strong-coupling factor U.
2.2.2 Optimization of U
The results above can be used to increase or optimize the performance of a wireless energy transfer system, which employs capacitively-loaded coils. For example, from the scaling of Eq. (27) with the different system parameters, one sees that to maximize the system figure-of-merit U, in some examples, one can:
- Decrease the resistivity of the conducting material. This can be achieved, for example, by using good conductors (such as copper or silver) and/or lowering the temperature. At very low temperatures one could use also superconducting materials to achieve extremely good performance.
- Increase the wire radius a. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations. The purpose of this action is mainly to reduce the resistive losses in the wire by increasing the cross-sectional area through which the electric current is flowing, so one could alternatively use also a Litz wire, or ribbon, or any low AC-resistance structure, instead of a circular wire.
- For fixed desired distance D of energy transfer, increase the radius of the loop r. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance vs. loop-size ratio D/r, decrease the radius of the loop r. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations.
- Increase the number of turns N. (Even though Eq. (27) is expected to be less accurate for N>1, qualitatively it still provides a good indication that we expect an improvement in the coupling-to-loss ratio with increased N.) In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size and possible voltage considerations, as will be discussed in following paragraphs.
- Adjust the alignment and orientation between the two coils. The figure-of-merit is optimized when both cylindrical coils have exactly the same axis of cylindrical symmetry (namely they are “facing” each other). In some examples, particular mutual coil angles and orientations that lead to zero mutual inductance (such as the orientation where the axes of the two coils are perpendicular and the centers of the two coils are on one of the two axes) should be avoided.
- Finally, note that the height of the coil h is another available design parameter, which can have an impact on the performance similar to that of its radius r, and thus the design rules can be similar.
The above analysis technique can be used to design systems with desired parameters. For example, as listed below, the above described techniques can be used to determine the cross sectional radius a of the wire used to design a system including two same single-turn loops with a given radius in order to achieve a specific performance in terms of U=κ/Γ at a given D/r between them, when the loop material is copper (σ=5.998·107S/m):
- D/r=5, U≧10, r=30 cm
a≧9 mm
- D/r=5, U≧10, r=5 cm
a≧3.7 mm
- D/r=5, U≧20, r=30 cm
a≧20 mm
- D/r=5, U≧20, r=5 cm
a≧8.3 mm
- D/r=10, U≧1, r=30 cm
a≧7 mm
- D/r=10, U≧1, r=5 cm
a≧2.8 mm
- D/r=10, U≧3, r=30 cm
a≧25 mm
- D/r=10, U≧3, r=5 cm
a≧10 mm
- D/r=5, U≧10, r=30 cm
Similar analysis can be done for the case of two dissimilar loops. For example, in some examples, the device under consideration may be identified specifically (e.g. a laptop or a cell phone), so the dimensions of the device object (rd,hd,ad,Nd) may be restricted. However, in some such examples, the restrictions on the source object (rs,hs,as,Ns) may be much less, since the source can, for example, be placed under the floor or on the ceiling. In such cases, the desired distance between the source and device may be fixed; in other cases it may be variable. Listed below are examples (simplified to the case Ns=Nd=1 and hs=hd=0) of how one can vary the dimensions of the source object to achieve a desired system performance in terms of Usd=κ/√{square root over (ΓsΓd)}, when the material is again copper (σ=5.998·107S/m):
- D=1.5 m, Usd≧15, rd=30 cm, ad=6 mm
rs=1.158 m, as≧5 mm
- D=1.5 m, Usd≧30, rd=30 cm, ad=6 mm
rs=1.15 m, as≧33 mm
- D=1.5 m, Usd≧1, rd=5 cm, ad=4 mm
rs=1.119 m, as≧7 mm
- D=1.5 m, Usd≧2, rd=5 cm, ad=4 mm
rs=1.119 m, as≧52 mm
- D=2 m, Usd≧10, rd=30 cm, ad=6 mm
rs=1.518 m, as≧7 mm
- D=2 m, Usd≧20, rd=30 cm, ad=6 mm
rs=1.514 m, as≧50 mm
- D=2 m, Usd≧0.5, rd=5 cm, ad=4 mm
rs=1.491 m, as≧5 mm
- D=2 m, Usd≧1, rd=5 cm, ad=4 mm
rs=1.491 m, as≧36 mm
2.2.3 Optimization of k
- D=1.5 m, Usd≧15, rd=30 cm, ad=6 mm
As described below, in some examples, the quality factor Q of the resonant objects may be limited from external perturbations and thus varying the coil parameters may not lead to significant improvements in Q. In such cases, one can opt to increase the strong-coupling factor U by increasing the coupling factor k. The coupling does not depend on the frequency and may weakly depend on the number of turns. Therefore, in some examples, one can:
- Increase the wire radii a1 and a2. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance D of energy transfer, increase the radii of the coils r1 and r2. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations.
- For fixed desired distance vs. coil-sizes ratio D/√{square root over (r1r2)}, only the weak (logarithmic) dependence of the inductance remains, which suggests that one should decrease the radii of the coils r1 and r2. In typical examples, this action can be limited by physical size considerations.
- Adjust the alignment and orientation between the two coils. In typical examples, the coupling is optimized when both cylindrical coils have exactly the same axis of cylindrical symmetry (namely they are “facing” each other). Particular mutual coil angles and orientations that lead to zero mutual inductance (such as the orientation where the axes of the two coils are perpendicular and the centers of the two coils are on one of the two axes) should obviously be avoided.
- Finally, note that the heights of the coils h1 and h2 are other available design parameters, which can have an impact to the coupling similar to that of their radii r1 and r2, and thus the design rules can be similar.
Further practical considerations apart from efficiency, e.g. physical size limitations, will be discussed in detail below.
2.2.4 Optimization of Overall System Performance
In embodiments, the dimensions of the resonant objects may be determined by the particular application. For example, when the application is powering a laptop or a cell-phone, the device resonant object cannot have dimensions that exceed those of the laptop or cell-phone respectively. For a system of two loops of specified dimensions, in terms of loop radii rs,d and wire radii as,d, the independent parameters left to adjust for the system optimization are: the number of turns Ns,d, the frequency f, the power-load consumption rate κl=Rl/2Ld and the power-generator feeding rate κg=Rg/2Ls, where Rg is the internal (characteristic) impedance of the generator.
In general, in various examples, the dependent variable that one may want to increase or optimize may be the overall efficiency η. However, other important variables may need to be taken into consideration upon system design. For example, in examples featuring capacitively-loaded coils, the designs can be constrained by, the currents flowing inside the wires Is,d and other components and the voltages across the capacitors Vs,d. These limitations can be important because for ˜Watt power applications the values for these parameters can be too large for the wires or the capacitors respectively to handle. Furthermore, the total loaded (by the load) quality factor of the device Qd[l]=ω/2(Γd+Γl)=ωLd/(Rd+Rl) and the total loaded (by the generator) quality factor of the source Qs[g]=ω/2(Γs+Γg)=ωLs/(Rs+Rg) are quantities that should be preferably small, because to match the source and device resonant frequencies to within their Q'"'"'s, when those are very large, can be challenging experimentally and more sensitive to slight variations. Lastly, the radiated powers Ps,rad and Pd,rad may need to be minimized for concerns about far-field interference and safety, even though, in general, for a magnetic, non-radiative scheme they are already typically small. In the following, we examine then the effects of each one of the independent variables on the dependent ones.
We define a new variable wp to express the power-load consumption rate for some particular value of U through Ul=κl/Γd=√{square root over (1+wp·U2)}. Then, in some examples, values which may impact the choice of this rate are: Ul=1wp=0 to minimize the required energy stored in the source (and therefore Is and Vs), Ul=√{square root over (1+U2)}>1
wp=1 to maximize the efficiency, as seen earlier, or Ul>>1
wp>>1 to decrease the required energy stored in the device (and therefore Id and Vd) and to decrease or minimize Qd[l]. Similar is the impact of the choice of the power-generator feeding rate Ug=κg/Γs, with the roles of the source/device and generator/load reversed.
In some examples, increasing Ns and Nd may increase Qs and Qd, and thus U and the efficiency significantly. It also may decrease the currents Is and Id, because the inductance of the loops may increase, and thus the energy Ws,d=Ls,d|Is,d|2/2 required for given output power Pl can be achieved with smaller currents. However, in some examples, increasing Nd and thus Qd can increase Qd[l], Pd,rad and the voltage across the device capacitance Vd. Similar can be the impact of increasing Ns on Qs[g], Ps,rad and Vs. As a conclusion, in some examples, the number of turns Ns and Nd may be chosen large enough (for high efficiency) but such that they allow for reasonable voltages, loaded Q'"'"'s and/or powers radiated.
With respect to the resonant frequency, again, there may be an optimal one for efficiency. Close to that optimal frequency Qd[l] and/or Qs[g] can be approximately maximum. In some examples, for lower frequencies the currents may typically get larger but the voltages and radiated powers may get smaller. In some examples, one may choose the resonant frequency to maximize any of a number of system parameters or performance specifications, such as efficiency.
One way to decide on an operating regime for the system may be based on a graphical method. Consider two loops of rs=25 cm, rd=15 cm, hs=hd=0, as=ad=3 mm and distance D=2 m between them. In
Finally, in embodiments, one could additionally optimize for the source dimensions, if, for example, only the device dimensions are limited. Namely, one can add rs and as in the set of independent variables and optimize with respect to these all the dependent variables of the system. In embodiments, such an optimization may lead to improved results.
2.3 Inductively-Loaded Conducting Rods
A straight conducting rod of length 2h and cross-sectional radius a has distributed capacitance and distributed inductance, and therefore can support a resonant mode of angular frequency ω. Using the same procedure as in the case of self-resonant coils, one can define an effective total inductance L and an effective total capacitance C of the rod through formulas Eqs. (19) and (20). With these definitions, the resonant angular frequency and the effective impedance may be given again by the common formulas ω=1/√{square root over (LC)} and Z=L/C respectively. To calculate the total inductance and capacitance, one can assume again a sinusoidal current profile along the length of the conducting wire. When interested in the lowest mode, if we denote by x the coordinate along the conductor, such that it runs from −h to +h, then the current amplitude profile may have the form I(x)=Io cos(πx/2h), since it has to be zero at the open ends of the rod. This is the well-known half-wavelength electric dipole resonant mode.
In some examples, one or more of the resonant objects may be inductively-loaded conducting rods. Referring to L→Ls
ω→ωs, as Lc→0.
In general, the desired CMT parameters can be found for this system, but again a very complicated solution of Maxwell'"'"'s Equations is generally required. In a special case, a reasonable estimate for the current distribution can be made. When Lc>>Ls>L, then ω≈1/√{square root over (LcC)}<<ωs and Z≈√{square root over (Lc/C)}>>Zs, while the current distribution is triangular along the rod (with maximum at the center-loading inductor and zero at the ends) and thus the charge distribution may be positive constant on one half of the rod and equally negative constant on the other side of the rod. This allows us to compute numerically C from Eq. (20). In this case, the integral in Eq. (20) can actually be computed analytically, giving the formula 1/C=1/(π∈oh)[ln(h/a)−1]. Explicit analytical formulas are again available for R from Eq. (21) and (22), since Irms=Io, |p|=qoh and |m|=0 (namely only the electric-dipole term is contributing to radiation), so we can determine also Qabs=1/ωCRabs, and Qrad=1/ωCRrad. At the end of the calculations, the validity of the assumption of triangular current profile may be confirmed by checking that indeed the condition Lc>>Lsω<<ωs is satisfied. This condition may be relatively easily satisfied, since typically a conducting rod has very small self-inductance Ls to begin with.
Another important loss factor in this case is the resistive loss inside the coil of the external loading inductor Lc and it may depend on the particular design of the inductor.
In some examples, the inductor may be made of a Brooks coil, which is the coil geometry which, for fixed wire length, may demonstrate the highest inductance and thus quality factor. The Brooks coil geometry has NBc turns of conducting wire of cross-sectional radius aBc wrapped around a cylindrically symmetric coil former, which forms a coil with a square cross-section of side rBc, where the inner side of the square is also at radius rBc (and thus the outer side of the square is at radius 2rBc), therefore NBc≈(rBc/2aBc)2. The inductance of the coil is then Lc=2.0285μorBcNBc2≈2.0285μorBc5/8aBc4 and its resistance
where the total wire length is lBc≈2≈(3rBc/2)NBc≈3πrBc3/4aBc2 and we have used an approximate square-root law for the transition of the resistance from the dc to the ac limit as the skin depth varies with frequency.
The external loading inductance Lc provides the freedom to tune the resonant frequency. For example, for a Brooks coil with a fixed size rBc, the resonant frequency can be reduced by increasing the number of turns NBc by decreasing the wire cross-sectional radius aBc. Then the desired resonant angular frequency ω=1/√{square root over (LcC)} may be achieved for aBc≈(2.0285μorBc5ω2C)1/4 and the resulting coil quality factor may be Qc≈0.169μoσrBc2ω/√{square root over (1+ω2μoσ√{square root over (2.0285μo(rBc/4)5C)})}. Then, for the particular simple case Lc>>Ls, for which we have analytical formulas, the total Q=1/ωC(Rc+Rabs+Rrad) becomes highest at some optimal frequency wQ, reaching the value Qmax, that may be determined by the loading-inductor specific design. For example, for the Brooks-coil procedure described above, at the optimal frequency Qmax≈Qc∞0.8(μoσ2rBc3/C)1/4. At lower frequencies it is dominated by ohmic loss inside the inductor coil and at higher frequencies by radiation. Note, again, that the above formulas are accurate as long as ωQ<<ωs and, as explained above, this may be easy to design for by using a large inductance.
The results of the above analysis for two examples, using Brooks coils, of subwavelength modes of λ/h≧200 (namely highly suitable for near-field coupling and well within the quasi-static limit) at the optimal frequency wQ are presented in Table 5.
