Texas Jury Returns Infringement Verdict in Papst Licensing's Mobile Device Lawsuit Against Samsung
A jury in the Eastern District of Texas has returned an infringement verdict against Samsung in litigation brought by German patent licensing firm Papst Licensing GmbH & Company Kg. In that November 6 verdict, the jury found that Samsung had infringed a single patent through the provision of certain mobile devices and awarded $5.9M in damages; in a second verdict issued that same day, the company’s infringement was determined to be not willful. The patent at issue is one of five asserted in this case and throughout Papst Licensing’s sprawling, 12-year litigation campaign. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has cancelled claims from each of the other four patents—including all claims asserted against Samsung—in a series of inter partes reviews (IPRs) filed by Samsung and other campaign defendants.
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
- Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Eastman Kodak Company
- FUJIFILM CORPORATION et al v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
- PAPST. KG V. CANNON, INC., ET AL.
- In re: Papst Licensing GmbH & Company Kg Patent Litigation
- PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG v. OLYMPUS CORP.
- Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Nikon Corporation et al
- Papst . KG v. Canon, Inc. et al
- MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. et al v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG
- PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG V. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
- CASIO AMERICA, INC v. PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG