A spate of recent transfers out of the Eastern District of Texas in cases brought there by NPEs include a failed motion for a writ of mandamus from the Federal Circuit seeking to reverse a transfer, a successful motion for a writ ordering a transfer, an NPE throwing in the towel by agreeing to transfer, and several follow-on successful motions to change venue, typically to the Northern District of California. All of these transfers out of Texas have occurred as the US Supreme Court considers whether to limit in which judicial districts patent infringement actions can be brought; the Court heard arguments in the TC Heartland case in late March, with a decision expected in the coming weeks.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. PriceLine Group, Inc. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. PriceLine Group, Inc. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Alibaba.com, Inc. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. AirBNB, Inc.
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. PriceLine Group, Inc. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Expedia, Inc.
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. CruiseShipCenters, L.P. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Hotels.com, L.P. et al
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. Hipmunk, Inc.
- Global Equity Management (SA) Pty. Ltd. v. TripAdvisor LLC