Table 5 shows in parentheses (for similarity to previous tables) analytical results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-rod resonant modes. Note that copper was used for the conducting material (σ=5.998·107S/m). The results show that, in some examples, the optimal frequency may be in the low-MHz microwave range and the expected quality factors may be Qabs>1000 and Qrad>100000.
In some examples, energy may be transferred between two inductively-loaded rods. For the rate of energy transfer between two inductively-loaded rods 1 and 2 at distance D between their centers, the mutual capacitance MC can be evaluated numerically from Eq. (23) by using triangular current distributions in the case ω<<ωs. In this case, the coupling may be only electric and again we have an analytical formula, which, in the quasi-static limit h<<D<<λ and for the relative orientation such that the two rods are aligned on the same axis, is 1/MC≈1/2π∈o·(h1h2)2/D3, which means that k∝(√{square root over (h1h2)}/D)3 is independent of the frequency ω. One can then get the resultant strong-coupling factor U.
It can be seen that the frequency ωU, where the figure-of-merit is maximized to the value Umax, is close to the frequency ωQ
Referring to Table 6, in parentheses (for similarity to previous tables) analytical results based on the above are shown for two systems each composed of a matched pair of the loaded rods described in Table 5. The average wavelength and loss rates are shown along with the coupling rate and coupling to loss ratio figure-of-merit U=κ/Γ as a function of the coupling distance D, for the two cases. Note that for Γrad the single-rod value is used. Again we chose Lc>>Ls to make the triangular-current assumption a good one and computed MC numerically from Eq. (23). The results show that for medium distances D/h=10−3 the expected coupling-to-loss ratios are in the range U˜0.5-100.
2.4 Dielectric Disks
In some examples, one or more of the resonant objects are dielectric objects, such as disks. Consider a two dimensional dielectric disk object, as shown in
The results for two TE-polarized dielectric-disk subwavelength modes of λ/r≧10 are presented in Table 7. Table 7 shows numerical FDFD (and in parentheses analytical SV) results for the wavelength and absorption, radiation and total loss rates, for two different cases of subwavelength-disk resonant modes. Note that disk-material loss-tangent Im{∈}/Re{∈}=10−4 was used. (The specific parameters corresponding to the plot in
The required values of e, shown in Table 7, might at first seem unrealistically large. However, not only are there in the microwave regime (appropriate for approximately meter-range coupling applications) many materials that have both reasonably high enough dielectric constants and low losses (e.g. Titania, Barium tetratitanate, Lithium tantalite etc.), but also ∈ could signify instead the effective index of other known subwavelength surface-wave systems, such as surface modes on surfaces of metallic materials or plasmonic (metal-like, negative-∈) materials or metallo-dielectric photonic crystals or plasmono-dielectric photonic crystals.
To calculate now the achievable rate of energy transfer between two disks 1 and 2, as shown in
κ=ω1/2··d3r∈2(r)E*2(r)E1(r)/∫d3r∈(r)|E1(r)|2,
where ∈j(r) and ∈(r) are the dielectric functions that describe only the disk j (minus the constant ∈o background) and the whole space respectively. Then, for medium distances D/r=10−3 and for non-radiative coupling such that D<2rc, where rc=mλ/2π is the radius of the radiation caustic, the two methods agree very well, and we finally find, as shown in Table 8, strong-coupling factors in the range U˜1-50. Thus, for the analyzed examples, the achieved figure-of-merit values are large enough to be useful for typical applications, as discussed below.
Note that even though particular examples are presented and analyzed above as examples of systems that use resonant electromagnetic coupling for wireless energy transfer, those of self-resonant conducting coils, capacitively-loaded resonant conducting coils, inductively-loaded resonant conducting rods and resonant dielectric disks, any system that supports an electromagnetic mode with its electromagnetic energy extending much further than its size can be used for transferring energy. For example, there can be many abstract geometries with distributed capacitances and inductances that support the desired kind of resonances. In some examples, the resonant structure can be a dielectric sphere. In any one of these geometries, one can choose certain parameters to increase and/or optimize U or, if the Q'"'"'s are limited by external factors, to increase and/or optimize for k or, if other system performance parameters are of importance, to optimize those.
In one example, consider a case of wireless energy transfer between two identical resonant conducting loops, labeled by L1 and L2. The loops are capacitively-loaded and couple inductively via their mutual inductance. Let rA denote the loops'"'"' radii, NA their numbers of turns, and bA the radii of the wires making the loops. We also denote by D12 the center-to-center separation between the loops.
Resonant objects of this type have two main loss mechanisms: ohmic absorption and far-field radiation. Using the same theoretical method as in previous sections, we find that for rA=7 cm, bA=6 mm, and NA=15 turns, the quality factors for absorption, radiation and total loss are respectively, QA,abs=πf/ΓA,abs=3.19×104, QA,rad=πf/ΓA,rad=2.6×108 and QA=πf/ΓA=2.84×104 at a resonant frequency f=1.8×107 Hz (remember that L1 and L2 are identical and have the same properties). ΓA,abs, ΓA,rad are respectively the rates of absorptive and radiative loss of L1 and L2, and the rate of coupling between L1 and L2 is denoted by κ12.
When the loops are in fixed distinct parallel planes separated by D12=1.4 m and have their centers on an axis (C) perpendicular to their planes, as shown in
We find that the energy transferred to L2 is maximum at time T*=κt*=tan−1(2.18)=1.14t*=4775(1/f) from Eq. (5), and constitutes ηE*=29% of the initial total energy from Eq. (6a), as shown in
We would like to be able to further increase the efficiency of energy transfer between these two resonant objects at their distance D12. In some examples, one can use an intermediate resonator between the source and device resonators, so that energy is transferred more efficiently from the source to the device resonator indirectly through the intermediate resonator.
3. Efficient Energy-Transfer by a Chain of Three ‘Strongly Coupled’ Resonances
Different temporal schemes can be employed, depending on the application, to transfer energy among three resonant objects. Here we will consider a particularly simple but important scheme: a one-time finite-amount energy-transfer scheme
3.1 Finite-Amount Energy-Transfer Efficiency
Let again the source, intermediate and device objects be 1, B, 2 respectively and their resonance modes, which we will use for the energy exchange, have angular frequencies ω1,B,2, frequency-widths due to intrinsic (absorption, radiation etc.) losses Γ1,B,2 and (generally) vector fields F1,B,2(r), normalized to unity energy. Once the three resonant objects are brought in proximity, they can interact and an appropriate analytical framework for modeling this resonant interaction is again that of the well-known coupled-mode theory (CMT), which can give a good description of the system for resonances having quality factors of at least, for example, 10. Then, using e−iωt time dependence, for the chain arrangement shown in
where κ11,BB,22 are the shifts in each object'"'"'s frequency due to the presence of the other, which are a second-order correction and can be absorbed into the eigenfrequencies by setting ω1,B,2→ω1,B,2+κ11,BB,22, and κij are the coupling coefficients, which from the reciprocity requirement of the system must satisfy κij=κji. Note that, in some examples, the direct coupling coefficient κ12 between the resonant objects 1 and 2 may be much smaller than the coupling coefficients κ1B and κB2 between these two resonant objects with the intermediate object B, implying that the direct energy transfer between 1 and 2 is substantially dominated by the indirect energy transfer through the intermediate object. In some examples, if the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 are at least 5 times larger than the direct coupling rate κ12, using an intermediate resonator may lead to an improvement in terms of energy transfer efficiency, as the indirect transfer may dominate the direct transfer. Therefore, in the CMT Eqs. (34) above, the direct coupling coefficient κ12 has been ignored, to analyze those particular examples.
