E-Commerce Campaign, Apparently Run by Equitable IP, Gins Back Up in Delaware
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC (CTP) has added more suits to its sole litigation campaign, which it resuscitated with a case filed against Wayfair last May in the Eastern District of Texas. This time the plaintiff has sued Amazon (1:19-cv-00518), eBay (1:19-cv-00519), Overstock.com (1:19-cv-00520), and Wal-Mart (1:19-cv-00521) in Delaware, asserting the same five e-commerce patents. At issue are a variety of common features in the defendants’ e-commerce platforms, including customer data retention and management, data management for products offered for sale and user reviews, purchase recommendations, user interface controls for immediate purchase or checkout, payment processing and the related use of customer data for shipment and billing info, order management, and related user notifications. Additionally, CTP targets features of those platforms that distinguish between multiple sellers for a given item and that allow sellers to choose from multiple payment processors.
Subscription Required
This content requires a subscription to view
- Over 7,000 news articles covering new patent cases, key policy decisions, and USPTO assignments
- Advanced custom alerts for campaigns and entities
- Proprietary litigation timelines
- Full access to Federal Circuit, PTAB, and ITC dockets
- Judge, venue, and law firm analytics
Market Sector
Related News
Details
Key Parties
Campaigns
Litigations
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Jet.com, Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Wayfair LLC
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC V. Overstock.com, Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. eBay Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Walmart Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Etsy, Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. eBay Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Walmart Inc.
- Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.