The three resonant modes of the combined system are found by substituting [a1(t) aB(t),a2(t)]=[A1,AB,A2]e−i
where Ω=[(ωA+ωB)−i(ΓA+ΓB)]/2, ΔωAB=[(ωA−θB)−i(ΓA−ΓB)]/2 and whose splitting we denote as {tilde over (δ)}E≡
Note that, when all resonators are at exact resonance ω1=ω2(=ωA)=ωB and for Γ1=Γ2(=ΓA)=ΓB, we get ΔωAB=0, {tilde over (δ)}E=2√{square root over (κ1B2+κB22)}, and then
namely we get that the resonant modes split to a lower frequency, a higher frequency and a same frequency mode.
Assume now that at time t=0 the source object 1 has finite energy |a1(0)|2, while the intermediate and device objects have |aB(0)|2=|a2(0)|2=0. Since the objects are coupled, energy will be transferred from 1 to B and from B to 2. With these initial conditions, Eqs. (34) can be solved, predicting the evolution of the field-amplitudes. The energy-transfer efficiency will be {tilde over (η)}E≡|a2(t)|2/|a1(0)|2. The ratio of energy converted to loss due to a specific loss mechanism in resonators 1, B and 2, with respective loss rates Γ1,loss, ΓB,loss and Γ2,loss will be {tilde over (η)}loss,E=∫0tdτ[2Γ1,loss|a1(τ)|2+2ΓB,loss|aB(τ)|2+2Γ2,loss|a2(τ)|2]/|a1(0)|2. At exact resonance ω1=ω2(=ωA)=ωB (an optimal condition) and in the special symmetric case Γ1=Γ2=ΓA and κ1B=κB2=κ, the field amplitudes are
where {tilde over (T)}≡√{square root over (2)}κt, {tilde over (Δ)}−1=2√{square root over (2)}κ/(ΓB−ΓA) and Ũ=2√{square root over (2)}κ/(ΓA+ΓB).
In some examples, the system designer can adjust the duration of the coupling t at will. In some examples, the duration t can be adjusted to maximize the device energy (and thus efficiency {tilde over (η)}E). Then, in the special case above, it can be inferred from Eq. (37c) that {tilde over (η)}E is maximized for the {tilde over (T)}={tilde over (T)}* that satisfies
In general, this equation may not have an obvious analytical solution, but it does admit a simple solution in the following two cases:
When ΓA=ΓB{tilde over (Δ)}=0, Ũ=√{square root over (2)}κ/ΓB, the energy transfer from resonator 1 to resonator 2 is maximized at
{tilde over (T)}*({tilde over (Δ)}=0)=2 tan−1Ũ (39)
resulting in an energy-transfer efficiency
which has the form of the two-object energy-transfer efficiency of Eq. (6b) but squared.
When ΓA=0{tilde over (Δ)}−1=Ũ=2√{square root over (2)}κ/ΓB, the energy transfer from resonator 1 to resonator 2 is maximized at
resulting in an energy-transfer efficiency
In both cases, and in general for any {tilde over (Δ)}, the efficiency is an increasing function of Ũ. Therefore, once more resonators that have high quality factors are preferred. In some examples, one may design resonators with Q>50. In some examples, one may design resonators with Q>100.
Returning to our illustrative example, in order to improve the ˜29% efficiency of the energy transfer from L1 to L2, while keeping the distance D12 separating them fixed, we propose to introduce an intermediate resonant object that couples strongly to both L1 and L2, while having the same resonant frequency as both of them. In one example, we take that mediator to also be a capacitively-loaded conducting-wire loop, which we label by LB. We place LB at equal distance (D1B=DB2=D12/2=0.7 m) from L1 and L2 such that its axis also lies on the same axis (C), and we orient it such that its plane is parallel to the planes of L1 and L2, which is the optimal orientation in terms of coupling. A schematic diagram of the three-loops configuration is depicted in
In order for LB to couple strongly to L1 and L2, its size needs to be substantially larger than the size of L1 and L2. However, this increase in the size of LB has considerable drawback in the sense that it may also be accompanied by significant decrease in its radiation quality factor. This feature may often occur for the resonant systems of this type: stronger coupling can often be enabled by increasing the objects'"'"' size, but it may imply stronger radiation from the object in question. Large radiation may often be undesirable, because it could lead to far-field interference with other RF systems, and in some systems also because of safety concerns. For rB=70 cm, bB=1.5 cm, and NB=1 turn, we get QB,abs=πf/ΓB,abs=7706, QB,rad=πf/ΓB,rad=400, so QB=πf/ΓB=380, and k1B≡κ1B/πf=kB2=0.0056, so Ũ=2√{square root over (2)}κ/(ΓA+ΓB)=5.94 and {tilde over (Δ)}−1=2√{square root over (2)}κ/(ΓB−ΓA)=6.1, at f=1.8×107 Hz. Note that since the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 are ≈70 times larger than κ12, indeed we can ignore the direct coupling between L1 and L2, and focus only on the indirect energy transfer through the intermediate loop LB, therefore the analysis of the previous section can be used.
The optimum in energy transferred to L2 occurs at time {tilde over (T)}*=√{square root over (2)}κt*=3.21t*=129(1/f), calculated from Eq. (38), and is equal to {tilde over (η)}E*=61.5% of the initial energy from Eq. (37c). [Note that, since QA>>QB, we could have used the analytical conclusions of the case {tilde over (Δ)}−1=Ũ and then we would have gotten a very close approximation of {tilde over (T)}*=3.19 from Eq. (41).] The energy radiated is {tilde over (η)}rad,E(t*)=31.1%, while the energy absorbed is {tilde over (η)}abs,E(t*)=3.3%, and 4.1% of the initial energy is left in L1. Thus, the energy transferred, now indirectly, from L1 to L2 has increased by factor of 2 relative to the two-loops direct transfer case. Furthermore, the transfer time in the three-loops case is now ≈35 times shorter than in the two-loops direct transfer, because of the stronger coupling rate. The dynamics of the energy transfer in the three-loops case is shown in
Note that the energy radiated in the three-loop system has undesirably increased by factor of 4 compared to the two-loop system. We would like to be able to achieve a similar improvement in energy-transfer efficiency, while not allowing the radiated energy to increase. In this specification, we disclose that, in some examples, this can be achieved by appropriately varying the values of the coupling strengths between the three resonators.
4. Efficient Energy-Transfer by a Chain of Three Resonances with Adiabatically Varying Coupling Strengths
Consider again the system of a source resonator R1, a device resonator R2 and an intermediate resonator RB. For the purposes of the present analysis, R1 and R2 will be assumed to have negligible mutual interactions with each other, while each of them can be strongly coupled to RB, with coupling rates κ1B and κB2 respectively. Note that, in some examples of wireless energy transfer systems, for the resonant object RB to be able to have strong coupling with other resonant objects, it may be accompanied with inferior loss properties compared to R1 and R2, usually in terms of substantially larger radiation losses.
It was seen in a previous section that, when the resonators 1 and 2 are at exact resonance ω1=ω2=ωA and for Γ1=Γ2=ΓA, the system supports a resonant state (eigenstate) with resonant frequency (eigenfrequency) {tilde over (ω)}ds=ωA−iΓA and resonant field amplitudes {right arrow over (V)}ds=[−κB2 0 κ1B]T/√{square root over (κ1B2+κB22)}, where here we normalized it. This eigenstate {right arrow over (V)}ds we call the “dark state” in analogy with atomic systems and the related phenomenon of Electromagnetically Induced Transparency (EIT), wherein complete population transfer between two quantum states through a third lossy state, coupled to each of the other two states, is enabled. The dark state is the most essential building block of our proposed efficient weakly-radiative energy-transfer scheme, because it has no energy at all in the intermediate (lossy) resonator RB, i.e. aB(t)=0 ∀ t whenever the three-object system is in state {right arrow over (V)}ds. In fact, if ΓA→0, then this state is completely lossless, or if ΓA,rad→0, then this state is completely non-radiative. Therefore, we disclose using predominantly this state to implement the wireless energy transfer. By doing that, the proposed energy transfer scheme can be made completely lossless, in the limit ΓA→0, no matter how large is the loss rate ΓB, as shown in
Let us demonstrate how it is possible to use the dark state for energy transfer with minimal loss. From the expression of {right arrow over (V)}ds one can see that, if the three-object system is in the state {right arrow over (V)}ds, then, in general, there is energy in the source resonator with field amplitude proportional to the coupling rate κB2 between the device resonator and the intermediate resonator, and there is also energy in the device resonator with field amplitude proportional to the coupling rate κ1B between the source resonator and the intermediate resonator. Then, κ1B=0 corresponds to all the system'"'"'s energy being in R1, while κB2=0 corresponds to all the system'"'"'s energy being in R2.
So, the important considerations necessary to achieve efficient weakly-radiative energy transfer, consist of preparing the system initially in state {tilde over (V)}ds and varying the coupling rates in time appropriately to evolve this state {tilde over (V)}ds in a way that will cause energy transfer. Thus, if at t=0 all the energy is in R1, then one should have κ1B(t=0)<<κB2(t=0), for example κ1B(t=0)=0 and κB2(t=0)≠0. In order for the total energy of the system to end up in R2, at a time tEIT when the full variation of the coupling rates has been completed, we should have κ1B(t=tEIT)>>κB2(t=tEIT), for example κ1B(t=tEIT)≠0 and κB2(t=tEIT)=0. This ensures that the initial and final states of the three-object system are parallel to {tilde over (V)}ds. However, a second important consideration is to keep the three-object system at all times in {tilde over (V)}ds(t), even as κ1B(t) and κB2(t) are varied in time. This is crucial in order to prevent the system'"'"'s energy from getting into any of the two other eigenstates {tilde over (V)}± and thus getting into the intermediate object RB, which may be highly radiative or lossy in general, as in the example of
where {tilde over (V)}± are the remaining two eigenstates of the system, with corresponding eigenvalues
Referring to
In some examples, the coupling rate κ1B is much smaller than the coupling rate the coupling rate κB2 at the beginning of the energy transfer. By the end, i.e., when a substantial amount of energy has been transferred from the first resonator structure R1 to the second resonator structure, R2, the coupling rate κ1B is much greater than the coupling rate κB2. In some examples, the coupling rate κ1B can be set to a fixed value while the coupling rate κB2 is being varied from its maximum to its minimum value. In some examples, the coupling rate κB2 can be set to a fixed value while the coupling rate κ1B is being varied from its minimum to its maximum value. In some examples, the coupling rate κ1B can be varied from a minimum to a maximum value while the coupling rate κB2 is being varied from its maximum to minimum value.
Referring now to
In some implementations, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can effect an adjustment of coupling rates between the resonator structures by changing a relative orientation of one or more of the resonator structures with respect to each other. For example, referring again to
In some implementations, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can effect an adjustment of coupling rates between the resonator structures by translationally moving one or more of the resonator structures with respect to each other. For example, the positions of the first and second resonator structures, R1 and R2, can be adjusted, e.g., moved along an axis, with respect to the intermediate resonator structure RB to simultaneously change κ1B and κB2. Alternatively, a position of the intermediate resonator structure, RB, can be adjusted, e.g., moved along an axis, with respect to the first and second resonator structures to simultaneously change κ1B and κB2. Alternatively, a position of only the first resonator structure, R1, can be adjusted, e.g., moved along an axis, with respect to the intermediate RB resonator structure to change κ1B, while the positions of R2 and RB are fixed and thus κB2 is fixed to a value intermediate between the minimum and maximum values of κ1B. Alternatively, a position of only the second resonator structure, R2, can be adjusted, e.g., moved along an axis, with respect to the intermediate RB resonator structure to change κB2, while the positions of R1 and RB are fixed and thus κ1B is fixed to a value intermediate between the minimum and maximum values of κB2.
In some examples, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can dynamically adjust an effective size of the resonator objects to effect adjustments in the coupling rates κ1B and κB2 similar to that described above. The effective size can be adjusted by changing a physical size of the resonator objects. For example, the physical size can be adjusted by effecting mechanical changes in area, length, or other physical aspect of one or more of the resonator structures. The effective size can also be adjusted through non-mechanical changes, such as, but not limited to, applying a magnetic field to change the permeability of the one or more of the resonator structures.
In principle, one would think of making the transfer time tEIT as long as possible to ensure adiabaticity. However there is limitation on how slow the transfer process can optimally be, imposed by the losses in Rl and R2. Such a limitation may not be a strong concern in typical atomic EIT case, because the initial and final states there can be chosen to be non-lossy ground states. However, in our case, losses in R1 and R2 are not avoidable, and can be detrimental to the energy transfer process whenever the transfer time tEIT is not less than 1/ΓA. This is because, even if the three-object system is carefully kept in {tilde over (V)}ds at all times, the total energy of the system will decrease from its initial value as a consequence of losses in Rl and R2. Thus the duration of the transfer may be a compromise between these two limits: the desire to keep tEIT long enough to ensure near-adiabaticity, but short enough not to suffer from losses in R1 and R2.
Given a particular functional variation of the coupling rates with time with variation duration parameter tEIT, one may calculate the optimal energy transfer efficiency in the following way: First, for each tEIT, determine the optimal time t*, at which the energy at R2 is maximized and the transfer process may be terminated. Then find the optimal variation time tEIT* based on the counteracting mechanisms discussed above. The optimal efficiency of energy transfer {tilde over (η)}EIT,E* can then be calculated. In most cases, this procedure may need to be done numerically using the CMT Eqs. (34) as analytical solutions may not be possible. With respect to optimizing the functional dependence of the coupling rates with time, one may choose one that minimizes the coupling of energy to the eigenstates {tilde over (V)}± for a given tEIT, which may lead to the temporal analog of a Chebyshev taper.
In some examples, the optimal tEIT may not be long enough for the adiabadicity criterion of Eq. (43) to be always satisfied. In those cases, some energy may get into at least one of the lossy states {tilde over (V)}±. Still significant improvement in efficiency and radiation loss may be achieved by the mode of operation where the coupling rates are variable, compared to the mode of operation where the coupling rates are constant, provided the maximum energy that enters the states {tilde over (V)}± is much less in the variable rate scenario than in the constant rate scenario. In examples, using the proposed scheme of time-varying coupling rates may be advantageous as long as the maximum energy stored in the intermediate resonator is substantially small. In some examples, substantially small may be at most 5% of the peak total energy of the system. In some examples, substantially small may be at most 10% of the peak total energy of the system.
We can now also see why the mode of operation of the system where the coupling rates are kept constant in time may cause a considerable amount of lost (and especially radiated) energy, compared to the proposed mode of operation where the coupling rates are varied adiabatically in time. The reason is that, when κ1B=κB2=const, the energies in R1 and R2 will always be equal to each other if the three-object system is to stay in {tilde over (V)}ds. So one cannot transfer energy from R1 to R2 by keeping the system purely in state {tilde over (V)}ds; note that even the initial state of the system, in which all the energy is in R1 and there is no energy in R3, cannot be solely in {tilde over (V)}ds for fixed nonzero κ1B and κB2, and has nonzero components along the eigenstates {tilde over (V)}± which implies a finite energy will build up in RB, and consequently result in an increased radiation, especially if ΓB,rad>>ΓA,rad, which may be the case if the resonator RB is chosen large enough to couple strongly to R1 and R2, as explained earlier.
The previous analysis explains why a considerable amount of energy was radiated when the inductive coupling rates of the loops were kept constant in time, like in
κ1B(t)=κ sin(πt/2tEIT) (44)
κB2(t)=κ cos(πt/2tEIT) (45)
for 0<t<tEIT, and kB≡κ1B/πf=kB2=0.0056 as before. By using the same CMT analysis as in Eq. (34), we find, in
This considerable decrease in radiation may seem surprising, because the intermediate resonator LB, which mediates all the energy transfer, is highly radiative (650 times more radiative than L1 and L2), and there is much more time to radiate, since the whole process lasts 14 times longer than in
An example implementation of the coupling rate adjustment system 300 is described below, where the resonators are capacitively-loaded loops, which couple to each other inductively. At the beginning (t=0), the coupling rate adjustment system 300 sets the relative orientation of the first resonator structure L1 to be perpendicular to the intermediate resonator structure LB. At this orientation, the value of the coupling rate κ1B between the first and intermediate resonator structure is at its minimum value. Also, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can set the relative orientation of the second resonator structure L2 to be parallel to the intermediate resonator structure LB. At this orientation, the value of the coupling rate κB2 is at a maximum value. During wireless energy transfer, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can effect the rotation of the first resonator structure L1 about its axis so that the value of κ1B is increased. In some examples, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can also effect the rotation of the second resonator structure, L2, about its axis so that the value of κB2 is decreased. In some examples, a similar effect can be achieved by fixing L1 and L2 to be perpendicular to each other and rotating only LB to be parallel to L2 and perpendicular to L1 at t=0 and parallel to L1 and perpendicular to L2 at t=tEIT. In some examples, a similar effect can be achieved by fixing LB and one of L1 and L2 (e.g., L1) at a predetermined orientation (e.g. at 45 degrees with respect to the intermediate resonator LB) and rotating only the other of L1 and L2 (e.g., L2 from parallel to LB at t=0 to perpendicular to LB at t=tEIT).
Similarly, in some implementations, at the beginning (t=0), the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can set the position of the first resonator structure L1 at a first large predetermined distance from the intermediate resonator structure LB so that the value of the coupling rate κ1B is at its minimum value. Correspondingly, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can set the position of the second resonator structure L2 at a second small predetermined distance from the intermediate resonator structure LB so that the value of the coupling rate κB2 between the first and intermediate resonator structure is at its maximum value. During wireless energy transfer, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can affect the position of the first resonator structure L1 to bring it closer to LB so that the value of κ1B is increased. In some examples, the coupling rate adjustment system 300 can also effect the position of the second resonator structure, L2, to take it away from LB so that the value of κB2 is decreased. In some examples, a similar effect can be achieved by fixing L1 and L2 to be at a fixed distance to each other and effecting the position of only LB to be close to L2 and away from L1 at t=0 and close to L1 and away from L2 at t=tEIT. In some examples, a similar effect can be achieved by fixing LB and one of L1 and L2 (e.g., L1) at a predetermined (not too large but not too small) distance and effecting the position only the other of L1 and L2 (e.g., L2 from close to LB at t=0 to away from LB at t=tEIT).
5. Comparison of Static and Adiabatically Dynamic Systems
In the abstract case of energy transfer from R1 to R2, where no constraints are imposed on the relative magnitude of κ, ΓradA, ΓradB, ΓabsA, and ΓabsB, it is not certain that the adiabatic-κ (EIT-like) system will always perform better than the constant-κ one, in terms of the transferred and radiated energies. In fact, there could exist some range of the parameters (κ, ΓradA, ΓradB, ΓabsA, ΓabsB), for which the energy radiated in the constant-K transfer case is less than that radiated in the EIT-like case. For this reason, we investigate both the adiabatic-κ and constant-κ transfer schemes, as we vary some of the crucial parameters of the system. The percentage of energies transferred and lost (radiated+absorbed) depends only on the relative values of κ, ΓA=ΓradA+ΓabsA and ΓB=ΓradB+ΓradB. Hence we first calculate and visualize the dependence of these energies on the relevant parameters κ/ΓB and ΓB/ΓA, in the contour plots shown in
The way the contour plots are calculated is as follows. For each value of (κ/ΓB, ΓB/ΓA) in the adiabatic case, where κ1B(t) and κB2(t) are given by Eq. (44)-(45), one tries range of values of tEIT. For each tEIT, the maximum energy transferred E2(%) over 0<t <tEIT, denoted by max(E2, tEIT), is calculated together with the total energy lost at that maximum transfer. Next the maximum of max(E2, tEIT) over all values of tEIT is selected and plotted as single point on the contour plot in
Although one may be interested in reducing the total energy lost (radiated+absorbed) as much as possible in order to make the transfer more efficient, the undersirable nature of the radiated energy may make it important to consider reducing the energy radiated. For this purpose, we calculate the energy radiated at optimum transfer in both the adiabatic-κ and constant-κ schemes, and compare them. The relevant parameters in this case are κ/ΓB, ΓB/ΓA, ΓradA/ΓA, and ΓradB/ΓB. The problem is more complex because the parameter space is now 4-dimensional. So we focus on those particular cross sections that can best reveal the most important differences between the two schemes. From
To get quantitative estimate of the radiation reduction factor in the general case where ΓA,rad≠0, we calculate the ratio of energies radiated at optimum transfers in both schemes, namely,
which depends only on ΓradB/ΓradA, the time-dependent mode amplitudes, and the optimum transfer times in both schemes. The latter two quantities are completely determined by κ/ΓB and ΓB/ΓA. Hence the only parameters relevant to the calculations of the ratio of radiated energies are ΓradB/ΓradA, κ/ΓB and ΓB/ΓA, thus reducing the dimensionality of the investigated parameter space from down to 3. For convenience, we multiply the first relevant parameter ΓradB/ΓradA by ΓB/ΓA which becomes (ΓradB/ΓB)/(ΓradA/ΓA), i.e. the ratio of quantities that specify what percentage of each object'"'"'s loss is radiated. Next, we calculate the ratio of energies radiated as function of (ΓradB/ΓB)/(radA/ΓA) and κ/ΓB in the two special cases ΓB/ΓA=50, and ΓB/ΓA=500, and plot them in
It is to be understood that while three resonant objects are shown in the previous examples, other examples can feature four or more resonant objects. For example, in some examples, a single source object can transfer energy to multiple device objects through one intermediate object. In some examples, energy can be transferred from a source resonant object to a device resonant object, through two or more intermediate resonant objects, and so forth.
6. System Sensitivity to Extraneous Objects
In general, the overall performance of an example of the resonance-based wireless energy-transfer scheme depends strongly on the robustness of the resonant objects'"'"' resonances. Therefore, it is desirable to analyze the resonant objects'"'"' sensitivity to the near presence of random non-resonant extraneous objects. One appropriate analytical model is that of “perturbation theory” (PT), which suggests that in the presence of an extraneous perturbing object p the field amplitude a1(t) inside the resonant object 1 satisfies, to first order:
where again ω1 is the frequency and Γ1 the intrinsic (absorption, radiation etc.) loss rate, while δκ11(p) is the frequency shift induced onto 1 due to the presence of p and δΓ1(p) is the extrinsic due to p (absorption inside p, scattering from p etc.) loss rate. δΓ1(p) is defined as δΓ1(p)≡Γ1(p)−Γ1, where Γ1(p) is the total perturbed loss rate in the presence of p. The first-order PT model is valid only for small perturbations. Nevertheless, the parameters δκ11(p), δΓ1(p) are well defined, even outside that regime, if a1 is taken to be the amplitude of the exact perturbed mode. Note also that interference effects between the radiation field of the initial resonant-object mode and the field scattered off the extraneous object can for strong scattering (e.g. off metallic objects) result in total Γ1,rad(p) that are smaller than the initial Γ1,rad (namely δΓ1,rad(p) is negative).
It has been shown that a specific relation is desired between the resonant frequencies of the source and device-objects and the driving frequency. In some examples, all resonant objects must have the same eigenfrequency and this must be equal to the driving frequency. In some implementations, this frequency-shift can be “fixed” by applying to one or more resonant objects and the driving generator a feedback mechanism that corrects their frequencies. In some examples, the driving frequency from the generator can be fixed and only the resonant frequencies of the objects can be tuned with respect to this driving frequency.
The resonant frequency of an object can be tuned by, for example, adjusting the geometric properties of the object (e.g. the height of a self-resonant coil, the capacitor plate spacing of a capacitively-loaded loop or coil, the dimensions of the inductor of an inductively-loaded rod, the shape of a dielectric disc, etc.) or changing the position of a non-resonant object in the vicinity of the resonant object.
In some examples, referring to
In some examples, referring to
In other examples, the frequency adjusting scheme can rely on information exchange between the resonant objects. For example, the frequency of a source object can be monitored and transmitted to a device object, which is in turn synched to this frequency using frequency adjusters, as described above. In other embodiments the frequency of a single clock can be transmitted to multiple devices, and each device then synched to that frequency using frequency adjusters, as described above.
Unlike the frequency shift, the extrinsic perturbing loss due to the presence of extraneous perturbing objects can be detrimental to the functionality of the energy-transfer scheme, because it is difficult to remedy. Therefore, the total perturbed quality factors Q(p) (and the corresponding perturbed strong-coupling factor U(p) should be quantified.
In some examples, a system for wireless energy-transfer uses primarily magnetic resonances, wherein the energy stored in the near field in the air region surrounding the resonator is predominantly magnetic, while the electric energy is stored primarily inside the resonator. Such resonances can exist in the quasi-static regime of operation (r<<λ) that we are considering: for example, for coils with h<<2r, most of the electric field is localized within the self-capacitance of the coil or the externally loading capacitor and, for dielectric disks, with ∈>>1 the electric field is preferentially localized inside the disk. In some examples, the influence of extraneous objects on magnetic resonances is nearly absent. The reason is that extraneous non-conducting objects p that could interact with the magnetic field in the air region surrounding the resonator and act as a perturbation to the resonance are those having significant magnetic properties (magnetic permeability Re{μ}>1 or magnetic loss Im{μ}>0). Since almost all every-day non-conducting materials are non-magnetic but just dielectric, they respond to magnetic fields in the same way as free space, and thus will not disturb the resonance of the resonator. Extraneous conducting materials can however lead to some extrinsic losses due to the eddy currents induced inside them or on their surface (depending on their conductivity). However, even for such conducting materials, their presence will not be detrimental to the resonances, as long as they are not in very close proximity to the resonant objects.
The interaction between extraneous objects and resonant objects is reciprocal, namely, if an extraneous object does not influence a resonant object, then also the resonant object does not influence the extraneous object. This fact can be viewed in light of safety considerations for human beings. Humans are also non-magnetic and can sustain strong magnetic fields without undergoing any risk. A typical example, where magnetic fields B˜1T are safely used on humans, is the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technique for medical testing. In contrast, the magnetic near-field required in typical embodiments in order to provide a few Watts of power to devices is only B˜10−4T, which is actually comparable to the magnitude of the Earth'"'"'s magnetic field. Since, as explained above, a strong electric near-field is also not present and the radiation produced from this non-radiative scheme is minimal, the energy-transfer apparatus, methods and systems described herein is believed safe for living organisms.
An advantage of the presently proposed technique using adiabatic variations of the coupling rates between the first and intermediate resonators and between the intermediate and second resonators compared to a mode of operation where these coupling rates are not varied but are constant is that the interactions of the intermediate resonator with extraneous objects can be greatly reduced with the presently proposed scheme. The reason is once more the fact that there is always a substantially small amount of energy in the intermediate resonator in the adiabatic-κ scheme, therefore there is little energy that can be induced from the intermediate object to an extraneous object in its vicinity. Furthermore, since the losses of the intermediate resonator are substantially avoided in the adiabatic-κ case, the system is less immune to potential reductions of the quality factor of the intermediate resonator due to extraneous objects in its vicinity.
6.1 Capacitively-Loaded Conducting Loops or Coils
In some examples, one can estimate the degree to which the resonant system of a capacitively-loaded conducting-wire coil has mostly magnetic energy stored in the space surrounding it. If one ignores the fringing electric field from the capacitor, the electric and magnetic energy densities in the space surrounding the coil come just from the electric and magnetic field produced by the current in the wire; note that in the far field, these two energy densities must be equal, as is always the case for radiative fields. By using the results for the fields produced by a subwavelength (r<<λ) current loop (magnetic dipole) with h=0, we can calculate the ratio of electric to magnetic energy densities, as a function of distance Dp from the center of the loop (in the limit r<<Dp) and the angle θ with respect to the loop axis:
where the second line is the ratio of averages over all angles by integrating the electric and magnetic energy densities over the surface of a sphere of radius Dp. From Eq. (48) it is obvious that indeed for all angles in the near field (x<<1) the magnetic energy density is dominant, while in the far field (x>>1) they are equal as they should be. Also, the preferred positioning of the loop is such that objects which can interfere with its resonance lie close to its axis (θ=0), where there is no electric field. For example, using the systems described in Table 4, we can estimate from Eq. (48) that for the loop of r=30 cm at a distance Dp=10r=3 m the ratio of average electric to average magnetic energy density would be ˜12% and at Dp=3r=90 cm it would be ˜1%, and for the loop of r=10 cm at a distance Dp=10r=1 m the ratio would be ˜33% and at Dp=3r=30 cm it would be ˜2.5%. At closer distances this ratio is even smaller and thus the energy is predominantly magnetic in the near field, while in the radiative far field, where they are necessarily of the same order (ratio→1), both are very small, because the fields have significantly decayed, as capacitively-loaded coil systems are designed to radiate very little. Therefore, this is the criterion that qualifies this class of resonant system as a magnetic resonant system.
To provide an estimate of the effect of extraneous objects on the resonance of a capacitively-loaded loop including the capacitor fringing electric field, we use the perturbation theory formula, stated earlier, δΓ1,abs(p)=1/4·∫d3r Im{∈p(r)}|E1(r)|2/W with the computational FEFD results for the field of an example like the one shown in the plot of
Self-resonant coils can be more sensitive than capacitively-loaded coils, since for the former the electric field extends over a much larger region in space (the entire coil) rather than for the latter (just inside the capacitor). On the other hand, self-resonant coils can be simple to make and can withstand much larger voltages than most lumped capacitors. Inductively-loaded conducting rods can also be more sensitive than capacitively-loaded coils, since they rely on the electric field to achieve the coupling.
6.2 Dielectric Disks
For dielectric disks, small, low-index, low-material-loss or far-away stray objects will induce small scattering and absorption. In such cases of small perturbations these extrinsic loss mechanisms can be quantified using respectively the analytical first-order perturbation theory formulas
[δQ1,rad(p)]−1≡2δΓ1,rad(p)/ω1∝∫d3r[Re{∈p(r)}|E1(r)|]2/w
[δQ1,abs(p)]−1≡2δΓ1,rad(p)/ω1=∫d3rIm{∈p(r)}|E1(r)|2/2w
where W=∫d3r∈(r)|E1(r)|2/2 is the total resonant electromagnetic energy of the unperturbed mode. As one can see, both of these losses depend on the square of the resonant electric field tails E1 at the site of the extraneous object. In contrast, the coupling factor from object 1 to another resonant object 2 is, as stated earlier,
k12=2κ12/√{square root over (ω1ω2)}≈∫d3r∈2(r)E*2(r)E1(r)/∫d3r∈(r)|E1(r)|2
and depends linearly on the field tails E1 of 1 inside 2. This difference in scaling gives us confidence that, for, for example, exponentially small field tails, coupling to other resonant objects should be much faster than all extrinsic loss rates (κ12>>δΓ1,2(p)), at least for small perturbations, and thus the energy-transfer scheme is expected to be sturdy for this class of resonant dielectric disks.
However, we also want to examine certain possible situations where extraneous objects cause perturbations too strong to analyze using the above first-order perturbation theory approach. For example, we place a dielectric disk close to another off-resonance object of large Re{∈}, Im{∈} and of same size but different shape (such as a human being h), as shown in
In general, different examples of resonant systems have different degree of sensitivity to external perturbations, and the resonant system of choice depends on the particular application at hand, and how important matters of sensitivity or safety are for that application. For example, for a medical implantable device (such as a wirelessly powered artificial heart) the electric field extent must be minimized to the highest degree possible to protect the tissue surrounding the device. In such cases where sensitivity to external objects or safety is important, one should design the resonant systems so that the ratio of electric to magnetic energy density we/wm is reduced or minimized at most of the desired (according to the application) points in the surrounding space.
7 Applications
The non-radiative wireless energy transfer techniques described above can enable efficient wireless energy-exchange between resonant objects, while suffering only modest transfer and dissipation of energy into other extraneous off-resonant objects. The technique is general, and can be applied to a variety of resonant systems in nature. In this Section, we identify a variety of applications that can benefit from or be designed to utilize wireless power transmission.
Remote devices can be powered directly, using the wirelessly supplied power or energy to operate or run the devices, or the devices can be powered by or through or in addition to a battery or energy storage unit, where the battery is occasionally being charged or re-charged wirelessly. The devices can be powered by hybrid battery/energy storage devices such as batteries with integrated storage capacitors and the like. Furthermore, novel battery and energy storage devices can be designed to take advantage of the operational improvements enabled by wireless power transmission systems.
Devices can be turned off and the wirelessly supplied power or energy used to charge or recharge a battery or energy storage unit. The battery or energy storage unit charging or recharging rate can be high or low. The battery or energy storage units can be trickle charged or float charged. It would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that there are a variety of ways to power and/or charge devices, and the variety of ways could be applied to the list of applications that follows.
Some wireless energy transfer examples that can have a variety of possible applications include for example, placing a source (e.g. one connected to the wired electricity network) on the ceiling of a room, while devices such as robots, vehicles, computers, PDAs or similar are placed or move freely within the room. Other applications can include powering or recharging electric-engine buses and/or hybrid cars and medical implantable devices. Additional example applications include the ability to power or recharge autonomous electronics (e.g. laptops, cell-phones, portable music players, house-hold robots, GPS navigation systems, displays, etc), sensors, industrial and manufacturing equipment, medical devices and monitors, home appliances (e.g. lights, fans, heaters, displays, televisions, counter-top appliances, etc.), military devices, heated or illuminated clothing, communications and navigation equipment, including equipment built into vehicles, clothing and protective-wear such as helmets, body armor and vests, and the like, and the ability to transmit power to physically isolated devices such as to implanted medical devices, to hidden, buried, implanted or embedded sensors or tags, to and/or from roof-top solar panels to indoor distribution panels, and the like.
A number of examples of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.